Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Risk Exchange with Distorted Probabilities

  • Andreas Tsanakas (a1) and Nicos Christofides (a2)
Abstract

An exchange economy is considered, where agents (insurers/banks) trade risks. Decision making takes place under distorted probabilities, which are used to represent either rank-dependence of preferences or ambiguity with respect to real-world probabilities. Pricing formulas and risk allocations, generalising the results of Bühlmann (1980, 1984) are obtained via the construction of aggregate preferences from heterogeneous agents’ utility and distortion functions. This involves the introduction of a novel ‘collective ambiguity aversion’ coefficient. It is shown that probability distortion changes insurers’ behaviour, who trade not only to share the aggregate market risk, but are also found to bet against each other. Moreover, probability distortion tends to increase the price of insurance (increase asset returns). While the cases of rank-dependence and ambiguity are formally similar, an important distinction emerges as for rank-dependent preferences equilibria are determinate, while for ambiguity they are generally indeterminate.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Risk Exchange with Distorted Probabilities
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Risk Exchange with Distorted Probabilities
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Risk Exchange with Distorted Probabilities
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
References
Hide All
Aase K. (1993) Equilibrium in a reinsurance syndicate; existence, uniqueness and characterisation. ASTIN Bulletin 23(2), 185211.
Aase K. (2002) Perspectives of Risk Sharing. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal 2, 73128.
Artzner P., Delbaen F., Eber J.-M., and Heath D. (1999) Coherent measures of risk. Mathematical Finance 9(3), 203228.
Aubin J-P. (1981) Cooperative Fuzzy Games. Mathematics of Operations Research 6(1), 113.
Aumann R.J. and Shapley L.S. (1974) Values of Non-Atomic Games. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Basle Committee On Banking Supervision (2003) The New Basel Capital Accord.
Billot A., Chateauneuf A., Gilboa I. and Tallon J.-M. (2000) Sharing Beliefs: Between Agreeing and Disagreeing. Econometrica 68(3), 685694.
Borch K. (1962) Equilibrium in a Reinsurance Market. Econometrica 30(3), 424444.
Borch K. (1985) A Theory of Insurance Premiums. The Geneva Papers of Risk and Insurance, 192208.
Bühlmann H. (1980) An Economic Premium Principle. ASTIN Bulletin 11(1), 5260.
Bühlmann H. (1984) The General Economic Premium Principle. ASTIN Bulletin 14(1), 1321.
Carlier G. and Dana R.A. (2002) Core of convex distortions of a probability. Journal of Economic Theory 113(2), 199222.
Chateauneuf A., Dana R.A. and Tallon J.-M. (2000) Optimal Risk-Sharing Rules and Equilibria with Choquet-Expected-Utility. Journal of Mathematical Economics 34, 191214.
Chen Z. and Epstein L. (2002) Ambiguity, risk, and asset returns in continuous time. Econometrica 70(4), 14031443.
Chew S.H., Karni E. and Safra Z. (1987) Risk Aversion in the Theory of Expected Utility with Rank Dependent Probabilities. Journal of Economic Theory 42, 370381.
Choquet G. (1953) Theory of capacities. Annales de l’Institut Fourier 5, 131295.
Dana R-A. (2002) On Equilibria when Agents have Multiple Priors. Annals of Operations Research 114, 105115.
Denneberg D. (1990) Distorted Probabilities and Insurance Premiums. Methods of Operations Research 63, 35.
Denneberg D. (1994) Non-additive Measure and Integral. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
Dhaene J., Denuit M., Goovaerts M.J., Kaas R. and Vyncke D. (2002) The Concept of Comonotonicity in Actuarial Science and Finance: Theory. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 31(1), 333.
Dubey P., Neyman A. and Weber R.J. (1981) Value Theory Without Efficiency. Mathematics of Operations Research 6, 122128.
Duffie D. (1996) Dynamic Asset Pricing Theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Epstein L.G. and Wang T. (1994) Intertemporal asset pricing under Knightian uncertainty. Econometrica 62(3), 283322.
Gilboa I. (1985) Subjective Distortions of Probabilities and Non-additive Probabilities. Preprint, The Foerder Institute of Economic Research, Tel Aviv University.
Gilboa I. and Schmeidler D. (1989) Maxmin Expected Utility with a Non-unique Prior. Journal of Mathematical Economics 18, 141153.
Knight F.H. (1921) Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. Houghton Mifflin, Boston.
Landsberger M. and Meilijson I. (1994) Co-monotone Allocations, Bickel-Lehmann dispersion and the Arrow-Pratt measure of risk aversion. Annals of Operations Research 52, 97106.
Mehra R. and Prescott E. (1985) The Equity Premium: A Puzzle. Journal of Monetary Economics 15, 145161.
Quiggin J. (1982) A Theory of Anticipated Utility. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 3, 323343.
Quiggin J. (1993) Generalized Expected Utility Theory: The Rank-dependent Model. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.
Rothschild M. and Stiglitz J. (1970) Increasing Risk: I. A Definition. Journal of Economic Theory 2, 225243
Rubinstein M. (1974) An Aggregation Theorem for Securities Markets. Journal of Financial Economics 1, 225244.
Samet D., and Tauman Y. (1982) The Determination of Marginal Cost Prices under a Set of Axioms. Econometrica 50(4), 895909.
Schmeidler D. (1989) Subjective Probability and Expected Utility without Additivity. Econometrica 57(3), 571587.
Tasche D. (2000) Conditional Expectation as Quantile Derivative. Preprint, TU Munich.
Tsanakas A. and Desli E. (2003) Risk measures and theories of choice. British Actuarial Journal 9(4), 959991.
Von Neumann J. and Morgenstern O. (1944) Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Wang S.S. (1996) Premium Calculation by Transforming the Premium Layer Density. ASTIN Bulletin, 26(1), 7192.
Wilson R. (1968) The Theory of Syndicates. Econometrica 36(1), 119132.
Yaari M. (1987) The Dual Theory of Choice under Risk. Econometrica 55(1), 95115.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

ASTIN Bulletin: The Journal of the IAA
  • ISSN: 0515-0361
  • EISSN: 1783-1350
  • URL: /core/journals/astin-bulletin-journal-of-the-iaa
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 41 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 75 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 16th January 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.