Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-7drxs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T07:26:15.376Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Global Experimentalist Governance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 May 2014


This article outlines the concept of Global Experimentalist Governance (GXG). GXG is an institutionalized transnational process of participatory and multilevel problem solving, in which particular problems (and the means of addressing them) are framed in an open-ended way, and subjected to periodic revision by various forms of peer review in light of locally generated knowledge. GXG differs from other forms of international organization and transnational governance, and is emerging in various issue areas. The Montreal Protocol on ozone-depleting substances is used to illustrate how GXG functions. The conditions for the emergence of GXG are specified, as well as some of its possible benefits.

Featured Article
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)



Florence Ellinwood Allen Professor of Law, New York University Law School (email:; Professor of International Affairs, Princeton University (email:; Maurice T. Moore Professor of Law and Social Science, Columbia Law School (email: We are grateful to the participants in a conference on Experimentalist Governance at Brown University in November 2013 for their interest in these ideas and their reaction to our presentation on these themes, and to Professor Richard Locke, Director of the Watson Institute at Brown University, for hosting that meeting.


Abbott, Kenneth N. 2012. Public-Private Sustainability Governance. International Affairs 88:543564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abbott, Kenneth N., Censchel, Philipp, Snidal, Duncan Zangl, Bernhard. 2014. International Organizations as Orchestrators. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Allan, Catherine Stankey, George Henry. eds. 2009. Adaptive Environmental Management. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alter, Karen Meunier, Sophie. 2009. The Politics of International Regime Complexity: Symposium. Perspectives on Politics 7:1324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andonova, Liliana. 2010. Public-Private Partnerships for the Earth: Politics and Patterns of Hybrid Authority in the Multilateral System. Global Environmental Politics 10:2453.Google Scholar
Baldwin, Richard. 2013. WTO 2.0. Geneva: World Trade Organization Secretariat. Available from, accessed 29 March 2014.Google Scholar
Bauer, Steffen. 2007. Administering International Governance: What Role for Treaty Secretariats? Global Governance Working Paper 29. Available from, accessed 29 March 2014.Google Scholar
Bell, Stephen Hindmoor, Andrew. 2009a. Commentary: The Governance of Public Affairs. Journal of Public Affairs 9:149159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, Stephen Hindmoor, Andrew. 2009b. Rethinking Governance: The Centrality of the State in Modern Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Colgan, Jeff D., Keohane, Robert O. van de Graaf, Thijs. 2012. Punctuated Equilibrium in the Energy Regime Complex. Review of International Organizations 7:117143.Google Scholar
De Búrca, Gráinne, Keohane, Robert O. Sabel, Charles. 2013. New Modes of Pluralist Global Governance. New York University Journal of International Law & Politics 45:723786.Google Scholar
Djelic, Marie-Laure Sahlin-Andersson, Kerstin. eds. 2006. Transnational Governance: Institutional Dynamics of Regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, Bruce Evan. 2011. Collaborative Resilience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Grant, Ruth Keohane, Robert O.. 2005. Accountability and Abuses of Power in World Politics. American Political Science Review 99:2943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Jessica. 2014. Rethinking Private Authority: Agents and Entrepreneurs in Global Environmental Governance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Greene, Owen. 1998. The System for Implementation Review in the Ozone Regime. In The Implementation and Effectiveness of International Environmental Commitments, edited by David G. Victor, Kal Raustiala and Eugene B. Skolnikoff, 89136, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hale, Thomas Held, David. eds. 2011. The Handbook of Transnational Governance: Institutions and Innovations. New York: Polity.Google Scholar
Helfer, Laurence R. 2004. Regime Shifting: The TRIPS Agreement and New Dynamics of International Intellectual Property Lawmaking. Yale Journal of International Law 29:184.Google Scholar
Holley, Cameron. 2010. Facilitating Monitoring, Subverting Self-Interest and Limiting Discretion: Learning from ‘New’ Forms of Accountability in Practice. Columbia Journal of Environmental Law 35:128211.Google Scholar
Hooghe, Liesbet Marks, Gary. 2001. Multilevel Governance and European Integration. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Jordan, Andrew Schout, Adriaan. 2006. The Coordination of the European Union: Exploring the Capacities of Networked Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. Victor, David G.. 2011. The Regime Complex for Climate Change. Perspectives on Politics 9:723.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. Ostrom, Elinor. eds. 1995. Local Commons and Global Interdependence. New York: Sage.Google Scholar
Koch, Beate Kohler Eising, Rainer. 2005. The Transformation of Governance in the European Union. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Orsini, Amandine, Morin, Jean-Frédéric Young, Oran. 2013. Regime Complexes: A Buzz, a Boom or a Boost for Global Governance? Global Governance 19:2739.Google Scholar
Ostrom, Elinor. 1990. Governing the Commons. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ostrom, Elinor. 2011. The Challenge of Achieving Conservation and Development. The Annual Proceedings of the Wealth and Well-Being of Nations 4:2127.Google Scholar
Ostrom, Elinor, Janssen, Marco A. Anderies, John M.. 2007. Going Beyond Panaceas. Proceedings of the National Academy of the Sciences (USA) 104:1517615178.Google Scholar
Overdevest, Christine Zeitlin, Jonathan. 2012. Assembling an Experimentalist Regime: Transnational Governance Interactions in the Forestry Sector. Regulation and Governance 8 (1):2248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parson, Edward A. 2003. Protecting the Ozone Layer: Science and Strategy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piattoni, Simona. 2009. Multi-level Governance: A Historical and Conceptual Analysis. Journal of European Integration 31:163180.Google Scholar
Raustiala, Kal Victor, David G.. 2004. The Regime Complex for Plant Genetic Resources. International Organization 58:277310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabel, Charles Zeitlin, Jonathan. eds. 2010. Experimentalist Governance in the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Simmons, Beth A. 2009. Mobilizing for Human Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slaughter, Anne-Marie. 2005. A New World Order. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
United Nations Environmental Programme, Ozone Secretariat. 2000. . The Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer. Available from, accessed 29 March 2014.Google Scholar
Victor, David. 2011. Global Warming Gridlock: Creating More Effective Strategies for Protecting the Planet. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, Max. 1978 [1922]. Basic Sociological Terms. In Economy and Society, Vol. 1, edited by Gunther Ross and Claus Wittich, 326, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
World Bank. 2004. Case Study of the Multilateral Fund for the Implementation of the Montreal Protocol. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Zhao, Jimin Ortolano, Leonard. 2003. The Chinese Government's Role in Implementing Multilateral Environmental Agreements: The Case of the Montreal Protocol. The China Quarterly 175:708725.Google Scholar