Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Democratic Mis-haps: The Problem of Democratization in a Time of Biopolitics

  • Jenny Reardon (a1)

Following the stringent critiques of organizers of the Human Genome Diversity Project for excluding people from the initiative’s early planning, subsequent administrators of high-profile efforts to study human genetic variation, such as the International HapMap Project, have made great efforts to stress the importance of including the people who are to be the objects of study in research design and regulation. Such efforts to ‘democratize’ genomics would appear to represent a positive development. However, in practice they have satisfied few as they fail to recognize the most basic lesson of the Human Genome Diversity Project debates: genomics raises questions not just about the inclusion of people, but about their very constitution. Positing concrete, stable subjects in society, current efforts to ‘democratize’ genomics fail to recognize that entangled in the fundamental questions about nature posed by this emergent form of technoscience are fundamental questions about the order and constitution of societies. The creation of sustainable and desirable forms of governance require us to come to terms with challenges posed to liberal democratic practices and values, such as inclusion, in an age defined partially by this mutual dis/ordering of nature and society.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

L.L. Cavalli-Sforza , A.C. Wilson , C.R. Cantor , R.M. Cook-Deegan , & M.C. King (1991). Call for a worldwide survey of human genetic diversity: A vanishing opportunity for the human genome project. Genomics, 11 (summer), 490491.

A. Clarke , J. Fishman , J. Fosket , L. Mamo , & J. Shim (2003). Biomedicalization: Technoscientific transformations of health, illness and U.S. biomedicine. American Sociological Review, 68 (April), 161194.

R. Herzig (2006). Review of Appropriating technology: Vernacular science and social power. Isis, 97, 181182.

IHMC (International HapMap Consortium) (2003). The International HapMap Project. Nature, 426, 789795.

IHMC (International HapMap Consortium) (2004). Integrating ethics and science in the International HapMap Project. Nature Reviews Genetics, 5, 467475.

IHMC (International HapMap Consortium) (2005) A haplotype map of the human genome. Nature, 437, 12991320.

P. Kitcher (2001). Science, truth and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

F. Livingstone (1962). On the non-existence of human races. Current Anthropology, 3, 279.

J. Reardon (2004). Decoding race and human difference in a genomic age. Differences: A journal of feminist cultural studies, 15, 3865.

N.A. Rosenberg , J.K. Pritchard , J.L. Weber , H.M. Cann , K.K. Kidd , L.A. Zhivotovsky (2002). Genetic structure of human populations. Science, 298, 2381.

P.A. Treichler (1987). AIDS, homophobia and biomedical discourse: An epidemic of signification. Cultural Studies, 1, 263305.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

  • ISSN: 1745-8552
  • EISSN: 1745-8560
  • URL: /core/journals/biosocieties
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 3 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 38 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 24th June 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.