Skip to main content
×
×
Home

From on High: The Effect of Elite Polarization on Mass Attitudes and Behaviors, 1972–2012

  • Joshua N. Zingher and Michael E. Flynn
Abstract

Though there is widespread scholarly consensus that American political elites have become increasingly ideologically polarized, there remains debate about how the mass electorate has responded to the increase in polarization at the elite level. This article shows that as party elites have become more polarized, individuals have become better able to identify the party that best matches their own ideological positions, thereby contributing to polarization at the mass level. Using forty years of ANES and DW-NOMINATE data to test this argument, it was found that the relationship between a voter’s position in policy space and their political behavior is indeed conditional upon polarization at the elite level. This finding demonstrates how changes in elite polarization translate to behavioral changes on the mass level.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      From on High: The Effect of Elite Polarization on Mass Attitudes and Behaviors, 1972–2012
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      From on High: The Effect of Elite Polarization on Mass Attitudes and Behaviors, 1972–2012
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      From on High: The Effect of Elite Polarization on Mass Attitudes and Behaviors, 1972–2012
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Footnotes
Hide All
*

Old Dominion University, Department of Political Science and Geography (email: jzingher@odu.edu); Department of Political Science, Kansas State University (email: meflynn@ksu.edu). The authors would like to thank three anonymous reviewers for their constructive feedback. In addition, the authors thank Michael D. McDonald and Ben Farrer for their helpful feedback during the early stages of the project. Data replication sets are available at https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataverse/BJPolS. Online appendices are available at http://dx.doi.org/doi: 10.1017/S0007123415000514.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Abramowitz Alan. 2010. The Disappearing Center. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
Abramowitz Alan, and Saunders Kyle. 2006. Exploring the Bases of Partisanship in the American Electorate: Social Identity vs. Ideology. Political Research Quarterly 59:175187.
Abramowitz Alan, and Saunders Kyle. 2008. Is Polarization Really a Myth? Journal of Politics 70:542555.
Ansolabehere Stephen, Rodden Jonathan, and Snyder James M. Jr. 2008. The Strength of Issues: Using Multiple Measures to Gauge Preference Stability, Ideological Constraint and Issue Voting. American Political Science Review 102:215232.
Berry William D., Golder Matt, and Milton Daniel. 2012. Improving Tests of Theories Positing Interaction. Journal of Politics 74:653671.
Brewer Mark. 2005. The Rise of Partisanship and the Expansion of Partisan Conflict within the American Electorate. Political Research Quarterly 58:219229.
Campbell James. 2005. Why Bush Won the Presidential Election of 2004: Incumbency, Ideology, Terrorism, and Turnout. Political Science Quarterly 120:219241.
Carmines Edward G., and Stimson James. 1989. Issue Evolution: Race and the Transformation of American Politics. New York: Princeton University Press.
Carroll Royce, Lewis Jeffrey, Lo James, McCarty Nolan, Poole Keith, and Rosenthal Howard. 2013. Common Space DW-NOMINATE Scores with Bootstrapped Standard Errors (Joint House and Senate Scaling), 6 February. Available from: http://voteview.com/dwnomjoint.asp.
Carsey Thomas, and Layman Geoffrey. 2006. Changing Sides or Changing Minds? Party Identification and Policy Preferences in the American Electorate. American Journal of Political Science 50:464477.
Converse Phillip. 1964. Belief Systems in Mass Publics. Pp. 206261 in David Apter, ed., Ideology and Discontent. New York: The Free Press.
Cox Gary, and McCubbins Matthew D.. 2005. Setting the Agenda. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Downs Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
Ellis Christopher, and Stimson James. 2012. Ideology in America. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Feldman Stanley, and Johnston Christopher. 2014. Understanding the Determinants of Political Ideology: Implications of Structural Complexity. Political Psychology 35:337358.
Fiorina Morris, and Abrams Samuel J.. 2008. Political Polarization in the American Public, Pp. 563588 in Annual Review of Political Science 11.
Fiorina Morris, Abrams Samuel J., and Pope Jeremy. 2011. Culture War? The Myth of a Polarized America, 3rd edn., New York: Longman.
Fiorina Morris, and Levendusky Matthew. 2006. Disconnected: The Political Class Versus the People – Rejoinder. Pp. 4971 in Pietro S. Nivola and David W. Brady, eds, Red and Blue Nation? Volume 1Characteristics and Causes of America’s Polarized Politics . Washington, D.C: Hoover Institution Press.
Green Donald, Palmquist Bradley, and Schickler Eric. 2002. Partisan Hearts and Minds: Political Parties and the Social Identities of Voters. New Haven, Conn: Yale University Press.
Goren Paul. 2013. On Voter Competence. New York: Oxford University Press.
Gorsuch Richard L. 1974. Factor Analysis. Philadelphia, Penn: W. B. Saunders Company.
Grofman Bernard. 1991. Multivariate Methods and the Analysis of Racially Polarized Voting: Pitfalls in the Use of Social Science by the Courts. Social Science Quarterly 72:826833.
Hetherington Mark. 2001. Resurgent Mass Partisanship. American Political Science Review 95:619631.
Iyengar Shanto, Sood Gaurav, and Lelkes Yphtach. 2012. Affect, Not Ideology: A Social Identity Perspective on Polarization. Public Opinion Quarterly 76:405431.
Jacobson Gary. 2000. Partisan Polarization in National Politics: The Electoral Connection. Pp. 930 in Jon Bond and Richard Fleisher, eds, Polarized Politics Congress and the President in a Partisan Era. Washington, D.C: Congressional Quarterly Press.
Layman Geoffrey, and Carsey Thomas. 2002. Party Polarization and ‘Conflict Extension’ in the American Electora. American Journal of Political Science 46:786802.
Layman Geoffrey, Carsey Thomas, Green James C., Herrera Richard, and Cooperman Rosalyn. 2010. Activists and Conflict Extension in American Party Politics. American Political Science Review 104:324346.
Levendusky Matthew. 2009. The Partisan Sort. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Levendusky Matthew. 2010. Clearer Cues, More Consistent Voters: A Benefit of Elite Polarization. Political Behavior 32:111131.
Levendusky Matthew, and Pope Jeremy. 2011. Red States vs. Blue States: Going Beyond the Mean. Public Opinion Quarterly. 75:227248.
Mann Thomas E. 2007. Polarizing the House of Representatives: How Much Does Gerrymandering Matter?. Pp. 263283 in Pietro S. Nivola and David W. Brady, eds, Red and Blue Nation? Volume 1Characteristics and Causes of America’s Polarized Politics . Washington, D.C: Hoover Institution Press.
Mason Lilliana. 2013. The Rise of Uncivil Agreement: Issue Versus Behavioral Polarization in the American Electorate. American Behavioral Scientist 57:140159.
Mason Lilliana. 2015. I Disrespectfully Agree: The Differential Effects of Partisan Sorting on Behavioral and Issue Polarization. American Journal of Political Science 59:128145.
McCarty Nolan, Poole Keith, and Rosenthal Howard. 2006. Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.
Miller Gary, and Schofield Norman. 2008. The Transformation of the Republican and Democratic Party Coalitions in the U.S. Perspectives on Politics 6:433450.
Nicholson Stephen. 2012. Polarizing Cues. American Journal of Political Science 56:5266.
Poole Keith, and Rosenthal Howard. 1997. Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting. New York: Oxford University Press.
Rohde David. 1991. Parties and Leaders in the Post-Reform House. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Saunders Kyle L., and Abramowitz Alan. 2004. Ideological Realignment and Active Partisans in the American Electorate. American Politics Research 32:285309.
Schofield Norman, Claassen Christopher, Gallego Maria, and Ozdemir Ugur. 2011. Empirical and Formal Models of the United States Presidential Elections in 2000 and 2004. Pp. 259302 in Norman Schofield and Gonzalo Gaballero, eds, Political Economy of Institutions, Democracy and Voting. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Schofield Norman, Miller Gary, and Martin Andrew. 2003. Critical Elections and Political Realignments in the USA: 1860–2000. Political Studies 51:217240.
Stonecash Jeffrey, Brewer Mark, and Mariani Mack D.. 2003. Diverging Parties: Social Change, Realignment, and Party Polarization. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.
Treier Shawn, and Hillygus Sunshine. 2009. The Nature of Political Ideology in the Contemporary Electorate. Public Opinion Quarterly 73:679703.
Zaller Jonathan. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

British Journal of Political Science
  • ISSN: 0007-1234
  • EISSN: 1469-2112
  • URL: /core/journals/british-journal-of-political-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
Type Description Title
PDF
Supplementary materials

Zingher and Flynn supplementary material S1
Appendix

 PDF (1.1 MB)
1.1 MB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 29
Total number of PDF views: 289 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 1069 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 20th February 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.