Skip to main content Accessibility help

The Effects of Female Leadership on Women's Voice in Political Debate

  • Jack Blumenau (a1)


Do female leaders amplify the voices of other women in politics? The author addresses this question by examining parliamentary debates in the UK House of Commons. In the context of a difference-in-differences design that exploits over-time variation in the gender of cabinet ministers, the article demonstrates that female ministers substantially increase the participation of other female MPs in relevant debates, compared to when the minister is male. It also uses a measure of debate influence, based on the degree to which words used by one legislator are adopted by other members, to show that female ministers also increase the influence of female backbenchers. To explore the mechanisms behind these results, the author introduces a new metric of ministerial responsiveness and shows that female ministers are significantly more responsive than their male counterparts to the speeches of female backbenchers.


Corresponding author

*Corresponding author. E-mail:


Hide All
Ahlquist, JS and Levi, M (2011) Leadership: what it means, what it does, and what we want to know about it. Annual Review of Political Science 14, 124.
Angrist, JD and Pischke, J-S (2009) Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Asgari, S, Dasgupta, N and Cote, NG (2010) When does contact with successful ingroup members change self-stereotypes? Social Psychology 41(3), 203211.
Ban, P et al. (2018) A Woman's Voice in the House: Gender Composition and its Consequences in Committee Hearings. Working Paper.
Barnes, TD and O'Brien, DZ (2018) Defending the realm: the appointment of female defense ministers worldwide. American Journal of Political Science 62(2), 355368.
Beaman, L et al. (2009) Powerful women: does exposure reduce bias? Quarterly Journal of Economics 124(4), 14971540.
Beaman, L et al. (2012) Female leadership raises aspirations and educational attainment for girls: a policy experiment in India. Science 335(6068), 582586.
Beckwith, K and Cowell-Meyers, K (2007) Sheer numbers: critical representation thresholds and women's political representation. Perspectives on Politics 5(3), 553565.
Benoit, K et al. (2018) Quanteda: an R package for the quantitative analysis of textual data. Journal of Open Source Software 3(30), 774.
Bertrand, M et al. (2019) Breaking the glass ceiling? The effect of board quotas on female labor market outcomes in Norway. The Review of Economic Studies 86(1), 191239.
Bettinger, EP and Long, BT (2005) Do faculty serve as role models? The impact of instructor gender on female students. American Economic Review 95(2), 152157.
Bird, K (2005) Gendering parliamentary questions. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations 7(3), 353370.
Blumenau, J (2019) Replication Data for: The Effects of Female Leadership on Women’s Voice in Political Debate,, Harvard Dataverse, V1, UNF:6:cNk2L7LNGzOsULSrK9+pfg== [fileUNF]
Brajer, V and Gill, A (2010) Yakity-yak: who talks back? An email experiment. Social Science Quarterly 91(4), 10071024.
Bullock, JG, Green, DP and Ha, SE (2010) Yes, but what's the mechanism? (don't expect an easy answer). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 98(4), 550.
Cameron, AC and Miller, DL (2015) A practitioner's guide to cluster-robust inference. Journal of Human Resources 50(2), 317372.
Campbell, DE and Wolbrecht, C (2006) See Jane run: women politicians as role models for adolescents. The Journal of Politics 68(2), 233247.
Catalano, A (2009) Women acting for women? An analysis of gender and debate participation in the British House of Commons 2005–2007. Politics & Gender 5(01), 4568.
Chattopadhyay, R and Duflo, E (2004) Women as policy makers: evidence from a randomized policy experiment in India. Econometrica 72(5), 14091443.
Childs, S (2000) The New Labour women MPs in the 1997 British Parliament: issues of recruitment and representation. Women's History Review 9(1), 5573.
Childs, S (2004) A feminised style of politics? Women MPs in the House of Commons. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations 6(1), 319.
Childs, S and Krook, ML (2009) Analysing women's substantive representation: from critical mass to critical actors. Government and Opposition 44(2), 125145.
Csardi, G and Nepusz, T (2006) The igraph software package for complex network research. InterJournal, Complex Systems, 1695.
Dasgupta, N and Asgari, S (2004) Seeing is believing: exposure to counterstereotypic women leaders and its effect on the malleability of automatic gender stereotyping. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 40(5), 642658.
Dietrich, BJ, Enos, RD and Sen, M (2017) Gender dynamics in elite political contexts: evidence from supreme court oral arguments. Working Paper.
Eagly, AH and Johnson, BT (1990) Gender and leadership style: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 108(2), 233.
Erkan, G and Radev, DR (2004) Lexrank: graph-based lexical centrality as salience in text summarization. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 22, 457479.
Escobar-Lemmon, M and Taylor-Robinson, MM (2009) Getting to the top: career paths of women in Latin American cabinets. Political Research Quarterly 62(4), 685699.
Fader, A et al. (2007) Mavenrank: identifying influential members of the US Senate using lexical centrality. In Proceedings of the 2007 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning (EMNLP-CoNLL), pp. 658666.
Gilardi, F (2015) The temporary importance of role models for women's political representation. American Journal of Political Science 59(4), 957970.
Grimmer, J and Stewart, BM (2013) Text as data: the promise and pitfalls of automatic content analysis methods for political texts. Political Analysis 21(3), 267297.
Hannah, A and Murachver, T (1999) Gender and conversational style as predictors of conversational behavior. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 18(2), 153174.
Hannah, A and Murachver, T (2007) Gender preferential responses to speech. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 26(3), 274290.
Hawkesworth, M (2003) Congressional enactments of race–gender: toward a theory of race–gendered institutions. American Political Science Review 97(04), 529550.
Heath, RM, Schwindt-Bayer, LA and Taylor-Robinson, MM (2005) Women on the sidelines: women's representation on committees in Latin American legislatures. American Journal of Political Science 49(2), 420436.
Humphreys, M, Masters, WA and Sandbu, ME (2006) The role of leaders in democratic deliberations: results from a field experiment in São Tomé and Príncipe. World Politics 58(4), 583622.
Imai, K et al. (2011) Unpacking the black box of causality: learning about causal mechanisms from experimental and observational studies. American Political Science Review 105(4), 765789.
Karakowsky, L, McBey, K and Miller, DL (2004) Gender, perceived competence, and power displays examining verbal interruptions in a group context. Small Group Research 35(4), 407439.
Karpowitz, CF and Mendelberg, T (2014) The Silent Sex. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Karpowitz, CF, Mendelberg, T and Shaker, L (2012) Gender inequality in deliberative participation. American Political Science Review 106(3), 533547.
Kathlene, L (1994) Power and influence in state legislative policymaking: the interaction of gender and position in committee hearing debates. American Political Science Review 88(3), 560576.
Kleinberg, JM (1999) Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment. Journal of the ACM (JACM) 46(5), 604632.
Krook, ML and O'Brien, DZ (2012) All the president's men? The appointment of female cabinet ministers worldwide. The Journal of Politics 74(3), 840855.
Lovenduski, J (2005) Feminizing Politics. Cambridge: Polity.
Mansbridge, J (1999) Should blacks represent blacks and women represent women? A contingent ‘yes’. The Journal of Politics 61(3), 628657.
Mendelberg, T, Karpowitz, CF and Goedert, N (2014) Does descriptive representation facilitate women's distinctive voice? How gender composition and decision rules affect deliberation. American Journal of Political Science 58(2), 291306.
Mendelberg, T, Karpowitz, CF and Oliphant, JB (2014) Gender inequality in deliberation: unpacking the black box of interaction. Perspectives on Politics 12(1), 1844.
Mihalcea, R (2004) Graph-based ranking algorithms for sentence extraction, applied to text summarization. In Proceedings of the ACL 2004 on Interactive Poster and Demonstration Sessions. Association for Computational Linguistics. Article No. 20.
Nixon, LA and Robinson, MD (1999) The educational attainment of young women: role model effects of female high school faculty. Demography 36(2), 185194.
O'Brien, DZ (2015) Rising to the top: gender, political performance, and party leadership in parliamentary democracies. American Journal of Political Science 59(4), 10221039.
Page, L et al. (1999) The PageRank citation ranking: bringing order to the Web. Technical report Stanford InfoLab.
Pearson, K and Dancey, L (2011) Speaking for the underrepresented in the House of Representatives: voicing women's interests in a partisan era. Politics & Gender 7(04), 493519.
Sanders, LM (1997) Against deliberation. Political Theory 25(3), 347376.
Sapiro, V (1981) Research frontier essay: when are interests interesting? The problem of political representation of women. American Political Science Review 75(3), 701716.
Studlar, DT and Moncrief, GF (1999) Women's work? The distribution and prestige of portfolios in the Canadian provinces. Governance 12(4), 379395.
Thomson, R, Murachver, T and Green, J (2001) Where is the gender in gendered language? Psychological Science 12(2), 171175.
Wang, M and Kelan, E (2013) The gender quota and female leadership: effects of the Norwegian gender quota on board chairs and CEOs. Journal of Business Ethics 117(3), 449466.
Wängnerud, L (2009) Women in parliaments: descriptive and substantive representation. Annual Review of Political Science 12, 5169.
Wolbrecht, C and Campbell, DE (2007) Leading by example: female members of parliament as political role models. American Journal of Political Science 51(4), 921939.


Type Description Title
Supplementary materials

Blumenau Dataset

Supplementary materials

Blumenau supplementary material
Online Appendix

 PDF (704 KB)
704 KB


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed