Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Cognitive Biases and Communication Strength in Social Networks: The Case of Episodic Frames

  • Lene Aarøe (a1) and Michael Bang Petersen (a1) (a2)
Abstract

Media stories often reach citizens via a two-step process, transmitted to them indirectly via their social networks. Why are some media stories strongly transmitted and impact opinions powerfully in this two-step flow while others quickly perish? Integrating classical research on the two-step flow of political communication and novel theories from cognitive psychology, this article outlines a model for understanding the strength of political frames in the two-step flow. It argues that frames that resonate with cognitive biases (that is, deep-seated psychological decision rules) will be transmitted more and have a stronger influence on opinion when citizens recollect media frames in their social networks. Focusing on the case of episodic and thematic frames, the study tests this model. It introduces a novel research design: implementing the children’s game ‘Telephone’ in consecutive experimental online surveys fielded to nationally representative samples. This design helps gauge the reliability of transmission and the degree of persuasiveness in actual chains of transmission.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*Corresponding author. Email: michael@ps.au.dk
References
Hide All
Aarøe, L (2011) Investigating frame strength: the case of episodic and thematic frames. Political Communication 28 (2):207226.
Aarøe, L Jensen, C (2015) Learning to match: how prior frame exposure increases citizens’ value matching abilities. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 27 (1):4670.
Aarøe, Lene Petersen, Michael Bang (2018) Replication Data for: “Cognitive Biases and Communication Strength in Social Networks: The Case of Episodic Frames”, https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/EM3AZ2, Harvard Dataverse, V1.
Achen, CH (1982) Interpreting and Using Regression. Sage University Papers: Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, No. 07–029. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Arceneaux, K (2012) Cognitive biases and the strength of political arguments. American Journal of Political Science 56 (2):271285.
Arceneaux, K , Johnson, M Maes, HH (2012) The genetic basis of political sophistication. Twin Research and Human Genetics 15 (1):3441.
Bar-Hillel, M (1980) The base-rate fallacy in probability judgments. Acta Psychologica 44 (3):211233.
Barlett, FC (1932) Remembering. Oxford: Macmillan.
Bebbington, K et al. (2017) The sky is falling: evidence of a negativity bias in the social transmission of information. Evolution and Human Behavior 38 (1):92101.
Berger, J Milkman, KL (2012) What makes online content viral? Journal of Marketing Research 49 (2):192205.
Bond, RM et al. (2012) A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization. Nature 489 (7415):295298.
Boyer, P (2001) Religion Explained: The Evolutionary Foundations of Religious Belief. New York: Random and Basic Books.
Brosius, H-B Bathelt, A (1994) The utility of exemplars in persuasive communications. Communication Research 21, 4878.
Brown, WM , Palameta, B Moore, C (2003) Are there nonverbal cues to commitment? An exploratory study using the zero-acquaintance video presentation paradigm. Evolutionary Psychology 1, 4269.
Carlson, TN (2018) Modeling political information transmission as a game of telephone. The Journal of Politics 80 (1):348352.
Carpini, MXD Keeter, S (1996) What Americans Know about Politics and Why it Matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Choi, S (2015) The two-step flow of communication in Twitter-based public forums. Social Science Computer Review 33 (6):696711.
Chong, D Druckman, JN (2007a) Framing public opinion in competitive democracies. American Political Science Review 101, 637655.
Chong, D Druckman, JN (2007b) Framing theory. Annual Review of Political Science 10, 103126.
Cobb, MD Kuklinski, JH (1997) Changing minds: political arguments and political persuasion. American Journal of Political Science 41 (1):88121.
Converse, PE (1964) The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In Apter DE, (ed.) Ideology and Discontent. New York: Free Press, pp. 206261.
Cosmides, L Tooby, J (2006) Evolutionary psychology, moral heuristics, and the law. In Gigerenzer G and Engel C, (eds) Heuristics and the Law, Dahlem Workshop Report 94. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 181212.
De Martino, B et al. (2006) Frames, biases, and rational decision-making in the human brain. Science 313 (5787):684687.
Druckman, JN (2011) What’s it all about? Framing in political science. In Keren G, (ed) Perspectives on Framing. New York: Psychology Press/Taylor and Francis, pp. 279302.
Druckman, J , Levendusky, M McLain, A (2018) No need to watch: how the effects of Partisan Media can spread via inter-personal discussions. American Journal of Political Science 62 (1):99112.
Dunbar, RIM (1998) The social brain hypothesis. Evolutionary Anthropology 6 (5):178190.
Ferejohn, JA (1990) Information and the electoral process. In Ferejohn JA and Kuklinski JH, (eds) Information and Democratic processes. Chicago: University of Illinois Press, pp. 234253.
Ford, R (2015) Who should we help? An experimental test of discrimination in the British Welfare State. Political Studies 64 (3):630650.
Fowler, JH Schreiber, D (2008) Biology, politics, and the emerging science of human nature. Science 322 (5903):912914.
Gamson, WA Modigliani, A (1987) The changing culture of affirmative action. Research in Political Sociology 3, 137177.
Gamson, WA Modigliani, A (1989) Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: a constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology 95 (1):137.
Gerber, AS Green, DP (2000) The effects of canvassing, telephone calls, and direct mail on voter turnout: a field experiment. American Political Science Review 94 (3):653663.
Gigerenzer, G Goldstein, DG (1996) Reasoning the fast and frugal way: models of bounded rationality. Psychological Review 103 (4):650669.
Gigerenzer, G Selten, R (2002) Bounded Rationality: The Adaptive Toolbox. Cambridge and London: MIT Press.
Gilliam, FD Jr Iyengar, S (2000) Prime suspects: the influence of local television news on the viewing public. American Journal of Political Science 44 (3):560573.
Grimmer, J Stewart, BM (2013) Text as data: the promise and pitfalls of automatic content analysis methods for political texts. Political Analysis 21, 267297.
Gross, K (2008) Framing persuasive appeals: episodic and thematic framing, emotional response, and policy opinion. Political Psychology 29 (2):169192.
Haley, KJ Fessler, DMT (2005) Nobody’s watching? Subtle cues affect generosity in an anonymous dictator game. Evolution and Human Behavior 26 (3):245256.
Hetherington, MJ (2001) Resurgent mass partisanship: the role of elite polarization. American Political Science Review 95 (3):619631.
Huckfeldt, R Sprague, J (1987) Networks in context: the social flow of political information. American Political Science Review 81 (4):11971216.
Iyengar, S (1991) Is Anyone Responsible? How Television Frames Political Issues. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Iyengar, S (1996) Framing responsibility for political issues. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 546 (1):5970.
Kahneman, D (2011) Thinking Fast, Thinking Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.
Kashima, Y (2000) Maintaining cultural stereotypes in the serial reproduction of narratives. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 26, 594604.
Katz, E (1957) The two-step flow of communication: an up-to-date report on an hypothesis. Public Opinion Quarterly 21 (1):6178.
Katz, E Lazarsfeld, PF (1955) Personal Influence. New York: Free Press.
Kellstedt, PM (2000) Media framing and the dynamics of racial policy preferences. American Journal of Political Science 44 (2):245260.
Kelly, RL (1995) The Foraging Spectrum: Diversity in Hunter–Gatherer Lifeways. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
Kinder, DR (1998) Opinion and action in the realm of politics. In Gilbert DT, Fiske ST and Lindzey G, (eds) The Handbook of Social Psychology, 4th ed., New York: McGraw-Hill, pp. 778867.
Korpus 90 (2013) Sproglige hitliste – de 150 hyppigste ord i Korpus 90 [Linguistic hitlists – the 150 most frequent words in Korpus 90]. Available at http://korpus.dsl.dk/e-resurser/frekvens150.php?lang=dk, accessed 17 May 2013.
Krippendorf, K (2004) Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Kurzban, R (2001) The social psychophysics of cooperation: nonverbal communication in a public goods game. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 25 (4):241259.
Laver, M Garry, J (2000) Estimating policy positions from political texts. American Journal of Political Science 44 (3):619634.
Lecheler, S de Vreese, CH (2013) What a difference a day makes? The effects of repetitive and competitive news framing over time. Communication Research 40 (2):147175.
LeDoux, JE (1992) Emotion as memory: anatomical systems underlying indelible neural traces. In Christianson SÅ, (ed.) The Handbook of Emotion and Memory: Research and Theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 269288.
Lippmann, W (1922) Public Opinion. Lexington, KY: Feather Trail Press.
Lyons, A Kashima, Y (2001) The reproduction of culture: communication processes tend to maintain cultural stereotypes. Social Cognition 19 (3):372394.
Macrae, CN , Milne, AB Bodenhausen, GV (1994) Stereotypes as energy-saving devices: a peek inside the cognitive toolbox. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 66 (1):3747.
McManus, JH (1994) Market-driven Journalism: Let the Citizen Beware. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Mesoudi, A Whiten, A (2008) The multiple roles of cultural transmission experiments in understanding human cultural evolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 363 (1509):34893501.
Mesoudi, A , Whiten, A Dunbar, R (2006) A bias for social information in human cultural transmission. British Journal of Psychology 97 (3):405423.
Mutz, DC Mondak, JJ (2006) The workplace as a context for cross‐cutting political discourse. Journal of Politics 68 (1):140155.
Nelson, TE , Clawson, RA Oxley, ZB (1997) Media framing of a civil liberties controversy and its effect on tolerance. American Political Science Review 91 (3):567584.
Ostfeld, M Mutz, D (2014) Revisiting the effects of case reports in the news. Political Communication 31 (1):5372.
O’Keefe, D (2002) Persuasion: Theory of Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Petersen, MB (2015) Evolutionary political psychology: on the origin and structure of heuristics and biases in politics. Advances in Political Psychology 36 (S1):4578.
Petersen, MB Aarøe, L (2013) Politics in the mind’s eye: imagination as a link between social and political cognition. American Political Science Review 107 (2):275293.
Scharlemann, JP et al. (2001) The value of a smile: game theory with a human face. Journal of Economic Psychology 22 (5):617640.
Sell, A et al. (2009) Human adaptations for the visual assessment of strength and fighting ability from the body and face. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 276 (1656):575584.
Small, DA Loewenstein, G (2005) The devil you know: the effects of identifiability on punishment. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 18 (5):311318.
Sniderman, PM , Brody, RA Tetlock, PE (1991) Reasoning and Choice: Explorations in Political Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Springer, SA Harwood, J (2015) The influence of episodic and thematic frames on policy and group attitudes: mediational analysis. Human Communication Research 41 (2):226244.
Tooby, J Cosmides, L (1992) The psychological foundations of culture. In Barkow JH, Cosmides L and Tooby J, (eds) The Adapted Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 19135.
Tversky, A Kahneman, D (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 185 (4157):11241131.
Weimann, G (1991) The influentials: back to the concept of opinion leaders? Public Opinion Quarterly 55 (2):267279.
Wilson, RK Eckel, CC (2006) Judging a book by its cover: beauty and expectations in the trust game. Political Research Quarterly 59, 189202.
Zaller, J (1992) The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Zillmann, D Brosius, HB (2000) Exemplification in Communication: The Influence of Case Reports on the Perception of Issues. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Zillmann, D et al. (1996) Effects of exemplification in news reports on the perception of social issues. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 73, 427444.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

British Journal of Political Science
  • ISSN: 0007-1234
  • EISSN: 1469-2112
  • URL: /core/journals/british-journal-of-political-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Type Description Title
UNKNOWN
Supplementary materials

Aarøe and Petersen Dataset
Dataset

 Unknown
PDF
Supplementary materials

Aarøe and Petersen supplementary material
Online Appendix

 PDF (576 KB)
576 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed