Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-5c569c448b-9hjnw Total loading time: 0.269 Render date: 2022-07-05T15:26:38.037Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

When Do Governments Resort to Election Violence?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2013

Abstract

When are governments most likely to use election violence, and what factors can mitigate government incentives to resort to violence? How do the dynamics of election violence differ in the pre- and post-election periods? The central argument of this article is that an incumbent's fear of losing power as the result of an election, as well as institutionalized constraints on the incumbent's decision-making powers, are pivotal in her decision to use election violence. While it may seem obvious to suggest that incumbents use election violence in an effort to fend off threats to their power, it is not obvious how to gauge these threats. Thus, a central objective of this article is to identify sources of information about the incumbent's popularity that can help predict the likelihood of election violence. The observable implications of this argument are tested using newly available cross-national evidence on elections, government use of pre- and post-election violence, and post-election protests from 1981 to 2004.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

School of International Relations and Pacific Studies and Department of Political Science, University of California, San Diego (email: ehafner@ucsd.edu); Department of Political Science, Yale University (email: susan.hyde@yale.edu) and Department of Political Science, University of California, San Diego (email: rjablonski@ucsd.edu). Support for this research was provided by the Laboratory on International Law and Regulation at the University of California, San Diego, the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs at Princeton University and the MacMillan Center for International and Area Studies at Yale University. Replication data and an online appendix are available at http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1017/S0007123412000671. For helpful comments, we would like to thank participants at workshops at the University of California at San Diego, George Washington University, Yale University and panel participants at the 2010 ISA annual meeting, as well as Jason Brownlee, Sarah Bush, Gary Cox, David Cingranelli, Daniela Donno, Christian Davenport, Thad Dunning, Christopher Fariss, Tom Flores, David Lake, Ellen Lust, Irfan Nooruddin, Philip Roeder, Ken Scheve and Susan Stokes. We also thank Sarah Knoesen, Michael Plouffe and Kristy Pathakis for valuable research assistance. Any errors or omissions are our own.

References

Amnesty International. 2001. Zimbabwe-Amnesty International Report.Google Scholar
Associated Press. 2007. Torture Fear for Mugabe Opponent. Australia: Herald Sun, 14 March.Google Scholar
Banks, Arthur S. 2005. Cross-National Time-Series Data Archive. Databanks International. Available from http://www.databanksinternational.com/, accessed 29 March 2009.Google Scholar
Banks, Arthur S. 1975. Cross-National Time-Series Data Archive: User's Manual, 1–2. Binghamton: Center for Comparative Political Research, State University of New York.Google Scholar
Beaulieu, Emily. 2006. Protesting the Contest: Election Boycotts Around the World, 1990–2002. PhD Dissertation. University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
Blaydes, Lisa. 2010. Elections and Distributive Politics in Mubarak's Egypt. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brownlee, Jason. 2009. Portents of Pluralism: How Hybrid Regimes Affect Democratic Transitions. American Journal of Political Science 53 (3):515532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunce, Valerie J.Wolchik, Sharon L.. 2006. Favorable Conditions and Electoral Revolutions. Journal of Democracy 17 (4):518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunce, Valerie J.Wolchik, Sharon L.. 2010. Defeating Dictators: Electoral Change and Stability in Competitive Authoritarian Regimes. World Politics 62 (1):4386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, Sabine C. 2006. The Dynamic Relationship Between Protest and Repression. Political Research Quarterly 59 (1):111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, Sabine C. 2010. The Use of Repression as a Response to Domestic Dissent. Political Studies 58 (1):167186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cingranelli, DavidFilippov, Mikhail. 2010. Electoral Rules and Incentives to Protect Human Rights. The Journal of Politics 72 (1):243257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cingranelli, David L., Richards, David L.. 2010. The Cingranelli-Richards (CIRI) Human Rights Dataset. Available from http://www.humanrightsdata.org, accessed 12 June 2009.Google Scholar
Collier, Paul. 2009. Wars, Guns, and Votes. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Collier, PaulVicente, Pedro C.. 2012. Violence, Bribery, and Fraud: The Political Economy of Elections in Sub-Saharan Africa. Public Choice 153:117147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary W. 2008. Authoritarian Elections and Leadership Succession, 1975–2000. San Diego: University of California.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1971. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Davenport, Christian. 1995. Multi-Dimensional Threat Perception and State Repression: An Inquiry into Why States Apply Negative Sanctions. American Journal of Political Science 39 (3):683713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davenport, Christian. 1997. From Ballots to Bullets: An Empirical Assessment of How National Elections Influence State uses of Political Repression. Electoral Studies 16 (4):517540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davenport, Christian. 1998. Liberalizing Event or Lethal Episode? An Empirical Assessment of How National Elections Affect the Suppression of Political and Civil Liberties. Social Science Quarterly 79 (2):321340.Google Scholar
Davenport, Christian. 2007. State Repression and Political Order. Annual Review of Political Science 10 (1):123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, David R., Ward, Michael D.. 1990. They Dance Alone. Journal of Conflict Resolution 34 (3):449475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, Larry Jay. 2002. Thinking About Hybrid Regimes. Journal of Democracy 13 (2):2135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunning, Thad. 2011. Fighting and Voting: Violent Conflict and Electoral Politics. Journal of Conflict Resolution 55 (3):327339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elkins, Zachary, Ginsburg, Tom, Melton, James. 2007. Comparative Constitutions Project: Informing the Science of Constitutional Design. Available from http://www.comparativeconstitutionsproject.org/data.htm, accessed 5 August 2009.Google Scholar
Fearon, James D. 2011. Self-Enforcing Democracy. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 126 (4):16611708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gandhi, JenniferPrzeworski, Adam. 2009. Holding onto Power by Any Means? The Origins of Competitive Elections. Atlanta, GA: Emory University.Google Scholar
Gartner, Scott SigmundRegan, Patrick M.. 1996. Threat and Repression: The Non-Linear Relationship between Government and Opposition Violence. Journal of Peace Research 33 (3):273287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geoghegan, Andrew. 2008. Tsvangirai Calls for International Intervention in Zimbabwe. Sydney: Australian Broadcasting Corporation.Google Scholar
Goemans, Hein E., Gleditsch, Kristian S.Chiozza, Giacomo. 2009. Introducing Archigos: A Dataset of Political Leaders. Journal of Peace Research 46 (2):269283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, Dipak K, Singh, HarinderSprague, Tom. 1993. Government Coercion of Dissidents. Journal of Conflict Resolution 37 (2):301339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M. 2005. Trading Human Rights: How Preferential Trade Agreements Influence Government Repression. International Organization 59 (3):593629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M. 2009. Forced to be Good: How Trade Agreements Boost Human Rights. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M., Helfer, Laurence R.Fariss, Christopher J.. 2011. Emergency and Escape: Explaining Derogations from Human Rights Treaties. International Organization 65 (4):673707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M., Hyde, Susan D., Jablonski, Ryan S.. 2013. Surviving Elections: Election Violence and Leader Tenure. SSRN eLibrary. Available from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1975026, accessed 31 August 2012.Google Scholar
Henderson, Conway W. 1991. Conditions Affecting the Use of Political Repression. The Journal of Conflict Resolution 35 (1):120142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoppen, K. Theodore. 1984. Elections, Politics, and Society in Ireland, 1832–1885. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Howard, Marc M.Roessler, Philip G.. 2006. Liberalizing Electoral Outcomes in Competitive Authoritarian Regimes. American Journal of Political Science 50 (2):365381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, Rhoda E.Donnelly, Jack. 1986. Human Dignity, Human Rights, and Political Regimes. The American Political Science Review 80 (3):801817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Human Rights Watch. 2010. Cambodia: Tribunal's First Step in Search for Justice. Available from http://www.hrw.org/en/news/2010/07/26/cambodia-tribunal-s-first-step-search-justice, accessed 3 August 2010.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. 1991. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Hyde, Susan D., Marinov, Nikolay. 2011. Codebook for National Elections Across Democracy and Autocracy. NELDA. Available from http://hyde.research.yale.edu/nelda/NELDA_codebook_2011.pdf, accessed 30 May 2012.Google Scholar
Hyde, Susan D.Marinov, Nikolay. 2012a. Which Elections Can Be Lost? Political Analysis 20 (2):191210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyde, Susan D., Marinov, Nikolay. 2012b. Does Information Facilitate Self-Enforcing Democracy? The Role of International Election Observation. Available from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1266678, accessed 12 December 2012.Google Scholar
Inter-Parliamentary Union. 1993. Cambodia: Parliamentary Elections Constituent Assembly, 1993. Available from http://www.ipu.org/parline-e/reports/arc/2051_93.htm, accessed 21 July 2010.Google Scholar
Keyssar, Alexander. 2009. The Right to Vote: The Contested History of Democracy in the United States, revised ed. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
King, Gary. 2001. Proper Nouns and Methodological Propriety: Pooling Dyads in International Relations Data. International Organization 55 (2):497507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krieger, Norma. 2000. Zimbabwe Today: Hope against Grim Realities. Review of African Political Economy 27 (85):443450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krieger, Norma. 2005. ZANU(PF) Strategies in General Elections, 1980–2000: Discourse and Coercion. African Affairs 104 (414):134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehoucq, Fabrice. 2003. Electoral Fraud: Causes, Types, and Consequences. Annual Review of Political Science 6:233256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitsky, StevenWay, Lucan. 2002. The Rise of Competitive Authoritarianism. Journal of Democracy 13 (2):5165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitsky, StevenWay, Lucan. 2010. Competitive Authoritarianism: The Origins and Evolution of Hybrid Regimes in the Post-Cold War Era. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael S. 1990. Economics and Elections: The Major Western Democracies. University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindberg, Staffan I. 2006a. Democracy and Elections in Africa. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Lindberg, Staffan I. 2006b. Tragic Protest: Why Do Opposition Parties Boycott Elections? In Electoral Authoritarianism: The Dynamics of Unfree Competition, edited by Andreas Schedler. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
Lindberg, Staffan I. ed. 2009. Democratization by Elections. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1983. Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics, 2nd ed.London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Machado, Fabiana, Scartascini, CarlosTommasi, Mariano. 2011. Political Institutions and Street Protests in Latin America. Journal of Conflict Resolution 55 (3):340365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magaloni, Beatriz. 2006. Voting for Autocracy: Hegemonic Party Survival and Its Demise in Mexico. Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott, Brinks, DanielPerez-Linan, Anibal. 2001. Classifying Political Regimes in Latin America, 1945–1999. Studies in Comparative International Development 36 (1):3765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mallet, Victor. 2000. Mugabe Set for Poll Victory. London: Financial Times. June 27.Google Scholar
Marshall, Monty G. 2007. Major Episodes of Political Violence, 1946–2006. Center for Systemic Peace. Available from http://www.systemicpeace.org/warlist.htm, accessed 17 August 2009.Google Scholar
Marshall, Monty G., Jaggers, Keith. 2002. Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2002. Dataset Users’ Manual. Center for International Development and Conflict Management, College Park, University of Maryland.Google Scholar
Moore, Will H. 1998. Repression and Dissent: Substitution, Context, and Timing. American Journal of Political Science 42 (3):851873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, Will H. 2000. The Repression of Dissent. Journal of Conflict Resolution 44 (1):107127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumayer, Eric. 2011. Do Governments Mean Business When They Derogate? Human Rights Violations During Notified States of Emergency. SSRN eLibrary. Available from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1654001, accessed 5 January 2010.Google Scholar
Nohlen, Dieter. ed. 2005. Elections in the Americas: A Data Handbook. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nohlen, Dieter, Grotz, FlorianHartmann, Christof. eds. 2001. Elections in Asia and the Pacific: A Data Handbook. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nohlen, Dieter, Michael, KrennerichThibaut, Bernhard. eds. 1999. Elections in Africa: A Data Handbook. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nolen, Stephanie. 2005. Do Shiny Boxes Make for a Fair Vote in Zimbabwe?; Behind the Appearance of an Orderly Election there was Evidence of Old-Style Intimidation. Toronto: The Globe and Mail. 1 April.Google Scholar
Osborn, Andrew. 2005. West Turns a Blind Eye as Activists Crushed Before Azerbaijan Poll. London: The Independent. 5 November.Google Scholar
OSCE/ODIHR. 2006. Republic of Azerbaijan Parliamentary Elections 6 November 2005: OSCE/ODIHR Election Observation Mission Final Report. Warsaw: Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe: Office of Democratic Institutions and Human Rights. Available from http://www.osce.org/documents/odihr/2006/02/17923_en.pdf, accessed 23 June 2008.Google Scholar
Poe, Steven C.Tate, C. Neal. 1994. Repression of Human Rights to Personal Integrity in the 1980s: A Global Analysis. The American Political Science Review 88 (4):853872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poe, Steven C., Tate, C. NealKeith, Linda Camp. 1999. Repression of the Human Right to Personal Integrity Revisited: A Global Cross-National Study Covering the Years 1976–1993. International Studies Quarterly 43 (2):291313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poe, Steven C., Tate, C. Neal, Keith, Linda CampLanier, Drew N.. 2000. Domestic Threats: The Abuse of Personal Integrity. In Paths to State Repression: Human Rights and Contentious Politics in Comparative Perspective, edited by Christian A. Davenport, 2770. Boulder, CO: Roman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam. 1991. Democracy and the Market: Political and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przeworski, Adam. 2006. Self-Enforcing Democracy. In The Oxford Handbook of Political Economy, edited by Barry R. Weingast and Donald A. Wittman, 312328. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Raath, Jan. 2002. Chaos Fears as Mugabe Blocks Poll Observers. London: The Times, 7 March.Google Scholar
Richards, David L. 1999. Perilous Proxy: Human Rights and the Presence of National Elections. Social Science Quarterly 80 (4):648665.Google Scholar
Riker, William H. 1965. Democracy in the United States. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Robinson, James A.Torvik, Ragnar. 2009. The Real Swing Voter's Curse. American Economic Review 99 (2):310315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roessler, Philip G.Howard, Marc M.. 2009. Post-Cold War Political Regimes: When Do Elections Matter? In Democratization by Elections, edited by Staffan I. Lindberg Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Schedler, Andreas. 2002. The Menu of Manipulation. Journal of Democracy 13 (2):3650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlink, Leo. 2002. Murders in Mugabe Torture Camps, Paper Reports. Australia: Hobart Mercury. 4 March.Google Scholar
Seligson, Mitchell A.Booth, John A.. 1995. Elections and Democracy in Central America, Revisited. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Shenon, Philip. 1993. Cambodia Factions use Terror Tactics in Crucial Election. The New York Times, 10 May.Google Scholar
Simpser, Alberto. 2012. Why Parties and Governments Manipulate Elections: Theory, Practice, and Implications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sisk, Timothy D. 1995. Democratization in South Africa: The Elusive Social Contract. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Snyder, Jack L. 2000. From Voting to Violence: Democratization and Nationalist Conflict. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Straus, ScottTaylor, Charlie. 2012. Democratization and Electoral Violence in Sub-Saharan Africa, 1990–2008. In Voting in Fear, edited by Dorina A. Bekoe. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace.Google Scholar
Synovitz, Ron. 2009. Checkered Past of Iranian Opinion Polls Leaves Much In Doubt. Radio Free Europe.Google Scholar
The Economist. 2009. No Certain Outcome; Iran's Presidential Election. The Economist, 4 June.Google Scholar
Thornycroft Peta. 2005. Zimbabwe Voters Were Gripped by Terror Election Observers Condemn Mugabe Victory. London: The Daily Telegraph. 4 April.Google Scholar
Timberg, Craig, Mugari, Shakeman. 2008a. Zimbabwe's Opposition To Boycott Runoff Vote; Party's Executive Panel Unanimous in Its Belief 2nd Round Isn't Needed. The Washington Post, 11 April.Google Scholar
Tucker, Joshua. 2007. Enough! Electoral Fraud, Collective Action Problems, and Post-Communist Colored Revolutions. Perspectives on Politics 5 (3):535551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. Department of State. 1994. Cambodia Human Rights Practices, 1993. Available from http://dosfan.lib.uic.edu/ERC/democracy/1993_hrp_report/93hrp_report_eap/Cambodia.html, accessed 19 January 2010.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of State. 2001. Zimbabwe Human Rights Practices, 2000. Available from http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/hrrpt/2000/af/852.htm, accessed 19 January 2010.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of State. 2003. Zimbabwe Human Rights Practices 2002. Available from http://www.state.gov/j/drl/rls/hrrpt/2002/18234.htm, accessed 13 June 2012.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of State. 2006a. Azerbaijan Human Rights Practices, 2005. Available from http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/hrrpt/2005/61637.htm, accessed 19 July 2010.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of State. 2006b. Zimbabwe Human Rights Practices 2005. Human Rights Report. Available from http://www.state.gov/j/drl/rls/hrrpt/2005/61600.htm, accessed 13 June 2012.Google Scholar
Valiyev, Anar M. 2006. Parliamentary Elections in Azerbaijan: A Failed Revolution. Problems of Post-Communism 53 (3):1735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weingast, Barry R. 1997. The Political Foundations of Democracy and the Rule of Law. American Political Science Review 91 (2):245263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, Steven I. 2006. Votes and Violence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
World Bank. 2006. World Development Indicators. [CD-ROM].Google Scholar
Zakaria, Fareed. 1997. The Rise of Illiberal Democracy. Foreign Affairs 76 (6):2243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zanger, Sabine C. 2000. A Global Analysis of the Effect of Political Regime Changes on Life Integrity Violations, 1977–93. Journal of Peace Research 37 (2):213233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeldin, Theodore. 1971. The Political System of Napoleon III. New York: W.W. Norton (New York: Macmillan 1958).Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Hafner-Burton Supplementary Material

Appendix

Download Hafner-Burton Supplementary Material(File)
File 490 KB
Supplementary material: File

Hafner-Burton Supplementary Material

Hafner-Burton Supplementary Material data replication 1

Download Hafner-Burton Supplementary Material(File)
File 2 KB
Supplementary material: File

Hafner-Burton Supplementary Material

Supplementary Material

Download Hafner-Burton Supplementary Material(File)
File 13 KB
Supplementary material: File

Hafner-Burton Supplementary Material

Hafner-Burton Supplementary Material data replication 2

Download Hafner-Burton Supplementary Material(File)
File 297 KB
154
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

When Do Governments Resort to Election Violence?
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

When Do Governments Resort to Election Violence?
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

When Do Governments Resort to Election Violence?
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *