Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-59b7f5684b-s82fj Total loading time: 0.366 Render date: 2022-09-30T22:46:50.160Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "displayNetworkTab": true, "displayNetworkMapGraph": false, "useSa": true } hasContentIssue true

Coups and Democracy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 August 2013

Abstract

This study uses new data on coups d’état and elections to document a striking development: whereas the vast majority of successful coups before 1991 installed durable rules, the majority of coups after that have been followed by competitive elections. The article argues that after the Cold War, international pressure influenced the consequences of coups. In the post-Cold War era, countries that were most dependent on Western aid were the first to embrace competitive elections after their coups. This theory also helps explain the pronounced decline in the number of coups since 1991. While the coup d’état has been (and still is) the single most important factor leading to the downfall of democratic governments, these findings indicate that the new generation of coups has been far less harmful for democracy than their historical predecessors.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Department of Political Science, Yale University; Department of Political Science, University of Rochester (emails: nikolay.marinov@yale.edu, hgoemans@mail.rochester.edu). We thank participants at panels at the 2008 International Studies Association Annual Meeting, the 2008 Midwest Political Science Annual Meeting and the 2010 American Political Science Association Meeting for their feedback. We also thank participants at worskshops held at Yale University, the University of Rochester, the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Columbia University, Princeton University, the London School of Economics and the University of Mannheim between 2009 and 2012 for comments and suggestions. We thank Page Fortna, Gary Cox and Jay Ulfelder for their comments on an earlier draft. Any remaining errors are ours alone. Data replication sets and online appendices are available at http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1017/S0007123413000264

References

Alesina, Alberto Dollar, David. 2000. Who Gives Foreign Aid to Whom and Why? Journal of Economic Growth 5:3363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alesina, Alberto, Ozler, Sule, Roubini, Nouriel Swagel, Phillip. 1996. Political Instability and Economic Growth. Journal of Economic Growth 1:189211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel, Katz, Jonathan N. Tucker, Richard. 1998. Taking Time Seriously: Time-Series-Cross-Section Analysis with a Binary Dependent Variable. American Journal of Political Science 42 (4):12601288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beissinger, Mark R. 2007. Structure and Example in Modular Political Phenomena: The Diffusion of Bulldozer/Rose/Orange/Tulip Revolutions. Perspectives on Politics 5 (2):259276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belkin, Aaron Schofer, Evan. 2003. Toward a Structural Understanding of Coup Risk. Journal of Conflict Resolution 47:594620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bermeo, Sarah Blodgett. 2011. Foreign Aid and Regime Change: A Role for Donor Intent. World Development 39 (11):20212031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bienen, Henry Van De Walle, Nicolas. 1989. Time and Power in Africa. American Political Science Review 83:1934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boix, Carles. 2011. Democracy, Development, and the International System. American Political Science Review 105 (4):809828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boix, Charles Stokes, Susan. 2003. Endogenous Democratization. World Politics 55:517549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brancati, Dawn Snyder, Jack L.. 2011. Rushing to the Polls: The Causes of Premature Postconflict Elections. Journal of Conflict Resolution 55 (3):469492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunce, Valerie Wolchik, Sharon. 2010. Defeating Dictators: Electoral Change and Stability in Competitive Authoritarian Regimes. World Politics 62:4386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnside, Craig Dollar, David. 2000. Aid, Policies and Growth. The American Economic Review 90 (4):847868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bush, Sarah Sunn. 2011. International Politics and the Spread of Quotas for Women in Legislatures. International Organization 65 (1):103137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheibub, Jose Antonio. 2006. Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, and Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheibub, José Antonio, Gandhi, Jennifer Vreeland, James Raymond. 2010. Democracy and Dictatorship Revisited. Public Choice 143:67101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collier, P. 2010. Wars, Guns, and Votes: Democracy in Dangerous Places. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Corstange, Daniel Marinov, Nikolay. 2012. Taking Sides in Other People's Elections: The Polarizing Effect of Foreign Intervention. American Journal of Political Science 53:655670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coufoudakis, Van. 1977. The European Economic Community and the ‘Freezing’ of the Greek Association, 1967–1974. Journal of Common Market Studies 16:114131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, Gordon. 2000. European Union Development Cooperation and the Promotion of Democracy. In Democracy Assistance: International Co-operation for Democratization, edited by Peter Burnell, 90128. London and Portland: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
Dafoe, Allan. 2012. First Do No Harm: The Risks of Modeling Temporal Dependence. Manuscript, Yale University.Google Scholar
Deutsch, Karl. 1961. Social Mobilization and Political Development. American Political Science Review 55:493514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Djankov, Simeon, Montalvo, Jose Reynal-Querol, Marta. 2008. The Curse of Aid. Journal of Economic Growth 13 (3):169194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donno, Daniela. 2010. Who is Punished? Regional Intergovernmental Organizations and the Enforcement of Democratic Norms. International Organization 64:593625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunning, Thad. 2004. Conditioning the Effects of Aid: Cold War Politics, Donor Credibility, and Democracy in Africa. International Organization 58:409423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feaver, Peter D. 1999. Civil-Military Relations. Annual Review of Political Science 2 (1):211241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finer, Samuel E. 1988. The Man on Horseback: The Role of the Military in Politics. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Geddes, Barbara. 1999. What do We Know About Democratization After Twenty Years? Annual Review of Political Science 2:115144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleditsch, Kristian Skrede Ward, Michael D.. 2006. Diffusion and the International Context of Democratization. International Organization 60 (4):911933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goemans, Henk E., Gleditsch, Kristian Skrede Chiozza, Giacomo. 2009. Introducing Archigos: A Dataset of Political Leaders. Journal of Peace Research 46 (2):269283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurr, Ted Robert. 2000. Polity IV. College Park: Center for International Development and Conflict Management, University of Maryland.Google Scholar
Hagopian, Frances Mainwaring, Scott. 2005. The Third Wave of Democratization in Latin America: Advances and Setbacks. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huntington, Samuel. 1968. Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hyde, Susan. 2007. The Observer Effect in International Politics: Evidence from a Natural Experiment. World Politics 60 (1):3763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyde, Susan. 2011. The Pseudo-Democrats Dilemma: Why Election Observation Became an International Norm. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyde, Susan D. Marinov, Nikolay. 2012. Which Elections Can be Lost? Political Analysis 20 (2):191210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John. 2000. America's Liberal Grand Strategy: Democracy and National Security in the Post-War Era. In American Democracy Promotion: Impulses, Strategies, and Impacts, edited by Michael Cox, G. John Ikenberry and Takashi Inoguchi, 103126. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackman, Robert. 1976. Politicians in Uniform: Military Governments and Social Change in the Third World. The American Political Science Review 70:10781097.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackman, Robert. 1978. The Predictability of Coups d’état: A Model with African Data. The American Political Science Review 72 (4):12621275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Thomas, Slater, Robert McGowan, Pat. 1984. Explaining African Military Coups d'Etat, 1960–1982. The American Political Science Review 78:622640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalyvas, Stathis N. Balcells, Laia. 2010. International System and Technologies of Rebellion: How the End of the Cold War Shaped Internal Conflict. American Political Science Review 104 (3):415429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karakatsanis, N. 1997. Do Attitudes Matter? The Military and Democratic Consolidation in Greece. Armed Forces & Society 24 (2):289314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelley, Judith. 2008. Assessing the Complex Evolution of Norms: The Rise of International Election Monitoring. International Organization 62 (2):221255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelley, Judith. 2012. International Influence on Elections in Transition States. Annual Review of Political Science 15 (4):203220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Gary, Tomz, Michael Wittenberg, Jason. 2000. Making the Most of Statistical Analyses: Improving Interpretation and Presentation. American Journal of Political Science 44:347361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knack, Stephen. 2004. Does Foreign Aid Promote Democracy. International Studies Quarterly 48:251266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaCouture, Jean. 1970. The Demigods: Charismatic Leadership in the Third World. New York: Alfred Knopf.Google Scholar
Le Vine, Victor. 2004. Politics in Francophone Africa. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Levitsky, Steven Way, Lucan. 2010. Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes After the Cold War. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipset, Seymor. 1959. Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy. American Political Science Review 53 (1):69105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Londregan, John B. Poole, Keith T.. 1990. Poverty, the Coup Trap, and the Seizure of Executive Power. World Politics 42 (2):151183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luttwak, Edward. 1969. Coup d'Etat: A Practical Handbook. New York: Alfred Knopf.Google Scholar
Marshall, Monty G. Marshall, Donna Ramsey. 2013. Coup d’état Events, 1946–2012. Vienna, VA: Center for Systemic Peace.Google Scholar
McFaul, Michael. 2007. Ukraine Imports Democracy – External Influences on the Orange Revolution. International Security 32 (2):4583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGowan, Pat Johnson, Thomas. 2003. African Military Coups d'Etat and Underdevelopment: A Quantitative Historical Analysis. The Journal of Modern African Studies 47:594620.Google Scholar
McGowan, Patrick. 2003. Journal of Modern African Studies 41:339–70.Google Scholar
Morrison, Kevin. 2009. Oil, Nontax Revenue, and the Redistributional Foundations of Regime Stability. International Organization 63:107138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naftali, Timothy, ed. 2001. John F. Kennedy: The Great Crises. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Needler, Martin. 1966. Political Development and Military Intervention in Latin America. The American Political Science Review 60:616626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pevehouse, Jon C. 2002. Democracy from the Outside-In? International Organizations and Democratization. International Organization 56 (3):515549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, Jonathan M. Thyne, Clayton L.. 2011. Global Instances of Coups from 1950 to 2010. Journal of Peace Research 48 (2):249259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, Jon. 2012. Determinants of the Attempting and Outcome of Coups d’état. Journal of Conflict Resolution 56 (6):10171040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przeworski, Adam Limongi, Fernando. 1997. Modernization – Theories and Facts. World Politics 49 (2):155183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, Alvarez, Michael E., Cheibub, José Antonio Limongi, Fernando. 2000. Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World, 1950–1990. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roessler, Philip. 2011. The Enemy Within: Personal Rule, Coups, and Civil War in Africa. World Politics 63 (2):300346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schraeder, Peter J., Steven, W. Hook Bruce, Taylor. 1998. Clarifying the Foreign Aid Puzzle: A Comparison of American, Japanese, French, and Swedish Aid Flows. World Politics 50 (2):294323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Alastair. 2008. The Perils of Unearned Income. The Journal of Politics 70:780793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Karen. 2003. European Union Foreign Policy in a Changing World. Cambridge, UK: Polity.Google Scholar
Svolik, Milan. 2009. Power Sharing and Leadership Dynamics in Authoritarian Regimes. American Journal of Political Science 53 (2):477494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Charles Lewis, Jodice, David A. 1983. World Handbook of Political and Social Indicators III: 1948–1982. Compiled by Charles Lewis Taylor. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.Google Scholar
Tucker, Joshua. 2007. Enough! Electoral Fraud, Collective Action Problems and Post-Communist Colored Revolutions. Perspectives on Politics 5 (3):535551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehead, Laurence, ed. 1996. The International Dimensions of Democratization. Oxford Studies in Democratization. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wright, Joseph. 2009. How Foreign Aid Can Foster Democratization in Authoritarian Regimes. American Journal of Political Science 53 (3):552571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yalman, Nur. 1968. Intervention and Extrication: The Officer Corps in the Turkish Crisis. In The Military Intervenes: Case Studies in Political Development, edited by Henry Bienen, 127144. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Zuk, Gary Thompson, William. 1982. The Post-Coup Military Spending Question: A Pooled Cross-Sectional Time-Series Analysis. American Political Science Review 76:6074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Marinov Supplementary Material

Supplementary Data

Download Marinov Supplementary Material(File)
File 581 KB
Supplementary material: PDF

Marinov Supplementary Material

Appendix 1

Download Marinov Supplementary Material(PDF)
PDF 119 KB
Supplementary material: PDF

Marinov Supplementary Material

Appendix 2

Download Marinov Supplementary Material(PDF)
PDF 153 KB
95
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Coups and Democracy
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Coups and Democracy
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Coups and Democracy
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *