Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-zklqj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-29T04:29:23.208Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Integrating Social Science with Neuroscience: Potentials and Problems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2007

John Cromby
John Cromby
Affiliation:
Department of Human Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough LE11 3TU, UK E-mail: J.Cromby@lboro.ac.uk
Get access

Abstract

New opportunities for systematic collaboration between neuroscience and social science have opened up in recent years, and some of the potentials and the problems that accompany them are explored with reference to Damasio’s work. Systematic collaboration and integration might yield benefits for metatheoretical, theoretical and substantive inquiry, but will be impeded by language, conceptual and methodological problems. Strategies to facilitate collaboration are discussed, and it is concluded that methodological problems will be most difficult to resolve.

Keywords

affectiveembodimentemotionhabitusinterdisciplinarysomatic marker

Information

Type
Articles
Information
BioSocieties , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , June 2007 , pp. 149 - 169
Copyright
Copyright © London School of Economics and Political Science 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Ahmed, S. (2004). The cultural politics of emotion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Archer, M. (1995). Realist social theory: The morphogenetic approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baerveldt, C., & Voestermans, P. (2005). Culture, emotion and the normative structure of reality. Theory and Psychology, 15, 449–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bangert, M., & Altenmueller, E. (2003). Mapping perception to action in piano practice: A longitudinal DC-EEG study. URL (accessed November 2006): http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=270043& tools=botGoogle Scholar
Bennett, M.R., & Hacker, P.M.S. (2003). Philosophical foundations of neuroscience. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Benson, C. (2001). The cultural psychology of self: Place, morality and art in human worlds. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bentley-Macleod, W. (2002). Complexity, bounded rationality and heuristic search. URL (accessed December 2006): http://ssrn.com/abstract=170989Google Scholar
Bianchi-Demichelli, F., Grafton, S., & Ortigue, S. (2006). The power of love on the human brain. Social Neuroscience, 1, 90–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blakemore, C. (1990). Understanding images in the brain. In Barlow, H.Blakemore, C. & Weston-Smith, M. (Eds), Images and understanding, 257–283. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1991). The peculiar history of scientific reason. Sociological Forum, 6, 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, G. (1999). The challenges of interdisciplinarity. Policy Sciences, 32, 327–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burkitt, I. (1991). Social selves. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Burkitt, I. (1999). Bodies of thought: Embodiment, identity and modernity. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burkitt, I. (2003). Psychology in the field of being: Merleau-Ponty, ontology and social constructionism. Theory and Psychology, 13, 319–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of sex. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cacioppo, J., & Berntson, G. (Eds) (2005). Social neuroscience. Hove: Psychology Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chalmers, D. (1995). Facing up to the problem of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 2, 200–219.Google Scholar
Craig, A. (1997). Postmodern pluralism and our selves. Theory and Psychology, 7, 505–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cromby, J. (2004). Between constructionism and neuroscience: The societal co-constitution of embodied subjectivity. Theory and Psychology, 14, 797–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cromby, J. (2005). Theorising embodied subjectivity. International Journal of Critical Psychology, 15, 133–150.Google Scholar
Crossley, N. (2001). The social body: Habit, identity and desire. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damasio, A.R. (1994). Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason and the human brain. London: Picador.Google Scholar
Damasio, A.R. (1999). The feeling of what happens: Body, emotion and the making of consciousness. London: William Heinemann.Google Scholar
Damasio, A. (2002) A neurobiology for emotion and feeling. Paper presented at the ‘Emotion, Evolution and Rationality’ conference, 27 April, Kings College London.Google Scholar
Damasio, A.R. (2003). Looking for Spinoza: Joy, sorrow and the feeling brain. Orlando, FL: Harvest.Google Scholar
Davis, A., & Rose, D. (2000). Experimental method in psychology. In Breakwell, G.Hammond, S. & Fife-Schaw, C. (Eds), Research methods in psychology, 42–58. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Demos, J. (1996). Shame and guilt in early New England. In Harré, R. & Parrott, W.G. (Eds), The emotions: Social, cultural and biological dimensions, 74–88. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Edwards, D. (1999). Emotion discourse. Culture and Psychology, 5, 271–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (1992). Discursive psychology. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Ekman, P. (1992). Are there basic emotions? Psychological Review, 99, 550–553.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elias, N. (1978). The history of manners: The civilising process, vol. 1. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Elster, J. (2004). Emotions and rationality. In Manstead, A.Frijda, N. & Fischer, A. (Eds), Feelings and emotions: The Amsterdam symposium. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1988). Technologies of the self. In Martin, L.Gutman, H. & Hutton, P. (Eds), Technologies of the self, 16–49. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gergen, K.J. (1991). The saturated self. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gergen, K.J. (1997). Realities and relationships: Soundings in social construction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gieryn, T. (1983). Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review, 48, 781–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, G. (1993). Philosophy of mind: An introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gross, P., & Levitt, N. (1994). Higher superstition: The academic left and its quarrels with science. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, S., & Jacques, M. (Eds). (1989). New times: The changing face of politics in the 1990s. London: Lawrence & Wishart.Google Scholar
Harré, R. (1992). The second cognitive revolution. American Behavioural Scientist, 36, 3–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harré, R. (2002). Cognitive science: A philosophical introduction. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heelas, P., & Lock, A. (Eds). (1981). Indigenous psychologies: The anthropology of the self. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Henriques, J., Hollway, W., Urwin, C., Venn, C., & Walkerdine, V. (1984). Changing the subject: Psychology, social regulation and subjectivity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hiller, J. (2005). Sex, mind and emotion through the life course: A biopsychosocial perspective. In Hiller, J.Wood, H. & Bolton, W. (Eds), Sex, mind and emotion. London: Karnac.Google Scholar
Joyce, P. (1995). Class. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lambie, J.A., & Marcel, A.J. (2002). Consciousness and the varieties of emotion experience. Psychological Review, 109, 219–259.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lamont, M., & Molnar, V. (2002). The study of boundaries in the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 167–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazarus, R. (1982). Thoughts on the relationship between emotion and cognition. American Psychologist, 37, 1019–1024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Doux, J. (1999). The emotional brain. London: Phoenix.Google Scholar
Logan, R. (1987). Historical change in prevailing sense of self. In Yardley, K. & Honess, T. (Eds), Self and identity: Psychosocial perspectives, 13–26. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Maguire, E., Gadian, D., Johnsrude, I., Good, C., Ashburner, J., Frackowiak, R. et al. (2000). Navigation related structural change in the hippocampi of taxi drivers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science (USA), 97, 4398–4403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martin, R. (1988). Truth, power, self: An interview with Michel Foucault. In Martin, L.Gutman, H. & Hutton, P. (Eds), Technologies of the self, 9–15. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Metzger, N., & Zare, R. (1999). Interdisciplinary research: From belief to reality. Science, 283, 642–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moriera, T., & Palladino, P. (2005). Between truth and hope: On Parkinson’s disease, neurotransplantation and the production of the ‘self’. History of the Human Sciences, 18, 55–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, B. (1994). Anthropology of the self: The individual in cultural perspective. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Nightingale, D.J. (1999). Bodies: Reading the body. In I. Parker, & The Bolton Discourse Network (Eds), Critical textworks, 167–177. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Panksepp, J. (1998). Affective neuroscience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panksepp, J. (2004). Emotional consciousness: Animalian sources of affective values and the core self. Paper presented at the Science, Self and Meaning conference (annual conference of the Consciousness and Experiential Psychology Section of the British Psychological Society), Oxford.Google Scholar
Parker, I. (1996). Against Wittgenstein: Materialist reflections on language in psychology. Theory and Psychology, 6, 363–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, I., Georgaca, E., Harper, D., McLaughin, T., & Stowell-Smith, M. (1995). Deconstructing psychopathology. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potter, J., & Edwards, D. (1990). Nigel Lawson’s tent: Discourse analysis, attribution theory and the social psychology of fact. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 405–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhoten, D., & Parker, A. (2004). Risks and rewards of an interdisciplinary career path. Science, 306, 2046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, K. (2002). What IQ tests test. Theory and Psychology, 12, 283–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, D. (1991). Might the self be a substance after all? Theory and Psychology, 1, 37–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rolls, E.T. (1999). The brain and emotion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rose, H., & Rose, S. (2001). Alas poor Darwin: Arguments against evolutionary psychology. London: Vintage (Jonathan Cape).Google Scholar
Rose, N. (2005). Becoming neurochemical selves. URL (accessed December 2006): http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/sociology/pdf/Rose-BecomingNeurochemicalSelves.pdfGoogle Scholar
Rose, S. (1997). Lifelines: Life beyond the gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ross, A. (1996). Introduction. Social Text, 46/47, 14, 93–100.Google Scholar
Schmitt, W.A., Brinkley, C.A., & Newman, J.P. (1999). Testing Damasio’s somatic marker hypothesis with psychopathic individuals: Risk-takers or risk-averse? Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 108, 538–543.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shilling, C. (2003). The body and social theory, 2nd edn. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shotter, J., & Gergen, K.J. (1989). Texts of identity. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Smail, D.J. (2005). Power, interest and psychology: Elements of a social materialist understanding of distress. Ross-on-Wye: PCCS Books.Google Scholar
Solms, M., & Turnbull, O. (2002). The brain and the inner world: An introduction to the neuroscience of subjective experience. New York: Other Press.Google Scholar
Stam, H. (Ed.) (1998). The body and psychology. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stearns, P., & Knapp, M. (1996). Historical perspectives on grief. In Harré, R. & Parrott, W.G. (Eds), The emotions: Social, cultural and biological dimensions, 132–150. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the self: The making of the modern identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tolman, C. (1994). Psychology, society, subjectivity: An introduction to German Critical Psychology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ullmann, S. (1991). Tacit assumptions in the computational study of vision. In Gorea, A.Fregnac, Y.Kapoula, Z. & Findlay, J. (Eds), Representations of vision: Trends and tacit assumptions in vision research, 305–318. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
van Ommen, C. (2005). Damasio’s subject: Constructions of self in contemporary neuroscience. Paper presented at the International Society for Theoretical Psychology Conference, Cape Town.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L.S. (1962). Thought and language, trans. E. Hanfmann, & G. Vakar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wertsch, J. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Woody, E., & Szechtman, H. (2000). Hypnotic hallucinations: Towards a biology of epistemology. Contemporary Hypnosis, 17, 4–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wykes, T., & Brammer, M. (2002). Effects on the brain of a psychological treatment: Cognitive remediation therapy. British Journal of Psychiatry, 181, 144–152.Google ScholarPubMed
Young, I.M. (1990). ‘Throwing like a girl’ and other essays in feminist philosophy and social theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Zajonc, R.B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35, 151–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zajonc, R.B. (1984). On the primacy of affect. American Psychologist, 39, 117–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar