Skip to main content


  • Jean-Philippe Boucher (a1) and Rofick Inoussa (a2)

Ratemaking is one of the most important tasks of non-life actuaries. Usually, the ratemaking process is done in two steps. In the first step, a priori ratemaking, an a priori premium is computed based on the characteristics of the insureds. In the second step, called the a posteriori ratemaking, the past claims experience of each insured is considered to the a priori premium and set the final net premium. In practice, for automobile insurance, this correction is usually done with bonus-malus systems, or variations on them, which offer many advantages. In recent years, insurers have accumulated longitudinal information on their policyholders, and actuaries can now use many years of informations for a single insured. For this kind of data, called panel or longitudinal data, we propose an alternative to the two-step ratemaking approach and argue this old approach should no longer be used. As opposed to a posteriori models of cross-section data, the models proposed in this paper generate premiums based on empirical results rather than inductive probability. We propose a new way to deal with bonus-malus systems when panel data are available. Using car insurance data, a numerical illustration using at-fault and non-at-fault claims of a Canadian insurance company is included to support this discussion. Even if we apply the model for car insurance, as long as another line of business uses past claim experience to set the premiums, we maintain that a similar approach to the model proposed should be used.

Corresponding author
Hide All
Bolancé C., Denuit M., Guillén M. and Lambert Ph. (2007) Greatest accuracy credibility with dynamic heterogeneity: The Harvey-Fernandes model. Belgian Actuarial Bulletin, 7 (1), 1418
Borgan Ø., Hoem J.M. and Norberg R. (1981) A nonasymptotic criterion for the evaluation of automobile bonus systems. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, 1981 (3), 265–178.
Boucher J.-P., Denuit M. and Guillén M. (2007) Risk classification for claim counts: A comparative analysis of various zero-inflated mixed Poisson and hurdle models. North American Actuarial Journal, 11 (4), 110131.
Boucher J.-P., Denuit M. and Guillén M. (2008) Models of insurance claim counts with time dependence based on generalisation of poisson and negative binomial distributions. Variance, 2 (1), 135162.
Boucher J.-P., Denuit M. and Guillén M. (2009) Number of accidents or number of claims? An approach with zero-inflated poisson models for panel data. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 76 (4), 821846.
Boucher J.-P. and Guillén M. (2009) A survey on models for panel count data with applications to insurance. Revista de la Real Academia de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales, 103 (2), 277295.
Brown R.L. (1988) Minimum bias with generalized LinearSSS models. PCAS, LXXV, 187217.
Bühlmann H. (1967) Experience rating and credibility. ASTIN Bulletin, 4, 199207.
Bühlmann H. and Straub E. (1970). GlaubwÄurdigkeit fÄur SchadensÄatze. Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Schweizerischer Versicherungsmathematiker, 70, 111133.
Denuit M., Maréchal X., Pitrebois S. and Walhin J.-F. (2007) Actuarial Modelling of Claim Counts: Risk Classification, Credibility and Bonus-Malus Scales. New York: Wiley.
Frees E. and Valdez E.A. (2008) Hierarchical insurance claims modeling. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 103 (484), 14571469.
Gelman A. and Robert C.P. (2013) “Not only defended but also applied”: The perceived absurdity of Bayesian inference. The American Statistician, 67 (1), 15.
Gelman A. and Shalizi C.R. (2013) Philosophy and the practice of Bayesian statistics. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 66, 838.
Gerber H.U. and Jones D. (1975) Credibility formulas of the updating type. Transactions of the Society of Actuaries, 27, 3152.
Gilde V. and Sundt B. (1989) On bonus systems with credibility scales. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, 1989 (1), 1322.
Gourieroux C. and Jasiak J. (2004) Heterogeneous INAR(1) model with application to car insurance. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 34, 177192.
Hachemeister C. (1975) Credibility for regression models with applications to trend. In Credibility: Theory and Applications (ed. Kahn P.M.) pp. 129163. New York: Academic Press.
Jewell W. (1975) The use of collateral data in credibility theory: A hierarchical model. Giornale dell Istituto Italiano degli Attuari, 38, 116.
Lemaire J. (1995) Bonus-Malus Systems in Automobile Insurance. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
McCullagh P. and Nelder J.A. (1989) Generalized Linear Models, 2nd ed.London: Chapman and Hall.
Norberg R. (1976) A credibility theory for automobile bonus system. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, 1976, 92107.
Purcaru O., Guillen M. and Denuit M. (2004) Linear credibility models based on time series for claim counts. Belgian Actuarial Bulletin, 4, 6274.
Ryder J.M. (1976) Subjectivism - A reply in defense of classical actuarial methods (with discussion). Journal of the Institute of Actuaries, 103, 59112.
Smyth G. and Jorgensen B. (2002) Fitting Tweedie's compound Poisson model to insurance claims data: Dispersion modelling. ASTIN Bulletin, 32 (1), 143157.
Sundt B. (1988) Credibility estimators with deometric weights. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 7, 113122.
Young V. and DeVylder E.F. (2000) Credibility in favor of unlucky insureds. North American Actuarial Journal, 4 (1), 107113.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

ASTIN Bulletin: The Journal of the IAA
  • ISSN: 0515-0361
  • EISSN: 1783-1350
  • URL: /core/journals/astin-bulletin-journal-of-the-iaa
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 60 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 287 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 19th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.