Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

The Future is a Moving Target: Predicting Political Instability

  • Drew Bowlsby (a1), Erica Chenoweth (a2), Cullen Hendrix (a1) and Jonathan D. Moyer (a1)
Abstract

Previous research by Goldstone et al. (2010) generated a highly accurate predictive model of state-level political instability. Notably, this model identifies political institutions – and partial democracy with factionalism, specifically – as the most compelling factors explaining when and where instability events are likely to occur. This article reassesses the model’s explanatory power and makes three related points: (1) the model’s predictive power varies substantially over time; (2) its predictive power peaked in the period used for out-of-sample validation (1995–2004) in the original study and (3) the model performs relatively poorly in the more recent period. The authors find that this decline is not simply due to the Arab Uprisings, instability events that occurred in autocracies. Similar issues are found with attempts to predict nonviolent uprisings (Chenoweth and Ulfelder 2017) and armed conflict onset and continuation (Hegre et al. 2013). These results inform two conclusions: (1) the drivers of instability are not constant over time and (2) care must be exercised in interpreting prediction exercises as evidence in favor or dispositive of theoretical mechanisms.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      The Future is a Moving Target: Predicting Political Instability
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      The Future is a Moving Target: Predicting Political Instability
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      The Future is a Moving Target: Predicting Political Instability
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
*Corresponding author. Email: jmoyer@du.edu
References
Hide All
Banerjee, MV Duflo, E (2009) The experimental approach to development economics. Annual Review of Economics 1, 151178.
Boix, C (2011) Democracy, development, and the international system. American Political Science Review 105 (4):809828.
Bowlsby, D, Chenoweth, E, Hendrix, C Moyer, J (2018) Replication Data for: The Future is a Moving Target: Predicting Political Instability, https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/XMGVO2, Harvard Dataverse, V1, UNF:6:s2+Q3W+hPkdB/e24Vhx/IQ== [fileUNF].
Cederman, LE Weidmann, NB (2017) Predicting armed conflict: time to adjust our expectations? Science 355 (6324):474476.
Cerra, V Saxena, SC (2008) Growth dynamics: the myth of economic recovery. American Economic Review 98 (1):439457.
Chenoweth, E (2015) Major Episodes of Contention Dataset, Vol. 1. Denver, CO: University of Denver.
Chenoweth, E Ulfelder, J (2017) Can structural conditions explain the onset of nonviolent uprisings? Journal of Conflict Resolution 61 (2):298324.
Chiba, D Gleditsch, KS (2017) The shape of things to come? Expanding the inequality and grievance model for civil war forecasts with event data. Journal of Peace Research 54 (2):275297.
Collier, P Hoeffler, A (2004) Greed and grievance in civil war. Oxford Economic Papers 56 (4):563595.
Dafoe, A (2014) Science deserves better: the imperative to share complete replication files. PS: Political Science & Politics 47 (1):6066.
Evanschitzky, H Armstrong, JA (2010) Replications of forecasting research. International Journal of Forecasting 26 (1):48.
Fawcett, R (2006) An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognition Letters 27 (8):861874.
Friedman, M (1968) The role of monetary policy. American Economic Review 58 (1):117.
Gates, S et al. (2012) Development consequences of armed conflict. World Development 40 (9):17131722.
Ghobarah, HA, Huth, P Russett, B (2004) The post-war public health effects of civil conflict. Social Science & Medicine 59 (4):869884.
Giacomini, R Rossi, B (2009) Detecting and predicting forecast breakdowns. The Review of Economic Studies 76 (2):669705.
Goldstone, JA et al. (2010) A global model for forecasting political instability. American Journal of Political Science 54 (1):190208.
Gurr, TR (1970) Why Men Rebel. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Hegre, H Sambanis, N (2006) Sensitivity analysis of empirical results on civil war onset. Journal of Conflict Resolution 50 (4):508535.
Hegre, H et al. (2013) Predicting armed conflict, 2010–2050. International Studies Quarterly 57 (2):250270.
Hegre, H et al. (2017) Introduction: forecasting in peace research. Journal of Peace Research 54 (2):113124.
Honaker, J King, G (2010) What to do about missing values in time‐series cross‐section data. American Journal of Political Science 54 (2):561581.
Litterman, L Scheinkman, J (1991) Common factors affecting bond returns. Journal of Fixed Income 1 (1):5461.
Lucas, RE (1973) Some international evidence on output–inflation tradeoffs. American Economic Review 63 (3):326334.
Marshall, MG, Gurr, TR Harff, B (2016) PITF State Failure Problem Set. Vienna, VA: Center for Systemic Peace.
Nosek, BA et al. (2015) Promoting an open research culture. Science 348 (6242):14221425.
Nyseth Brehm, H (2017) Re-examining risk factors of genocide. Journal of Genocide Research 19 (1):6187.
Pesaran, M, Pettenuzzo, D Timmermann, A (2006) Forecasting time series subject to multiple structural breaks. Review of Economic Studies 73 (4):10571084.
Reinhart, C Rogoff, KS (2009) This Time is Different: Eight Centuries of Financial Folly. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Stock, JH Watson, MW (1996) Evidence on structural instability in macroeconomic time series relations. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 14 (1):1130.
Themnér, L Wallensteen, P (2012) Armed conflicts, 1946–2011. Journal of Peace Research 49 (4):565575.
Vreeland, JR (2008) The effect of political regime on civil war: unpacking anocracy. The Journal of Conflict Resolution 52 (3):401425.
Ward, MD Beger, A (2017) Lessons from near real-time forecasting of irregular leadership changes. Journal of Peace Research 54 (2):141156.
Ward, MD, Greenhill, BD Bakke, KM (2010) The perils of policy by p-value: predicting civil conflicts. Journal of Peace Research 47 (4):363375.
Wendt, AE (1987) The agent-structure problem in international relations theory. International Organization 41 (3):335370.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

British Journal of Political Science
  • ISSN: 0007-1234
  • EISSN: 1469-2112
  • URL: /core/journals/british-journal-of-political-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary materials

Bowlsby et al. supplementary material
Appendices A-D

 Word (52 KB)
52 KB
UNKNOWN
Supplementary materials

Bowlsby et al. Dataset
Dataset

 Unknown

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed