Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-558cb97cc8-zcgq2 Total loading time: 0.273 Render date: 2022-10-07T17:13:39.054Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "displayNetworkTab": true, "displayNetworkMapGraph": false, "useSa": true } hasContentIssue true

What Counts as Evidence? Panel Data and the Empirical Evaluation of Revised Modernization Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 July 2016

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes and Comments
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Department of Political Science, University of Olso (emails: s.a.dahlum@stv.uio.no, c.h.knutsen@stv.uio.no).

References

Dahlum, Sirianne, and Knutsen, Carl Henrik. 2016. Democracy by Demand? Reinvestigating the Effect of Self-Expression Values on Political Regime Type. British Journal of Political Science.Google Scholar
Hadenius, Axel, and Teorell, Jan. 2005. Cultural and Economic Prerequisites of Democracy: Reassessing Recent Evidence. Studies in Comparative International Development 39 (4):87106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald, and Welzel, Christian. 2005. Modernization, Cultural Change and Democracy. The Human Development Sequence. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knutsen, Carl Henrik. 2010. Measuring Effective Democracy. International Political Science Review 31 (2):109128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leamer, Edward E. 1985. Sensitivity Analyses Would Help. American Economic Review 57 (3):308313.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, Alvarez, Michael, Cheibub, José Antonio, and Limongi, Fernando. 2000. Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World, 19501990 . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teorell, Jan, and Hadenius, Axel. 2006. Democracy Without Democratic Values: A Rejoinder to Welzel and Inglehart. Studies in Comparative International Development 41 (3):95111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welzel, Christian. 2013. Freedom Rising: Human Empowerment and the Quest for Emancipation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welzel, Christian, Inglehart, Ronald, and Kruse, Stefan. 2016. Pitfalls in the Study of Democratization. Testing the Emancipatory Theory of Democracy. British Journal of Political Science.Google Scholar
2
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

What Counts as Evidence? Panel Data and the Empirical Evaluation of Revised Modernization Theory
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

What Counts as Evidence? Panel Data and the Empirical Evaluation of Revised Modernization Theory
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

What Counts as Evidence? Panel Data and the Empirical Evaluation of Revised Modernization Theory
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *