Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-7f7b94f6bd-dwjtz Total loading time: 0.495 Render date: 2022-07-01T02:22:56.137Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

Long-term declines of wader populations at the Tagus estuary, Portugal: a response to global or local factors?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2011

TERESA CATRY*
Affiliation:
Centro de Estudos do Ambiente e do Mar (CESAM)/Museu Nacional de História Natural, Universidade de Lisboa, Rua da Escola Politécnica 58, 1250-102 Lisboa, Portugal.
JOSÉ A. ALVES
Affiliation:
Centre for Ecology Evolution and Conservation, School of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK.
JOANA ANDRADE
Affiliation:
Sociedade Portuguesa para o Estudo das Aves, Av. da Liberdade nº 105 2º esq, 1250-140 Lisboa, Portugal.
HELDER COSTA
Affiliation:
Av. Eng. Arantes e Oliveira, 23-9ºA, 1900 Lisboa, Portugal.
MARIA P. DIAS
Affiliation:
Unidade de Investigação em Eco-Etologia, ISPA. R. Jardim do Tabaco, 34. 1149-041 Lisboa & Museu Nacional História Natural, Universidade de Lisboa, Rua da Escola Politécnica 58, 1250-102 Lisboa, Portugal.
PEDRO FERNANDES
Affiliation:
Rua da República da Bolivia, 36 1º Dto, 1500-548 Lisboa, Portugal.
ANA LEAL
Affiliation:
Centro de Biologia Ambiental, Departamento de Biologia Animal, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal.
PEDRO M. LOURENÇO
Affiliation:
Animal Ecology Group, Centre for Ecological and Evolutionary Studies, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 14, 9750AA Haren, The Netherlands.
RICARDO C. MARTINS
Affiliation:
Centro de Biologia Ambiental (CBA)/Museu Nacional História Natural, Universidade de Lisboa, Rua da Escola Politécnica 58, 1250-102 Lisboa, Portugal.
FILIPE MONIZ
Affiliation:
Reserva Natural do Sapal de Castro Marim e Vila Real de Santo António. Sapal de Venta Moinhos, Apartado 7. 8950-999 Castro Marim, Portugal.
SARA PARDAL
Affiliation:
IMAR – Institute of Marine Research, Zoology Department, University of Coimbra, 3004-517 Coimbra, Portugal.
AFONSO ROCHA
Affiliation:
Rua Luís de Camões nº52, 3º Esq. 2890-084 Alcochete, Portugal.
CARLOS D. SANTOS
Affiliation:
Centro de Estudos do Ambiente e do Mar (CESAM)/Museu Nacional de História Natural, Universidade de Lisboa, Rua da Escola Politécnica 58, 1250-102 Lisboa, Portugal.
VITOR ENCARNAÇÃO
Affiliation:
Instituto da Conservação da Natureza e Biodiversidade, Rua de Santa Marta 55, 1169-230 Lisboa, Portugal.
JOSÉ P. GRANADEIRO
Affiliation:
Centro de Estudos do Ambiente e do Mar (CESAM)/Museu Nacional de História Natural, Universidade de Lisboa, Rua da Escola Politécnica 58, 1250-102 Lisboa, Portugal.
*
*Author for correspondence; e-mail: teresa_catry@yahoo.com
Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Summary

Migratory wader populations face global threats, mainly related to increasing rates of habitat loss and disturbance driven by human activities. To a large extent, the long-term survival of these populations requires the conservation of networks of sites along their migratory flyways. The Tagus estuary, Portugal, is among the most important wetlands for waders in the East Atlantic Flyway. Annual winter wader counts have been carried in this wetland since 1975 and a monthly roost-monitoring programme was implemented in 2007. Wintering populations of three out of the five most abundant species, Dunlin Calidris alpina, Grey Plover Pluvialis squatarola and Redshank Tringa totanus, showed significant population declines over the past three decades, which are most likely due to the loss and degradation of roost sites as a result of increasing human activity. The situation is unlikely to improve, as a high proportion of the wintering waders use roost sites that are situated in highly urbanised areas with no legal protection. The use of different roost sites by waders is highly variable both temporally and spatially, thus emphasizing the need for a network of good quality roost sites. Additionally, during migration, 60–80% of all the waders of the Tagus estuary concentrate at a single refuge, thus increasing the risk for wader populations during these periods.

Sumário

As populações de aves limícolas migradoras enfrentam ameaças globais, maioritariamente relacionadas com a crescente perda de habitat e perturbação humana. Para garantir a sobrevivência a longo-termo destas populações é imprescindível a conservação de uma rede de áreas húmidas ao longo das suas rotas migratórias. O estuário do Tejo, em Portugal, é uma das mais importantes áreas húmidas para aves limícolas na rota Migratória do Atlântico Este. Desde 1975, foram efectuadas contagens anuais de aves limícolas no inverno nesta zona húmida e, em 2007, foi implementado um programa de monitorização mensal dos refúgios de preia-mar. As populações invernantes de três das cinco espécies de limícolas mais abundantes no estuário, o Pilrito-de-peito-preto Calidris alpina, a Tarambola-cinzenta Pluvialis squatarola e o Perna-vermelha Tringa totanus, mostraram tendências significativas de decréscimo nas últimas três décadas, potencialmente devido à degradação e perda de refúgios como resultado da crescente actividade antropogénica. Esta situação poderá deteriorar-se, uma vez que uma grande proporção das aves limícolas invernantes utiliza refúgios em áreas densamente urbanizadas sem qualquer estatuto legal de protecção. A utilização dos diferentes refúgios do estuário do Tejo por aves limícolas tem uma grande variação espacial e temporal, o que reforça a importância da existência de uma rede de refúgios de elevada qualidade nesta área húmida. Durante a migração, 60 a 80% das aves limícolas concentram-se num único refúgio, ficando assim particularmente vulneráveis neste período.

Type
Research Articles
Copyright
Copyright © BirdLife International 2011

Introduction

Wader populations are declining worldwide, representing a matter of international conservation concern (International Wader Study Group 2003). Habitat loss and disturbance, mainly as a result of increasing human activity, are among the main causes of these declines (Goss-Custard and Yates Reference Goss-Custard and Yates1992; Davidson and Rothwell Reference Davidson and Rothwell1993). Estuaries traditionally hold large numbers of waders during the non-breeding season, acting both as wintering and stopover areas. Estuarine waders are particularly threatened by land reclamation and the consequent changes in natural habitats due to urbanisation, dyke construction and conversion of semi-natural habitats as saltpans into aquacultures (van de Kam et al. Reference van de Kam, Ens, Piersma and Zwarts2004). Similarly, pressure from recreational activities has markedly increased and is presently very high and widespread in many important areas (Davidson and Rothwell Reference Davidson and Rothwell1993, van de Kam et al. Reference van de Kam, Ens, Piersma and Zwarts2004). In addition, the negative impacts of climate change on shorebirds, particularly of sea level rise, are just starting to be modelled and quantified, but will most probably cause significant losses of both feeding and roosting areas (Watkinson et al. Reference Watkinson, Gill and Hulme2004, Galbraith et al. Reference Galbraith, Jones, Park, Clough, Herrod-Julius, Harrington and Page2005, Durell et al. Reference Durell, Stillman, Caldow, McGrorty, West and Humphreys2006). Although the numbers and distribution of estuarine waders is mainly determined by the availability of suitable foraging areas, high tide roosts are a crucial and often limiting habitat. In fact, loss of roosting sites may substantially increase the energetic costs of waders (due to increased flight time) and decrease their probability of survival (Durell et al. Reference Durell, Stillman, Triplet, Aulert, Biot, Bouchet, Duhamel and Goss-Custard2005). In addition, roost availability is known to limit access to feeding areas (Dias et al. Reference Dias, Granadeiro, Lecoq, Santos and Palmeirim2006, Rogers et al. Reference Rogers, Piersma and Hassel2006, van Gils et al. Reference van Gils, Spaans, Dekinga and Piersma2006), given the need to minimise the energy costs of flying between roosting and feeding sites (Rogers Reference Rogers2003). Previous studies have showed that good quality feeding sites (offering high intake rates) are only used frequently if roosting occurs close by (Dias et al. Reference Dias, Granadeiro, Lecoq, Santos and Palmeirim2006, van Gils et al. Reference van Gils, Spaans, Dekinga and Piersma2006), which might constrain the carrying capacity of estuaries.

The Tagus estuary, Portugal, is one of the largest estuarine wetlands in Europe and the second most important wetland for waders in Iberia (Delany et al. Reference Delany, Scott, Dodman and Stroud2009), holding regularly c.50,000 waders during the winter (Moreira Reference Moreira1997). It has a strategic geographical position within the East Atlantic Flyway holding important, but mostly unquantified, populations of migratory waders during both the spring and autumn migration periods. This wetland has been classified as internationally important under the Ramsar Convention for supporting more than 1% of the relevant wintering populations of Avocet Recurvirostra avosetta, Black-tailed Godwit Limosa limosa, Grey Plover Pluvialis squatarola, Dunlin Calidris alpina, Ringed Plover Charadrius hiaticula, Bar-tailed Godwit Limosa lapponica, and of the breeding population of Black-winged Stilt Himantopus himantopus (Delany et al. Reference Delany, Scott, Dodman and Stroud2009). Moreover, in some years it holds c.40% of the western European population of Black-tailed Godwit during the spring migration period (Lourenço et al. Reference Lourenço, Kentie, Schroeder, Alves, Groen, Hooijmeijer and Piersma2010). Despite its international importance, long-term trends in wader populations at this wetland are virtually unknown. Determination of such trends is particularly relevant given the importance of the site and recent reports of loss or degradation of several roosting sites in the area (Dias et al. Reference Dias, Granadeiro, Lecoq, Santos and Palmeirim2006).

In the present study we (1) assess population trends of the most abundant wintering waders at the Tagus estuary during the last three decades, (2) describe seasonal variations in wader abundance and (3) evaluate the relative importance of distinct roosts throughout the annual cycle for most wader species. In addition, we briefly examine the effectiveness of the existing protected areas and their suitability for the conservation of the whole assemblage of waders in this wetland.

Methods

Study area

The intertidal area of the Tagus estuary, Portugal (38º 45’ N, 09º 50’ W), covers about 97 km2 and is mostly composed of mud flats with smaller areas dominated by sandy sediments. Saltmarshes, saltpans (mainly abandoned or transformed into aquacultures) and, to a lesser extent, agricultural fields (such as rice fields; Masero et al. in press), are also used by waders, mainly as high-tide roosts (see Table 1 for a description of roost sites). The northern areas of the estuary were designated as nature reserve in 1976 and a larger area, including intertidal areas and surrounding land, was designated in 1988 as a Special Protection Area (SPA), under European Union legislation (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Map of the study area with the location of monitored roosts and the boundaries of the Special Protection Area for Birds (SPA) and the Tagus Estuary Nature Reserve (RNET).

Table 1. Characteristics and legal protection status of high-tide roosts at the Tagus estuary. RNET = Tagus Estuary Nature Reserve, SPA = Special Protection Area for Birds; na = not applicable.

Bird counts at the Tagus estuary and elsewhere

Annual wader counts were carried out in January between 1975 and 2006 at the main high-tide roosts of the Tagus estuary, including the northern saltmarshes (Rufino Reference Rufino1979, Rufino Reference Rufino1982, Costa and Rufino Reference Costa and Rufino1994, Costa and Rufino Reference Costa and Rufino1997, ICNB unpubl. data). In this period, all roost sites were counted by two observers, usually in a single day, sometimes in two consecutive days, and assessed by land, with the exception of the northern saltmarshes, which were counted by boat. From January 2007 onwards, we set up a more intensive monitoring scheme of the 13 most important roosts of the Tagus estuary (excluding the northern saltmarsh area; Figure 1). In this new scheme, bird counts were carried out monthly, during the spring tides of the second fortnight of each month. Counts were carried out within a 5-day period (maximum) and took place exclusively during spring tides with amplitudes higher than 3.3 m, in order to ensure that all birds present in the estuarine flats had moved to the high tide roosts (Rosa et al. Reference Rosa, Encarnação, Granadeiro and Palmeirim2006, pers.obs.). Depending on the size of the roost and on the distribution of the roosting birds (highly gathered or dispersed), one or two observers counted the birds as they entered the refuge or when they were already settled. Non-simultaneous counts could lead to potential errors if birds move between roosts in consecutive days. However, this could hardly have biased the main results and conclusions about seasonal variations in wader abundance, given the overall annual consistency of the phenological patterns.

Long-term trends (1975–2010) of five common wader species at three other important national wetlands (Ria de Aveiro, Sado estuary and Ria Formosa; Rufino Reference Rufino1979, Rufino Reference Rufino1982, Costa and Rufino Reference Costa and Rufino1994, Costa and Rufino Reference Costa and Rufino1997, ICNB unpubl. data) are also presented to assess the relative contribution of local and global factors in explaining potential variations in numbers of waders at the Tagus estuary.

Data analysis

We used the software package TrendSpotter to assess significant long-term trends in five wader species at Tagus estuary, Ria de Aveiro, Sado estuary and Ria Formosa. Missing values in our initial dataset were imputed using the program Trends and Indices for Monitoring Data (TRIM; Pannekoek and van Strien Reference Pannekoek and van Strien2001). TrendSpotter uses a smoothing method from the class of structural time-series analysis in combination with the Kalman filter (Visser Reference Visser2004, Soldaat et al. Reference Soldaat, Visser, van Roomen and van Strien2007). This software estimates smoothed population numbers and their standard deviations, and allows the estimation of confidence intervals based on the deviations of time point values from the smoothed line. It is then possible to test the difference between the smoothed population number of the last year of a time series against each of the preceding years (total change rate – TCR), taking into account serial correlation. Mean yearly change rate (YCR) estimates, i.e. the TCR expressed as a mean change rate per year, and confidence intervals, were used to classify the trends per year in six categories: “strong increase”, “moderate increase”, “stable”, “moderate decline”, “steep decline” and “uncertain” (see Soldaat et al. Reference Soldaat, Visser, van Roomen and van Strien2007 for further details on TCR and YCR calculations and trend classification). All data counts were ln-transformed prior to the analysis. A “population alert” system has been implemented in the UK by the British Trust for Ornithology (BTO), in order to identify strong (> 50%) and moderate declines (25–49%) in national and regional bird populations over different time series (Atkinson et al. Reference Atkinson, Austin, Rehfisch, Baker, Cranswick, Kershaw, Robinson, Langston, Stroud, Van Turnhout and Maclean2006). In this study, we use TrendSpotter to calculate alerts through the conversion of the TCR values: an upper TCR confidence interval lower than 0.75 or lower than 0.50 represents an alert threshold of 25% and of 50%, respectively (Soldaat et al. Reference Soldaat, Visser, van Roomen and van Strien2007).

For some of the analyses, monthly count data collected from 2007 onwards at the Tagus estuary were pooled seasonally: autumn migration (September and October), winter (November, December, January and February), spring migration (March, April and May) and summer (June, July and August). The Shannon diversity index (H) was used to compare the distribution of waders in the roosts of the Tagus estuary between winter and migratory periods, in order to identify differences in the roosting behaviour of wintering vs. migratory birds, namely if birds are more gregarious during a particular season, which might have important conservation implications. Given that the number of roosts was similar in both periods, the diversity index reflects the evenness of birds in the different monitored roosts. Differences in H between winter and the migratory periods (spring and autumn seasons pooled) were tested against 1000 bootstrap replicates, following Hammer et al. (Reference Hammer, Harper and Ryan2001).

Overall, results are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Computations were carried out using the R software (R Development Core Team 2007).

Results

Long-term trends in wintering wader populations

Three of the five most abundant wintering waders at the Tagus estuary have significantly declined over the past 30 years, namely Dunlin, Grey Plover and Redshank (Table 2, Figure 2). The steepest decline over the whole time series was recorded for Dunlin, whose numbers frequently exceeded 20,000 individuals during the 1970s, 1980s and 1990s, but barely reached 10,000 birds during the last decade (Figure 2). The Dunlin population trend triggers a strong alert for a decline (> 50%) over the last 30 years, and moderate alerts (25%–49% decline) over the last 20 and 10 years. Population changes undergone by wintering Grey Plovers generate a strong alert for a decline at the Tagus estuary over the last 20 years, and moderate declines during the whole time series and over the last 10 years. Moderate alerts are produced for declines in Redshank population across the last 30 and 20 years (Table 3). Numbers of Black-tailed Godwit and Avocet at the Tagus estuary showed high inter-annual variation but, with the exception of a moderate decline in the Avocet population until the late 1980s (insufficient to trigger an alert), the overall trends look stable (Table 2; Figure 2).

Figure 2. Abundance of the five most important wader species at the Tagus estuary between 1975 and 2006 (from January counts). Overall trends are represented by a solid line (smoothed population numbers estimated by TrendSpotter) and the grey shaded area represents 95% confidence intervals. Significant declines were recorded for Dunlin, Grey Plover and Redshank (see text).

Table 2. Population trends of Dunlin, Grey Plover, Black-tailed Godwit, Avocet and Redshank at the study area (Tagus estuary) and at three other important Portuguese wetlands (Ria Aveiro, Sado estuary and Ria Formosa). Declines are shadowed in grey. Trend legend: ↑↑ strong increase, moderate increase, ↔ stable, moderate decline, ↓↓ steep decline, ? uncertain.

Table 3. Population alerts triggered for Dunlin, Grey Plover, Black-tailed Godwit and Redshank at the Tagus estuary and Ria Aveiro during different time periods. No alerts were generated for Avocet or for any species at Sado estuary and Ria Formosa. Moderate and strong alerts correspond to > 25% and > 50% declines, respectively.

At the other three wetlands, long-term declines were exclusively recorded at Ria de Aveiro, for Black-tailed Godwit, Avocet and Redshank (Table 2, Figure 3).

Figure 3. Abundance of the five most important wader species at three major Portuguese wetlands, Sado estuary, Ria Formosa and Ria de Aveiro, between 1975 and 2010 (from January counts). Overall trends are represented by a solid line (smoothed population numbers estimated by TrendSpotter) and the grey shaded area represents 95% confidence intervals. Significant declines over the entire time-series were recorded for Black-tailed Godwit, Avocet and Redshank at Ria de Aveiro (see text).

Seasonal variations in wader populations and high-tide roost use

Between 2007 and 2009, an average of 16,817 ± 7,596 (n = 34) waders were counted each month in the main roosts of the Tagus estuary. The minimum number of birds was consistently recorded in May–June, whereas the season with highest abundances showed considerable annual variation: 32,519 birds in April 2007, during spring migration; 26,992 birds in February 2008, during winter, and 21,674 birds in September 2009, during autumn migration (Figure 4). The peak abundance of most species coincided with the migration periods (Appendix S1 in online Supplementary Material).

Figure 4. Seasonal abundance of waders in the Tagus estuary in 2007, 2008 and 2009, assessed by roost counts.

The relative importance of each roost site varied seasonally and by species (Table 4, Appendix S2). Samouco saltpans (roost 7) harboured the largest numbers of waders all year round, especially during the migration periods, when 60–80% of all waders passing through the Tagus estuary used this area. Overall, birds were more evenly distributed in the roosts in winter than during the migration periods (Shannon diversity index H = 1.77 and H = 1.26, for winter and migration periods respectively, P < 0.001), when few birds used the roosts located in the southern part of the estuary (see also Table 4).

Table 4. Seasonal importance (% of birds) of the monitored roosts for waders at the Tagus estuary (2007–2009).

The percentage of birds roosting in areas outside the designated SPA exceeded 30% during winter for each of the five most abundant wader species (Table 5). These figures varied seasonally and with species; for example, during autumn, more than 50% of the Redshank population used refuges in areas that lack any status of legal protection (Table 5).

Table 5. Proportion of waders using roosts outside the Special Protection Area for Birds (SPA). Total numbers of birds in each season are presented in brackets.

Discussion

Long-term trends in wintering wader populations

Count data from the last three decades have shown major declines in some of the most abundant wader species at the Tagus estuary, with strong and/or moderate alerts triggered for the declines of Dunlin, Grey Plover and Redshank. The apparent stability of the populations of Dunlins from the subspecies C a. alpina (the most represented subspecies at the Tagus estuary) at a global level (Delany et al. Reference Delany, Scott, Dodman and Stroud2009), is at variance with the trend in the Tagus estuary, providing strong evidence of a decline due to local factors. Changes in wader population size could also result from a shift in species’ distribution. Climate change is inducing waders to winter closer to their breeding grounds, thus promoting declines in the populations at their southern distribution ranges (Rehfisch et al. Reference Rehfisch, Austin, Freeman, Armitage and Burton2004). However, Dunlins are not declining in any of the other major Portuguese wetlands, which also support the idea of a local decline. Conversely, the decrease of Grey Plovers in the Tagus estuary is in agreement with the global decrease of the eastern Atlantic population (Delany et al. Reference Delany, Scott, Dodman and Stroud2009). Uncertainty in European trends of Redshanks (Delany et al. Reference Delany, Scott, Dodman and Stroud2009) prevents a direct comparison with the decline recorded at the Tagus estuary. Nonetheless, it is likely that the local factor responsible for the decline of Dunlin populations might also affect other species with similar ecological requirements, such as Grey Plover and Redshank.

Seasonal variations in wader populations and in high-tide roost use

Overall, the phenological patterns of most waders presented in this study coincide with those previously described for the Tagus estuary (Moreira Reference Moreira1995) and other Iberian wetlands (e.g. Lopes et al. Reference Lopes, Múrias, Cabral and Marques2005, Masero et al. Reference Masero, Pérez-Hurtado, Castro and Arroyo2000). However, our data clearly show the importance of the estuary as a stopover area, both during spring and autumn migration periods. Indeed, most species reach peak abundance during these periods and the total abundance of staging populations is certainly higher given that even peak counts are known to underestimate the total passage population due to the turnover rates of migrants (Schaub et al. Reference Schaub, Pradel, Jenni and Lebreton2001, Frederiksen et al. Reference Frederiksen, Fox, Madsen and Colhoun2001, Gillings et al. Reference Gillings, Atkinson, Baker, Bennett, Clark, Cole, González, Kalasz, Minton, Niles, Porter, Serrano, Sitters and Woods2009).

Waders regularly used c.10 roosts in the Tagus estuary and its importance varied seasonally. In fact, the roosts located in the southern part of the estuary held large numbers of birds during the winter, but apparently most of the birds were concentrated in the northern part of the estuary during migratory periods. This seasonal variation in the relative importance of the roost emphasises the need for a network of good quality roost sites around the entire intertidal area. This requirement is certainly applicable to medium to large-size estuaries worldwide, where the cost of commuting between roosting and foraging areas forms an important part of the bird’s time and energetic budget (Mitchell et al. Reference Mitchell, Moser and Kirby1988, Rogers et al. Reference Rogers, Piersma and Hassel2006).

Samouco (roost 7) is currently the most important roost in the Tagus estuary, not only for harbouring several thousand waders all year round but mostly because those numbers correspond to 30–80% (depending on the year and season considered) of all the waders on this wetland. Roost quality and, consequently, roost selection, have been found to be related to distance to feeding areas, predation risk, human disturbance and thermoregulation costs (Dias et al. Reference Dias, Granadeiro, Lecoq, Santos and Palmeirim2006, Rogers et al. Reference Rogers, Piersma and Hassel2006, Rosa et al. Reference Rosa, Encarnação, Granadeiro and Palmeirim2006, Peters and Otis Reference Peters and Otis2007). Samouco is a very large saltpan complex, which has been partly managed for waterbirds since 2007. Levels of disturbance are comparatively low (given the restricted access to the area) and the low water level in the managed tanks provides feeding opportunities during the high-tide period, which might partly explain its relative importance.

Roost loss and degradation as the likely cause of local wader declines

In the Tagus estuary, several roosts have disappeared in the last decades, while others are presently threatened by human activities (Dias et al. Reference Dias, Granadeiro, Lecoq, Santos and Palmeirim2006), and this is likely to be one of the most relevant causes of wader declines (see below). By contrast, there is no evidence of recent changes in the quality of intertidal areas that could explain such declines. In fact, the current implementation of a sewage treatment network on the Tagus estuary that could affect the quality of intertidal flats seems to have a low impact on the overall density and biomass of benthic prey, and consequently on the abundance of waders (Alves Reference Alves2009). Conversely, a recent study has shown that the current harvesting levels of shellfishing are compatible with the preservation of intertidal flats as foraging areas for waders (Dias et al. Reference Dias, Peste, Granadeiro and Palmeirim2008).

Several studies have linked wader population declines with disturbance or loss of high tide roosting sites (Mitchell et al. Reference Mitchell, Moser and Kirby1988, Pfister et al. Reference Pfister, Harrington and Lavine1992, Burton et al. Reference Burton, Evans and Robinson1996). At the Tagus estuary several pieces of evidence also point to the relationship between wader declines and roost degradation. Dramatic changes in the estuarine landscape occurred with the abandonment of salt exploitation in the last 40–50 years, which maintained 221 active saltpans by the end of the 1950s (Silva Reference Silva1958), decreasing to 10 in the 1990s (Brito Reference Brito1994), and that is presently represented by only one working saltpan. The abandonment or conversion of saltpans into aquacultures frequently compromises their suitability for waterbirds, mostly in consequence of the irregularity or excessive water levels in the tanks (e.g. Masero Reference Masero2003), and at the Tagus estuary there are several examples of such a negative impact. Even roosts located within the SPA boundaries, particularly saltpans, are threatened by transformation into aquacultures (all but two roosts, Vale de Frades and Samouco, face this situation). Vasa Sacos saltpans (roost 2), traditionally one of the most important roosts in the Tagus estuary, were abandoned and then recently converted into grass shrimp Palaemonetes varians aquaculture. During this process the number of birds decreased dramatically. Recent management actions, such as the control of water levels in the tanks, resulted in an increase in the number of roosting waders, but those are still far below the numbers recorded prior to the onset of the commercial exploitation. For instance, average numbers of Dunlin between January and March reached 5,000 birds before shrimp exploitation (when the saltpans were abandoned but water levels were managed for birds; Lecoq Reference Lecoq2002) and barely exceeded 2,000 birds in the same period in 2009. A similar situation was recorded at Vale de Frades saltpans that harboured approximately 1,500 wintering Dunlins when water levels were regularly controlled (Lecoq Reference Lecoq2002) and had an average of 230 Dunlins in the absence of any management measure during the winters of 2007–2009. Another roost, Alverca (roost 1), an isolated saltpan complex on the north of the estuary has suffered severe continuous habitat degradation (with dykes and gates that allow water control destroyed and uncontrolled growth of invasive vegetation following saltpan abandonment) and was partly converted into a sewage treatment station. Despite its strategic location, and of being classified as an Important Bird Area for harbouring important numbers of wintering Avocets (BirdLife International 2009), this roost presently has virtually no waders.

Different factors are potentially threatening other roosts. Some roosting sites in the southern part of the estuary (Corroios, Seixal, Alhos Vedros) that sustain large numbers of waders are in close proximity to major urban centres, and yet lack formal legal protection. The proximity to urban centres implies episodic disturbance due to human presence (e.g. shellfishers, leisure activities) degrading the stable and quiet conditions required by waders for roosting.

The loss of high tide roosts may render important intertidal areas inaccessible to birds, and thus high quality areas may become too far away to be profitability exploited (Dias et al. Reference Dias, Granadeiro, Lecoq, Santos and Palmeirim2006; van Gils et al. Reference van Gils, Spaans, Dekinga and Piersma2006). In fact, previous studies have shown that the location of high tide roosts influences the use of tidal flats by Dunlins in the Tagus estuary (Dias et al. Reference Dias, Granadeiro, Lecoq, Santos and Palmeirim2006), as birds need to minimise flight costs and predation risk in routine movements (Rehfisch et al. Reference Rehfisch, Clark, Langston and Greenwood1996, Rogers et al. Reference Rogers, Piersma and Hassel2006). Dias et al. (Reference Dias, Granadeiro, Lecoq, Santos and Palmeirim2006) showed that fewer than 20% of Dunlins forage more than 5 km away from their roosts, and concluded that the lack of roosts might explain the underuse of north-west intertidal areas of the Tagus estuary.

Variability in roost use requires a network of high quality roosting sites

Roost fidelity and roost preferences are thought to be variable among waders (Rehfisch et al. Reference Rehfisch, Insley and Swann2003, Conklin et al. Reference Conklin, Colwell and Fox-Fernandez2008). In the Tagus estuary, the suitability of roosts for waders is likely to vary with time, as indicated by changes in the relative importance of individual roosts across seasons. Accordingly, previous studies have shown large variations in patterns of roost-use by waders, somehow unrelated to roost quality. In California, less-used roosts by Dunlins were not the ones with lower quality (assessed as a measure of distance to foraging areas and predation risk) nor were used only when preferred roosts were unavailable, suggesting that roost site selection is a rather complex and state-dependent process (Conklin et al. Reference Conklin, Colwell and Fox-Fernandez2008). This reinforces the idea that it is crucial to maintain a network of high quality roosts within the same wetland to ensure the conservation of a large and diverse wader community. Nonetheless, the loss of a particular roost can have severe negative consequences for species showing strong roost fidelity (Rehfisch et al. Reference Rehfisch, Insley and Swann2003) or for the whole wader community during specific periods of their life-cycle. During the spring migration, c.80% of all the waders in the Tagus estuary concentrate at the Samouco saltpans. This highlights the importance of the Samouco roost in the Tagus estuary and the vulnerability of migrant waders to the loss of one particular roost.

The maintenance of a network of high quality roosts at the Tagus estuary depends on the implementation of a wide range of management measures. At saltpans, the control of water level, the maintenance of exposed margins and the control of invasive vegetation in the tanks and tank walls of saltpans has been shown to be particularly important (Dias Reference Dias2009). At the southern estuary, most high tide roosts located in saltmarshes are threatened by the expansion of urban areas and crescent human disturbance. The classification of these sites as a Special Protection Area would be the first and most important step for their conservation. Artificial roosts have been successfully implemented to mitigate the loss of natural refuges (Furness Reference Furness1973, Burton et al. Reference Burton, Evans and Robinson1996) and could potentially provide an alternative to actual roosting sites in the Tagus estuary. Strategically located artificial refuges could even increase the carrying capacity of the estuary by allowing waders to exploit tidal areas that are currently too far from any high-tide roost (Dias et al. Reference Dias, Granadeiro, Lecoq, Santos and Palmeirim2006).

Conclusions

This study (1) provides evidence of declining trends for some of the most abundant wader species in the Tagus estuary (some of them showing stable or increasing trends in other large estuaries in Portugal), (2) highlights the role of this wetland as a stopover area for waders using the East Atlantic Flyway, (3) presents evidence of seasonal variation in roost use by waders, emphasising the need for a network of good quality roost sites, which are at present highly threatened by human activities and (4) identifies the degradation of roost quality as a likely cause for wader declines. The established monitoring programme will be crucial to update the persistence of population trends. Concurrently, roost quality parameters should be established, involving quantitative indicators, and their evolution should also be monitored. In this process, all efforts should be conducted to identify the specific threats that wader populations are facing (particularly during the migratory period), and to provide evidence-based data for a concerted conservation strategy.

Supplementary Material

The online supplementary materials for this article can be found at journals.cambridge.org/bci

Acknowledgements

We are particularly grateful to all the volunteers that helped with roost counts since 2007, namely Catarina Miranda, João Jara and Mafalda Figueiredo. We would also like to acknowledge all the land-owners/renters who gave us permission to access private wader roosting sites in the Tagus estuary, in particularly to Sr. Eduardo Guedes, Sr. Almiro Sousa, Sr. José Almeida, Fundação das Salinas do Samouco, and also to the Natural Reserve of the Tagus Estuary (RNET). Rafael Matias kindly provided some of his drawings (Dunlin, Grey Plover and Avocet) to be included in Appendix S1. We thank two referees for valuable comments on the manuscript. Since October 2008, this study has been partly supported by Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (FCT) through the Project “MigraTagis” (PTDC/MAR/66319/2006). TC and MPD beneficiated of post-doctoral grants from FCT (SFRH/BPD/46967/2008 and 46827/2008, respectively).

References

Alves, J. A. (2009) Implications of migration strategies and winter location in a migratory shorebird. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.Google Scholar
Atkinson, P. W., Austin, G. E., Rehfisch, M. M., Baker, H., Cranswick, P., Kershaw, M., Robinson, J., Langston, R.H.W., Stroud, D. A., Van Turnhout, C. and Maclean, I.M.D. (2006) Identifying declines in waterbirds: The effects of missing data, population variability and count period on the interpretation of long-term survey data. Biol. Conserv. 130: 549–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BirdLife International (2009) Important Bird Area Factsheet: Salinas de Alverca e Forte Casa, Portugal. Downlowded from Data Zone at http://www.birdlife.org.Google Scholar
Brito, B. G. P (1994) A Aquacultura no Estuário do Tejo: caracterização preliminar. Seminário sobre Recursos Haliêuticos, Ambiente, Aquacultura e Qualidade do Pescado da Península de Setúbal. Setúbal, Portugal: IPIMAR.Google Scholar
Burton, N. H. K., Evans, P. R. and Robinson, M. A. (1996) Effect on shorebird numbers of disturbance, the loss of a roost site and its replacement by an artificial island at Hartlepool, Cleveland. Biol. Conserv. 77: 193–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conklin, J. R., Colwell, M. A. and Fox-Fernandez, N. W. (2008) High variation in roost use by Dunlin wintering in California: implications for habitat limitation. Bird Conserv. Int. 18: 275–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa, L. T. and Rufino, R. (1994) Contagens de aves aquáticas em Portugal. Janeiro de 1994. Airo 5: 8–16.Google Scholar
Costa, L. T. and Rufino, R. (1997) Contagens de aves aquáticas em Portugal. Janeiro de 1997. Airo 8: 25–32.Google Scholar
Davidson, N. C. and Rothwell, P. I. (1993) Disturbance to waterfowl on estuaries. Wader Study Group Bull. Special Issue 68: 3–5.Google Scholar
Delany, S., Scott, D., Dodman, T. and Stroud, D., eds. (2009) An atlas of wader populations in Africa and western Eurasia. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Wetlands International and International Wader Study Group.Google Scholar
Dias, M. P. (2009) Use of salt ponds by wintering shorebirds throughout the tidal cycle. Waterbirds 32: 531–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dias, M. P., Granadeiro, J. P., Lecoq, M., Santos, C. D. and Palmeirim, J. M. (2006) Distance to high-tide roosts constrains the use of foraging areas by dunlins: implications for the management of estuarine areas. Biol. Conserv. 131: 446–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dias, M. P., Peste, F., Granadeiro, J. P. and Palmeirim, J. M. (2008) Does traditional shellfishing affect foraging by waders? The case of the Tagus estuary (Portugal). Acta Oecol. 33: 188–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durell, S. E. A. le V. dit, Stillman, R. A., Triplet, P., Aulert, C., Biot, D. O. dit, Bouchet, A., Duhamel, S., and Goss-Custard, J. D. (2005) Modelling the efficacy of proposed mitigation areas for shorebirds: a case study on the Seine Estuary, France. Biol. Conserv. 123: 67–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durell, S. E. A. le V. dit, Stillman, R., Caldow, R. W. G., McGrorty, S., West, A. D. and Humphreys, J. (2006) Modelling the effect of environmental change on shorebirds: a case study on Poole Harbour, UK. Biol. Conserv. 131: 459–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frederiksen, M., Fox, A. D., Madsen, J. and Colhoun, K. (2001) Estimating the total number of birds using a staging site. J. Wildl. Manage. 62: 282–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furness, R. W. (1973) Roost selection in waders. Scott. Birds 7: 281–287.Google Scholar
Galbraith, H., Jones, R., Park, R., Clough, J., Herrod-Julius, S., Harrington, B. and Page, G. (2005) Global climate change and sea level rise: potential losses of intertidal habitat for shorebirds. Washington DC: USDA Forest Service General Technical Report. Pp. 1119–1122.Google Scholar
Gillings, S., Atkinson, P. W., Baker, A. J., Bennett, K. A., Clark, N. A., Cole, K. B., González, P., Kalasz, K. S., Minton, C. D. T., Niles, L. J., Porter, R. C., Serrano, I. L., Sitters, H. P. and Woods, J. L. (2009) Staging behaviour in Red Knot (Calidris canutus) in Delaware Bay: implications for monitoring mass and population size. The Auk 126: 54–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goss-Custard, J. D. and Yates, M. G. (1992) Towards predicting the effect of salt-marsh reclamation on feeding bird numbers on the Wash. J. Appl. Ecol. 29: 330–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammer, Ø., Harper, D. A. T. and Ryan, P. D. (2001) PAST: Paleontological Statistics Software Package for Education and Data Analysis. Paleontologia Electronica 4: 1–9.Google Scholar
International Wader Study Group (2003) Waders are declining worldwide. Conclusions from the 2003 International Wader Study Group Conference, Cádiz, Spain. Wader Study Group Bull. 101/102: 8–12.Google Scholar
Lecoq, M. (2002) Influência da Localização do Refúgio de Preia-mar na Selecção das Áreas de Alimentação Entre-marés pelo Pilrito-comum Calidris alpina. Umpublished First Degree Thesis, Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal.Google Scholar
Lopes, R. J., Múrias, T., Cabral, J. A. and Marques, J. C. (2005) A ten year study of variation, trends and seasonality of a shorebird community in the Mondego estuary, Portugal. Waterbirds 28: 8–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lourenço, P. M., Kentie, R., Schroeder, S., Alves, J. A., Groen, N., Hooijmeijer, J. C. E. W. and Piersma, T. (2010) Phenology, stop-over dynamics and population size of migrating Black-tailed Godwits Limosa limosa limosa at a key staging area, the Tejo and Sado rice plantations. Ardea 98: 35–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masero, J. A. (2003) Assessing alternative anthropogenic habitats for conserving waterbirds: salinas as buffers against the impact of natural habitat loss for shorebirds. Biodivers. Conserv. 12: 1157–1173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masero, J. A., Pérez-Hurtado, A., Castro, M. and Arroyo, G. M. (2000) Complementary use of intertidal mudflats and adjacent salinas by foraging waders. Ardea 88: 177–191.Google Scholar
Masero, J. A., Santiago-Quesada, F., Sánchez-Gusmán, J. M., Villegas, A., Abad-Gómez, J. M., Lopes, R. J., Encarnação, V., Corbacho, C. and Morán, R. (2011) Long lengths of stay, large numbers, and trends of the Black-tailed Godwit Limosa limosa in rice fields during spring migration. Bird Conserv. Internat.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, J. R., Moser, M. E. and Kirby, J. S. (1988) Declines in midwinter counts of waders roosting on the Dee estuary. Bird Study 35: 19 l-198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moreira, F. (1995) A utilização das zonas entre-marés do Estuário do Tejo por aves aquáticas e suas implicações para os fluxos de energia na teia trófica estuarina. PhD Thesis. University of Lisbon, Lisbon.Google Scholar
Moreira, F. (1997) The importance of shorebirds to energy fluxes in a food web of a south European estuary. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 44: 67–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pannekoek, J. and van Strien, A.. (2001) TRIM (Trends and Indices for Monitoring Data). Vooburg: Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek (CBS). (Research paper no. 1020).Google Scholar
Peters, K. A. and Otis, D. L. (2007) Shorebird roost-site selection at two temporal scales: is human disturbance a factor? J. Appl. Ecol. 44: 196–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfister, C., Harrington, B. A and Lavine, M. (1992) The impact of human disturbance on shorebirds at a migration staging area. Biol. Conserv. 60: 115–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Development Core Team (2007) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org.Google ScholarPubMed
Rehfisch, M. M., Clark, N. A., Langston, R. H. W. and Greenwood, J. J. D. (1996) A guide to the provision of refuges for waders: an analysis of 30 years of ringing data from the Wash, England. J. Appl. Ecol. 33: 673–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rehfisch, M. M., Insley, H. and Swann, B. (2003) Fidelity of overwintering shorebirds to roosts on the Moray Basin, Scotland: implications for predicting impacts of habitat loss. Ardea 91: 53–70.Google Scholar
Rehfisch, M. M., Austin, G. E., Freeman, S. N., Armitage, M. J. S. and Burton, N. H. K. (2004) The possible impact of climate change on the future distributions and numbers of waders on Britain’s non-estuarine coast. Ibis 146: 70–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, D. I. (2003) High-tide roost choice by coastal waders. Wader Study Group Bull. 100: 73–79.Google Scholar
Rogers, D. I., Piersma, T. and Hassel, C. J. (2006) Roost availability may constrain shorebird distribution: exploring the energetic costs of roosting and disturbance around a tropical bay. Biol. Conserv. 133: 225–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosa, S., Encarnação, A. L., Granadeiro, J. P. and Palmeirim, J. M. (2006) High-tide roost selection by waders: maximizing feeding opportunities or avoiding predation? Ibis 148: 88–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rufino, R. (1979) Limícolas em Portugal. Lisboa, Portugal: Secretaria de Estado do Ambiente, CEMPA.Google Scholar
Rufino, R. (1982) Contagens de aves aquáticas. Janeiro 1982. Lisboa, Portugal: CEMPA, SNPRCNGoogle Scholar
Schaub, M., Pradel, R., Jenni, L. and Lebreton, J. D. (2001) Migrating animals stop over longer than usually thought: an improved capture–recapture analysis. Ecology 82: 852–859.Google Scholar
Silva, J. F. (1958) Inquérito à Indústria do Sal. Salgado do Tejo, VII Volume. Lisboa, Portugal: Editor Comissão Reguladora dos Perodutos Químicos e Farmacêuticos.Google Scholar
Soldaat, L., Visser, H., van Roomen, M. and van Strien, A. (2007) Smoothing and trend detection in waterbird monitoring data using structural time-series analysis and the Kalman filter. J. Ornithol. 148: S351–S357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van de Kam, J., Ens, B., Piersma, T. and Zwarts, L. (2004) Shorebirds: an illustrated behavioural ecology. Utrecht, The Netherlands: KNNV Publishers.Google Scholar
van Gils, J. A., Spaans, B., Dekinga, A. and Piersma, T. (2006) Foraging in a tidally structured environment by red knots (Calidris canutus): ideal, but not free. Ecology 87: 1189–1202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Visser, H. (2004) Estimation and detection of flexible trends. Atmos. Environ. 38: 4135–4145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkinson, A. R., Gill, J. A. and Hulme, M. (2004) Flying in the face of climate change: a review of climate change, past, present and future. Ibis 146 S1: 4–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. Map of the study area with the location of monitored roosts and the boundaries of the Special Protection Area for Birds (SPA) and the Tagus Estuary Nature Reserve (RNET).

Figure 1

Table 1. Characteristics and legal protection status of high-tide roosts at the Tagus estuary. RNET = Tagus Estuary Nature Reserve, SPA = Special Protection Area for Birds; na = not applicable.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Abundance of the five most important wader species at the Tagus estuary between 1975 and 2006 (from January counts). Overall trends are represented by a solid line (smoothed population numbers estimated by TrendSpotter) and the grey shaded area represents 95% confidence intervals. Significant declines were recorded for Dunlin, Grey Plover and Redshank (see text).

Figure 3

Table 2. Population trends of Dunlin, Grey Plover, Black-tailed Godwit, Avocet and Redshank at the study area (Tagus estuary) and at three other important Portuguese wetlands (Ria Aveiro, Sado estuary and Ria Formosa). Declines are shadowed in grey. Trend legend: ↑↑ strong increase, moderate increase, ↔ stable, moderate decline, ↓↓ steep decline, ? uncertain.

Figure 4

Table 3. Population alerts triggered for Dunlin, Grey Plover, Black-tailed Godwit and Redshank at the Tagus estuary and Ria Aveiro during different time periods. No alerts were generated for Avocet or for any species at Sado estuary and Ria Formosa. Moderate and strong alerts correspond to > 25% and > 50% declines, respectively.

Figure 5

Figure 3. Abundance of the five most important wader species at three major Portuguese wetlands, Sado estuary, Ria Formosa and Ria de Aveiro, between 1975 and 2010 (from January counts). Overall trends are represented by a solid line (smoothed population numbers estimated by TrendSpotter) and the grey shaded area represents 95% confidence intervals. Significant declines over the entire time-series were recorded for Black-tailed Godwit, Avocet and Redshank at Ria de Aveiro (see text).

Figure 6

Figure 4. Seasonal abundance of waders in the Tagus estuary in 2007, 2008 and 2009, assessed by roost counts.

Figure 7

Table 4. Seasonal importance (% of birds) of the monitored roosts for waders at the Tagus estuary (2007–2009).

Figure 8

Table 5. Proportion of waders using roosts outside the Special Protection Area for Birds (SPA). Total numbers of birds in each season are presented in brackets.

Supplementary material: PDF

Catry Supplementary Material

Supplementary Material.pdf

Download Catry Supplementary Material(PDF)
PDF 131 KB
You have Access
32
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Long-term declines of wader populations at the Tagus estuary, Portugal: a response to global or local factors?
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Long-term declines of wader populations at the Tagus estuary, Portugal: a response to global or local factors?
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Long-term declines of wader populations at the Tagus estuary, Portugal: a response to global or local factors?
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *