Skip to main content

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
Cancel
×
×
Home
  • Home
Article
  • Cited by 2
  • Cited by
    Crossref Citations
    Crossref logo
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.
    Pons, Vincent and Liegey, Guillaume 2018. Increasing the Electoral Participation of Immigrants: Experimental Evidence from France. The Economic Journal,
    Bhatti, Yosef Dahlgaard, Jens Olav Hansen, Jonas Hedegaard and Hansen, Kasper M. 2018. Can governments use Get Out The Vote letters to solve Europe’s turnout crisis? Evidence from a field experiment. West European Politics, Vol. 41, Issue. 1, p. 240.
    ×
  • Access
  • Open access

Is Door-to-Door Canvassing Effective in Europe? Evidence from a Meta-study across Six European Countries

  • Yosef Bhatti, Jens Olav Dahlgaard, Jonas Hedegaard Hansen and Kasper M. Hansen
Abstract

A vast amount of experimental evidence suggests that get-out-the-vote encouragements delivered through door-to-door canvassing have large effects on turnout. Most of the existing studies have been conducted in the United States, and are inspiring European mobilization campaigns. This article explores the empirical question of whether the American findings are applicable to Europe. It combines existing European studies and presents two new Danish studies to show that the pooled point estimate of the effect is substantially smaller in Europe than in the United States, and finds no effects in the two Danish experiments. The article discusses why the effects seem to be different in Europe compared to the United States, and stresses the need for further experiments in Europe as there is still considerable uncertainty regarding the European effects. While one possible explanation is that differences in turnout rates explain the differences in effect sizes, the empirical analysis finds no strong relationship between turnout and effect sizes in either Europe or the United States.

  • View HTML
      • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Is Door-to-Door Canvassing Effective in Europe? Evidence from a Meta-study across Six European Countries
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Is Door-to-Door Canvassing Effective in Europe? Evidence from a Meta-study across Six European Countries
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Is Door-to-Door Canvassing Effective in Europe? Evidence from a Meta-study across Six European Countries
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2016
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Footnotes
Hide All
*

Danish Institute for Local and Regional Government Research (email: yobh@kora.dk); Department of Political Science, University of Copenhagen (emails: jod@ifs.ku.dk, jhh@ifs.ku.dk and kmh@ifs.ku.dk/www.kaspermhansen.eu). The authors thank the volunteers in Copenhagen and Randers for participating in the two door-two-door experiments, Jens Kristian Rasmussen for coordinating the effort in Randers, and Mariann Malchau Olsen and Ane Reese Mikkelsen for excellent research assistance. They thank Donald P. Green, Florian Foos, Frederik Hjorth and participants at the Danish Political Science Association’s Annual Meeting 2015 for valuable comments. This project was supported by the Danish Council for Independent Research (grant no. 12-124983). Data replication sets are available at http://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataverse/BJPolS and online appendices are available at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123416000521.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Angrist, Joshua D., Imbens, Guido W., and Rubin, Donald B.. 1996. Identification of Causal Effects Using Instrumental Variables. Journal of the American Statistical Association 91 (434):444–455.
Bedolla, Lisa G., and Michelson, Melissa R.. 2012. Mobilizing Inclusion: Transforming the Electorate through Get-Out-The-Vote Campaigns. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Bengtsson, Åsa, Hansen, Kasper M., Harðarson, Ólafur Th., Narud, Hanne M., and Oscarsson, Henrik. 2014. The Nordic Voter: Myths of Exceptionalism. Colchester: ECPR Press.
Bhatti, Yosef, Dahlgaard, Jens Olav, Hansen, Jonas Hedegaard, and Hansen, Kasper Møller. 2014a. Hvem stemte og hvem blev hjemme? – Valgdeltagelsen ved kommunalvalget 19. november 2013. Beskrivende analyser af valgdeltagelsen baseret på registerdata [Who Voted and Who Stayed at Home? – Voter Turnout at the November 19, 2013 Municipal Elections. Descriptive Analyses of Voter Turnout based on Register Data], Working Paper No. 2/2014, Copenhagen: Center for Voting and Parties,Department of Political Science, University of Copenhagen.
Bhatti, Yosef, Dahlgaard, Jens Olav, Hansen, Jonas Hedegaard, and Hansen, Kasper Møller. 2014b. Kan man øge valgdeltagelsen? – Analyse af mobiliseringstiltag ved kommunalvalget den 19. November 2013 [Is it Possible to Increase Voter Turnout? Analysis of Mobilization Initiatives at the November 19, 2013 Municipal Elections], Working Paper No. 3/2014, Copenhagen: Center for Voting and Parties, Department of Political Science, University of Copenhagen.
Bhatti, Yosef, Dahlgaard, Jens Olav, Hansen, Jonas Hedegaard, and Hansen, Kasper Møller. 2014c. Mobilisering via SMS til Europaparlamentsvalget 25. maj 2014 [Mobilization via SMS at the European Parliament Election May 25, 2014], Working Paper No. 5/2014, Copenhagen: Center for Voting and Parties, Department of Political Science, University of Copenhagen.
Bhatti, Yosef, Dahlgaard, Jens Olav, Hansen, Jonas Hedegaard, and Hansen, Kasper Møller. 2015. Getting Out the Vote with Evaluative Thinking. American Journal of Evaluation 36 (3):389–400.
Braconnier, Celine, Dormagen, Jean-Yves, and Pons, Vincent. 2016. Voter Registration Costs and Disenfranchisement: Experimental Evidence from France, Working Paper No. 15-098. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School.
Cantoni, Enrico, and Pons, Vincent. 2016. Do Interactions With Candidates Increase Voter Support and Participation? Experimental Evidence from Italy, Working Paper No. 16-080. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School.
Enos, Ryan D., and Fowler, Anthony. 2016. Aggregate Effects of Large-Scale Campaigns on Voter Turnout. Political Science Research and Methods. Published online 18 May 2016. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2016.21.
Fieldhouse, Edward, Cutts, David, John, Peter, and Widdop, Paul. 2014. When Context Matters: Assessing Geographical Heterogeneity of Get-Out-The-Vote Treatment Effects Using a Population Based Field Experiment. Political Behavior 36 (1):77–97.
Foos, Florian. 2016. First Impressions – Lasting Impressions: Candidate Contact and Party Support in the 2015 UK General Election. Paper Prepared for the NYU CESS Experimental Political Science Conference 2016, New York City, NY, 19–20 February.
Foos, Florian, and John, Peter. 2016. Parties Are No Civic Charities: Voter Contact and the Changing Partisan Composition of the Electorate. Conditionally accepted for publication in Political Science Research and Methods. http://www.florianfoos.net/resources/Manuscript_Foos_John.pdf.
Franco, Annie, Malhotra, Neil, and Simonovits, Gabor. 2014. Publication Bias in the Social Sciences: Unlocking the File Drawer. Science 345 (6203):1502–1505.
Gerber, Alan S., and Green, Donald P.. 2000. The Effects of Canvassing, Telephone Calls, and Direct Mail on Voter Turnout: A Field Experiment. American Political Science Review 94 (3):653–663.
Gerber, Alan S., and Green, Donald P.. 2012. Field Experiments: Design, Analysis, and Interpretation. New York: WW Norton.
Giné, Xavier, and Mansuri, Ghazala. 2011. Together We Will: Experimental Evidence on Female Voting Behavior in Pakistan. Policy Research Working Papers. Washington, DC: World Bank. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-5692.
Green, Donald P., and Gerber, Alan A.. 2008. Get Out the Vote: How to Increase Voter Turnout, 2nd Edition. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Green, Donald P., Gerber, Alan A., and Nickerson, David W.. 2003. Getting Out the Vote in Local Elections: Results from Six Door-to-Door Canvassing Experiments. Journal of Politics 65 (4):1083–1096.
Green, Donald P., McGrath, Mary C., and Aronow, Peter M.. 2013. Field Experiments and the Study of Voter Turnout. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 23 (1):27–48.
Guan, Mei, and Green, Donald P.. 2006. Noncoercive Mobilization in State-Controlled Elections: An Experimental Study in Beijing. Comparative Political Studies 39 (10):1175–1193.
Hansen, Jonas Hedegaard. 2016. Residential Mobility and Turnout: The Relevance of Social Costs, Timing and Education. Political Behavior 38 (4):769–791.
Jason, Daniel W., and Kollerup, Simon. 2014. Dør-til-dør-kampagnens effekt på kendskab, personlige stemmer og partivalg – et felteksperiment [Door-to-Door Campaigns’ Effect on Recognition, Personal Votes and Party Choice – A Field Experiment]. In Folketingsvalgkampen 2011 i perspektiv [The Campaign for Parliament 2011 in Perspective] edited by Kasper Møller Hansen and Karina Kosiara-Pedersen, 153–174. Copenhagen: DJØF-forlag.
John, Peter, and Brannan, Tessa. 2008. How Different are Telephoning and Canvassing? Results from a ‘Get Out the Vote’ Field Experiment in the British 2005 General Election. British Journal of Political Science 38 (3):565–574.
Karp, Jeffrey A., Banducci, Susan A., and Bowler, Shaun. 2007. Getting Out the Vote: Party Mobilization in a Comparative Perspective. British Journal of Political Science 38 (1):91–112.
Matland, Richard E., and Murray, Gregg R.. 2012. An Experimental Test of Mobilization Effects in a Latino Community. Political Research Quarterly 65 (1):192–205.
Nickerson, David W. 2008. Is Voting Contagious? Evidence from Two Field Experiments. American Political Science Review 102 (1):49–57.
Nyman, Pär. 2014. Door-to-Door Canvassing in the European Elections: Evidence from a Swedish Field Experiment. Uppsala: Working Paper, Department of Government, Uppsala University.
Pons, Vincent. 2016. Will a Five-Minute Discussion Change Your Mind? A Countrywide Experiment on Voter Choice in France, Working Paper No. 16-079. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School.
Pons, Vincent, and Liegey, Guillaume. 2016. Increasing the Electoral Participation of Immigrants – Experimental Evidence from France, Working Paper No. 16-094. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School.
Ramiro, Luis, Morales, Laura, and Jiménez-Buedo, Maria. 2012. The Effects of Party Mobilization on Electoral Results. An Experimental Study of the 2011 Spanish Local Elections. Paper Prepared for the 2012 International Political Science Association World Congress of Political Science, Madrid, 8–12 July.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

British Journal of Political Science
  • ISSN: 0007-1234
  • EISSN: 1469-2112
  • URL: /core/journals/british-journal-of-political-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *

CAPTCHA *

Skip to the audio challenge
×

Keywords

Type Description Title
PDF
Supplementary materials

Bhatti supplementary material
Appendix

 PDF (25 KB)
25 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Cancel
Confirm
×