No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The Sale of Offices, Corruption, and Formalization: A Comparative Study of China and France in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 April 2024
Abstract
This paper provides a detailed exploration of the sale of offices in China and France in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. In France, the sale of offices became deeply integrated into the officialdom, effectively serving as a formal institution. It was a part of the financial framework and contributed to the operation of the bureaucracy. However, this practice led to public dissatisfaction due to concerns about the fairness of the judicial system. Conversely, in China, the sale of offices was less formalized and more directly associated with corruption due to the close connection with informal income and the challenge to the formal system of imperial civil examinations. It was considered an ad hoc, informal, and pragmatic solution to financial emergencies. The sale of offices, in a different context, was seen as having both positive and negative aspects, with its impact varying, depending on the specific function it served.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Asian Journal of Law and Society
References
Armstrong, J. A. (1972). “Old-Regime Governors: Bureaucratic and Patrimonial Attributes.” Comparative Studies in Society and History, 14(1): 2–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bélyéd, L. (2010). Dictionnaire de l’Ancien Régime. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Bonney, R. (1988). Society and Government In France Under Richelieu and Mazarin 1624–61. London: Macmillan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cabourdin, G. & Viard, G.. (1990). Lexique historique de la France d’Ancien Régime. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
Carey, J. A. (1981). Judicial Reform in France before the Revolution of 1789. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ch’u, T. (1962). Local Government in China under the Ch’ing. Cambridge & London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Descimon, R. (2006). “La vénalité des offices comme dette publique sous l’Ancien Régime français. Le bien commun au pays des intérêts privés.” In Béaur, G., Andreau, J. & Grenier, J.-Y., eds., La dette publique dans l’histoire, 177–242. Paris: Comité pour l’Histoire économique et financière de la France.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doyle, W. (1996). Venality. The Sale of Offices in Eighteenth Century France. London & New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durand, S. (2017). “Corruption and Anticorruption in France between the 1670s and the 1780s.” In Kroeze, R., Vitória, A. & Geltner, G., eds., Anticorruption in History: From Antiquity to the Modern Era, 153–64. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Elman, B. A. (2013). Civil Examinations and Meritocracy in Late Imperial China. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldner, E. (2013). “Corruption on Trial: Money, Power, and Punishment in France’s Chambre de Justice of 1716.” Crime, Histoire & Sociétés/Crime, History & Societies, 17(1): 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guo, C. (1995). “Shiba Shiji Houqi Zhongguo Tanwu Wenti Yanjiu [Corruption in the Late Eighteenth Century].” Studies in Qing History, 1: 14–35.Google Scholar
Le Roy Ladurie, E. (1994). The Royal French State, 1460–1610, Vale, J., trans. Oxford: Blackwell Ltd.Google Scholar
Li, H. (2019). “Quanqiu Shiye xia Qingchao Guojia de Xingcheng ji Xingzhi Wenti: yi Diyuan Zhanlue he Caizheng Gouzao wei Zhongxin [Qing State Formation and Its Essential Nature in a Global Perspective: With a Focus on Geostrategy and Fiscal Structure].” Historical Research, 2: 49–67.Google Scholar
Liu, F. (2010). “Zhanshi zhong de Feichanggui Juanna: lun Kangxichao Pingsanfan Kaiqi de Juanna Shili [On the Unconventional Donations in the War: The Donation Case during the Course of Repressing Three King’s Rebellion in the Kangxi Dynasty].” Journal of Renmin University of China 24(1): 115–23.Google Scholar
Liu, F. (2020). “Yanglianyin wuyi Yanglian: yi Qianjia Shiqi Tanjuan Guanyuan Yanglianyin wei Zhongxin de Kaocha [The Nourishing Honesty Silver Couldn’t Nourish Honesty: An Investigation Centering on the Apportionment of Officials’ Nourishing Honesty Silver During the Periods of Qianlong and Jiaqing].” Journal of Historical Science, 11: 28–44.Google Scholar
Lui, A. Y. (1978). Chinese Censors and the Alien Emperor, 1644–1660. Hong Kong: Centre of Asian Studies, University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Ma, Q. (1974). Impeachments under the Reign of Qianlong Emperor. Taipei: Huagang Press.Google Scholar
Mann, M. (2012). The Sources of Social Power (Volume 1): A History of Power from the Beginning to AD 1760. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mingyingzong Shilu (1962, repr.). Taipei: Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
Mousnier, R. (1971). La vénalité des offices sous Henri IV et Louis XIII. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Mousnier, R. (1974). The Institutions of France under the Absolute Monarchy 1598–1789, Society and the State, B. Pierce, trans. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Nagle, J. (2008). Un orgueil français: la vénalité des offices sous l’Ancien Régime. Paris: Odile Jacob.Google Scholar
Pagès, G. (1932). “La vénalité des offices dans l’ancienne France.” Revue historique, 169(3): 477–95.Google Scholar
Park, N. E. (1997). “Corruption in Eighteenth Century China.” The Journal of Asian Studies, 56(4): 967–1005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sawyer, J. K. (1988). “Judicial Corruption and Legal Reform in Early Seventeenth-Century France.” Law and History Review, 6(1): 95–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shen, X. (2002). “Qingdai Caizheng Shouru Guimo yu Jiegou Bianhua Shulun [A Study on the Scale and Structure of Fiscal income in the Qing].” Beijing Social Science, 1: 84–90.Google Scholar
Stocker, C. (1978). “Public and Private Enterprise in the Administration of a Renaissance Monarchy: The First Sales of Office in the Parlement of Paris (1512–1524).” The Sixteenth Century Journal, 9(2): 4–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sueur, P. (1989). Histoire du droit public français, XVe-XVIIIe siècle: la genèse de l’Etat contemporain. Affirmation et crise de l’Etat sous l’Ancien Régime. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Tocqueville, A. (2011). The Ancien Regime and the French Revolution, Goldhammer, A., trans., Elster, J., ed. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Wang, Z. (2013). “Qinhan zhi Suitang Wudai Maiguan Shulue [The Sale of Office from Qin Han to Wudai].” In Wang, Z., ed., Zhonghua Gu Zhengzhi Shi Lunji [Ancient Political History of China], 77–96. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press (China).Google Scholar
Wang, Z. (2014). “Judicial Reasoning and Political Legitimacy in Early Eighteenth-Century Criminal Justice: China, England an France.” JSD diss., Yale University.Google Scholar
Wu, S. (2021). Qingdai Juanna yu Guojia Zhili [Juanna and State Governance in the Qing]. Beijing: Social Science Academic Press (China).Google Scholar
Wu, Y. (2013). Zhongguo de Juanna Zhidu Yu Shehui [ Juanna and Society in China]. Nanjing: Jiangsu People Press.Google Scholar
Xu, D. (1950). Qingdai Juanna Zhidu [Juanna System in the Qing]. Beijing: Peking University Press.Google Scholar
Yang, G. (2009). “Juanna, Baoju yu Wanqing de Lizhi Shifan [Subscription, Recommendation, and Bureaucracy Anomy in the Late Qing Dynasty].” Social Science, 5: 130–8.Google Scholar
Zelin, M. (1992). The Magistrate’s Tael: Rationalizing Fiscal Reform in Eighteenth-century Chʻing China. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Zhang, C. (2013). “Qingdai Bufei Lougui Wenti Yanjiu [A Study on Department Fees and Corruptive Rule of the Qing Dynasty].” PhD diss., Wuhan University.Google Scholar