Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

The Cerebral Subject and the Challenge of Neurodiversity

  • Francisco Ortega (a1)
Abstract
Abstract

The neurodiversity movement has so far been dominated by autistic people who believe their condition is not a disease to be treated and, if possible, cured, but rather a human specificity (like sex or race) that must be equally respected. Autistic self-advocates largely oppose groups of parents of autistic children and professionals searching for a cure for autism. This article discusses the positions of the pro-cure and anti-cure groups. It also addresses the emergence of autistic cultures and various issues concerning autistic identities. It shows how identity issues are frequently linked to a ‘neurological self-awareness’ and a rejection of psychological interpretations. It argues that the preference for cerebral explanations cannot be reduced to an aversion to psychoanalysis or psychological culture. Instead, such preference must be understood within the context of the diffusion of neuroscientific claims beyond the laboratory and their penetration in different domains of life in contemporary biomedicalized societies. Within this framework, neuroscientific theories, practices, technologies and therapies are influencing the ways we think about ourselves and relate to others, favoring forms of neurological or cerebral subjectivation. The article shows how neuroscientific claims are taken up in the formation of identities, as well as social and community networks.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

I. Hacking (2002). Making up people. Historical Ontology, 99–114. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP.

L.J. Kirmayer (1988). Mind and body as metaphors: Hidden values in biomedicine. In M. Lock and D.R. Gordon (Eds), Biomedicine examined, 5793. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

D. Rees , & S. Rose (Eds) (2004). The new brain sciences: Perils and prospects. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.

N. Rose (2007). The politics of life itself: Biomedicine, power, and subjectivity in the twenty-first century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

BioSocieties
  • ISSN: 1745-8552
  • EISSN: 1745-8560
  • URL: /core/journals/biosocieties
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 3
Total number of PDF views: 20 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 269 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 24th April 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.