Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T17:08:57.059Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Preliminary Evaluation of an Online Training Package in Cognitive Behaviour Therapy: Satisfaction Ratings and Impact on Knowledge and Confidence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2011

David Westbrook ,
Freda McManus ,
Gavin Clark  and
James Bennett-Levy
David Westbrook*
Affiliation:
Oxford Cognitive Therapy Centre, Warneford Hospital, UK
Freda McManus
Affiliation:
Oxford Cognitive Therapy Centre, and University of Oxford, Warneford Hospital, UK
Gavin Clark
Affiliation:
University of Reading, UK
James Bennett-Levy
Affiliation:
University of Sydney, Lismore, Australia
*
Reprint requests to David Westbrook, Oxford Cognitive Therapy Centre, Warneford Hospital, Oxford OX3 7JX, UK. E-mail: david.westbrook@oxfordhealth.nhs.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background: Online CBT training is in its infancy. The initial studies have varied program characteristics and trainee groups, but results appear promising. At this stage, there is a need to evaluate programs with different characteristics to determine which are useful, and which are not. Method: This paper reports a preliminary evaluation of an online CBT training package, OCTC Online, which is distinguished from other online programs by its particularly strong focus on video presentations by trainers, accompanying PowerPoint slides, and video demonstrations of key clinical techniques. Participants (N = 94) completed online rating scales and questionnaires assessing (a) their satisfaction with the training; (b) their self-rated knowledge and confidence about the topics discussed (pre- and post-training); and (c) a multiple choice questionnaire (MCQ) objective test of knowledge (also pre- and post-training). Results: Results showed that on average students were highly satisfied with the online training modules, their self-rated confidence increased significantly, and so did their scores on the MCQ. Conclusions: The study has significant limitations but nevertheless contributes to the growing body of evidence that online training may have a useful part to play in enhancing therapists’ knowledge of CBT theory and techniques, and their confidence in using the techniques.

Keywords

Cognitive behaviour therapytrainingonlineweb
Type
Research Article
Information
Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy , Volume 40 , Issue 4 , July 2012 , pp. 481 - 490
Copyright
Copyright © British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bennett-Levy, J., McManus, F., Westling, B. and Fennell, M. (2009). Acquiring and refining CBT skills and competencies: which training methods are perceived to be most effective? Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 37, 571–583.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bennett-Levy, J. and Perry, H. (2009). The promise of online cognitive behavioural therapy training for rural and remote mental health professionals. Australasian Psychiatry, 17 Supplement, 121–124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carroll, K. M., Nich, C., Sifry, R., Frankforter, T., Nuro, K. F., Ball, S. A., Fentona, L. and Rounsaville, B. J. (2000). A general system for evaluating therapist adherence and competence in psychotherapy research in the addictions. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 57, 225–238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dimeff, L., Koerner, K., Woodcock, E., Beadnell, B., Brown, M., Skutch, J. et al. (2009). Which training method works best? A randomized controlled trial comparing three methods of training clinicians in dialectical behavior therapy skills. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 47, 921–930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairburn, C. G. and Cooper, Z. (2011). Therapist competence, therapy quality, and therapist training. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 49, 373–378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirkpatrick, D. and Kirkpatrick, J. (2006). Evaluating Training Programs: the four levels (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publisher.Google Scholar
NICE (National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence) (2011). Mental Health and Behavioural Conditions. Available from http://guidance.nice.org.uk/Topic/MentalHealthBehavioural Accessed 16 April 2011.Google Scholar
Rakovshik, S. and McManus, F. (2010). Establishing evidence-based training in cognitive behavioral therapy: a review of current empirical findings and theoretical guidance Clinical Psychology Review, 30, 496–516.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shafran, R., Clark, D. M., Fairburn, C. G., Arntz, A., Barlow, D. H., Ehlers, A. et al. (2009). Mind the gap: improving the dissemination of CBT. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 47, 902–909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sholomskas, D. E., Syracuse-Siewert, G., Rounsaville, B. J., Ball, S. A., Nuro, K. F., and Carroll, K. M. (2005). We don't train in vain: a dissemination trial of three strategies of training clinicians in cognitive-behavioral therapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 106–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weingardt, K. R., Cucciare, M. A., Bellotti, C. and Lai, W. P. (2009). A randomized trial comparing two models of web-based training in cognitive-behavioral therapy for substance abuse counselors. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 37, 219–227.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weingardt, K. R., Villafranca, S. W. and Levin, C. (2006). Technology-based training in cognitive behavioral therapy for substance abuse counselors. Substance Abuse, 27, 19–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.