Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-l69ms Total loading time: 0.508 Render date: 2022-08-17T10:59:13.712Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

‘Are You Local?’ Indigenous Iron Age and Mobile Roman and Post-Roman Populations: Then, Now and In-Between

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 March 2018

Richard Hingley
Affiliation:
Durham Universityrichard.hingley@durham.ac.ukkate.sharpe@durham.ac.uk
Chiara Bonacchi
Affiliation:
UCL Institute of Archaeologyc.bonacchi@ucl.ac.uk
Kate Sharpe
Affiliation:
Durham Universityrichard.hingley@durham.ac.ukkate.sharpe@durham.ac.uk

Abstract

The Iron Age and Roman periods are often defined against each other through the establishment of dualities, such as barbarity–civilisation, or spiritual–rational. Despite criticisms, dualities remain prevalent in the National Curriculum for schools, television, museum displays and academic research. Recent scientific studies on human origins, for example, have communicated the idea of an ‘indigenous’ Iron Age, setting this against a mobile and diverse Roman-period population. There is also evidence for citizens leveraging dualities to uphold different positions on contemporary issues of mobility, in the UK and internationally. This paper discusses values and limitations of such binary thinking, and considers how ideas of ambiguity and temporal distancing can serve to challenge attempts to use such dualities to map the past too directly onto the present, reflecting on recent social media debates about Britain and the European Union.

Type
Articles
Information
Britannia , Volume 49 , November 2018 , pp. 283 - 302
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2018. Published by The Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Dyson et al.1999.

References

Ancient Identities 2017: Ancient Identities Today <http://ancientidentities.org> (Accessed 3/4/2017)+(Accessed+3/4/2017)>Google Scholar
Albarella, U., Johnstone, C., and Vickers, K. 2008: ‘The development of animal husbandry from the late Iron Age to the early Roman period’, Journal of Archaeological Science 35, 1828–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albion - the historical case for Brexit 2017: Albion - The Historical Case for Brexit <https://www.facebook.com/AlbionUK1/photos/a.1711231345806998.1073741828.1710958729167593/1711230045807128/?type=3> (Accessed 20/3/2017)+(Accessed+20/3/2017)>Google Scholar
Appleby, G.A. 2005: ‘Crossing the Rubicon: fact or fiction in Roman re-enactment’, Public Archaeology 4, 257–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ballard, S. 2007: ‘Warriors and weavers: constructing British Iron Age identities in museums’, in Hamilton, S., Whitehouse, R.D. and Wright, J.I. (eds), Archaeology and Women: Ancient and Modern Issues, Walnut Creek, CA, 167–98Google Scholar
BBC 2017: Bitesize, Roman Empire <http://www.bbc.co.uk/education/topics/zwmpfg8> (Accessed 6/1/2017)+(Accessed+6/1/2017)>Google Scholar
Beard, M. 2013: ‘Officers and gentlemen? Roman Britain and the British Empire’, in Swenson, A. and Mandler, P. (eds), From Plunder to Preservation: Britain and the Heritage of Empire c. 1800–1940, Oxford, 4962CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beard, M., and Henderson, J. 1999: ‘Rule(d) Britannia: displaying Roman Britain in the museum’, in Merriman 1999, 44–73Google Scholar
Bendrey, R., Hayes, T., and Palmer, M. 2009: ‘Patterns of Iron Age horse supply: an analysis of strontium isotope ratios in teeth’, Archaeometry 51, 140–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonacchi, C. 2012: Communicating Archaeology: From Trends to Policy. Public Perceptions and Experience, PhD thesis, UCL Institute of ArchaeologyGoogle Scholar
Bonacchi, C. 2013: ‘Audiences and values of archaeology on the small screen’, Public Archaeology 12(2), 117–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonacchi, C. 2014: ‘Understanding the public experience of archaeology in the UK and Italy: a call for a “sociological movement” in Public Archaeology’, European Journal of Post-Classical Archaeologies 4, 377400Google Scholar
Bonacchi, C. 2017: ‘Digital media in Public Archaeology’, in Moshenska, G. (ed.), Key Concepts in Public Archaeology, London, 6072Google Scholar
Bonacchi, C., Altaweel, M., and Krzyzanska, M. in press: ‘The heritages of Brexit: Roles of the past in the construction of political identities through social media’, Journal of Social ArchaeologyGoogle Scholar
Booth, T.J., and Madgwick, R. 2016: ‘New evidence for diverse secondary burial practices in Iron Age Britain’, Journal of Archaeological Science 67, 1424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowman, M. 1998: ‘Belief, legend and perception of the sacred in contemporary Bath,’ Folklore 109, 2531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, M. (ed.) 2010: Classics & Imperialism in the British Empire, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braund, D. 1996: Ruling Roman Britain: Kings, Queens, Governors and Emperors from Julius Caesar to Agricola, LondonGoogle Scholar
Brexit 2017: Brexit https://www.facebook.com/UKexitEU/> (Accessed 20/13/2017)+(Accessed+20/13/2017)>Google Scholar
Caesar, : Gallic War, trans. Edwards, H.J., London (1917; reprinted 1986)Google Scholar
Cahill Wilson, J. 2014: ‘Romans and Roman material in Ireland: a wider social perspective’, in Cahill Wilson et al. 2014, 11–58Google Scholar
Cahill Wilson, J., Standish, C., and O'Brien, E. 2014: ‘Investigating mobility and migration in the later Irish Iron Age’, in Cahill Wilson et al. 2014, 127–49Google Scholar
Cahill Wilson, J., Dowling, G., Ann Bevivino, M., and Bradley, P. (eds) 2014: Late Iron Age and ‘Roman’ Ireland, Discovery Programs Report 8, DublinGoogle Scholar
Chenery, C., Müldner, G., Evans, J., Eckardt, H., and Lewis, M. 2010: ‘Strontium and stable isotope evidence for diet and mobility in Roman Gloucester, UK’, Journal of Archaeological Science 37, 150–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chenery, C., Eckardt, H., and Müldner, G. 2011: ‘Cosmpolitan Catterick? Isotope evidence for population movement on the northern frontier’, Journal of Archaeological Science 38, 1525–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cipolla, C.N., and Hayes, K.H. (eds) 2015: Rethinking Colonialism: Comparative Archaeological Approaches, GainesvilleCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, D., and Hunter, F. 2001: ‘Representing the Romans in the Museum of Scotland’, in Davies et al. 2001, 1–11Google Scholar
Clarke, K. 2001: ‘Island nation: re-reading Tacitus' Agricola,’ Journal of Roman Studies 91, 94122Google Scholar
Collis, J. 2003: The Celts: Origins, Myths, Inventions, StroudGoogle Scholar
Cotton, J. 2008: ‘Harper Road, Southwark: an early Roman burial revisited’, in Clark, J., Cotton, J., Hall, J., Sherris, R. and Swain, H. (eds), Londinium and Beyond: Essays on Roman London and its Hinterland for Harvey Sheldon, CBA Research Report 156, York, 151–61Google Scholar
Cunliffe, B. 2005: Iron Age Britain, LondonGoogle Scholar
Davies, G., Gardner, A., and Lockyear, K. (eds) 2001: TRAC 2000: Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Theoretical Roman Archaeology Conference, London 2000, OxfordGoogle Scholar
de Ligt, L., and Tacoma, E. 2016a: ‘Approaching migration in the early Roman Empire’, in de Ligt and Tacoma 2016b, 1–22Google Scholar
de Ligt, L., and Tacoma, E. (eds) 2016b: Migration and Mobility in the Early Roman Empire, LeidenGoogle Scholar
Department for Children 2008: History in the National Curriculum. Key Stages 2–3, Cardiff, Welsh Assembly GovernmentGoogle Scholar
Department of Education 2014: The National Curriculum in England: Framework document, December 2014, LondonGoogle Scholar
Dietler, M. 2006: ‘Celticism, Celtitude and Celticity. The consumption of the past in the age of globalization’, in Rieckhoff, S. (ed.), Celtes et Gaulois, l'archéologie face à l'histoire, vol. 1, Bibracte, 237–48Google Scholar
Dyson, J., Gattis, M., Pemberton, S., and Shearsmith, R. 1999: The League of Gentlemen: The Entire First Series, DVD video, BBC, LondonGoogle Scholar
Eckardt, H. (ed.) 2010: Roman Diasporas: Archaeological Approaches to Mobility and Diversity in the Roman Empire, Journal of Roman Archaeology Supplementary Series 78, Portsmouth, RIGoogle Scholar
Eckardt, H., and Müldner, G. 2016: ‘Mobility, migrations and diasporas in Roman Britain’, in Millett et al. 2016, 203–23Google Scholar
Eckardt, H., Müldner, G., and Lewis, M. 2014: ‘People on the move in Roman Britain’, World Archaeology 46(4), 534–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckardt, H., Müldner, G., and Speed, G. 2015: ‘The late Roman field army in northern Britain? Mobility, material culture and multi-isotope analysis at Scorton (N. Yorks)’, Britannia 46, 191223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
English Heritage 2010: Research Strategy for Prehistory: Consultation Draft, June 2010, London, <https://content.historicengland.org.uk/content/docs/research/draft-prehistoric-strategy.pdf> (Accessed 20/12/2016)+(Accessed+20/12/2016)>Google Scholar
Evans, J., Stoodley, N., and Chenery, C. 2006: ‘A strontium and oxygen isotope assessment of a possible fourth century immigrant population in a Hampshire cemetery, southern England’, Journal of Archaeological Science 33, 265–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher Onar, N.F., Liu, J.H., and Woodward, M. 2014: ‘Critical junctures? Complexity and the post-colonial nation-state’, International Journal of Intercultural Relations 43, 2234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foubert, L., and Breeze, D. 2014: ‘Mobility in the Roman Empire’, in Leary 2014, 175–86Google Scholar
Gardner, A. 2013: ‘Thinking about Roman imperialism: postcolonialism, globalisation and beyond?’, Britannia 44, 125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, A. 2017: ‘Brexit, boundaries and imperial identities: a comparative view’, Journal of Social Archaeology 17(1), 326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garraffoni, R.S., and Funari, P.P. 2012: ‘The uses of Roman heritage in Brazil: traditional reception and new critical approaches’, Heritage & Society 5(1), 5376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GBrexit 2017: Gbrexit https://www.facebook.com/GBrexit/> (Accessed 20/3/2017)+(Accessed+20/3/2017)>Google Scholar
Geary, P.J. 2002: The Myth of Nations: The Medieval Origins of Europe, OxfordGoogle Scholar
Ghosh, P. 2015: ‘DNA study shows Celts are not a unique genetic group’, BBC News, 18 March 2015 <http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-31905764> (Accessed 31/1/2017)+(Accessed+31/1/2017)>Google Scholar
Gibson, M., Trower, S., and Tregidga, G. 2013: ‘Mysticism, myth and Celtic identity’, in Gibson, M., Trower, S. and Tregidga, G. (eds), Mysticism, Myth and Celtic Identity, London, 120Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. 2011: Victorian Culture and Classical Antiquity: Art, Opera, and the Proclamation of Modernity, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonzalez-Ruibal, A. 2010: ‘Colonialism and European archaeology’, in Lydon, J. and Rizvi, U. (eds), Handbook of Postcolonial Archaeology, Walnut Creek, CA, 3950Google Scholar
Gowland, R., and Garnsey, P. 2010: ‘Skeletal evidence for health, nutritional status and malaria in Rome and the empire’, in Eckardt 2010, 131–56Google Scholar
Hannam, K., Sheller, M., and Urry, J. 2006: ‘Editorial: mobilities, immobilities and moorings’, Mobilities 1, 122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, D.C., Jones, R., McInroy, N., and Milligan, C. 2002: ‘Timing and spacing in Celtic geographies’, in Harvey, D.C., Jones, R., McInroy, N. and Milligan, C. (eds), Celtic Geographies: Old Culture, New Times, London, 117Google Scholar
Hayes, K.H. 2015: ‘Indigeneity and diaspora: colonialism and the classification of displacement’, in Cipolla and Hayes 2015, 54–75Google Scholar
Hingley, R. 2000: Roman Officers and English Gentlemen, LondonGoogle Scholar
Hingley, R. 2008: The Recovery of Roman Britain 1586–1906: ‘A Colony so Fertile’, OxfordGoogle Scholar
Hingley, R. 2011: ‘Iron Age knowledge: pre-Roman peoples and myths of origin’, in Moore, T. and Armada, X.-L. (eds), Atlantic Europe in the First Millennium BC, Oxford, 617–37Google Scholar
Hingley, R. 2015a: ‘Post-colonial and global Rome: the genealogy of empire’, in Pitts, M. and Versluys, J.M. (eds), Globalisation and the Roman World: World History, Connectivity and Material Culture, Cambridge, 3246Google Scholar
Hingley, R. 2015b: ‘Working with descendant communities in the study of Roman Britain: fragments of an ethnographic project design’, in Cipolla and Hayes 2015, 161–89Google Scholar
Hingley, R. 2018: ‘Frontiers and mobilities: the Frontiers of the Roman Empire World Heritage Site’, European Journal of Archaeology 21 (1), 7895CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hingley, R., and Miles, D. 2002: ‘The human impact on the landscape: agriculture, settlement, industry, infrastructure’, in Salway, P. (ed.), The Roman Era: Short Oxford History of the British Isles, Oxford, 141–71Google Scholar
Hingley, R., and Unwin, C. 2005: Boudica: Iron Age Warrior Queen, LondonGoogle Scholar
Historical Association 2013: Final Programme of Study: National Curriculum <https://www.history.org.uk/ha-news/news/1830> (Accessed 11/1/2017)+(Accessed+11/1/2017)>Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, E. 1990: National and Nationalism since 1780: Programme, Myth, Reality, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Holtorf, C. 2009: ‘A European perspective on indigenous and immigrant archaeologies’, World Archaeology 41(4), 671–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, F. 2013: ‘The lives of Roman objects beyond the frontier’, in Wells, P. (ed.), Rome Beyond its Frontiers: Imports, Attitudes and Practices, Journal of Roman Archaeology Supplementary Series 94, Portsmouth, RI, 1528Google Scholar
Ivleva, T. 2016: ‘Britons on the move: mobility of British-born emigrants in the Roman Empire’, in Millett et al. 2016, 245–61Google Scholar
James, S. 1999: The Atlantic Celts: Ancient Peoples or Modern Invention?, LondonGoogle Scholar
Jansen, Y., Celibates, R., and de Bloois, J. 2015: ‘Introduction’, in Jansen, Y., Celibates, R. and de Bloois, J. (eds), The Irregularization of Migration in Contemporary Europe: Detention, Deportation, Drowning, London, ixxxivGoogle Scholar
Kaur, R. 2011: ‘“Ancient cosmopolitanism” and South Asian diaspora’, South Asian Diaspora 3(2), 197213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendrick, J., and Lewis, J. 2004: ‘Indigenous people's rights and the politics of the term “indigenous”’, Anthropology Today 20(2), 49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Killgrove, K. 2010: ‘Identifying immigrants to Imperial Rome using strontium isotope analysis’, in Eckardt 2010, 157–74Google Scholar
Killgrove, K., and Montgomery, J. 2016: ‘All roads lead to Rome: Exploring human migration to the eternal city through the biochemistry of skeletons from two imperial-era cemeteries (1st-3rd c AD)’, PLoS ONE 11(2), e0147585 https:doi.org/10/journal.phone.0147585. (Accessed 8/1/2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kristiansen, K. 1996: ‘European origins – “civilisation” and “barbarism”’, in Graves-Brown, P., Jones, S. and Gamble, C.S. (eds), Cultural Identity and Archaeology: The Construction of European Communities, London, 138–44Google Scholar
Kuper, A. 2003: ‘The return of the native’, Current Anthropology 43(3), 389402 (including comments and replies)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leach, S., Eckardt, H., Chenery, C., Müldner, G., and Lewis, M. 2010: ‘A “lady” of York: migration, ethnicity and identity in Roman York’, Antiquity 84, 131–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leary, J. (ed.) 2014: Past Mobilities: Archaeological Approaches to Movement and Mobility, FarnhamGoogle Scholar
Leslie, S., Winney, B., Hellenthal, G., Davidson, D., Boumertit, A., Day, T., Hutnik, K., Royrvik, E., Cunliffe, B., Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium 2, International Multiple Sclerosis Genetic Consortium, Lawson, D., Falush, D., Freeman, C., Pirinen, M., Mayers, S., Robinson, M., Donnelly, P., and Bodmer, W. 2015: ‘The fine-scale genetic structure of the British population’, Nature 519, 309–14CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lucy, S., and Herring, C. 1999: ‘Viewing the “Dark Ages”: the portrayal of early Anglo-Saxon life and material culture in museums’, in Merriman 1999, 74–94Google Scholar
Marichal, J. 2013: ‘Political Facebook groups: micro-activism and the digital front stage’, First Monday 18(12) http://journals.uic.edu/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/4653 (Accessed 6/1/2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martiniano, R., Caffell, A., Holst, M., Hunter-Mann, K., Montgomery, J., Müldner, G., McLaughlin, R.L., Teasdale, M.D., van Rheenen, W., Veldink, J.H., van den Berg, L.H., Hardiman, O., Carroll, M., Roskams, S., Oxley, J., Morgan, C., Thomas, M.G., Barnes, I., McDonnell, C., Collins, M.J., and Bradley, D.G. 2016: ‘Genomic signals of migration and continuity in Britain before the Anglo-Saxons’, Nature Communications 7, DOI: 10.1038/ncomms10326CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mattingly, D. 2006: An Imperial Possession: Britain in the Roman Empire, LondonGoogle Scholar
McKinley, J., Leivers, M., Schuster, J., Marshall, P., Barclay, A.J., and Stoodley, N. 2015: Cliffs End Farm, Isle of Thanet, Kent: A Mortuary and Ritual Site of the Bronze Age, Iron Age and Anglo-Saxon Period, Wessex Archaeological Reports 31, SalisburyGoogle Scholar
Merriman, N. (ed.) 1999: Making Early History in Museums, LeicesterGoogle Scholar
Millard, A. 2015: ‘Isotopic investigation of residential mobility and diet’, in McKinley et al. 2015Google Scholar
Millett, M., Revell, L., and Moore, A. (eds) 2016: The Oxford Handbook of Roman Britain, OxfordGoogle Scholar
Mills, N. 2013: ‘Introduction: presenting the Romans’, in Mills, N. (ed.), Presenting the Romans: Interpreting the Frontiers of the Roman Empire World Heritage Site, Woodbridge, 110Google Scholar
Moore, T. 2016: ‘Britain, Gaul and Germany: cultural interactions’, in Millett et al. 2016, 262–82Google Scholar
Morse, M. 2005: How the Celts Came to Britain: Druids, Ancient Skulls and the Birth of Archaeology, StroudGoogle Scholar
Mytum, H. 1999: ‘Pembrokeshire's pasts: natives, invaders and Welsh archaeology: the Castell Henllys experience’, in Stone, P.G. and Planel, P. (eds), The Constructed Past. Experimental Archaeology, Education and the Public, London, 181205Google Scholar
Mytum, H. 2003: ‘Evoking time and place in reconstruction and display: the case of Celtic identity and Iron Age art’, in Jameson, J.H., Ehrenhard, J.E. and Finn, C.A. (eds), Ancient Muses: Archaeology and the Arts, Tuscaloosa, Alabama, 92108Google Scholar
Mytum, H. 2004: ‘Reconstruction policy and purpose at Castell Henllys Iron Age fort’, in Jameson, J.H. (ed.), The Reconstructed Past: Reconstruction in the Interpretation of Archaeology and History, Plymouth, 91102Google Scholar
Nesbitt, C. 2016: ‘Multiculturalism on Hadrian's Wall’, in Millett et al. 2016, 224–44Google Scholar
Piccini, A., and Henson, D. 2006: Survey of Heritage Television Viewing http://content.historicengland.org.uk/content/heritage-counts/pub/eh_tvcounts_report_final.pdf (Accessed 6/1/2017)Google Scholar
Pitts, M. 2016: ‘The ancient British genome: writing new histories’, British Archaeology, November/December 2016, 1425Google Scholar
Pohl, M. 2016: ‘Museum representations of Roman Britain and Roman London: a post-colonial perspective’, Britannia 47, 209–41Google Scholar
Prowse, T.L. 2016: ‘Isotopes and mobility in the ancient Roman world’, in de Ligt and Tacoma 2016b, 205–33Google Scholar
Prowse, T.L., Barta, J.L., von Hunnius, T.L., and Small, A.M. 2010: ‘Stable isotope and mitochondrial DNA evidence for geographical origins on a Roman estate at Vagnari (Italy)’, in Eckardt 2010, 175–98Google Scholar
Redfern, R.C., Gröcke, D.R., Millard, A.R., Ridgeway, V., Johnson, L., and Hefner, J.T. 2016: ‘Going south of the river: a multidisciplinary analysis of ancestry, mobility and diet in a population from Roman Southwark, London’, Journal of Archaeological Science 74, 1122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redfern, R., Marshall, M., Eaton, K., and Pointar, H.N. 2017: ‘“Written in bone”: new discoveries about the lives and burials of four Roman Londoners’, Britannia 48, 257–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, P. 1979: Iron-Age Farm: The Butser Experiment, LondonGoogle Scholar
Rhys, O. 2008: ‘A Celtic village? Practices and changing interpretations at an Iron Age village reconstruction’, in Davis, O., Sharples, N. and Waddington, K. (eds), Changing Perspectives on the First Millennium BC: Proceedings of the Iron Age Research Student Seminar 2006, Oxford, 235–48Google Scholar
Runnymede Trust 2013: Consultation Response by the Runnymede Trust in Conjunction with Operation Black Vote and Supported by a Coalition of Race Equality Organisations to the Proposed Changes to the National Curriculum in England History Key Stages 1–4, LondonGoogle Scholar
Runnymede Trust no date: Roman Revealed: Who Were the Real Romans? A Runnymede Teaching Resource, LondonGoogle Scholar
Schiffels, S. 2016: ‘What is ancient DNA’, British Archaeology, November/December 2016, 16Google Scholar
Schiffels, S., Haak, W., Paajanen, P., Llamas, B., Popescu, E., Loe, L., Clarke, R., Lyons, A., Mortimer, R. Sayer, D., Tyler-Smith, C., Cooper, A., and Durban, R. 2016: ‘Iron Age and Anglo-Saxon genomes from East England reveal British migration history’, Nature Communications DOI: 10.1038/ncomms10408CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schweissing, M.M., and Grupe, G. 2003: ‘Stable strontium isotopes in human teeth and bone: a key to migration events of the late Roman period in Bavaria’, Journal of Archaeological Science 30, 1373–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seller, W.C., and Yeatman, R.J. 1930: 1066 and All That, LondonGoogle Scholar
Shaw, H., Montgomery, J., Redfern, R., Gowland, R., and Evans, J. 2016: ‘Identifying migrants in Roman London using lead and strontium stable isotopes’, Journal of Archaeological Science 66, 5768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sillitoe, P. 2013: ‘The anthropological imagination and British Iron Age society’, in Shankland, D. (ed.), Archaeology and Anthropology: Past, Present and Future, London, 145–71Google Scholar
Smiles, S. 1994: The Image of Antiquity: Britain and the Romantic Imagination, LondonGoogle Scholar
Stout, A. 2008: Creating Prehistory: Druids, Ley Hunters and Archaeologists in Pre-War Britain, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tacitus: Agricola, Woodman, A.J. (ed.), Cambridge (2014)Google Scholar
The Brexit Bible 2017: The Brexit Bible https://www.facebook.com/thebrexitbible/> (Accessed 20/3/2017)+(Accessed+20/3/2017)>Google Scholar
theguardian 2017: ‘Mary Beard v Aaron Banks: “Your vision of the UK is like mine of Rome—a dream”’, theguardian <https://www.theguardian.com/books/2017/jan/16/mary-beard-arron-banks-eu-ukip-twitter-rome> (Accessed 5/9/2017)+(Accessed+5/9/2017)>Google Scholar
Tolia-Kelly, D. 2011: ‘Narrating the postcolonial landscape: archaeologies of race at Hadrian's Wall’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS 36, 7188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
University of Reading/Runnymede Trust 2017: Romans Revealed <http://www.romansrevealed.com> (Accessed 6/1/2017)+(Accessed+6/1/2017)>Google Scholar
University of Reading 2017: A Long Way from Home: Diaspora Communities in Roman Britain <http://www.reading.ac.uk/archaeology/research/Projects/arch-HE-Diaspora.aspx> (Accessed 6/1/2017)+(Accessed+6/1/2017)>Google Scholar
Vance, N. 1997: The Victorians and Ancient Rome, OxfordGoogle Scholar
van der Veen, M., Livarda, A., and Hill, A. 2008: ‘New plants in Roman Britain — dispersal and social access’, Environmental Archaeology 13(1), 1136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Dommelen, P. 2014: ‘Moving on: archaeological perspectives on mobility and migration’, World Archaeology 46:4, 477–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Versluys, M.J. 2014: ‘Understanding objects in motion: an archaeological dialogue on Romanization’, Archaeological Dialogues 21(1), 120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, L.M. 2014: The Origins of Roman London, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward-Perkins, B. 2005: The Fall of Rome and the End of Civilisation, OxfordGoogle Scholar
Webster, J. 1999: ‘Here be dragons! The continuing influence of Roman attitudes to northern Britain’, in Bevan, B. (ed.), Northern Exposure: Interpretative Devolution and the Iron Ages in Britain, Leicester, 2132Google Scholar
Webster, J. 2001: ‘Creolizing the Roman provinces’, American Journal of Archaeology 105, 209–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weekes, J. 2016: ‘Cemeteries and funerary practices’, in Millett et al. 2016, 425–47Google Scholar
Wilson, A.F. 2013: ‘From apocalyptic paranoia to the mythic nation: political extremity and myths of origin in the neo-Fascist milieu’, in Gibson et al. 2013, 199–215Google Scholar
Wilson, P. 2016: ‘Romano-British archaeology in the early twenty-first century’, in Millett et al. 2016, 43–62Google Scholar
Witcher, R. 2013: ‘On Rome's ecological contribution to British flora and fauna: landscape, legacy and identity’, Landscape History 34(2), 526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Withey, J., and Brown, J. 2017: ‘Alt-right commentator claims Romans weren't ethnically diverse, gets owned by actual historian’ indy100.com <https://www.indy100.com/article/historian-scholling-paul-joseph-watson-alt-right-ethnically-diverse-roman-britain-twitter-7860551> (Accessed 5/9/2017)+(Accessed+5/9/2017)>Google Scholar
Woolf, G. 2011: Tales of the Barbarians: Ethnography and Empire in the Roman West, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
6
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

‘Are You Local?’ Indigenous Iron Age and Mobile Roman and Post-Roman Populations: Then, Now and In-Between
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

‘Are You Local?’ Indigenous Iron Age and Mobile Roman and Post-Roman Populations: Then, Now and In-Between
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

‘Are You Local?’ Indigenous Iron Age and Mobile Roman and Post-Roman Populations: Then, Now and In-Between
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *