Skip to main content
×
Home

All Policies Are Glocal: International Environmental Policy Making with Strategic Subnational Governments

Abstract

National governments have intensified their attempts to create international institutions in various policy fields such as the environment, finance and trade. At the same time, many subnational policy makers have begun to duplicate international efforts by setting their own, stricter policies while others remain inactive or enact more lax regulation. This ‘glocalization’ of policy creates a complex and potentially costly patchwork system of regulations. To shed light on this phenomenon, this article analyzes the interaction between subnational and national governments within a game-theoretic model of international treaty negotiations. The glocalization of regulatory policy can be understood as an attempt by subnational policy makers to strategically constrain or empower national governments in international negotiations. The study finds that the shadow of international treaty formation gives rise to within-country and cross-country policy balancing dynamics that may explain some of the subnational policy polarization that is currently observable in many countries. The article specifies the conditions under which these dynamics occur, spells out empirically testable hypotheses and identifies possible theoretical extensions.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      All Policies Are Glocal: International Environmental Policy Making with Strategic Subnational Governments
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      All Policies Are Glocal: International Environmental Policy Making with Strategic Subnational Governments
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      All Policies Are Glocal: International Environmental Policy Making with Strategic Subnational Governments
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
The online version of this article is published within an Open Access environment subject to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution licence http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
Footnotes
Hide All
*

Department of Political Science, University of St.Gallen (email: michael.bechtel@unisg.ch); Department of Political Science, Columbia University (email: ju2178@columbia.edu). Michael M. Bechtel gratefully acknowledges support from the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant #PP00P1-139035). A supplementary online appendix is available at www.mbechtel.com/index.php/research and http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1017/S0007123413000495.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Andonova Liliana B. Mitchell Ronald B.. 2010. The Rescaling of Global Environmental Politics. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 35 (1):255282.
Bäck Hanna, Debus Marc, Müller Jochen, Bäck Henry , 2010, Regional Government Formation in Varying Multi-Level Contexts: A Comparison of Eight European Countries. Mannheim, Göteborg: Unpublished Manuscript.
Bechtel Michael M. Scheve Kenneth F.. 2013. Mass Supports for Climate Agreements Depends on Institutional Design. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States 110 (32):1376313768.
Bechtel Michael M. Tosun Jale. 2009. Changing Economic Openness for Environmental Policy Convergence: When Can Bilateral Trade Agreements Induce Convergence of Environmental Regulation? International Studies Quarterly 53 (4):931953.
Benoit Kenneth Laver Michael. 2006. Party Policy in Modern Democracies. London: Routledge.
Betsill Michele M. Bulkeley Harriet. 2004. Transnational Networks and Global Environmental Governance: The Cities for Climate Protection Program. International Studies Quarterly 48 (2):471493.
Birch Eugenie L. Wachter Susan M.. 2008. Growing Greener Cities: Urban Sustainability in the Twenty-First Century. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Bodiguel Maryvonne Buller Henry. 1994. Environmental Policy and the Regions in France. Regional Politics and Policy 4 (3):92109.
Budge Ian, Klingemann Hans-Dieter, Volkens Andrea, Bara Judith Tanenbaum Eric. 2001. Mapping Policy Preferences. Estimates for Parties, Electors and Governments 1945-1998. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chapman Terrence L. 2009. Audience Beliefs and International Organization Legitimacy. International Organization 63 (4):733764.
Harstad Bård. 2007. Harmonization and Side Payments in Political Cooperation. American Economic Review 97 (3):871889.
Iida Keisuke. 1993. When and How Do Domestic Constraints Matter? Two-Level Games with Uncertainty. Journal of Conflict Resolution 37 (3):403426.
Kahn Matthew E. 2006. Green Cities: Urban Growth and the Environment. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Kern K. Bulkeley Harriet. 2009. Cities, Europeanization and Multi-Level Governance: Governing Climate Change Through Transnational Municipal Networks. Journal of Common Market Studies 47 (2):309322.
Laver Mark H., Benoit Kenneth Garry John. 2003. Extracting Policy Positions from Political Texts Using Words as Data. American Political Science Review 97 (2):311331.
Lutsey N.D. Sperling . 2007. America's Bottom-Up Climate Change Mitigation Policy. Energy Policy 36 (2):673685.
Lyon Thomas P. Yin Haitao. 2010. Why Do States Adopt Renewable Portfolio Standards?: An Empirical Investigation. Energy Journal 31 (3):131155.
Mazmanian Daniel A., Jurewitz John Nelson Hal. 2008. California's Climate Change Policy: The Case of a Subnational State Actor Tackling a Global Challenge. Journal of Environment and Development 17 (4):401423.
Meyer Stephen M. Konisky David M.. 2007. Adopting Local Environmental Institutions: Environmental Need and Economic Constraints. Political Research Quarterly 60 (1):316.
Milner Helen V. 1997. Interests, Institutions, and Information: Domestic Politics and International Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Milner Helen V. Rosendorff B Peter. 1997. Democratic Politics and International Trade Negotiations: Elections and Divided Government as Constraints on Trade Liberalization. Journal of Conflict Resolution 41 (1):117146.
Mo Jongryn. 1994. The Logic of Two-Level Games with Endogenous Domestic Coalitions. Journal of Conflict Resolution 38 (3):402422.
Morrow James D. 1991. Electoral and Congressional Incentives and Arms Control. Journal of Conflict Resolution 35 (2):245265.
Nash John F. 1950. The Bargaining Problem. Econometrica 18 (2):155162.
Putnam Robert D. 1988. Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games. International Organization 42 (3):429460.
Rabe B. 2004. Statehouse and Greenhouse: The Evolving Politics of American Climate Change Policy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Rubinstein Ariel. 1982. Perfect Equilibrium in a Bargaining Model. Econometrica 50 (1):97110.
Schaffer Lena Maria. 2011. Voluntary Climate Change Initiatives in the US – Analyzing Participation in Space and Time. PhD thesis, ETH Zurich, Zurich.
Schelling Thomas C. 1960. The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Schneider Gerald Weitsman Patricia A.. 1996. The Punishment Trap: Integration Referendums as Popularity Contests. Comparative Political Studies 28 (4):582607.
Schreurs Miranda A. Tiberghien Yves. 2007. Multi-Level Reinforcement: Explaining European Union Leadership in Climate Change Mitigation. Global Environmental Politics 7 (4):1946.
Smith Alastair Hayes David R.. 1997. The Shadow of the Polls: Electoral Effects on International Agreements. International Interactions 23 (1):79108.
Tarar Ahmer. 2001. International Bargaining with Two-Sided Domestic Constraints. Journal of Conflict Resolution 45 (3):320340.
UK Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. 2010. Adapting to Climate Change: A Guide for Local Councils. UK Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.
Urpelainen Johannes. 2009. Explaining the Schwarzenegger Phenomenon: Local Frontrunners in Climate Policy. Global Environmental Politics 9 (3):82105.
Urpelainen Johannes. 2010. Regulation Under Economic Globalization. International Studies Quarterly 54 (4):10991121.
Victor David G. 2011. Global Warming Gridlock: Creating More Effective Strategies for Protecting the Planet. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Voeten Erik Brewer Paul R.. 2006. Public Opinion, the War in Iraq, and Presidential Accountability. Journal of Conflict Resolution 50 (6):809830.
Yeager David Scott, Laron Samuel B., Krosnick Jon A. Tompson Trevor. 2011. Measuring Americans’ Issue Priorities: A New Version of the Most Important Problem Question Reveals More Concern about Global Warming and the Environment. Public Opinion Quarterly 75 (1):709747.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

British Journal of Political Science
  • ISSN: 0007-1234
  • EISSN: 1469-2112
  • URL: /core/journals/british-journal-of-political-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
Type Description Title
PDF
Supplementary Materials

Bechtel and Urpelainen Supplementary Material
Appendix

 PDF (313 KB)
313 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 23
Total number of PDF views: 237 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 380 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 17th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.