Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-qc88w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-08T06:50:29.382Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Review of trial reintroductions of the long-lived, cooperative breeding Southern Ground-hornbill

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 April 2020

LUCY V. KEMP Open the ORCID record for LUCY V. KEMP [Opens in a new window] ,
ANTOINETTE KOTZE ,
RAYMOND JANSEN ,
DESIRÉ L. DALTON ,
PAUL GROBLER  and
ROB M. LITTLE
LUCY V. KEMP*
Affiliation:
Department of Genetics, University of the Free State, P.O. Box 339, Bloemfontein 9300, South Africa. Mabula Ground-Hornbill Project, P.O. Box 876, Bela Bela 0480, South Africa. National Zoological Garden, South African National Biodiversity Institute, P.O. Box 754, Pretoria 0001, South Africa.
ANTOINETTE KOTZE
Affiliation:
Department of Genetics, University of the Free State, P.O. Box 339, Bloemfontein 9300, South Africa. National Zoological Garden, South African National Biodiversity Institute, P.O. Box 754, Pretoria 0001, South Africa.
RAYMOND JANSEN
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental, Water and Earth Sciences, Tshwane University of Technology, Private Bag X680, Pretoria 0001, South Africa.
DESIRÉ L. DALTON
Affiliation:
Department of Genetics, University of the Free State, P.O. Box 339, Bloemfontein 9300, South Africa. National Zoological Garden, South African National Biodiversity Institute, P.O. Box 754, Pretoria 0001, South Africa.
PAUL GROBLER
Affiliation:
Department of Genetics, University of the Free State, P.O. Box 339, Bloemfontein 9300, South Africa.
ROB M. LITTLE
Affiliation:
FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology, DST-NRF Centre of Excellence, University of Cape Town, Private Bag X3, Rondebosch 7701, South Africa.
*
*Author for correspondence; email: project@ground-hornbill.org.za
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Reintroduction to, or reinforcement of, threatened wild populations are commonly used conservation strategies. Reintroductions of the Southern Ground-hornbill Bucorvus leadbeateri have been tested as a potential conservation tool for this vulnerable species since 1995. Forty-two individuals have been reintroduced under varying management strategies. We analysed the outcomes of these attempts to assess which factors contributed most to success or failure. The species exhibits complex social learning and hierarchy, and is long-lived, with delayed sexual maturity. Immediate survival was significantly affected by the season in which the release was done and by the quality of the released birds. The best-quality release birds were reared with wild behavioural characteristics and were well-socialised to captive conspecifics prior to being placed into managed groups (‘bush schools’), where social learning was led by an experienced, wild alpha male. Once reintroduced birds had survived their first year after release, continued wild experience and wild mentorship significantly affected their survival. Since sample sizes limited the rigour of some statistical analyses, other factors were considered that may also determine success. These quasi-experimental reintroductions revealed novel threats to the species, such as the importance of a nest to group cohesion, that harvested second-hatched chicks provide viable release birds, which essentially doubles wild productivity, and that reintroductions generate valuable civil society awareness of the plight of the species.

Keywords

Bucorvus leadbeateribush-schoolsmentorreintroductionSouthern Ground-hornbill

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Bird Conservation International , Volume 30 , Issue 4 , December 2020 , pp. 533 - 558
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of BirdLife International

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abolnik, C., Gerdes, G. H., Kitching, J., Swanepoel, S., Romito, M. and Bisschop, S. P. R. (2008) Characterization of pigeon paramyxoviruses (Newcastle disease virus) isolated in South Africa from 2001 to 2006. The Onderstepoort J. Veterin. Res. 75: 147–152.Google ScholarPubMed
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B. M. and Walker, S. C. (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J. Statist. Softw. 67: 1–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartel, R. A. and Rabon, D. R. Jr. (2014) Re-introduction and recovery of the red wolf in the southeastern USA. In Soorae, P., ed. Global Re-introduction Perspectives : 2013 Further case studies from around the globe. Gland, Switzerland: SSC Re-introduction Specialist Group and Abu Dhabi, UAE: Environment Agency-Abu Dhabi.Google Scholar
Black, J. M. (1991) Reintroduction and restocking: guidelines for bird recovery programmes. Bird Conserv. Internatn. 1: 329–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolker, B. M., Brooks, M. E., Clark, C. J., Geange, S. W., Poulsen, J. R., Stevens, M. H. H. and White, J. S. S. (2009) Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24: 127–135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boycott, R. and Parker, V. (2003) Birds of the Malolotja Nature Reserve, Swaziland. Pp. 38–39 in Bright Continent Guide Vol. 3. Cape Town, South Africa: Avian Demography Unit.Google Scholar
Brauning, Daniel, W., Barber, P. and McMorris, F.A. (2013) Management and biology of the Peregrine Falcon (Falco peregrinus) in Pennsylvania. Harrisburg, Pennsylvania: WHO.Google Scholar
Carstens, K. F., Kassanjee, R., Little, R. M., Ryan, P. G. and Hockey, P. A. R. (2019a) Breeding success and population growth of Southern Ground Hornbills Bucorvus leadbeateri in an area supplemented with nest boxes. Bird Conserv. Internatn. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959270919000108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carstens, K. F., Kassanjee, R., Little, R. M., Ryan, P. G. and Hockey, P. A. R. (2019b) Natal dispersal in the Southern Ground Hornbill Bucorvus leadbeateri. Ostrich 90: 119–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cilliers, D., Evans, S., Coetzee, H. and van Rensburg, L. (2013) Developing a site selection tool to assist reintroduction efforts for the Southern Ground-hornbill Bucorvus leadbeateri. Ostrich 84: 101–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, D. (2008) Re-introduction of the red kite into Co. Wicklow, Ireland. In Soorae, P. S., ed. Global re-introduction perspective: re-introduction case-studies from around the globe. Abu Dhabi, UAE: IUCN/SSC Re-introduction Specialist Group.Google Scholar
Clutton-Brock, T.H. (2006) Cooperative breeding in mammals. Pp. 173–190 in Kappeler, P. M. and van Schaik, C. P., eds. Cooperation in primates and humans: Mechanisms and evolution. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coupe, M. F. (1967) Aggressive behaviour in Wreathed Hornbills at Chester Zoo. Avicult. Mag. 67(170).Google Scholar
Courchamp, F., Grenfell, B. and Clutton-Brock, T. (1999) Population dynamics of obligate cooperators. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 266(1419): 557–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Courchamp, F. and Macdonald, D. W. (2001) Crucial importance of pack size in the African wild dog Lycaon pictus. Anim. Conserv. 4: 169–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickman, C. R., Glen, A. S. and Letnic, M. (2009) Reintroducing the dingo: Can Australia’s conservation wastelands be restored? Pp. 238–269 in Reintroduction of top-order predators. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
du Plessis, M. A. D. U., Erlich, Y., Ross-Gillespie, A. and Rode, S. (2007) The use of artificial nest sites by Southern Ground Hornbills in a private conservation area of South Africa. In Kemp, A. C., ed.The active management of hornbills and their habitats for conservation. Pretoria, South Africa: Naturalists and Nomads.Google Scholar
Ewen, J. G., Armstrong, D. P., Parker, K. A. and Seddon, P. J., eds. (2012a) Reintroduction biology. Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewen, J. G., Armstrong, D. P., Parker, K. A. and Seddon, P. J., eds. (2012b) Reintroduction biology: integrating science and management. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewen, J. G., Soorae, P. S. and Canessa, S. (2014) Reintroduction objectives, decisions and outcomes: global perspectives from the herpetofauna. Anim. Conserv. 17(S1): 74–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graf, J. A., Gusset, M., Reid, C., Jansen van Rensburg, S., Slotow, R. and Somers, M. J. (2006) Evolutionary ecology meets wildlife management : artificial group augmentation in the re-introduction of endangered African wild dogs (Lycaon pictus). Anim. Conserv. 9: 398–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gusset, M. (2009) A framework for evaluating reintroduction success in carnivores: lessons from African wild dogs. Pp. 307–320 in Reintroduction of top-order predators. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayward, M. W. and Somers, M. J. (2009) Reintroduction of top-order predators: using science to restore one of the drivers of biodiversity. Pp. 1–9 in Reintroduction of top-order predators. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinrich, W. R. (2008) Re-introduction of the Aplomado falcon into Texas and New Mexico, USA. In Soorae, P. S., ed. Global re-introduction perspective: re-introduction case-studies from around the globe. Abu Dhabi, UAE: IUCN/SSC Re-introduction Specialist Group.Google Scholar
Heinsohn, R.G. (1991) Kidnapping and reciprocity in cooperatively breeding white-winged choughs. Anim. Behav. 41: 1097–1100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IUCN (2012) IUCN guidelines for reintroductions and other conservation translocations. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.Google Scholar
Jones, C. G. and Merton, D. V. (2012) A tale of two islands: The rescue and recovery of endemic birds in New Zealand and Mauritius. Pp. 33–72 in Reintroduction biology: integrating science and management. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, C. G., Heck, W., Lewis, R. E., Mungroo, Y., Slade, G. and Cade, T. (2008) The restoration of the Mauritius Kestrel Falco punctatus population. Ibis 137(s1): S173–S180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, M., ed. (2011) Southern Ground Hornbill (Bucorvus leadbeateri) Species Recovery Plan for South Africa.Google Scholar
Jule, K. R., Leaver, L. A. and Lea, S. E. G. (2008) The effects of captive experience in reintroduction survival in carnivores: a review and analysis. Biol. Conserv. 141: 355–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemp, A. C. (1988) The behavioural ecology of the Southern Ground Hornbill: are competitive offspring at a premium? Pp. 267–269 in Proceedings of International 100th Deutscheornitologen-Gesselschaft Meeting. Bonn: Current topics in avian biology.Google Scholar
Kemp, A. C. (1995a) Southern Ground Hornbill Bucorvus leadbeateri. Pp. 94–99 in Bird families of the world: The hornbills Bucerotiformes. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kemp, A. C. (1995b) Walking with ground hornbills - a dream come true. Birds Africa 10–15.Google Scholar
Kemp, A. C. and Begg, K. S. (1996) Nest sites of the Southern Ground Hornbill Bucorvus leadbeateri in the Kruger National Park, South Africa, and conservation implications. Ostrich 67: 9–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemp, A. C. and Kemp, M. I. (1980) The biology of the Southern Gound-Hornbill Bucorvus leadbeateri (Vigors) (Aves: Bucerotidae). Ann. Transvaal Mus. 32(February): 65–100.Google Scholar
Kemp, A. C. and Kemp, M. I. (2007) What proportion of Southern Ground Hornbill nesting attempts fledge more than one chick? Data from the Kruger National Park. Pp. 267–286 in Kemp, A. C. and Kemp, M. I., eds. Proceedings of the 4th International Hornbill Conference: The active management of hornbills and their habitats for conservation. Pretoria, South Africa: Naturalists and Nomads.Google Scholar
Kemp, A. C., Joubert, S. C. J. and Kemp, M. I. (1989) Distribution of southern ground hornbills in the Kruger National Park in relation to some environmental factors. South African J. Wildl. Res. 19: 93–98.Google Scholar
Kemp, A. C., Kemp, M. I. and Turner, A. (2007) What has become of eggs and chicks of Southern Ground Hornbills harvested from the Kruger National Park? Pp. 288–297 in Kemp, A. C. and Kemp, M. I., eds. Proceedings of the 4th International Hornbill Conference: The active management of hornbills and their habitats for conservation. Pretoria, South Africa: Naturalists and Nomads.Google Scholar
Kemp, L. and Verdoorn, G. (2013) Poisons and ground-hornbills: a report on the extent of the threat and conservation actions required. Bela Bela, South Africa.Google Scholar
Kleiman, D. V. (1989) Reintroduction of captive mammals for conservation: guidelines for reintroducing captive endangered species into the wild. Bioscience 39: 152–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, G. M. (1990) A preliminary investigation into the status, distribution and some aspects of the foraging ecology of the Southern Ground-hornbill (Bucorvus cafer) in Natal. MSc thesis. The University of Natal.Google Scholar
Koeppel, K. N. and Kemp, L. V. (2015) Lead toxicosis in Southern Ground-hornbills Bucorvus leadbeateri: a case from South Africa. J. Avian Med. Surgery 24: 340–344.Google Scholar
Koeppel, K. N. and Kemp, L. V. (2019) Immuno-efficacy of a Newcastle Disease Virus vaccine for use in Endangered Southern Ground-Hornbill Bucorvus leadbeateri. J. Avian Med. and Surgery.Google Scholar
Kokko, H. and Johnstone, R. A. (2001) The evolution of cooperative breeding through group augmentation. Proc. Royal Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 268: 187–196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loftie-Eaton, M. (2014) Geographic range dynamics of South Africa’s bird species. PhD thesis. The University of Cape Town.Google Scholar
Meretsky, V., Snyder, N. F. R., Beissinger, S. R., Clendenen, D. A. and Wiley, J. W. (2001) Quantity versus quality in California Condor reintroduction : Reply to Beres and Starfield. Conserv. Biol. 15: 1449–1451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morandini, V. and Ferrer, M. (2014) Sibling aggression and brood reduction: a review. Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 27: 1–15.Google Scholar
Morandini, V. and Ferrer, M. (2017) How to plan reintroductions of long-lived birds. PLOS One 12(4): e0174186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morrison, K., Daly, B., Burden, D., Engelbrecht, D., Jordan, M., Kemp, A., Kemp, M., Potgieter, C., et al. (2005) PHVA Southern Ground Hornbill (Bucorvus leadbeateri) Population and Habitat Viability Assessment workshop report. Johannesburg, South Africa.Google Scholar
Morrison, K., Daly, B., Burden, D., Engelbrecht, D., Kemp, A., Kemp, M., Potgieter, C. and Turner, A. (2007) A conservation plan for the Southern Ground Hornbill Bucorvus leadbeateri in South Africa. Pp. 3–12 in Kemp, A. C. and Kemp, M. I., eds. Proceedings of the 4th International Hornbill Conference: The active management of Hornbills and their habitats for conservation. Pretoria, South Africa: Naturalists and Nomads.Google Scholar
Ogada, D. and Buij, R. (2011) Large declines of the Hooded Vulture Necrosyrtes monachus across its African range. Ostrich 82: 101–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortiz-Catedral, L., Adams, L., Hauber, M. E. and Brunton, D. H. (2010) Conservation translocations of red-fronted parakeet on Matiu/ Somes Island and Motuihe Island, New Zealand. In Soorae, P. S., ed. Global re-introduction perspectives: 2010 Additional case-studies from around the globe. Abu Dhabi, UAE: IUCN/ SSC Re-introduction Specialist Group.Google Scholar
Piper, S. (2005) Supplementary feeding programmes: How necessary are they for the maintenance of numerous and healthy vultures populations? Pp. 41–50 in Houston, D. C. and Piper, S. E., eds. Proceedings of the International Conference on Conservation and Management of Vulture Populations. Thessaloniki, Greece: Natural History Museum of Crete and WWF Greece.Google Scholar
Rapaport, L. G., Kloc, B., Warneke, M., Mickelberg, J. L. and Ballou, J. D. (2013) Do mothers prefer helpers? Birth sex-ratio adjustment in captive callitrichines. Anim. Behav. 85: 1295–1302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reading, R. P., Miller, B. and Shepherdson, D. (2013) The value of enrichment to reintroduction success. Zoo Biol. 32: 332–341.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ripple, W. J. and Beschta, R. L. (2007) Restoring Yellowstone’s aspen with wolves. Biol. Conserv. 138: 514–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudolf, D. G., Conner, R. N., Carrie, D. K. and Schaefer, R. R. (1992) Experimental reintroduction of Red-cockaded Woodpeckers. The Auk 109: 914–916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santema, P., Taborsky, M., Kingma, S. A., Santema, P., Taborsky, M. and Komdeur, J. (2014) Group augmentation and the evolution of cooperation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 29: 476–484.Google Scholar
Sarrazin, F. and Barbault, R. (1996) Reintroduction: challenges and lessons for basic ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 5347: 474–478.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seddon, P. J., Sarrazin, F., Barbault, B., Beck, B. B., Griffith, B., Wolf, C.M., May, R. M. and Gorman, M. (1999) Persistence without intervention: assessing success in wildlife reintroductions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 14: 503.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seddon, P. J., Armstrong, D. P. and Maloney, R. F. (2007) Developing the science of reintroduction biology. Conserv. Biol. 21: 303–312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simmons, R. E., Brown, C. J. and Kemper, J. (2015) Southern Ground Hornbill. Pp. 38–39 in Birds to watch in Namibia: red, rare and endemic species. Windhoek, Namibia: Ministry of Environment and Tourism, Namibia Nature Foundation.Google Scholar
Spear, D. (2005) Dealing with socially complex species in population viability analysis: a case study of the cooperatively-breeding Southern Ground Hornbill, Bucorvus leadbeateri. The University of Cape Town.Google Scholar
Sutherland, W. J., Armstrong, D., Butchart, S. H. M., Earnhardt, J. M., Ewen, J., Jamieson, I., Jones, C. G., Lee, R., et al. (2010) Standards for documenting and monitoring bird reintroduction projects. Conserv. Lett. 3: 229–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, M. R. and Kemp, L. V. (2015) Southern Ground-hornbill. In Taylor, M. R., ed. The Eskom Red Data Book of birds of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. Johannesburg, South Africa: BirdLife South Africa.Google Scholar
Taylor, G., Canessa, S., Clarke, R. H., Ingwersen, D., Armstrong, D. P., Seddon, P. J. and Ewen, J. G. (2017) Is reintroduction biology an effective applied science ? Trends Ecol. Evol. 32: 873–880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theron, N. and Turner, A. (2008) Ten years on: a re-introduction of southern ground hornbill on Mabula Private Game Reserve in the Limpopo Province of South Africa. Pp. 104–107 in Soorae, P. S., ed. Global re-introduction perspectives: re-introduction case-studies from around the globe. Abu Dhabi, UAE: IUCN/SSC Reintroduction Specialist Group.Google Scholar
Theron, N., Jansen, R., Grobler, P. and Kotze, A. (2013a) The home range of a recently established group of Southern Ground-hornbill (Bucorvus leadbeateri) in the Limpopo Valley, South Africa. Koedoe 55: 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theron, N., Dalton, D., Grobler, J. P., Jansen, R. and Kotze, A. (2013b) Molecular insights on the re-colonization of the Limpopo Valley, South Africa, by Southern Ground-hornbills. J. Ornithol. 154: 727–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornton, A. and Raihani, N. (2010) Identifying teaching in wild animals. Learning and Behaviour 38: 297–309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turner, A. (2005) A history of the Ground Hornbill research and conservation project, based at Mabula Game Reserve: 1999-2005. Pp. 75–85 in PHVA Briefing Document. Cape Town: University of Cape Town.Google Scholar
Walters, J. R., Derrickson, S. R., Fry, D. M., Haig, S. M., John, M. and Wunderle, J. M. (2008) Status of the California Condor and efforts to achieve its recovery. (August). American Ornithologists Union. The American Ornithologists’ Union and Audubon California. (www.fws.gov › CalCondor › PDF_files › AOU-Audubon2008-Report)Google Scholar
Williams, D. R., Pople, R. G., Showler, D. A., Dicks, L. V., Child, M. F., Ermgassen, E. K. H. J. and Sutherland, W. J. (2013) Bird conservation: Global evidence for the effects of interventions. Volume 2. Exeter, UK: Pelagic Publishing.Google Scholar
Williams, V. L., Cunningham, A. B., Kemp, A. C. and Bruyns, R. K. (2014) Risks to birds traded for African traditional medicine: A quantitative assessment. PLoS ONE 9(8): e105397.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, G. and Hockey, P. A. R. (2013) Causes of variable reproductive performance by Southern Ground-hornbill Bucorvus leadbeateri and implications for management. Ibis 155: 476–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wynhoff, I. (1998) Lessons from the reintroduction of Maculinea teleius and M. nausithous in the Netherlands. J. Insect Conserv. 2: 47–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zoghby, B. A., Ryan, P. G., Little, R. M., Reid, T. and Hockey, P. A. R. (2015) Seasonal changes in movement and habitat use by Southern Ground-hornbills in the South African Lowveld. Ostrich 86: 87–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zoghby, B. A., Little, R. M., Ryan, P. G. and Hockey, P. A. R. (2016) Patterns of roost site selection and use by Southern Ground-hornbills in north-eastern South Africa. Ostrich 87: 125–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Kemp et al. supplementary material

Appendix S1-S4

Download Kemp et al. supplementary material(File)
File 26.1 KB