Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-20T12:39:55.976Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Use of a Token Economy to Regulate Household Behaviours

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 June 2009

John F. Masterson  and
Alan C. Vaux
John F. Masterson
Affiliation:
School of Remedial Linguistics, University of Dublin, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland
Alan C. Vaux
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Illinois 62901, U.S.A.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The failure of a high proportion of experimental communities has been attributed to disagreements among members about household chores. Differing performances and expectations frequently result in the household ceasing to be a pleasant place in which to live. The present study was carried out in a household of five graduate students. A point system based on the principles of the token economy was used to maintain required levels of behaviour in all members. Removal of the system for 2 weeks resulted in the total amount of work done remaining unchanged, but its distribution among the members changing immediately. Within the system problems could be solved by increasing or decreasing the points values of the behaviours in question. One such experiment, which successfully increased the number of original meals prepared by members, is described.

Type
Research Article
Information
Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy , Volume 10 , Issue 1 , January 1982 , pp. 65 - 78
Copyright
Copyright © British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrams, P. and McCullough, A. (1976). Communes, Sociology and Society, London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ayllon, T. and Azrin, N. (1968). The Token Economy. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Kanter, R. M. (1972). Commitment and Community. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kazdin, A. E. and Bootzin, R. R. (1972). The token economy: an evaluative review. Journal of Applied Behaviour Analysis 5, 343–364.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keniston, K. (1971). Youth and Dissent: The Rise of a New Opposition. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Kincade, K. (1973). A Walden Two Experiment. New York: Morrow.Google Scholar
Miller, L. K. (1976). Behaviour principles and experimental communities. In Behaviour Modification: Principles, Issues and Applications, Craighead, W. E., Kazdin, A. E. and Maloney, M. J. (Eds), Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Miller, L. K. and Feallock, R. (1973). A behavioural system for group living. In Behaviour Analysis and Education, Ramp, G. and Semb, G. (Eds), New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Phillips, E. L. (1968). Achievement place; token reinforcement procedures in a home-style rehabilitation setting for “pre-delinquent” boys. Journal of Applied Behaviour Analysis 1, 213–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, B. F. (1948). Walden Two. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Ulrich, R. E. (1973). Towards experimental living. Behaviour Modification Monographs 2, 1.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.