Alameda, J. R., & Cuetos, F. (1995). Diccionario de frecuencia de las unidades lingüísticas del castellano. Oviedo, Spain: Servicio de publicaciones de la Universidad de Oviedo.
Álvarez, C. J., Carreiras, M., & Perea, M. (2004). Are syllables phonological units in visual word recognition? Language and Cognitive Processes, 19, 427–452.
Álvarez, C. J., Carreiras, M., & Taft, M. (2001). Syllables and morphemes: Contrasting frequency effects in Spanish. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 27, 545–555.
Bogaerts, H., Meulenbroek, R. G. J., & Thomassen, A. J. W. M. (1996). The possible role of the syllable as a processing unit in handwriting. In Simner, M. L., Leedham, C. G., & Thomassen, A. J. W. M. (Eds.), Handwriting and drawing research: Basic and applied issues (pp. 115–126). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
Bradley, D. C., Sánchez-Casas, R. M., & García-Albea, J. E. (1993). The status of the syllable in the perception of Spanish and English. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 197–233.
Buchwald, A., & Rapp, B. (2003). The orthographic representation of consonant–vowel status: Evidence from two cases of acquired dysgraphia. Brain and Language, 87, 120–121.
Buchwald, A., & Rapp, B. (2006). Consonants and vowels in orthography. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 23, 308–337.
Caramazza, A. (1988). Some aspects of language processing revealed through the analysis of acquired dysgraphia: The lexical system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 11, 395–421.
Caramazza, A., & Miceli, G. (1990). The structure of graphemic representations. Cognition, 37, 243–297.
Caramazza, A., Miceli, G., Villa, G., & Romani, C. (1987). The role of the graphemic buffer in spelling: Evidence from a case of acquired dysgraphia. Cognition, 26, 59–85.
Carreiras, M., Alvarez, C. J., & de Vega, M. (1993). Syllable frequency and visual word recognition in Spanish. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 766–780.
Carreiras, M., & Perea, M. (2004). Naming pseudowords in Spanish: Effects of syllable frequency. Brain and Language, 90, 393–400.
Damian, M. (2003). Articulatory duration in single-word speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29, 416–433.
Delattre, M., Bonin, P., & Barry, C. (2006). Written spelling to dictation: Sound-to-spelling regularity affects both writing latencies and durations. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 1330–1340.
Dell, G. (1986). A spreading activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 96, 283–321.
Dell, G. (1988). The retrieval of phonological forms in production: Tests of predictions from a connectionist model. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 124–142.
Ellis, A. W. (1982). Spelling and writing (and reading and speaking). In Ellis, A. W. (Ed.), Normality and pathology in cognitive functions. New York: Academic Press.
Ellis, A. W. (1988). Normal writing processes and peripheral acquired dysgraphias. Language and Cognitive Processes, 3, 99–127.
Jóndóttir, M. K., Shallice, T., & Wise, R. (1996). Phonological mediation and the graphemic buffer disorder in spelling: Cross-language differences? Cognition, 59, 169–197.
Kandel, S., Álvarez, C. J., & Vallée, N. (2006). Syllables as processing units in handwriting production. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 18–31.
Kandel, S., & Valdois, S. (2006). Syllables as functional units in a copying task: A visuo-othographic and graphomotor approach. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21, 432–452
Kello, C. T., Plaut, D. C., & MacWhinney, B. (2000). The task dependence of staged vs. cascaded processing: An empirical and computational study of Stroop interference in speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 129, 340–361.
Kellogg, R. T. (1994). The psychology of writing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kellogg, R. T., Olive, T., & Piolat, A. (2007). Verbal, visual, and spatial working memory in written language production. Acta Psychologica, 124, 382–397.
Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Boston: MIT Press.
Mathey, S., & Zagar, D. (2002). Lexical similarity in visual word recognition: The effect of syllabic neighborhood in French. Current Psychology Letters: Behavior, Brain, and Cognition, 8, 107–121.
McCloskey, M., Badecker, W., Goodman-Schulman, R. A., & Aliminosa, D. (1994). The structure of graphemic representations in spelling: Evidence from a case of acquired dysgraphia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 11, 341–392.
Mehler, J., Dommergues, J. Y., Frauenfelder, U., & Seguí, J. (1981). The syllable's role in speech segmentation. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 298–305.
Perfetti, C. A. (1997). The psycholinguistics of spelling and reading. In Perfetti, C. A. & Rieben, L. (Eds.), Learning to spell: Research, theory, and practice across languages. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Sage, K., & Ellis, A. (2004). Lexical influences in graphemic buffer disorder. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 21, 381–400.
Sanfeliu, M. C., & Fernández, A. (1996). A set of 254 Snodgrass–Vanderwart pictures standardized for Spanish: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Behavior Research, Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 28, 537–555.
Sebastián-Gallés, N., Dupoux, E., Seguí, J., & Mehler, J. (1992). Contrasting syllabic effects in Catalan and Spanish. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 18–32.
Shallice, T. (1981). Phonological agraphia and the lexical route in writing. Brain, 104, 412–429.
Shallice, T., Rumiati, R. I., & Zadini, A. (2000). The selective impairment of the phonological output buffer. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 17, 517–546.
Snodgrass, J. G., & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 6, 174–215.
Tainturier, M. J., & Caramazza, A. (1996). The status of double letters in graphemic representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 53–73.
Tainturier, M. J., & Rapp, B. (2001). The spelling process. In Rapp, B. (Ed.), What deficits reveal about the human mind/brain: A handbook of cognitive neuropsychology. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
van Galen, G. P. (1991). Handwriting: Issues for a psychomotor theory. Human Movement Science, 10, 165–191.
Weingarten, R., Nottbusch, G., & Will, U. (2004). Morphemes, syllables, and graphemes in written word production. In Pechmann, T. & Habel, C. (Eds.), Multidisciplinary approaches to speech production (pp. 529–572). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Wheeldon, L. R., & Lahiri, A. (2002). The minimal unit of phonological encoding: Prosodic or lexical word. Cognition, 85, 31–41.
Wing, A. M., & Baddeley, A. D. (1980). Spelling errors in handwriting: A corpus and a distributional analysis. In Frith, U. (Ed.), Cognitive processes in spelling. London: Academic Press.
Zesiger, P., Orliaguet, J. P., Boë, L. J., & Mounoud, P. (1994). The influence of syllabic structure in handwriting and typing production. In Faure, C., Lorette, G., & Vinter, A. (Eds.), Advances in handwriting and drawing: A multidisciplinary approach (pp. 389–401). Paris: Europia.