Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T10:07:05.609Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Recording Therapy Sessions: An Evaluation of Patient and Therapist Reported Behaviours, Attitudes and Preferences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2009

Laura Shepherd
Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, and South London and Maudsley NHS Trust, UK
Paul M. Salkovskis*
Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, and South London and Maudsley NHS Trust, UK
Martin Morris
Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, and South London and Maudsley NHS Trust, UK
Reprint requests to Paul Salkovskis, Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London SE5 8AF, UK. E-mail:


Background: Audio recording of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) sessions has been recommended but not yet widely adopted. It is believed to have positive effects on later recall and reflection by the patient and on supervisory quality and accuracy for therapists. Aims: To evaluate self-reported attitudes and behaviour regarding audio recording of therapy sessions in both patients and therapists in a setting where such recording is routinely carried out. Method: In a centre specializing in CBT for anxiety disorders, 72 patients completed a questionnaire at the start of therapy and 31 patients completed a questionnaire at the end of therapy. Fifteen therapists also completed a similar questionnaire. Results: Ninety percent of patients reported listening to recordings between therapy sessions to some extent. The majority reported discussing the recordings with their therapist. Patients typically planned to keep the recordings after therapy ended. Most patients and therapists endorsed positive attitudes towards the use of recordings. Similar advantages (e.g. improving memory for sessions) and disadvantages (e.g. practical issues and feeling self-conscious) of recordings were generated by patients and therapists. Therapists were more likely than patients to express concern about recordings being distressing for patients to listen to. Both patients and therapists regarded the use of recordings for therapist peer supervision purposes favourably. Conclusion: The use of audio recording of sessions as an adjunct to therapy (where patients listen to recordings between sessions) and for therapist supervision is rated as both highly acceptable and useful by both therapists and patients.

Research Article
Copyright © British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Alpert, M. (1996). Videotaping psychotherapy. Journal of Psychotherapy Practice and Research, 5, 93105.Google ScholarPubMed
Ford, S., Fallowfield, L., Hall, A. and Lewis, S. (1995). The influence of audiotapes on patient participation in the cancer consultation. European Journal of Cancer, 31A, 22642269.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harvey, A. G., Clark, D. M., Ehlers, A. and Rapee, R. M. (2000). Social anxiety and self-impression: cognitive preparation enhances the beneficial effects of video feedback following a stressful social task. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 38, 11831192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macaskill, N. D. (1996). Improving clinical outcomes in REBT/CBT: the therapeutic uses of tape-recording. Journal of Rational-Emotive and Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 14, 199207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McHugh, P., Lewis, S., Ford, S., Newlands, E., Rustin, G., Coombes, C., Smith, D., O'Reilly, S. and Fallowfield, L. (1995). The efficacy of audiotapes in promoting psychological well-being in cancer patients: a randomized, controlled trial. British Journal of Cancer, 71, 388392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ong, L. M. L., Visser, M. R. M., Lammes, F. B., Van Der Velden, J., Kuenen, B. C. and de Haes, J. C. J. M. (2000). Effect of providing cancer patients with the audiotaped initial consultation on satisfaction, recall, and quality of life: a randomized, double-blind study. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 18, 30523060.Google Scholar
Perr, H. M. (1985). The use of audiotapes in psychotherapy. Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis and Dynamic Psychiatry, 13, 391398.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Shepherd supplementary material

Extended reports

Download Shepherd supplementary material(File)
File 265.2 KB
Submit a response


No Comments have been published for this article.