Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T01:07:59.998Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Use of Momentary Time Sampling and Partial Interval Recording in Behavioural Research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 June 2009

Alex Harrop ,
Michael Daniels  and
Christine Foulkes
Alex Harrop
Affiliation:
School of Health Sciences, Liverpool Polytechnic
Michael Daniels
Affiliation:
School of Health Sciences, Liverpool Polytechnic
Christine Foulkes
Affiliation:
School of Health Sciences, Liverpool Polytechnic
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The inherent properties of momentary time sampling (MTS) and partial interval recording (PIR) are examined. Findings derived from computer simulation investigations are discussed in terms of the mode of operation of the two time-sampling techniques. It is seen that the advantage of MTS is that it can, under certain restricted circumstances, estimate absolute duration of behaviour occurring. The important disadvantage of MTS is that it is relatively insensitive when estimating degree of change of behaviour. In contrast, although PIR cannot accurately measure absolute duration it is more sensitive to behaviour change than is MTS. It is concluded that the practitioner who wishes to use one of these methods of time sampling must carefully consider the aims and possible effects of the investigation before deciding which method to use.

Type
Research Article
Information
Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy , Volume 18 , Issue 2 , April 1990 , pp. 121 - 127
Copyright
Copyright © British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brulle, A. R. and Repp, A. C. (1984). An investigation of the accuracy of momentary time sampling procedures with time series data. British Journal of Psychology 75, 481–485.Google Scholar
Cheesman, P. L. and Watts, P. E. (1985). Positive Behaviour Management. London: Routledge, Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Harrop, A. (1980). Behaviour modification in the schools: A time for caution. Bulletin of the British Psychological Society 33, 158–160.Google Scholar
Harrop, A. (1983). Behaviour Modification in the Classroom. London: Hodder and Stoughton.Google Scholar
Harrop, A. and Daniels, M. (1985). Momentary time sampling with time series data: A commentary on the paper by Brulle and Repp. British Journal of Psychology 76, 533–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrop, A. and Daniels, M. (1986). Methods of time sampling: A reappraisal of momentary time sampling and partial interval recording. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 19, 73–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murphy, G. and Goodall, E. (1980). Measurement error in direct observations: a comparison of common recording methods. Behavior Research and Therapy 18, 147–150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Powell, J., Martindale, B., Kulp, S., Martindale, A. and Bauman, R. (1977). Taking a closer look: Time sampling and measurement error. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 10, 325–332.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Repp, A. C., Roberts, D. M., Slack, D. J., Repp, C. F. and Berkler, M. S. (1976). A comparison of frequency, interval and time-sampling methods of data collection. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 9, 501–508.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Westmacott, E. V. S. and Cameron, R. J. (1981). Behaviour can Change. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Wheldall, K. and Merrett, F. (1984). Positive Teaching: The Behavioural Approach. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.