Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-16T02:48:23.529Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Maximizing Dividends without Bankruptcy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2015

Hans U. Gerber ,
Elias S.W. Shiu  and
Nathaniel Smith
Hans U. Gerber
Affiliation:
at The University of Hong Kong, Ecole des hautes études commerciales, Université de Lausanne, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland, E-mail: hgerber@unil.ch
Elias S.W. Shiu
Affiliation:
at The University of Hong Kong, Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242-1409, USA, E-mail: eshiu@stat.uiowa.edu
Nathaniel Smith
Affiliation:
Ecole des hautes études commerciales, Université de Lausanne, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland, E-mail: nsmith@unil.ch
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Consider the classical compound Poisson model of risk theory, in which dividends are paid to the shareholders according to a barrier strategy. Let b* be the level of the barrier that maximizes the expectation of the discounted dividends until ruin. This paper is inspired by Dickson and Waters (2004). They point out that the shareholders should be liable to cover the deficit at ruin. Thus, they consider b0 , the level of the barrier that maximizes the expectation of the difference between the discounted dividends until ruin and the discounted deficit at ruin. In this paper, b* and b0 are compared, when the claim amount distribution is exponential or a combination of exponentials.

Keywords

Dividendsbarrier strategiesDickson and Waters modificationmixtures and combinations of exponential claim amount distributions
Type
Articles
Information
ASTIN Bulletin: The Journal of the IAA , Volume 36 , Issue 1 , May 2006 , pp. 5 - 23
Copyright
Copyright © ASTIN Bulletin 2006

References

Azcue, P. and Muler, N. (2005) Optimal reinsurance and dividend distribution policies in the Cramér-Lundberg model. Mathematical Finance, 15, 261–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borch, K. (1974) The Mathematical Theory of Insurance. Lexington Books, Lexington, MA.Google Scholar
Borch, K. (1990) Economics of Insurance. North Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Bühlmann, H. (1970) Mathematical Methods in Risk Theory. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg New York.Google Scholar
Burden, R.L., Douglas Faires, J. and Reynolds, A.C. (1981) Numerical Analysis, Second Edition. Prindle, Weber and Schmidt, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
De Finetti, B. (1957) Su un’impostazione alternativa della teoria collettiva del rischio. Transactions of the XVth International Congress of Actuaries, 2, 433–443.Google Scholar
Dickson, D.C.M. (2005) Insurance Risk and Ruin. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickson, D.C.M. and Waters, H.R. (2004) Some optimal dividends problems. ASTIN Bulletin, 34, 49–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, H.U. (1979) An Introduction to Mathematical Risk Theory. Huebner Foundation, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Gerber, H.U. and Shiu, E.S.W. (2006) On optimal dividend strategies in the compound Poisson model. Forthcoming in North American Actuarial Journal 10(2).Google Scholar
Lin, X.S., Willmot, G.E. and Drekic, S. (2003) The classical risk model with a constant dividend barrier: analysis of the Gerber-Shiu discounted penalty function. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 33, 551–566.Google Scholar
Paulsen, J. and Gjessing, H.K. (1997) Optimal choice of dividend barriers for a risk process with stochastic return on investments. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 20, 215–223.Google Scholar
Schmidli, H. (2007) Stochastic Control in Insurance. Springer-Verlag, London, forthcoming.Google Scholar