Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Legislative Activity and Gridlock in the European Union

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 February 2014

Abstract

This article develops a game-theoretical model of European Union (EU) policy making that suggests that the amount of legislative activity depends on the size of the gridlock interval. This is consistent with Krehbiel's study of US politics. This interval depends on two factors: (1) the preference configuration of the political actors and (2) the legislative procedures used in a particular period. Actors’ preferences and procedures are not expected to have any effect beyond their impact on the gridlock interval. The study predicts smaller gridlock intervals, and thus more legislative activity, under the co-decision (consultation) procedure when the pivotal member states and the European Parliament (Commission) are closer to each other. More activity is expected under qualified majority voting in the Council than under unanimity. The results find support for these propositions in an empirical analysis of EU legislative activity between 1979 and 2009.


Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

Footnotes

*

Professor of Political Economy, University of Leuven, and Consulting Professor, Stanford University (email: crombez@stanford.edu); Professor of European and Comparative Politics, London School of Economics and Political Science (email: s.hix@lse.ac.uk). We would like to thank Frank Häge, Simon Hug, Thomas König, Keith Krehbiel and Robert Thomson for comments and suggestions on an earlier version of the article. Online appendices and data replication sets are available at http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1017/S0007123413000380.


References

Benoit, Kenneth Laver, Michael. 2006. Party Policy in Modern Democracies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Black, Duncan. 1958. The Theory of Committees and Elections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Castles, Francis Mair, Peter. 1984. Left Right Political Scales: Some Expert Judgements. European Journal of Political Research 12:7378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crombez, Christophe. 1996. Legislative Procedures in the European Community. British Journal of Political Science 26:199228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crombez, Christophe. 1997. The Codecision Procedure in the European Union. Legislative Studies Quarterly 22:97119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crombez, Christophe. 2001. The Treaty of Amsterdam and the Codecision Procedure. In The Rules of Integration: Institutional Approaches to the Study of Europe, edited by Gerald Schneider and Mark Aspinwall, 101122. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Crombez, Christophe, Groseclose, Timothy Krehbiel, Keith. 2006. Gatekeeping. Journal of Politics 68:322334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crombez, Christophe Hix, Simon. 2011. Treaty Reform and the Commission's Appointment and Policy Making Role in the European Union. European Union Politics 12:291314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Döring, Herbert, Manow, Philip 2010. Parliament and Government Composition Database (ParlGov): An Infrastructure for Empirical Information on Political Institutions – Version 10/02. Available from http://parlgov.org.Google Scholar
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Erikson, Robert S., Mackuen, Michael B. Stimson, James A.. 2002. The Macro Polity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
European Parliament. 2009 . Activity Report: 1 May 2004 to 13 July 2009 (Kratsa-Tsagaropoulou, Vidal-Quadras, Rothe report). PE427.162v01-00.Google Scholar
Franklin, Mark N. Wlezien, Christopher. 1997. The Responsive Public – Issue Salience, Policy Change, and Preferences for European Unification. Journal of Theoretical Politics 9:347363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golub, Jonathan. 1999. In the Shadow of the Vote? Decision Making in the European Community. International Organization 53:733764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golub, Jonathan. 2008. The Study of Decision-Making Speed in the European Union. European Union Politics 9:167179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagemann, Sara. 2007. Applying Ideal Point Estimatation Methods to the Council of Ministers. European Union Politics 8:279296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Häge, Frank. 2011. The European Union Policy-Making Dataset. European Union Politics 12:455477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hertz, Robin F. Leuffen, Dirk. 2011. Too Big to Run? Analyzing the Impact of Enlargement on EU Decision-Making. European Union Politics 12:193215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hix, Simon, Noury, Abdul Roland, Gérard. 2006. Dimensions of Politics in the European Parliament. American Journal of Political Science 50:494511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hix, Simon, Noury, Abdul Roland, Gérard. 2007. Democratic Politics in the European Parliament. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hix, Simon Høyland, Bjørn. 2012. The Political System of the European Union, 3rd edn. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Hooghe, Liesbet, Bakker, Ryan, Brigevich, Anna, De Vries, Catherine, Edwards, Erica, Marks, Gary, Rovny, Jan, Steenbergen, Marco Vachudova, Milada. 2010. Reliability and Validity of Measuring Party Positions: The Chapel Hill Expert Surveys of 2002 and 2006. European Journal of Political Research 49:687703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, John Inglehart, Ronald. 1995. Expert Interpretations of Party Space and Party Locations in 42 Societies. Party Politics 1:73111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
König, Thomas. 2007. Divergence or Convergence? From Ever-Growing to Ever-Slowing European Legislative Decision Making. European Journal of Political Research 46:417444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
König, Thomas. 2008. Analysing the Process of EU Legislative Decision-Making: To Make a Long Story Short. European Union Politics 9:145165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
König, Thomas, Luetgert, Brooke Dannwolf, Tanja. 2006. Quantifying European Legislative Research: Using CELEX and PreLex in EU Legislative Studies. European Union Politics 7:553574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith. 1998. Pivotal Politics: A Theory of U.S. Lawmaking. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattila, Mikko. 2004. Contested Decisions: Empirical Analysis of Voting in the European Union Council of Ministers. European Journal of Political Research 43:2950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moser, Peter. 1997. A Theory of the Conditional Influence of the European Parliament in the Co-operation Procedure. Public Choice 91:333350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ray, Leonard. 1999. Measuring Party Positions on European Integration: Results from an Expert Survey. European Journal of Political Research 36:283306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romer, Thomas Rosenthal, Howard. 1978. Political Resource Allocation, Controlled Agendas, and the Status Quo. Public Choice 33:2743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scharpf, Fritz. 1988. The Joint-Decision Trap: Lessons from German Federalism and European Integration. Public Administration 66:239278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulz, Heiner König, Thomas. 2000. Institutional Reform and Decision-Making Efficiency in the European Union. American Journal of Political Science 44:653666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slapin, Jonathan. 2013. Measurement, Model Testing, and Legislative Influence in the European Union. European Union Politics, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Steenbergen, Marco Marks, Gary. 2007. Evaluating Expert Surveys. European Journal of Political Research 46:347366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steunenberg, Bernard. 1994. Decision Making Under Different Institutional Arrangements: Legislation by the European Community. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 150:642669.Google Scholar
Steunenberg, Bernard. 1997. Codecision and its Reform: A Comparative Analysis of Decision Making Rules in the European Union. In Political Institutions and Public Policy: Perspectives on European Decision Making, edited by Bernard Steunenberg and Frans van Vught, 205229. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, Robert. 2011. Resolving Controversy in the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, Robert, Boerefijn, Jovanka Stokman, Frans N.. 2004. Actor Alignments in European Union Decision Making. European Journal of Political Research 43:237261 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, Robert, Stokman, Frans N., Achen, Christopher H. König, Thomas. 2006. The European Union Decides: Testing Theories of European Decision-Making. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toshkov, Dimitar. 2011. Public Opinion and Policy Output in the European Union: A Lost Relationship. European Union Politics 12:169191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsebelis, George. 1994. The Power of the European Parliament as a Conditional Agenda Setter. American Political Science Review 88:128142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsebelis, George Garrett, Geoffrey. 2000. Legislative Politics in the European Union. European Union Politics 1:936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsebelis, George Garrett, Geoffrey. 2001. The Institutional Foundations of Intergovernmentalism and Supranationalism in the European Union. International Organization 55:357390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warntjen, Andreas, Hix, Simon Crombez, Christophe. 2008. The Party Political Make-up of EU Legislative Bodies. Journal of European Public Policy 15:12431253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmer, Christina, Schneider, Gerald Dobbins, Michael. 2005. The Contested Council: Conflict Dimensions of Intergovernmental Institution. Political Studies 53:403422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crombez and Hix Supplementary Material

Supplementary Material

[Opens in a new window]
File 27 KB

Crombez and Hix Supplementary Material

Supplementary Material

[Opens in a new window]
File 5 KB

Crombez and Hix Supplementary Material

Appendix

[Opens in a new window]
PDF 22 KB

Crombez and Hix Supplementary Material

Appendix

[Opens in a new window]
PDF 22 KB

Altmetric attention score


Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 62
Total number of PDF views: 632 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 4th December 2020. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Hostname: page-component-b4dcdd7-bf5bq Total loading time: 0.427 Render date: 2020-12-04T15:32:07.730Z Query parameters: { "hasAccess": "0", "openAccess": "0", "isLogged": "0", "lang": "en" } Feature Flags last update: Fri Dec 04 2020 15:00:26 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) Feature Flags: { "metrics": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "peerReview": true, "crossMark": true, "comments": true, "relatedCommentaries": true, "subject": true, "clr": false, "languageSwitch": true }

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Legislative Activity and Gridlock in the European Union
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Legislative Activity and Gridlock in the European Union
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Legislative Activity and Gridlock in the European Union
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *