Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 60
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Escribà-Folch, Abel 2016. Foreign direct investment and the risk of regime transition in autocracies. Democratization, p. 1.

    Kollias, Christos and Paleologou, Suzanna-Maria 2016. The Globalization and Peace Nexus: Findings Using Two Composite Indices. Social Indicators Research,

    Maeda, Ko 2016. Honeymoon or consolidation, or both?: Time dependence of democratic durability. Democratization, Vol. 23, Issue. 4, p. 575.

    Tansey, Oisín 2016. The problem with autocracy promotion. Democratization, Vol. 23, Issue. 1, p. 141.

    Adams, Samuel and Atsu, Francis 2015. Assessing the distributional effects of regulation in developing countries. Journal of Policy Modeling, Vol. 37, Issue. 5, p. 713.

    Chang, Chun-Ping Lee, Chien-Chiang and Hsieh, Meng-Chi 2015. Does globalization promote real output? Evidence from quantile cointegration regression. Economic Modelling, Vol. 44, p. 25.

    Crescenzi, Mark J.C. and Kadera, Kelly M. 2015. Built to Last: Understanding the Link between Democracy and Conflict in the International System. International Studies Quarterly, p. n/a.

    Doces, John A. and Magee, Christopher S. P. 2015. Trade and Democracy: A Factor-Based Approach. International Interactions, Vol. 41, Issue. 2, p. 407.

    Gilady, Lilach 2015. Triangle or ‘trilemma’: Rousseau and the ‘Kantian peace’. Journal of International Relations and Development,

    Treisman, Daniel 2015. Income, Democracy, and Leader Turnover. American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 59, Issue. 4, p. 927.

    Balaev, Mikhail 2014. Improving models of democracy: The example of lagged effects of economic development, education, and gender equality. Social Science Research, Vol. 46, p. 169.

    Berden, Koen Bergstrand, Jeffrey H. and van Etten, Eva 2014. Governance and Globalisation. The World Economy, Vol. 37, Issue. 3, p. 353.

    Clark, Rob 2014. A Tale of Two Trends: Democracy and Human Rights, 1981–2010. Journal of Human Rights, Vol. 13, Issue. 4, p. 395.

    Graham, Benjamin A.T. 2014. Diaspora-owned firms and social responsibility. Review of International Political Economy, Vol. 21, Issue. 2, p. 432.

    Kono, Daniel Yuichi and Rickard, Stephanie J. 2014. Buying National: Democracy, Public Procurement, and International Trade. International Interactions, Vol. 40, Issue. 5, p. 657.

    Kucera, David Charles and Principi, Marco 2014. Democracy and foreign direct investment at the industry level: evidence for US multinationals. Review of World Economics, Vol. 150, Issue. 3, p. 595.

    Pepinsky, Thomas B. 2014. The Politics of Capital Flight in the Global Economic Crisis. Economics & Politics, Vol. 26, Issue. 3, p. 431.

    Regilme, Salvador Santino F. 2014. Bringing the Global Political Economy Back In: Neoliberalism, Globalization, and Democratic Consolidation. International Studies Perspectives, Vol. 15, Issue. 3, p. 277.

    Regilme, Salvador Santino F. 2014. The social science of human rights: the need for a ‘second image reversed’?. Third World Quarterly, Vol. 35, Issue. 8, p. 1390.

    Wu, Wen-Chin 2014. When Do Dictators Decide to Open Trade Regimes?-Inequality and Trade Openness in Authoritarian Countries. International Studies Quarterly, p. n/a.


Economic Globalization and Democracy: An Empirical Analysis

  • QUAN LI (a1) and RAFAEL REUVENY (a2)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 January 2003

The theoretical literature presents conflicting expectations about the effect of globalization on national democratic governance. One view expects globalization to enhance democracy; a second argues the opposite; a third argues globalization does not necessarily affect democracy. Progress in explaining how globalization affects democracy requires confronting these theoretical positions with data. We assess empirically the effects of globalization on the level of democracy from 1970 to 1996 for 127 countries in a pooled time-series cross-sectional statistical model. The effects of four national aspects of globalization on democracy are examined: trade openness, foreign direct investment inflows, portfolio investment inflows and the spread of democratic ideas across countries. We find that trade openness and portfolio investment inflows negatively affect democracy. The effect of trade openness is constant over time while the negative effect of portfolio investment strengthens. Foreign direct investment inflows positively affect democracy, but the effect weakens over time. The spread of democratic ideas promotes democracy persistently over time. These patterns are robust across samples, various model specifications, alternative measures of democracy and several statistical estimators. We conclude with a discussion of policy implications.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

British Journal of Political Science
  • ISSN: 0007-1234
  • EISSN: 1469-2112
  • URL: /core/journals/british-journal-of-political-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *