Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Dynamic Portfolio Allocation, the Dual Theory of Choice and Probability Distortion Functions

  • Mahmoud Hamada (a1), Michael Sherris and John van der Hoek
Abstract

Standard optimal portfolio choice models assume that investors maximise the expected utility of their future outcomes. However, behaviour which is inconsistent with the expected utility theory has often been observed.

In a discrete time setting, we provide a formal treatment of risk measures based on distortion functions that are consistent with Yaari’s dual (non-expected utility) theory of choice (1987), and set out a general layout for portfolio optimisation in this non-expected utility framework using the risk neutral computational approach.

As an application, we consider two particular risk measures. The first one is based on the PH-transform and treats the upside and downside of the risk differently. The second one, introduced by Wang (2000) uses a probability distortion operator based on the cumulative normal distribution function. Both risk measures rank-order prospects and apply a distortion function to the entire vector of probabilities.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Dynamic Portfolio Allocation, the Dual Theory of Choice and Probability Distortion Functions
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Dynamic Portfolio Allocation, the Dual Theory of Choice and Probability Distortion Functions
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Dynamic Portfolio Allocation, the Dual Theory of Choice and Probability Distortion Functions
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
References
Hide All
[1]Allais M. (1953) Le comportement de l’homme rationnel devant le risque. Economertica, 21, 503546.
[2]Bufman G. and Leiderman L. (1990) Consumption and asset returns under non-expected utility, some new evidence. Economics letters, 34, 231235.
[3]Camerer C.F. (1989) An experimental test of several generalized utility theories. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 2(1), 61104.
[4]Epstein L.G. and Zin S.E. (1989) Substitution, risk aversion, and the temporal behavior of consumption and asset returns: An empirical analysis. Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittersburg, PA.
[5]Epstein L.G. and Zin S.E. (1989) Substitution, risk aversion, and the temporal behavior of consumption and asset returns: A theoretical framework. Econometrica, 57(4), 93769.
[6]Fishburn P.C. (1988) Nonlinear preference and utility theory. Johns Hopkins Series in the Mathematical Sciences, no 5. Baltimore and London, pp. xiv, 259.
[7]Giovannini A. and Jorion P. (1989) Time-series tests of a non-expected utility model of asset pricing. Columbia University, New York.
[8]Hamada M. and Sherris M. (2001) On the relationship between risk neutral valuation and pricing using distortion operators. Working paper.
[9]He H. (1990) Convergence from discrete to continuous-time contingent claims prices. The Review of Financial Studies, 3(4), 523546.
[10]Ingersoll J.E. (1987) “Theory of Financial Decision Making”. Totowa, N.J. : Rowman and Littlefield.
[11]Kahneman D. and Tversky A. (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263291.
[12]Koskievic J.-M. (1999) An intertemporal consumption-leisure model with non-expected utility. Economics Letters, 64, 285289.
[13]Kreps D.M. and Porteus E.L. (1978) Temporal resolution of uncertainty and dynamic choice theory. Econometrica, 46(1), 185200.
[14]Osborne M. (2001) “Simplicial Algorithms for Minimizing Polyhedral Functions”. Cambridge University Press.
[15]Quiggin J. (1982) A theory of anticipated utility. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3, 323343.
[16]Roel A. (1985) Risk aversion in quiggin and yaari’s rank-order model of choice under uncertainty. The Economic Journal.
[17]Ross S.A. (1981) Some stronger measures of risk aversion in the small and in the large with aplications. Econometrica, 49, 621638.
[18]Van Der Hoek J. and Sherris M. (2001) A class of non-expected utility risk measures and implications for asset allocations. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 28, 6982.
[19]Wang S. (1996) Ambiguity aversion and the economics of insurance. University of Waterloo, research report 96-04.
[20]Wang S. (1996) Premium calculation by transforming the layer premium density. Astin Bulletin, 26, 7192.
[21]Wang S. (1998) Implementation of proportional hazards transforms in ratemaking. Proceedings of the Casualty Actuarial Society LXXXV. Available for download on http://www. casact.org/pubs/proceed/proceed98/index.htm.
[22]Wang S.S. (2000) A class of distortion operators for pricing financial and insurance risks. The Journal of Risk and Insurance, 36(1), 1536.
[23]Yaari M.E. (1986) “Univariate and Multivariate Comparison of Risk Aversion: A New Approach”. Cambridge University Press.
[24]Yaari M.E. (1987) The dual theory of choice under risk. Econometrica, 55, 95115.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

ASTIN Bulletin: The Journal of the IAA
  • ISSN: 0515-0361
  • EISSN: 1783-1350
  • URL: /core/journals/astin-bulletin-journal-of-the-iaa
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 1
Total number of PDF views: 100 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 94 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 20th January 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.