Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Peiffer, Caryn
and
Walton, Grant
2019.
Overcoming Collective Action Problems through Anti-corruption Messages.
SSRN Electronic Journal ,
Tankebe, Justice
Karstedt, Susanne
and
Adu-Poku, Sarah
2019.
Corruption Intentions Among Prospective Elites in Ghana: An Economy of Esteem.
International Criminal Justice Review,
Vol. 29,
Issue. 2,
p.
168.
Davis, Kevin E.
2021.
Anti-corruption Law and Systemic Corruption: The Role of Direct Responses.
Revista Direito GV,
Vol. 17,
Issue. 2,
Beesley, Celeste
and
Hawkins, Darren
2022.
Corruption, institutional trust and political engagement in Peru.
World Development,
Vol. 151,
Issue. ,
p.
105743.
Agerberg, Mattias
2022.
Messaging about corruption: The power of social norms.
Governance,
Vol. 35,
Issue. 3,
p.
929.
de Sa e Silva, Fabio
2022.
Relational legal consciousness and anticorruption: Lava Jato, social media interactions, and the co-production of law's detraction in Brazil (2017–2019).
Law & Society Review,
Vol. 56,
Issue. 3,
p.
344.
Peiffer, Caryn
and
Walton, Grant W
2022.
Getting the (right) message across: How to encourage citizens to report corruption.
Development Policy Review,
Vol. 40,
Issue. 5,
CHEESEMAN, NIC
and
PEIFFER, CARYN
2022.
The Curse of Good Intentions: Why Anticorruption Messaging Can Encourage Bribery.
American Political Science Review,
Vol. 116,
Issue. 3,
p.
1081.
Cheeseman, Nic
and
Peiffer, Caryn
2023.
Why efforts to fight corruption can undermine the social contract: Lessons from a survey experiment in Nigeria.
Governance,
Vol. 36,
Issue. 4,
p.
1045.
Barbabela, Letícia
2024.
A positive feedback mechanism? Institutional responsiveness to bribery reporting by citizens in 12 African countries.
Crime, Law and Social Change,