AmbroseMaureen. 2002. Contemporary Justice Research: A New Look at Familiar Questions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
BianchiEmily, BrocknerJoel, Van den BosKees, SeifertMatthias, MoonHenry, van DiljkeMarius, and De CremerDavid. 2015. Trust in Decision-Making Authorities Dictates the Form of the Interactive Relationship Between Outcome Fairness and Procedural Fairness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
BiesRobert. 2005. Are Procedural Justice and Interactional Justice Conceptually Distinct?. In Handbook of Organizational Justice, edited by Jerald Greenberg and Jason Colquitt, 85–112. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
BiesRobert, and MoagJoseph. 1986. Interactional Justice: Communication Criteria of Fairness. In Research on Negotiation in Organizations, edited by R. Lewicki, B. Sheppard and M. Bazerman, 43–55. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
BrennanGeoffrey, and PettitPhilip. 1990. Unveiling the Vote. British Journal of Political Science
BrocknerJoel. 2002. Making Sense of Procedural Fairness: How High Procedural Fairness Can Reduce or Heighten the Influence of Outcome Favorability. Academy of Management Review
ColquittJason, and ChertkoffJerome. 2002. Explaining Injustice: The Interactive Effect of Explanation and Outcome on Fairness Perceptions and Task Motivation. Journal of Management
CrosbyFaye, and FrancoJamie L.. 2003. Connections Between the Ivory Tower and the Multicolored World: Linking Abstract Theories of Social Justice to the Rough and Tumble of Affirmative Action. Personality and Social Psychology Review
DaltonRussell, and WelzienChristopher, eds. 2014. The Civic Culture Transformed. From Allegiant to Assertive Citizens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
De CremerDavid, and TylerTom. 2007. The Effects of Trust and Procedural Justice on Cooperation. Journal of Applied Psychology
DohertyDavid, and WolakJennifer. 2012. When Do the Ends Justify the Means? Evaluating Procedural Fairness. Political Behavior
EarleTimothy, and SiegristMichael. 2008. On the Relation Between Trust and Fairness in Environmental Risk Management. Risk Analysis
EllenbroekMoniek, VerkuytenMaykel, ThusJochem, and PoppeEdwin. 2014. The Fairness of National Decision-Making Procedures: The Views of Adolescents in 18 European Countries. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology
EsaiassonPeter, GilljamMikael, and PerssonMikael. 2012. Which Decision-Making Arrangements Generate the Strongest Legitimacy Beliefs? Evidence from a Randomised Field Experiment. European Journal of Political Research
EulauHeinz, WahlkeJohn, BuchananWilliam, and FergusonLeroy. 1959. The Role of the Representative: Some Empirical Observations on the Theory of Edmund Burke. American Political Science Review
FolgerRobert. 1977. Distributive and Procedural Justice: Combined Impact of ‘Voice’ and Improvement on Experienced Inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
FolgerRobert. 1984. Emerging Issues in the Social Psychology of Justice. In The Sense of Injustice: Social Psychological Perspectives, edited by Roger Folger, 3–24. New York: Plenum.
FolgerRobert, CropanzanoRussell, and GoldmanBarry. 2005. What is the Relationship Between Justice and Morality?. In Handbook of Organizational Justice, edited by Jerald Greenberg and Jason Colquitt, 215–245. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
FreyBruno, BenzMatthias, and StutzerAlois. 2004. Introducing Procedural Utility: Not Only What, But Also How Matters. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics
GanglAmy. 2003. Procedural Justice Theory and Evaluations of the Lawmaking Process. Political Behavior
GerbnerAlan, and GreenDonald. 2012. Field Experiments. Design, Analysis and Interpretation. New York: Norton.
GibsonJames, CaldeiraGregory, and Kenyatta SpenceLester. 2005. Why Do People Accept Public Policies They Oppose? Testing Legitimacy Theory with a Survey-Based Experiment. Political Research Quarterly
GilljamMikael, EsaiassonPeter, and LindholmTorun. 2009. The Voice of the Pupils: An Experimental Comparison of Decisions Made by Elected Pupil Councils, Pupils in Referenda, and Teaching Staff. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability
GrimesMarcia. 2006. Organizing Consent: The Role of Procedural Fairness in Political Trust and Compliance. European Journal of Political Research
HechterMichael. 2013. Alien Rule. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
HelwigCharles, ArnoldMary Louise, TanDingliang, and BoydDwight. 2007. Mainland Chinese and Canadian Adolescents’ Judgments and Reasoning About the Fairness of Democratic and Other Forms of Government. Cognitive Development
HibbingJohn, and AlfordJohn. 2004. Accepting Authoritative Decisions: Humans as Wary Cooperators. American Journal of Political Science
KloskoGeorge. 2000. Democratic Procedures and Liberal Consensus. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
KundaZiva. 1990. The Case for Motivated Reasoning. Psychological Bulletin
LeungKwok, TongKwok-Kit, and LindAllan. 2007. Realpolitik Versus Fair Process: Moderating Effects of Group Identification on Acceptance of Political Decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
LeviMargaret, and StokerLaura. 2000. Political Trust and Trustworthiness. Annual Review of Political Science
LijphartArend. 2000. Turnout. In International Encyclopedia of Elections, edited by Richard Rose, 314–322. Oxford: Macmillan.
LindAllan, and TylerTom R.. 1988. The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. London: Plenum Press.
LodgeMilton, and TaberCharles. 2014. The Rationalizing Voter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
LowiTheodore. 1972. Four Systems of Policy, Politics and Choice. Public Administration Review
LupferMichael, WeeksKelly, DoanKelly, and HoustonDavid. 2000. Folk Conceptions of Fairness and Unfairness. European Journal of Social Psychology
LupiaArthur, and MatsusakaJohn. 2004. Direct Democracy: New Approaches to Old Questions. Annual Review of Political Science
MacCounRobert. 2005. Voice, Control and Belonging: The Double-Edged Sword of Procedural Fairness. Annual Review of Law and Social Science
ManinBernhard. 1997. The Principles of Representative Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
MayerDavid, GreenbaumRebecca, KuenziMaribeth, and ShteynbergGarriy. 2009. When Do Fair Procedures Not Matter? A Test of the Identity Violation Effect. Journal of Applied Psychology
MillerDale. 2001. Disrespect and the Experience of Injustice. Annual Review of Psychology
MortonRebecca, and WilliamsKenneth. 2010. Experimental Political Science and the Study of Causality: From Nature to the Lab. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
MullenElizabeth, and SkitkaLinda. 2006. Exploring the Psychological Underpinnings of the Moral Mandate Effect: Motivated Reasoning, Identification, or Affect?
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
MuthenLinda, and BengtMuthen. 1998–2010. Mplus Users’ Guide, 6th Edition, Los Angeles, CA: Muthen and Muthen.
NapierJamie, and TylerTom. 2008. Does Moral Conviction Really Override Concerns About Procedural Justice?
Social Justice Research
PatemanCarole. 1970. Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
PerssonMikael, EsaiassonPeter and GilljamMikael. 2013. The Effects of Direct Voting and Deliberation on Legitimacy Beliefs: An Experimental Study of Decision-Making in Small Groups. European Political Science Review
PhillipsAnne. 1995. The Politics of Presence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
SheaDaniel, and FiorinaMorris. 2013. Can We Talk? The Rise of Rude, Nasty, Stubborn Politics. New York: Pearson.
ShroutPatrick, and BolgerNiall. 2002. Mediation in Experimental and Non-Experimental Studies: New Procedures and Recommendations. Psychological Methods
SkitkaLinda. 2002. Do the Means Always Justify the Ends or Do the Ends Sometimes Justify the Means? A Value Protection Model of Justice Reasoning. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
SkitkaLinda, and HoustonDavid. 2001. When Due Process Is of No Consequence: Moral Mandates and Presumed Defendant Guilt or Innocence. Social Justice Research
SkitkaLinda, and MullenElizabeth. 2008. Moral Convictions Often Override Concerns About Procedural Fairness. A Reply to Napier and Tyler. Social Justice Research
SkitkaLinda, WinquistJennifer, and HutchinsonSusan. 2003. Are Outcome Fairness and Outcome Favorability Distinguishable Psychological Constructs? A Meta-Analytic Review. Social Justice Research
SkitkaLinda, and WisneskiDaniel. 2012. Justice Theory and Research: A Social Functionalist Perspective. In Handbook of Psychology. Volume 5: Personality and Social Psychology, edited by Irving Weiner, Howard Tennen and Jerry Suls, 407–428. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.
SmithDaniel, and TolbertCaroline. 2004. Educated by Initiative: The Effects of Direct Democracy on Citizens and Political Organizations in the American States. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
TaberCharles, and LodgeMilton. 2006. Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs. American Journal of Political Science
TerwelBart, HarinckFieke, EllemersNaomi, and DaamenDancker. 2010. Voice in Political Decision Making: The Effect of Group Voice on Perceived Trustworthiness of Decision Makers and Subsequent Acceptance of Decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology
ThibautJohn, and WalkerLaurens. 1975. Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
TylerTom. 1990. Why People Obey the Law: Procedural Justice, Legitimacy and Compliance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
TylerTom. 1994. Governing and Diversity: The Effect of Fair Decision-Making Procedures on the Legitimacy of Government. Law and Society Review
TylerTom. 2000. Social Justice: Outcome and Procedure. International Journal of Psychology
TylerTom. 2006. Psychological Perspectives on Legitimacy and Legitimation. Annual Review of Psychology
Why People Cooperate. The Role of Social Motivations. Princeton. NJ: Princeton University Press: Tyler. Tom, and Steven Blader. 2003. The Group Engagement Model: Procedural Justice, Social Identity, and Cooperative Behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review 7:349–61.
TylerTom, BoeckmannRobert, SmithHeather, and HuoYuen. 1997. Social Justice in a Diverse Society. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
TylerTom, and LindAllan. 1992. A Relational Model of Authority in Groups. In Mark Zanna, (ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology
UlbigStacy. 2008. Voice is Not Enough – The Importance of Influence in Political Trust and Policy Assessments. Public Opinion Quarterly
Van den BosKees. 2001. Fairness Heuristic Theory: Assessing the Information to Which People Are Reacting Has a Pivotal Role in Understanding Organizational Justice. In Theoretical and Cultural Perspectives on Organizational Justice, edited by Stephen Gilliland, Dirk Steiner and Daniel Skarlicki. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
Van den BosKees. 2005. What is Responsible for the Fair Process Effect? In Handbook of Organizational Justice, edited by Jerald Greenberg and Jason Colquitt, 273–300. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associations.
Van den BosKees, and LindAllan. 2002. Uncertainty Management by Means of Fairness Judgments. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, edited by Mark P. Zanna, 1–60. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.
Van den BosKees, MaasMarjolein, WaldringIsmintha, and SeminGün. 2003. Toward Understanding the Psychology of Reactions to Perceived Fairness: The Role of Affect Intensity. Social Justice Research
Van den BosKees, VermuntRiël, and WilkeHenk. 1997. Procedural and Distributive Justice: What Is Fair Depends More on What Comes First Than on What Comes Next. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Van den BosKees, WilkeHenk, LindAllan, and VermuntRiël. 1998. Evaluating Outcomes by Means of the Fair Process Effect: Evidence for Different Processes in Fairness and Satisfaction Judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Van HouwelingenGijs, van DijkeMarius, and De CremerDavid. 2014. Fairness Enactment as Response to Higher Level Unfairness: The Roles of Self-Construal and Spatial Distance. Journal of Management. doi: 10.1177/0149206314530166.
Van ProoijenJan-Willem, Van den BosKees, and WilkeHenk. 2004. Group Belongingness and Procedural Justice: Social Inclusion and Exclusion by Peers Affects the Psychology of Voice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
WuXuan-Na, and WangEr-Ping. 2013. Outcome Favorability as a Boundary Condition to Voice Effect on People’s Reaction to Public Policymaking. Journal of Applied Social Psychology