Skip to main content
×
×
Home

An Economic Efficiency Approach to Reforming Corporate Governance: The Case of Multiple Stakeholder Boards

  • Say H. GOO (a1)
Abstract

This paper points out the problems of the current law on directors’ duties that forces directors to ignore stakeholder interests, with the unintended consequences of misallocation of resources and the weaknesses of a traditional legal approach to law reform, and uses multiple stakeholder boards as an example to demonstrate how an economic efficiency approach to law reform, adopting economic principles, could avoid some of the unintended consequences of a legal approach to law reform and help design better rules that promote allocative efficiency for the benefit of society as a whole. It argues that international organizations should take the lead in promoting the use of stakeholder directors in the board of directors of multinational corporations that have a history of corporate abuses for corporate decisions that have an impact on all stakeholders.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      An Economic Efficiency Approach to Reforming Corporate Governance: The Case of Multiple Stakeholder Boards
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      An Economic Efficiency Approach to Reforming Corporate Governance: The Case of Multiple Stakeholder Boards
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      An Economic Efficiency Approach to Reforming Corporate Governance: The Case of Multiple Stakeholder Boards
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Footnotes
Hide All
*

Professor of Law, Faculty of Law, The University of Hong Kong. This paper is based on the author’s earlier research and paper: Goo & Klingler (2014). The author would like to thank the Hong Kong Research Grant Council for a Theme-Based Research Scheme grant for the project “Enhancing HK as an International Financial Centre” that enables the author to further his research for this paper. Correspondence to Say H. Goo, The University of Hong Kong, Faculty of Law, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong. E-mail address: shgoo@hku.hk.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Ashton, Douglas (2012) “Revisiting Dual-Class Stock.” 68 St. John’s Law Review 863960.
Bainbridge, Stephen M. (1996) “Participatory Management within a Theory of the Firm.” 21 Journal of Corporation Law 1105.
Bainbridge, Stephen M. (2008) The New Corporate Governance in Theory and Practice, New York: Oxford University Press.
Bendall, Jem (2004) “Barricades and Boardrooms: A Contemporary History of the Corporate Accountability Movement.” 13 Technology Business and Society Programme Paper 1418.
Blair, Margaret M. (2003) “Shareholder Value, Corporate Governance, and Corporate Performance: A Post-Enron Reassessment of the Conventional Wisdom,” in P.K. Cornelius & B. Kogut, eds., Corporate Governance and Capital Flows in a Global Economy, New York: Oxford University Press, 53132.
Boyle, Anthony J., & Birds, John (1995) Boyle & Birds Company Law, 3rd edn, Bristol: Jordan.
Business Roundtable (1978) “The Role and Composition of the Board of Directors of the Large Publicly Owned Corporation.” 33 Business Lawyer 20832113.
Cheffins, Brian R. (1997) Company Law: Theory, Structure and Operation, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Coase, Ronald H. (1937) “The Nature of the Firm.” 4 Economica, New Series 386405.
Coase, Ronald H. (1960) “The Problem of Social Cost.” 3 The Journal of Law and Economics 144.
Cohen, Lauren, Frazzini, Andrea& Malloy, Christopher J. (2012) “Hiring Cheerleaders: Board Appointments of ‘Independent’ Directors.” 58 Management Science 120.
Crawford, Elise Perrault, & Williams, Cynthia Clark (2010) “Should Corporate Social Reporting be Voluntary or Mandatory? Evidence from the Banking Sector in France and the United States.” 10 Corporate Governance 512526.
Farrar, John F. (1991) Farrar’s Company Law, 3rd edn, London: Butterworths.
Friedman, Milton (1970) “The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits,” The New York Times Magazine, 13 September.
Gayo, Sabela (2012) “Mandatory and Voluntary Corporate Social Responsibility Policy Debates in Indonesia” Presented AT Chiang Mai: International Conference on International Relations and Development, ICIRD, 26 July 2012.
Goo, Say H. (2015) Should Weighted Voting Right Structure Be Allowed in an IFC: The Hong Kong Story” Presented at 4th Global Conference on Economic Geography 2015, Oxford University, 19–21 August 2015.
Goo, Say H. (2017) “The Legislative Policy of Real Estate Tax” Presented at 2017 Real Estate Taxation Law and Policy Symposium (Taiwan Law Foundation), 4–5 March 2017.
Goo, Say H., & Klingler, Désirée (2014) “The Limit of Directors’ Duties in Fostering Corporate Respects for Human Rights and Proposed Stakeholder Board,” in A. Paolini, ed., Research Handbook on Directors’ Duties, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 185210.
Hansmann, Henry, & Kraakman, Reinier (2001) “The End of History for Corporate Law.” 89 Georgetown Law Journal 439.
Hempel, Jan M., & Wiemken, Florian (2006) Managerhaftung im Wandel: Sarbanes-Oxley und Corporate Governance in Deutschland, Bremen: Salzwasser-Verlag.
Higgs, Derek (2003) Review of the Role and Effectiveness of Non-Executive Directors, London: Stationery Office.
Hkex.com (2013) “Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited (‘Company’) Board Diversity Policy,” http://www.hkex.com.hk/eng/exchange/corpgov/documents/board%20diversity%20policy.pdf (accessed 7 May 2017).
Hong Kong Institute of Chartered Secretaries (2006) “The Duties and Responsibilities of Independent Non-Executive Directors of Hong Kong Main Board Listed Companies.” 2 HKICS Publication 155.
Kerr, Michael, Janda, Richard& Pitts, Chip (2009) Corporate Social Responsibility: A Legal Analysis, Markham, Ontario: LexisNexis.
Mitchell, Lawrence E. (2010) “The Trouble with Boards,” in F.S. Kieff & T.A. Paredes, eds., Perspectives on Corporate Governance, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1761.
Nader, Ralph, Green, Mark& Seligman, Joel (1976) Taming the Giant Corporations, New York: Norton.
Oecd.org (2011) “OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises 2011,” https://www.oecd.org/corporate/mne/48004323.pdf (accessed 20 may 2017).
Ohchr.org (2011) “Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Implementing the United Nations ‘Protect, Respect, Remedy’ Framework,” http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/GuidingPrinciplesBusinessHR_EN.pdf (accessed 20 May 2017).
Ottervanger, Tom R., & Pais, Ralph M. (1981) “Employee Participation in Corporate Decision Making: The Dutch Model.” 15 International Lawyer 194.
Parkinson, John E. (1993) Corporate Power and Accountability, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Posner, Richard A. (1974–75) “The Economic Approach to Law.” 53 Texas Law Review 757.
Price, Tom (2010) “Corporate Social Responsibility: Is Good Citizenship Good for the Bottom Line?” in CQ Researcher, ed., Issues for Debate in Corporate Social Responsibility, Selections from CQ Researcher, Los Angeles: Sage Publications, 124.
Robeco.com (2015) “Do Companies with Diversified Boards Have Higher Stock Returns?” http://www.robeco.com/images/do-companies-with-diversified-boards-have-higher-stock-returns-april-2015.pdf (accessed 7 May 2017).
Roe, Mark J. (1999) “Codetermination and German Securities Markets,” in M.M. Blair & M.J. Roe, eds., Employees and Corporate Governance, Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press, 194205.
Sturms, David A. (1999) “Enhancing the Effectiveness of Independent Directors: Is the System Broken, Creaking, or Working?” 1 Villanova Journal of Law and Investment Management 103141.
Tamethecorporation.org (2007) “Taming The Giant Corporation: A National Conference on Corporate Accountability,” http://www.tamethecorporation.org (accessed 7 May 2017).
Ward, Halina (2003) “Legal Issues in Corporate Citizenship.” International Institute for Environment and Development, 144, http://pubs.iied.org/pdfs/16000IIED.pdf (accessed 20 May 2017).
Werther, William, & Chandler, David (2010) Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility, Stakeholders in a Global Environment, Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
Wettstein, Florian, & Waddock, Sandra (2005) “Voluntary or Mandatory: That Is (Not) the Question, Linking Corporate Citizenship to Human Rights Obligations for Business.” 6 Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts-und Unternehmensethik 304320.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Asian Journal of Law and Society
  • ISSN: 2052-9015
  • EISSN: 2052-9023
  • URL: /core/journals/asian-journal-of-law-and-society
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 23
Total number of PDF views: 148 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 553 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 24th July 2017 - 24th June 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.