Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T18:56:12.353Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Group of Silvered-Bronze Horse-Trappings from Xanten (Castra Vetera)*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 November 2011

Ian Jenkins
Ian Jenkins
Affiliation:
The British Museum, London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The subject of this article is a uniform group of Roman military horse-trappings of the first century a.d. found at Xanten and now in the British Museum. They were included with brief and, it is fair to say, inadequate entries in H. B. Walters' Catalogue of 1899 where it was suggested, wrongly, that the trappings were from an ornamental cuirass. Since then there has been no attempt at a comprehensive publication, or proper explanation of their purpose. The four large roundels in the group have, it is true, been frequently mentioned in the study of so-called phalerae However, discussion of these pieces has consistently ignored the related groups of harness furniture to which they belong. If this fact is surprising, it is all the more so when we reflect upon their obvious importance for the study of Roman military equipment. The publication of the, in many respects, parallel finds from Doorwerth on the Rhine in Holland by J. H. Holwerda in the 1930s has recently been challenged by M. Brouwer. While Holwerda claimed to have substantial parts of no less than five sets of horse-trappings, Brouwer argues that the horse-trappings from Doorwerth are too much of a miscellany even to attempt a reconstruction of one set. Brouwer condemns, accordingly, the plaster reconstruction (FIG. I) that used to stand in the Bronze Gallery of the Rijksmuseum van Oudheden as inaccurate. The Xanten horse-trappings are, then, the most complete, single surviving set of Roman military horse-trappings of their kind. On the basis of comparison with grave reliefs, and on internal evidence, it is possible to offer here a reconstruction of the original harness. On the basis of inscriptions punched into the trappings themselves, it is possible to speculate on the ownership of the trappings and the significance they held for their owner. Not the least interesting of these graffiti is the inscription PLINIO PRAEF(ECTO) EQ(UITUM) punched into the face of one of the large roundels (A3). More than one scholar has seen here an explicit reference to the historical C. Plinius Secundus, commonly known as Pliny the Elder.

Type
Articles
Information
Britannia , Volume 16 , November 1985 , pp. 141 - 164
Copyright
Copyright © Ian Jenkins 1985. Exclusive Licence to Publish: The Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Walters, H. B., Catalogue of Bronzes in the British Museum (London 1899), 2870–3.Google Scholar

2 The main reference is Heilmeyer, W.-D., RM lxxxii (1975), 304–12Google Scholar, with bibliography at note 23. To which should be added Boube-Piccot, Chr., Bull. Arch. Maroc. v (1964), 146 and 154Google Scholar; Taylor, A. K. (Dr Lawson), Roman Horse Equipment (unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of London, 1978) 238.Google Scholar

3 Holwerda, J. H., Oudh. Meded. xii (1931), suppl. 1–26.Google Scholar

4 Brouwer, M., Oudh. Meded. lxiii (1982), 145–99.Google Scholar

5 Brouwer, , op. cit. (note 4), 157.Google Scholar

6 Henszlmann, E., Catalogue of the Collection of the Monuments of Art Formed by the Late Gabriel Féjerváry of Hungary (London, 1853), 34.Google Scholar

7 Heilmeyer, , op. cit. (note 2), 306–7.Google Scholar

8 Braun, E., Monumenti, annali e bulletini pubblicati dall'Instituto di Corrispondenza Archeologia nel 1854, 91–2.Google Scholar

9 For a fuller description of the technique, see the important article by Painter, K. et al. , BMQ xxxvii (1973), 9–17Google Scholar; cf. Brouwer, , op. cit. (note 4), 148.Google Scholar

10 For the acanthus see Jucker, H., Das Bildnis im Blätterkelch (Lausanne and Freiburg 1961), passim.Google Scholar

11 Walters, , op. cit. (note 1), 351.Google Scholar

12 Heilmeyer, , op. cit. (note 2), 305–6.Google Scholar

13 Kroll, W., RE xxi (1951), 273–4Google Scholar. The all-important reference is Pliny, Letters 3, 5, 4. See also Syme, R.Harvard Studies lxxiii 73 (1969), 204–8.Google Scholar

14 Giuliani, L. in Bilder vom Menschen (Staatliche Museen, Berlin, 1980), 78Google Scholar. Cf. Künzl, E., Jb Z Mus Mainz xxx (1983), 386.Google Scholar

15 Brouwer, , op. cit. (note 4), 150.Google Scholar

16 ibid., pl. 10, 278a and b.Google Scholar

17 Espérandieu, E., Receuil Général des Bas-Reliefs, Statues et Bustes de la Gaule Romaine (Paris, 1922) Vol. VIII, 6448Google Scholar. The whole series provides a useful source of illustration for such tombstones. See most recently Schleiermacher, M., Römische Reitergrabsteine (Bonn 1984), passim.Google Scholar

18 Bohn, O., CIL xiii (Berlin, 1906)Google Scholar, 1002622. As Kenneth Painter has pointed out to me, Bohn had overlooked an earlier anonymous publication of the inscription in The Athenaeum 3914 (Nov. 1, 1902), 594, in a column entitled ‘Fine Art Gossip’. The author had arrived at the same reading as Bohn. The inscription appeared during a cleaning of the roundel. On the inscription see also Devijver, H., Symbolae A, 3 (Leuven, 1977), p. 44, 647.Google Scholar

19 Heilmeyer, , op. cit. (note 2), 306.Google Scholar

20 Neumann, A., ÖJh xxxv (1943), Beibl. 30.Google Scholar

21 Heilmeyer, Thus, op. cit. (note 2), 306Google Scholar; Büttner, ABJb clvii (1957), 149–50Google Scholar; Boube-Piccot, op. cit. (note 2), 146–7Google Scholar; Taylor, , op. cit. (note 2), 238.Google Scholar

22 Heilmeyer knew of the inscription but did not take it into account. The tentative reading he was given–L. Capitoni Marian(o), whence E. Künzl, loc. cit. (note 14)–may now be corrected.

23 I am grateful to Hazel Newey and the Metal Section of the British Museum Conservation Department for this.

24 MacMullen, R., AJA lxiv (1960), 23–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

25 Maxfield, V. A., The Military Decorations of the Roman Army (London, 1981), 95.Google Scholar

26 Matz, F., ‘Die Lauersforter Phalerae’, Winckelmanns-programm der archäologischen Gesellschaft zu Berlin xcii (1932), 2–41.Google Scholar

27 Yet, as Heilmeyer observes ‘Auch einer umfangreichen Literatur zu diesem Problem ist es bislang nicht gelungen, die Phalerae nach Truppengattungen, Rang des Ausgezeichneten oder Zeitstellung zu unterscheiden’, op. cit. (note 2), 310 and bibliography at note 44.

28 Büttner, , op. cit. (note 21), 145–52.Google Scholar

29 Alföldi, A., ‘Der frührömische Reiteradel und seine Ehrenabzeichen’, Deutsche Beiträge zur Altertumwissenschaft ii (1952), 17–25.Google Scholar

30 Taylor, , op. cit. (note 2), 236–9; idem, ‘Studien zum römischen Pferdgeschirr’, Jb Z Mus Mainz xxv (1978), 151.Google Scholar

31 Heilmeyer, , op. cit. (note 2), 308.Google Scholar

32 Taylor, , op. cit. (note 2), 239.Google Scholar

33 Hughes, M. J., Cowell, M. R. and Craddock, P. T., Archaeometry xviii (1976), 19–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

34 Craddock, P. T., Journ. Arch. Science v (1978), 12.Google Scholar

35 Craddock, P. T., Lang, J. and Painter, K. S., BMQ xxxvii (1973), 9–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

36 Niece, S. La, Ant. Journ. lxiii pt. 2, (1984), 279–97.Google Scholar

37 Brailsford, J. W., Guide to the antiquities of Roman Britain (London 1951).Google Scholar

38 Brailsford, J. W., Hod Hill 1 (London, 1962).Google Scholar

39 Craddock, P. T., Burnett, A. M. and Preston, K., in Oddy, W. A. (ed.), Scientific Studies in Numismatics (London, 1980), 53–64.Google Scholar

40 Riederer, J., Jahrbuch für Numismatik und Geldgeschichte xxiv (1974), 73–98.Google Scholar

41 Craddock, , op. cit. (note 32), 11–15.Google Scholar

42 Grant, M., From Imperium to Auctoritas (Cambridge, 1946), 87–90 and 493.Google Scholar