Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Commerce and Conflict: New Data about the Great War

  • Joanne Gowa and Raymond Hicks
Abstract

The First World War is often cited as proof par excellence of the flaws in the liberal peace argument because the adversaries it engaged had been each other’s major pre-war trading partners. Although commonly assumed to have wreaked havoc on the trade of the states it engaged, the war’s impact on commerce has rarely been rigorously examined. Using an original dataset, this study shows that the Great War triggered substitution processes that reduced its trade-related costs. Although recourse to second-best alternatives always induces efficiency losses, the costs of adjustment were small relative to the other costs that states incurred during the war. The analysis shows that the Great War is not the egregious exception to the theory that conventional wisdom has long assumed it to be. At the same time, it makes clear that the deterrent power of trade varies inversely with belligerents’ ability to access the markets of alternative trading partners.

Copyright
Footnotes
Hide All
*

Department of Politics, Princeton University (e-mail: jgowa@princeton.edu); Woodrow Wilson School, Princeton University (e-mail: rhicks@princeton.edu). Data replication sets are available at https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataverse/BJPolS, and online appendices are available at http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1017/S0007123415000289.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Abbatielo, John J. 2006. Anti-Submarine Warfare in World War 1: British Naval Aviation and the Defeat of the U-Boats. London: Routledge.
Anderson, James E. 2010. The Gravity Model, Working Paper No. 16576. Cambridge, MA: NBER.
Anderson, James, and van Wincoop, Eric. 2004. Trade Costs. Journal of Economic Literature XLII:691751.
Anderton, Charles H., and Carter, John R.. 2001. The Impact of War on Trade: An Interrupted Time-Series Study. Journal of Peace Research 38 (4):445457.
Anderton, Charles H., and Carter, John R.. 2003. Does War Disrupt Trade? In Globalization and Armed Conflict, edited by Gerald Schneider, Katherine Barbieri and Nils Petter Gleditsch, 299331. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Angell, Norman. 1909. The Great Illusion. London: W. Heinemann.
Arkolakis, Costas, Costinot, Arnaud, and Rodriguez-Clare, Andres. 2012. New Trade Models, Same Old Gains? American Economic Review 102 (1):94130.
Baier, Scott L., and Bergstrand, Jeffrey H.. 2009. Bonus Vetus OLS: A Simple Method for Approximating International Trade-Cost Effects Using the Gravity Equation. Journal of International Economics 77 (1):7785.
Baltagi, Badi H., Egger, Peter, and Pfaffermayr, Michael. 2003. A Generalized Design for Bilateral Trade Flow Models. Economics Letters 80 (3):391397.
Barbieri, Katherine. 2002. The Liberal Illusion: Does Trade Promote Peace? Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Barbieri, Katherine, and Levy, Jack S.. 1999. Sleeping With the Enemy: The Impact of War on Trade. Journal of Peace Research 36 (4):463479.
Barbieri, Katherine, and Levy, Jack S.. 2004. Trading With the Enemy During Wartime. Security Studies 13 (3):147.
Beckett, Ian F.W. 2012. The Making of the First World War. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Bernhofen, Daniel M., and Brown, John C.. 2005. An Empirical Assessment of the Comparative Advantage Gains from Trade: Evidence from Japan. The American Economic Review 95 (1):208225.
Bonfatti, Roberto, and O’Rourke, Kevin H.. 2014. Growth, Import Dependence and War, Working Paper No. 20326. Cambridge, MA: NBER.
Boyce, Robert. 2009. The Great Interwar Crisis and the Collapse of Globalization. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Broadberry, Stephen, and Harrison, Mark. 2005. The Economics of World War I: An Overview. In The Economics of World War I, edited by Stephen Broadberry and Mark Harrsion, 340. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Copeland, Dale C. 1996. Economic Interdependence and War: A Theory of Trade Expectations. International Security 20 (4):541.
Davis, Lance, and Engerman, Stanley. 2006. Naval Blockades in Peace and War: Economic History Since 1750. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Domke, William K. 1988. War and the Changing Global System. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Dorussen, Han. 2006. Heterogeneous Trade Interests and Conflict: What You Trade Matters. Journal of Conflict Resolution 50 (1):87107.
Egger, Peter, and Pfaffermayr, Michael. 2003. The Proper Panel Econometric Specification of the Gravity Equation: A Three-Way Model With Bilateral Interaction Effects. Empirical Economics 28 (3):571580.
Eicher, Theo S., and Henn, Christian. 2011. In Search of WTO Trade Effects: Preferential Trade Agreements Promote Trade Strongly, But Unevenly. Journal of International Economics 83 (2):137153.
Eloranta, Jari, and Harrison, Mark. 2005. War and Disintegration, 1914-1950. In The Economics of World War I, edited by Stephen Broadberry and Mark Harrison, 134155. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Estevadeordal, Antoni, and Taylor, Alan M.. 2002. Testing Trade Theory in Ohlin’s Time. In Bertil Ohlin: A Centennial Celebration,1899–1999, edited by R. Findlay, L. Jonung and M. Lundahl. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Fearon, James. 1995. Rationalist Explanations for War. International Organization 49 (3):379414.
Feinstein, Charles, Temin, Peter, and Toniolo, Gianni. 2008. The World Economy Between the World Wars. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fey, Mark, and Goemans, Hein. 2009. Risky But Rational: War as An Institutionally-Induced Gamble. Journal of Politics 71 (1):3554.
Findlay, Ronald, and O’Rourke, Kevin. 2007. Power and Plenty: Trade, War, and the World Economy in the Second Millennium. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Gartzke, Erik, and Lupu, Yonatan. 2012. Trading on Preconceptions: Why World War I Was Not a Failure of Economic Interdependence. International Security 36 (4):115150.
Gasiorowski, Mark. 1986. Economic Interdependence and International Conflict: Some Cross-National Evidence. International Studies Quarterly 30 (1):2338.
Gasiorowski, Mark, and Polachek, Solomon. 1982. Conflict and Interdependence: East-West Trade and Linkages in the Era of Détente. Journal of Conflict Resolution 26 (4):709730.
Gholz, Eugene, and Press, Daryl G.. 2001. The Effects of Wars on Neutral Countries: Why It Doesn’t Pay to Preserve the Peace. Security Studies 10 (4):155.
Glick, Reuven, and Taylor, Alan. 2010. Collateral Damage: Trade Disruption and the Economic Impact of War. Review of Economic Statistics 92 (1):102127.
Goenner, Cullen P. 2010. From Toys to Warships: Interdependence and the Effects of Disaggregated Trade on Militarized Disputes. Journal of Peace Research 47 (5):112.
Gowa, Joanne. 1994. Allies, Adversaries, and International Trade. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Gowa, Joanne. 2015. Allies, Adversaries, and Wartime Trade. Unpublished manuscript.
Gowa, Joanne, and Mansfield, Edward D.. 1993. Power Politics and International Trade. American Political Science Review 87 (2):408420.
Gurr, Ted R. 1990 [1989]. Polity II: Political Structures and Regime Change, 1800–1986. Boulder, CO: Center for Comparative Politics [producer], 1989; Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 1990.
Halpern, Paul. 2006. The Blockade. In Naval Blockades and Sea Power: Strategies and Counter-Strategies 1805–2005, edited by Bruce Elleman and Sarah M. Paine, 91104. London: Routledge.
Hardach, Gerd. 1977. The First World War 1914–1918. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Harrison, Mark, and Wolf, Nikolaus. 2012. The Frequency of Wars. The Economic History Review 65 (3):10551076.
Head, Keith, Mayer, Thierry, and Ries, John. 2010. The Erosion of Colonial Trade Linkages After Independence. Journal of International Economics 81:114.
Hirschman, Albert O. 1980 [1945] National Power and the Structure of Foreign Trade. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Irwin, Douglas A. 2005. The Welfare Cost of Autarky: Evidence from the Jeffersonian Trade Embargo, 1807-09. Review of International Economics 13 (4):631645.
Jack, D.T. 1940. Studies in Economic Warfare. London: P.S. King.
Jacks, David, Meissner, Christopher, and Novy, Dennis. 2011. Trade Booms, Trade Busts, and Trade Costs. Journal of International Economics 83:185201.
Kleinberg, Katja B., Robinson, Gregory, and French, Stewart L.. 2012. Trade Concentration and Interstate Conflict. Journal of Politics 74 (2):529540.
Lambert, Nicholas A. 2012. Planning Armageddon: British Economic Warfare and the First World War. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Leeds, Ashley, Ritter, Jeffrey M., Mitchell, Sara M., and Long, Andrew G.. 2002. Alliance Treaty Obligations and Provisions, 1815–1944. International Interactions 28 (3):237260.
Leeds, Ashley, and Mattes, Michaela. 2007. Alliance Politics During the Cold War: Aberration, New World Order, or Continuation of History? Conflict Management and Peace Science 24 (3):183199.
Long, Andrew G. 2003. Defense Pacts and International Trade. Journal of Peace Research 40 (5):537552.
Loveday, A. 1921. The League of Nations and International Trade Statistics. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 94:156159.
Mansfield, Edward, and Pevehouse, Jon. 2000. Trade Blocs, Trade Flows, and International Conflict. International Organization 54 (4):775808.
Mansfield, Edward, and Bronson, Rachel. 1997. Alliances, Preferential Trading Arrangements, and International Trade. American Political Science Review 91 (1):94107.
Martin, Phillippe, Mayer, Thierry, and Thoenig, Mathias. 2008. Make Trade Not War? Review of Economic Studies 75 (3):865900.
Mathy, Gabriel P., and Meissner, Christopher M.. 2011. Trade, Exchange Rate Regimes and Output Co-Movement: Evidence from the Great Depression, Working Paper No. 16925. Cambridge, MA: NBER.
McDonald, Patrick, and Sweeney, Kevin. 2007. The Achilles’ Heel of Liberal IR Theory: Globalization and Conflict in the Pre-World War I Era. World Politics 59 (3):370403.
Milward, Alan S. 1979. War, Economy, and Society 1939-1945. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Mitchell, Brian R. 1988. British Historical Statistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Offer, Avner. 2000. The Blockade of Germany and the Strategy of Starvation, 1914-1918: An Agency Perspective. In Great War, Total War: Combat and Mobilization on the Western Front, 1914-1918, edited by Roger Chickering and Stig Föster, 169188. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Oneal, John R., and Russett, Bruce M.. 1999. Assessing the Liberal Peace With Alternative Specifications: Trade Still Reduces Conflict. Journal of Peace Research 36 (4):423442.
Oneal, John R., Oneal, Frances H., Maoz, Zeev, and Russett, Bruce. 1996. The Liberal Peace: Interdependence, Democracy, and International Conflict, 1950-85. Journal of Peace Research 33 (1):1128.
Oneal, John R., and Ray, James Lee. 1997. New Tests of the Democratic Peace: Controlling for Economic Interdependence, 1950-1985. Political Research Quarterly 50 (4):751775.
Osborne, Eric W. 2004. Britain’s Economic Blockade of Germany 1917-1919. London: Frank Cass.
Ossa, Ralph. 2012. Why Trade Matters At All, Working Paper No. 18113. Cambridge, MA: NBER.
Polachek, Solomon W. 1980. Conflict and Trade. Journal of Conflict Resolution 24 (1):5578.
Pollins, Brian M. 1989. Does Trade Still Follow the Flag? American Political Science Review 83 (2):465480.
Ripsman, Norrin M., and Blanchard, Jean-Marc F.. 1996. Commercial Liberalism Under Fire: Evidence from 1914 and 1936. Security Studies 6 (2):450.
Ritschl, Albrecht, and Straumann, Tobias. 2010. Business Cycles and Economic Policy, 1914-1945. In The Economics of World War I, edited by Stephen Broadberry and Mark Harrison, 156180. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Royal Commission. 1905. Report of the Royal Commission on Supply of Food and Raw Material in Time of War, Vol. 1: The Report. Gt. Brit. Parliament. Papers by command Cd., 2643, vol. 39.
Schulze, Max-Stephan. 2005. Austria-Hungary’s Economy in World War I. In The Economics of World War I, edited by Stephen Broadberry and Mark Harrison, 77111. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Simmons, Beth A. 2002. Capacity, Commitment, and Compliance: International Law and the Settlement of Territorial Disputes. Journal of Conflict Resolution 46 (6):829856.
Simmons, Beth A.. 2003. Pax Mercatoria and the Theory of the State. In Economic Interdependence and International Conflict, edited by Edward Mansfield, 3143. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Waltz, Kenneth N. 1979. Theory of International Politics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Ward, Michael D., Siverson, Randolph M., and Cao, Xun. 2007. Disputes, Democracies, and Dependencies: A Reexamination of the Kantian Peace. American Journal of Political Science 51 (3):583601.
World Trade Organization. 2014. World Trade Report 2014: Trade and Development, Recent Trends and the Role of the WTO. Geneva: World Trade Organization. Available from http://www.wto.org/english/res_e/booksp_e/world_trade_report14_e.pdf, accessed 7 May 2015.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

British Journal of Political Science
  • ISSN: 0007-1234
  • EISSN: 1469-2112
  • URL: /core/journals/british-journal-of-political-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
Type Description Title
PDF
Supplementary materials

Gowa and Hicks supplementary material
Appendices A-D

 PDF (545 KB)
545 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed