Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-24T20:10:22.774Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Value of a Vote: Malapportionment in Comparative Perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2001

DAVID SAMUELS
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, University of Minnesota
RICHARD SNYDER
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Abstract

Comparative studies of electoral institutions have largely neglected a fundamental characteristic of most of the world's electoral systems: malapportionment. This article provides a method for measuring malapportionment in different types of electoral systems, calculates levels of malapportionment in seventy-eight countries, and employs statistical analysis to explore the correlates of malapportionment in both upper and lower chambers. The analysis shows that the use of single-member districts is associated with higher levels of malapportionment in lower chambers and that federalism and country size account for variation in malapportionment in upper chambers. Furthermore, African and especially Latin American countries tend to have electoral systems that are highly malapportioned. The article concludes by proposing a broad, comparative research agenda that focuses on the origins, evolution and consequences of malapportionment.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2001 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)