Skip to main content Accessibility help

The Rightful Demise of the Sh*t Sandwich: Providing Effective Feedback

  • Ian Andrew James (a1)

Background: As a trainee cognitive therapist in the early 1990s, I was taught the Sh*t Sandwich by my supervisor. I continued to use this technique for many years without seeing the need to extend my repertoire of feedback strategies. Aims: This article describes a number of other feedback techniques, raising awareness of the processes underpinning feedback, and facilitating reflection on feedback methods. Method: This review examines feedback and the methods of feedback used to improve clinical competence. Results: Evidence informs us that the use of good feedback has a significant effect on learners’ outcomes (Milne, 2009). However, despite recognition of its importance, many supervisors fail to give adequate feedback and utilize methods that are sub-optimal. One such problematic method is the notorious “Sh*t Sandwich” (SS), which attempts to hide criticism within a cushion of two positive statements. This paper looks at various models of giving negative and positive feedback, suggesting that our repertoire of feedback methods may require expanding. Conclusion: The review suggests that feedback is a complex process and methods that place an emphasis on the learner as an active participant in the learning process (i.e. interactive approaches) should be encouraged. The paper suggests that negative feedback should generally be avoided in favour of constructive support, accompanied by specific, descriptive, balanced feedback, with new learning being consolidated by role play. Generally, feedback should be given about the task rather than the person, but when it is personalized it should relate to effort rather than ability.

Corresponding author
Reprint requests to Ian James, Newcastle General Hospital, Centre for the Health of the Elderly, Castleside Offices, Westgate Road, Newcastle upon Tyne NE4 6BE, UK. E-mail:
Hide All
Blackburn, I. M., James, I.A., Milne, D. L. and Reichelt, F. K. (2001). The revised cognitive therapy scale (CTS-R): psychometric properties. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 29, 431447.
Brookhart, S. (2008). How To Give Effective Feedback To Your Students. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Butler, R. and Nisan, M. (1986). Effects of no feedback, task-related comments, and grades on intrinsic motivation and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 210216.
Daniels, J. and Larson, L. (2001). The impact of performance feedback on counselling self-efficacy and counsellor anxiety. Counselor Education and Supervision, 41, 120130.
Dweck, C.S. (2006). Mindset. New York: Random House.
Friedlander, M., Siegel, S. M. and Brenock, K. (1989). Parallel process in counselling and supervision: a case study. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 36, 149157.
Haddock, G., Devane, S., Bradshaw, T., McGovern, J., Tarrier, N., Kinderman, P., et al. (2001). An investigation into the psychometric properties of the Cognitive Therapy Scale for Psychosis (CTS-Psy). Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 29, 221233.
Hattie, J. and Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81112.
Hoffman, M. A., Hill, C. E., Holmes, S. E. and Freitas, G. F. (2005). Supervisor perspective on the process and outcome of giving easy, difficult, or no feedback to supervisees. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 313.
Hill, F. (2007). Feedback to enhance student learning: facilitating interactive feedback on clinical skills. International Journal of Clinical Skills, 1, 2124.
James, I. A., Allen, K. and Collerton, D. (2004). A post-analysis of emotions in supervision. Behaviour and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 32, 507513.
James, I. A., Milne, D., Morse, R. and Blackburn, I. M. (2007). Conducting successful supervision: novel elements towards an integrative approach. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 35, 191200.
Kluger, A. and DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: a historical review, a meta-analysis and a preliminary intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 254284.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential Learning: experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood-Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Kopala, M. (1987). The impact of supervisory interventions on self-efficacy and anxiety of counselors: an evaluation of the single case research design. Dissertation Abstracts International, 49, 733A. (UMI No. 880781)
Lane, E. J.Daugherty, T. K. and Nyman, S. J. (1998). Feedback on ability in counselling, self-efficacy and persistence on task. Psychological Reports, 83, 11131114.
Larson, L. M. (1998). The social cognitive model of counselor training. The Counseling Psychologist, 26, 219273.
Londondeaneryeportfolio (2013). How To Give and Receive Feedback http// (accessed 24.06.2013).
McCoy, J. (2005). 2-Way Feedback. Victoria, Aus: Carneige Services Pty Ltd.
Milne, D. (2009). Evidence-Based Clinical Supervision. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Milne, D. L. and James, I. (2000). A systematic review of effective clinical supervision. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 39, 111127.
Milne, D. and James, I. A. (2002). The observed impact of training on competence in clinical supervision. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 41, 5572.
Mueller, C. M. and Dweck, C. S. (1998). Intelligence praise can undermine motivation and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 3352.
Page, E. (1958). Teacher comments and student performance: a seventy-four classroom experiment in school motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 49, 173181.
Pendleton, D., Schofield, T., Tate, P. and Havelock, P. (1984). The Consultation: an approach to learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Roth, A. and Pilling, S. (2007). The Competences Required to Deliver Effective CBT for People with Depression and with Anxiety Disorders. London: Department of Health, 283713 (Sept).
Roth, A., Pilling, S. and Turner, J. (2010). Therapist training and supervision in clinical trials: implications for clinical practice. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 38, 291302.
Vassilas, C. and Ho, L. (2000). Video for teaching purposes. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 6, 304311.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: the development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Young, J. and Beck, A. T. (1980). Cognitive Therapy Scale. Unpublished assessment instrument. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy
  • ISSN: 1352-4658
  • EISSN: 1469-1833
  • URL: /core/journals/behavioural-and-cognitive-psychotherapy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed