Hostname: page-component-857557d7f7-nk9cn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-20T05:06:58.851Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A co-design approach to examine and develop pathways to open employment for people with acquired brain injury

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2020

Em Bould Open the ORCID record for Em Bould [Opens in a new window]  and
Libby Callaway Open the ORCID record for Libby Callaway [Opens in a new window]
Em Bould*
Affiliation:
Department of Occupational Therapy, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
Libby Callaway
Affiliation:
Rehabilitation, Ageing and Independent Living Research Centre and Department of Occupational Therapy, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
*
*Corresponding author. Email: em.bould@monash.edu
Get access

Abstract

Background and objectives:

People with acquired brain injury (ABI) have traditionally experienced low employment rates, compared with the national average and others with disability in Australia. To positively impact mainstream economic participation following ABI, a co-design approach was used to investigate open employment pathways available and consider necessary pathway features to enable employment for people with ABI.

Method:

A qualitative focus group methodology was used with four groups: people with ABI; health professionals working with this group; employers providing work for people with ABI and social and injury insurers funding employment services. The project was delivered in two phases: (1) review existing work pathways in Australia and gather knowledge about enablers and barriers to employment following ABI and (2) use ABI lived experience, employers’ experience and allied health and social insurer expertise to develop a new pathway to mainstream employment.

Results:

Co-design helped to identify enablers and barriers to employment of people with ABI, as well as practical strategies to facilitate workplace diversity and inclusion. Enablers included replacing interviews with an onsite assessment to meet key staff and trial work tasks, employer education on ABI, the use of compensatory cognitive aides and graded on-the-job support. This guided the development of a new employment pathway, tailored for people with ABI, called ‘Employment CoLab’.

Conclusions:

The Employment CoLab pathway, when coupled with person-centred collaborative and effective social disability insurance approaches, offers opportunities to build inclusive, sustainable and scalable economic participation and mainstream wages for people with ABI.

Keywords

Acquired brain injuryco-designenablers and barrierseconomic participationemployment pathway

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Brain Impairment , Volume 22 , Issue 1 , March 2021 , pp. 50 - 66
Copyright
© Australasian Society for the Study of Brain Impairment 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2018). Disability, Ageing and Carers, Australia: Summary of Findings, cat no. 4330.0. Retrieved from https://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/mf/4430.0.Google Scholar
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2019). People with disability in Australia. Retrieved from https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/disability/people-with-disability-in-australia. Google Scholar
Australian Network on Disability. (2018). Australian Network on Disability Access and Inclusion Index. Retrieved from https://www.and.org.au/news.php/343/from-confusion-to-clarity-and-confidence Google Scholar
Birt, L., Scott, S., Cavers, D., Campbell, C., & Walter, F. (2016). Member checking: A tool to enhance trustworthiness or merely a nod to validation? Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1802–1811.Google Scholar
Bradley, E. H., Curry, L. A., & Devers, K. J. (2007). Qualitative data analysis for health services research: Developing taxonomy, themes, and theory. Health Services Research, 42(4), 1758–1772.Google Scholar
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brasure, M., Lamberty, G. J., Sayer, N. A., Nelson, N. W., Macdonald, R., Ouellette, J., & Wilt, T. J. (2013). Participation after multidisciplinary rehabilitation for moderate to severe traumatic brain injury in adults: A systematic review. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 94, 1398–1420.Google Scholar
Callaway, L., Barclay, L., McDonald, R., Farnworth, L., & Casey, J. (2015). Secondary health conditions experienced by people with spinal cord injury within community living: Implications for a National Disability Insurance Scheme. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 62(4), 246–254. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12206. CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Callaway, L., Enticott, J., Farnworth, L., McDonald, R., Migliorini, C. & Willer, B. (2017). Community integration outcomes of people with spinal cord injury and multiple matched controls: A pilot study. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 64(3): 226–234. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12350. Google Scholar
Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. London, UK: Sage.Google Scholar
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc. doi: 10.4135/9781452230153. Google Scholar
Cullen, N., Chundamala, J., Bayley, M., & Jutai, J. (2007). The efficacy of acquired brain injury rehabilitation. Brain Injury, 21(2), 113–132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dahm, J., & Ponsford, J. (2015). Predictors of global functioning and employment 10 years following traumatic brain injury compared with orthopaedic injury. Brain Injury, 29(13–14), 1539–1546.Google Scholar
Department of Health and Human Services (Victoria). (2018). Disability Employment Strategy 2018–2020. Retrieved from https://dhhs.vic.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/201805/disability-employment-strategy-2018020-1803045.pdf. Google Scholar
Department of Social Services. (2010). National disability strategy 2010–2020. Canberra, Australia: Author. Retrieved from http://www.dss.gov.au/our-responsibilities/disability-and-carers/program-services/government-international/national-disability-strategy.Google Scholar
Donker-Cools, B., Daams, J., Wind, H., & Frings-Dresen, H. (2016). Effective return-to-work interventions after acquired brain injury: A systematic review. Brain Injury, 30(2), 113–131. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2015.1090014. Google Scholar
Fadyl, J. K., & McPherson, K. M. (2009). Approaches to vocational rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury: A review of the evidence. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 24, 195–212.Google Scholar
Gentry, T., Kriner, R. Sima, A., McDonough, J., & Wehman, P. (2015). Reducing the need for personal supports among workers with Autism using an IPod touch as an assistive technology: Delayed randomized control trial. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45, 669–684.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hooson, J. M., Coetzer, R., & Stew, G., & Moore, A. (2013). Patients’ experience of return to work rehabilitation following traumatic brain injury: A phenomenological study. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 23, 19–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Howe, E. I., Andelic, N., Perrin, P. B., Røe, C., Sigurdardottir, S., Arango-Lasprilla, J. C., Lu, J., Løvstad, M., & Forslund, M. V. (2018). Employment probability trajectories up to 10 years after moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury. Frontiers in Neurology, 9, 1051.Google Scholar
Krefting, L. (1991). Rigor in qualitative research: The assessment of trustworthiness. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45(3), 214–222.Google Scholar
Libeson, L., Downing, M., Ross, P., & Ponsford, J. (2020). The experience of return to work in individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI): A qualitative study. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 30(3), 412–429.Google Scholar
Migliorini, C., Enticott, J., Callaway, L., Moore, S., & Willer, B. (2016). Community integration questionnaire: Outcomes of people with traumatic brain injury and high support needs compared with multiple matched controls, Brain Injury, 30(10), 1201–1207. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2016.1175666. Google Scholar
National Disability Insurance Scheme. (2013). National disability insurance scheme act 2013. Canberra, Australia: National Disability Insurance Scheme. Retrieved from http://www.comlaw.gov.au/Details/C2013A00020/Download.Google Scholar
National Disability Insurance Scheme. (2016). Reasonable and necessary supports. Canberra, Australia: National Disability Insurance Scheme. Retrieved from http://www.ndis.gov.au/participants/reasonable-and-necessary-supports.Google Scholar
National Disability Insurance Scheme. (2019). NDIS participant employment strategy 2019–2022. Canberra, Australia: National Disability Insurance Scheme. Retrieved from https://www.ndis.gov.au/about-us/strategies/participant-employment-strategy?utm_source=miragenews&utm_medium=miragenews&utm_campaign=new.Google Scholar
Ntsiea, M., Van Aswegen, H., Lord, S., & Olorunju, S. (2014). The effect of a workplace intervention programme on return to work after stroke: A randomised controlled trial. Clinical Rehabilitation, 29, 663–673.Google Scholar
Piccenna, L., Pattuwage, L., Romero, L., Lewis, V., Gruen, R., & Bragge, P. (2015). Briefing document: Optimising return to work practices following catastrophic injury. Melbourne, Australia: NTRI Forum.Google Scholar
Powell, L., Glang, A., Pinkelman, S., Albin, R., Harwick, R., Ettel, D., & Wild, M. (2015). Systematic instruction of assistive technology for cognition (ATC) in an employment setting following acquired brain injury: A single case, experimental study. NeuroRehabilitation, 37(3), 437–447. doi: 10.3233/NRE-151272. Google Scholar
Steel, E., Buchanan, R., Layton, N., & Wilson, E. (2017). Currency and competence of occupational therapists and consumers with rapidly changing technology. Occupational Therapy International, 1–5. doi: 10.1155/2017/5612843United. Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/disabilities/convention/conventionfull.shtml Google Scholar
van Velzen, J., van Bennekom, C., van Dormolen, M., Sluiter, J., & Frings-Dresen, M. (2011). Factors influencing return to work experienced by people with acquired brain injury: A qualitative research study. Disability and Rehabilitation, 33(23–24), 2237–2246.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waterhouse, P. J., Kimberley, H., Jonas, P., & Glover, J. (2010). What would it take? Employer perspectives on employing people with a disability. Adelaide [South Australia]: National Centre for Vocational Education Research.Google Scholar
Weaver, L. (2015). Effectiveness of work, activities of daily living, education, and sleep interventions for people with autism spectrum disorder: A systematic review. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 69(5), 1–11.Google Scholar
Willer, B., & Corrigan, J. (1994). Whatever it takes: A model for community-based services. Brain Injury, 8(7), 647–659.Google Scholar
Winkler, D., Unsworth, C., & Sloan, S. (2006). Factors that lead to successful community integration following severe traumatic train injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation Issue, 21(1), 8–21.Google Scholar