Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 65
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Colombo, Céline 2016. Justifications and Citizen Competence in Direct Democracy: A Multilevel Analysis. British Journal of Political Science, p. 1.

    Escher, Tobias and Rosar, Ulrich 2016. Der Einfluss von Online-Verfahren auf die Legitimität demokratischer Entscheidungen. Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft, Vol. 10, Issue. S2, p. 179.

    Rich, Timothy S and Holmes, Carolyn E 2016. Winning is not everything: Public perceptions of losers and non-voters in South Africa. Acta Politica, Vol. 51, Issue. 3, p. 328.

    Allen, Nicholas and Birch, Sarah 2015. Process Preferences and British Public Opinion: Citizens' Judgements about Government in an Era of Anti-politics. Political Studies, Vol. 63, Issue. 2, p. 390.

    Banducci, S. and Stevens, D. 2015. Surveys in Context: How Timing in the Electoral Cycle Influences Response Propensity and Satisficing. Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 79, Issue. S1, p. 214.

    Fatke, Matthias 2015. Participation and Political Equality in Direct Democracy: Educative Effect or Social Bias. Swiss Political Science Review, Vol. 21, Issue. 1, p. 99.

    Flavin, Patrick and Shufeldt, Gregory 2015. State Party Competition and Citizens’ Political Engagement. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, Vol. 25, Issue. 4, p. 444.

    Gash, Alison and Murakami, Michael H. 2015. Venue Effects: How State Policy Source Influences Policy Support. Politics & Policy, Vol. 43, Issue. 5, p. 679.

    KIM, TAEHEE 2015. The Effect of Direct Democracy on Political Efficacy: The Evidence from Panel Data Analysis. Japanese Journal of Political Science, Vol. 16, Issue. 01, p. 52.

    Lamare, J. Ryan and Lamare, James W. 2015. Electoral reform, situational forces, and political confidence: Results from a multi-wave panel. Electoral Studies, Vol. 40, p. 361.

    Leininger, Arndt 2015. Direct Democracy in Europe: Potentials and Pitfalls. Global Policy, Vol. 6, p. 17.

    McNulty, Stephanie L. and Wampler, Brian 2015. Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences.

    Radcliff, Benjamin and Shufeldt, Gregory 2015. Direct Democracy and Subjective Well-Being: The Initiative and Life Satisfaction in the American States. Social Indicators Research,

    Rich, Timothy S. 2015. Losers’ Consent or Non-Voter Consent? Satisfaction with Democracy in East Asia. Asian Journal of Political Science, Vol. 23, Issue. 3, p. 243.

    Schuck, Andreas R.T. and de Vreese, Claes H. 2015. Public support for referendums in Europe: A cross-national comparison in 21 countries. Electoral Studies, Vol. 38, p. 149.

    Scotto, Thomas J. and Xena, Carla 2015. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences.

    Seabrook, Nicholas R. Dyck, Joshua J. and Lascher, Edward L. 2015. Do Ballot Initiatives Increase General Political Knowledge?. Political Behavior, Vol. 37, Issue. 2, p. 279.

    Shah, Seema 2015. Free and fair? Citizens’ assessments of the 2013 general election in Kenya. Review of African Political Economy, Vol. 42, Issue. 143, p. 44.

    Ugues, Antonio and Medina Vidal, D. Xavier 2015. Public evaluations of electoral institutions in Mexico: An analysis of the IFE and TRIFE in the 2006 and 2012 elections. Electoral Studies, Vol. 40, p. 231.

    Alathur, Sreejith Vigneswara Ilavarasan, P. and Gupta, M.P. 2014. Determinants of citizens’ electronic participation: insights from India. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, Vol. 8, Issue. 3, p. 447.


Democracy, Institutions and Attitudes about Citizen Influence on Government

  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 April 2002

Theorists such as Carole Pateman and Benjamin Barber suggest that democratic participation will engage citizens and lead them to have more positive regard for political processes and democratic practices. The American states provide a setting where provisions for direct voter participation in legislation vary substantially. If participatory institutions have an ‘educative role’ that shapes perceptions of government, then citizens exposed to direct democracy may be more likely to claim they understand politics and be more likely to perceive that they are capable of participation. They may also be more likely to perceive that government is responsive to them. We merge data on state-level political institutions with data from the 1992 American National Election Study to test these hypotheses with OLS models. Our primary hypotheses find support. We present evidence that the effects of exposure to direct democracy on internal and external political efficacy rival the effects of formal education.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

British Journal of Political Science
  • ISSN: 0007-1234
  • EISSN: 1469-2112
  • URL: /core/journals/british-journal-of-political-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *