Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Institutions for the Anthropocene: Governance in a Changing Earth System

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2014

Abstract

The unusually stable Earth system of the Holocene epoch of the past 10,000 years, in which human civilization arose, is yielding to a more dynamic and unstable Anthropocene epoch driven by human practices. The consequences for key institutions, such as states, markets and global governance, are profound. Path dependency in institutions complicit in destabilizing the Earth system constrains response to this emerging epoch. Institutional analysis highlights reflexivity as the antidote to problematic path dependency. A more ecological discourse stresses resilience, foresight and state shifts in the Earth system. Ecosystemic reflexivity can be located as the first virtue of political institutions in the Anthropocene. Undermining all normative institutional models, this analysis enables re-thinking of political institutions in dynamic social-ecological terms.

Type
Articles
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

Footnotes

*

Australian Research Council Laureate Fellow, Centenary Professor, Centre for Deliberative Democracy and Global Governance, Institute for Governance and Policy Analysis, University of Canberra (email: john.dryzek@canberra.edu.au). These ideas were sharpened in working with Richard Norgaard, David Schlosberg and Hayley Stevenson. For helpful comments, the author thanks Andrew Dobson and Jonathan Kuyper. While he does make some gentle criticisms herein, he has learned much from his fellow participants in the Earth System Governance Project.

References

Abbott, Kenneth W. 2012. The Transnational Regime Complex for Climate Change. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 30 (4):571590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ackerman, Bruce A. 1991. We the People, I: Foundations. Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Baber, Walter F., and Bartlett, Robert V.. 2007. Deliberative Environmental Politics: Democracy and Ecological Rationality. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Barnosky, Anthony D., Hadly, Elizabeth A., Bascompte, Jordi, Berlow, Eric L., Brown, James H., Fortelius, Mikael, Getz, Wayne M., Harte, John, Hastings, Alan, Marquet, Pablo A., Martinez, Neo D., Mooers, Arne, Roopnarine, Peter, Vermeij, Geerat, Williams, John W., Gillespie, Rosemary, Kitzes, Justin, Marshall, Charles, Matzke, Nicholas, Mindell, David P., Revilla, Eloy, and Smith, Adam B.. 2012. Approaching a State Shift in Earth’s Biosphere. Nature 486:5258.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beck, Ulrich. 1992. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Beck, Ulrich, Giddens, Anthony, and Lash, Scott. 1994. Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Biermann, F., Abbott, K., Andresen, S., Bäckstrand, K., Bernstein, S., Betsill, M. M., Bulkeley, H., Cashore, B., Clapp, J., Folke, C., Gupta, A., Gupta, J., Haas, P. M., Jordan, A., Kanie, N., Kluvánková-Oravská, T., Lebel, L., Liverman, D., Meadowcroft, J., Mitchell, R. B., Newell, P., Oberthür, S., Olsson, L., Pattberg, P., Sánchez-Rodriguez, R., Schroeder, H., Underdal, A., Carmago Vieira, S., Vogel, C., Young, O. R., Brock, A., and Zondervan, R.. 2012a. Navigating the Anthropocene: Improving Earth System Governance. Science 335 (6074):13061307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biermann, Frank. 2012b. Greening the United Nations Charter: World Politics in the Anthropocene. Environment 54 (3):617.Google Scholar
Biermann, Frank, Pattberg, Philipp, van Asselt, Harro, and Zelli, Fariborz. 2009. The Fragmentation of Global Governance Architecture: A Framework for Analysis. Global Environmental Politics 9 (4):1440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryner, Gary C. 2000. The United States: ‘Sorry – Not Our Problem’. Pp. 273302 in Implementing Sustainable Development: Strategies and Initiatives in High Consumption Societies, edited by William M. Lafferty and James Meadowcroft. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bulkeley, Harriett, Castán Broto, Vanessa, Hodson, Mike, and Marvin, Simon, eds, 2010. Cities and Low-Carbon Transitions. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Camacho, Alejandro J. 2009. Adapting Governance to Climate Change: Managing Uncertainty through a Learning Infrastructure. Emory Law Journal 59 (1):177.Google Scholar
Catney, Philip, and Doyle, Timothy. 2011. The Welfare of Now and the Green (Post) Politics of the Future. Critical Social Policy 31 (2):174193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronon, William. 1995. The Trouble with Wilderness, or Getting Back to the Wrong Nature. Pp. 6990 in Uncommon Ground: Rethinking the Human Place in Nature, edited by William Cronon. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Crutzen, Paul, and Stoermer, E. F.. 2000. The Anthropocene. Global Change Newsletter 41:1718.Google Scholar
de Búrca, Gráinne, Keohane, Robert O., and Sabel, Charles. 2013. New Modes of Pluralist Global Governance. New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 45 (3):723786.Google Scholar
Diamond, Jared. 2005. Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Survive. New York: Viking Penguin.Google Scholar
Dietz, Thomas. 2013. Bringing Values and Deliberation to Science Communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110 (Suppl. 3):1408114087.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dobson, Andrew. 1990. Green Political Thought: An Introduction. London: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
Dobson, Andrew. 2010. Democracy and Nature: Speaking and Listening. Political Studies 58 (4):752768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dryzek, John S. 1987. Rational Ecology: Environment and Political Economy. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Dryzek, John S., Downes, David, Hunold, Christian, Schlosberg, David, with Hans-Kristian Hernes. 2003. Green States and Social Movements: Environmentalism in the United States, United Kingdom, Germany, and Norway. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dryzek, John S., Norgaard, Richard B., and Schlosberg, David. 2013. Climate-Challenged Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Economist, The . 2011. A Man-Made World: Science is Recognizing Humans as a Geological Force to be Reckoned With. The Economist, 26 May.Google Scholar
Eliasoph, Nina. 1998. Avoiding Politics: How Americans Produce Apathy in Everyday Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Folke, Carl. 2006. Resilience: The Emergence of a Perspective for Social-Ecological Systems Analysis. Global Environmental Change 16 (3):5367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Folke, Carl, Carpenter, Stephen R., Walker, Brian, Scheffer, Martin, Chapin, Terry, and Rockström, Johan. 2010. Resilience Thinking: Integrating Resilience, Adaptability, and Transformability. Ecology and Society 15 (4):article 20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Folke, Carl, Hahn, Thomas, Olsson, Per, and Norberg, Jon. 2005. Adaptive Governance of Social-Ecological Systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 30:441473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodin, Robert E. 1996a. Institutions and their Design. Pp. 153 in Theories of Institutional Design, edited by Robert E.Goodin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodin, Robert E. 1996b. Enfranchising the Earth, and Its Alternatives. Political Studies 44 (5):835849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunderson, Lance H., and Holling, C. S., eds. 2002. Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.Google Scholar
Hay, Colin. 2006. Constructivist Institutionalism. Pp. 5674 in The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions, edited by R. A. W. Rhodes, Sarah A. Binder and Bert A.Rockman. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hay, Colin, and Rosamond, Ben. 2002. Globalisation, European Integration, and the Discursive Construction of Economic Imperatives. Journal of European Public Policy 9 (2):147167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, Matthew. 2011. Climate Governance at the Crossroads: Experimenting with a Global Response after Kyoto. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, Breena. 2008. Justice and the Environment in Nussbaum’s ‘Capabilities Approach’: Why Sustainable Ecological Capacity is a Meta-Capability. Political Research Quarterly 61 (2):319332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keohane, Robert O., and Victor, David G.. 2011. The Regime Complex for Climate Change. Perspectives on Politics 9 (1):723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuyper, Jonathan. 2013. Historical Institutionalism in World Politics: Prospects for Democratisation. PhD thesis, Australian National University, Canberra.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 2004. Why has Critique Run out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern. Critical Inquiry 30 (2):225248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenton, Timothy M., Held, Herman, Kriegler, Elmar, Hall, Jim W., Lucht, Wolfgang, Rahmstorf, Stefan, and Joachim Schellnhuber, Hans. 2008. Tipping Elements in the Earth’s Climate System. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105 (6):17861793.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Litfin, Karen T. 1994. Ozone Discourses: Science and Politics in Global Environmental Cooperation. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Lomborg, Bjørn, ed. 2010. Smart Solutions to Climate Change: Comparing Costs and Benefits. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCright, Aaron, and Dunlap, Riley. 2011. The Politicization of Climate Change and Polarization in the American Public’s Views of Global Warming, 2001–2010. Sociological Quarterly 52 (2):155194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meadows, Donella H., Meadows, Dennis L., Randers, Jørgen, and Behrens, William H.. 1972. The Limits to Growth. New York: Universe Books.Google Scholar
Mills, Charles W. 1997. The Racial Contract. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Moser, Susanne C., and Dilling, Lisa. 2011. Communicating Climate Change. Pp. 161174 in The Oxford Handbook of Climate Change and Society, edited by John S. Dryzek, Richard B.Norgaard and David Schlosberg. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mulgan, Tim. 2011. Ethics for a Broken World: Imagining Philosophy after Catastrophe. Durham: Acumen.Google Scholar
National Research Council. 2010. Adapting to the Impacts of Climate Change. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Newell, Peter, and Paterson, Matthew. 2010. Climate Capitalism: Global Warming and the Transformation of the Global Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norgaard, Richard B. 1988. Sustainable Development: A Co-Evolutionary View. Futures 20 (6):606620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norgaard, Richard B. 2008. Finding Hope in the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Conservation Biology 22 (4):862869.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ostrom, Elinor. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, Elinor. 2009. A Polycentric Approach for Coping with Climate Change. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 5095, World Bank, Washington, D.C.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, Elinor, and Janssen, Marco A. 2004. Multi-Level Governance and Resilience of Social-Ecological Systems. Pp. 239259 in Globalisation, Poverty and Conflict, edited by Max Spoor. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Paehlke, Robert, and Torgerson, Douglas, eds. 2005. Managing Leviathan: Environmental Politics and the Administrative State, 2nd edition. Peterborough, Ont.: Broadview.Google Scholar
Parkinson, John, and Mansbridge, Jane, eds. 2012. Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parr, Adrian. 2009. Hijacking Sustainability. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Carole, Pateman. 1988. The Sexual Contract. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 2004. Politics in Time: History, Institutions and Social Analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rask, Mikko, Worthington, Richard, and Lammi, Minna, eds. 2012. Citizen Participation in Global Environmental Governance. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rockström, Johan, Steffen, Will, Noone, Kevin, Åsa Persson, , Stuart Chapin, F. III, Lambin, Eric F., Lenton, Timothy M., Scheffer, Marten, Folke, Carl, Joachim Schellnhuber, Hans, Nykvist, Björn, de Wit, Cynthia A., Hughes, Terry, van der Leeuw, Sander, Rodhe, Henning, Sörlin, Sverker, Snyder, Peter K., Costanza, Robert, Svedin, Uno, Falkenmark, Malin, Karlberg, Louise, Corell, Robert W., Fabry, Victoria J., Hansen, James, Walker, Brian, Liverman, Diane, Richardson, Katherine, Crutzen, Paul, and Foley, Jonathan A.. 2009. A Safe Operating Space for Humanity. Nature 461 (September) 472475.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sanders, Elizabeth. 2006. Historical Institutionalism. Pp. 3955 in The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions, edited by R. A. W. Rhodes, Sarah A. Binder and Bert A. Rockman. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schlosberg, David. 2007. Defining Environmental Justice: Theories, Movements, and Nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, Vivien A. 2008. Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse. Annual Review of Political Science 11:303326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, Amartya. 1999. Development as Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. 1979. States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia and China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Graham. 2003. Deliberative Democracy and the Environment. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soulé, Michael. 2013. Editorial: The ‘New Conservation. Conservation Biology 27 (5):895896.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spash, Clive L. 2010. The Brave New World of Carbon Trading. New Political Economy 15 (2):169195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steffen, Will, Crutzen, Paul J., and McNeill, John R. 2007. The Anthropocene: Are Humans Now Overwhelming the Great Forces of Nature? Ambio 36 (8):614621.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steffen, Will, Persson, Åsa, Deutsch, Lisa, Zalasiewicz, Jan, Williams, Mark, Richardson, Katherine, Crumley, Carole, Crutzen, Paul, Folke, Carl, Gordon, Line, Molina, Mario, Ramanathan, Veerabhadran, Rockström, Johan, Scheffer, Martin, Joachim Schellnhuber, Hans, and Svedin, Uno. 2011. The Anthropocene: From Global Change to Planetary Stewardship. Ambio 40 (7):739761.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stevenson, Hayley, and Dryzek, John S.. 2014. Democratizing Global Climate Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
World Commission on Environment and Development. 1987. Our Common Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Young, Oran R. 2010. Institutional Dynamics: Resilience, Vulnerability and Adaptation in Environmental and Resource Regimes. Global Environmental Change 20 (3):378385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 171
Total number of PDF views: 1423 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 28th January 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Hostname: page-component-898fc554b-p5tlp Total loading time: 0.57 Render date: 2021-01-28T03:05:05.503Z Query parameters: { "hasAccess": "0", "openAccess": "0", "isLogged": "0", "lang": "en" } Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false }

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Institutions for the Anthropocene: Governance in a Changing Earth System
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Institutions for the Anthropocene: Governance in a Changing Earth System
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Institutions for the Anthropocene: Governance in a Changing Earth System
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *