Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Juking the Stats? Authoritarian Information Problems in China

  • Jeremy L. Wallace
Abstract

Economic statistics inform citizens of general conditions, while central leaders use them to evaluate local officials. Are economic data systematically manipulated? After establishing discrepancies in economic data series cross-nationally, this article examines Chinese sub-national growth data. It leverages variation in the likelihood of manipulation over two dimensions, arguing that politically sensitive data are more likely to be manipulated at politically sensitive times. Gross domestic product (GDP) releases generate headlines, while highly correlated electricity production and consumption data are relatively unnoticed. In Chinese provinces, the difference between GDP and electricity growth increases in years with leadership turnover, which is consistent with juking the stats for political reasons. The analysis points to the political role of information and the limits of non-electoral accountability mechanisms in authoritarian regimes.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Juking the Stats? Authoritarian Information Problems in China
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Juking the Stats? Authoritarian Information Problems in China
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Juking the Stats? Authoritarian Information Problems in China
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Footnotes
Hide All
*

Department of Political Science, Ohio State University (email: wallace.521@osu.edu). The author wishes to thank Marcus Kurtz, Sarah Brooks, Irfan Nooruddin, Ohio State's Political Economy Working Group, Eva Bellin and Jessica Weiss, as well as Pu Xiaoyu and Jennifer Mayer for research assistance. Online appendices and replication files are available at http://dx.doi.org/doi: 10.1017/S0007123414000106.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Acemoglu, D. Robinson, J.A.. 2005. Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ames, B. 1970. Bases of Support for Mexico's Dominant Party. The American Political Science Review 64 (1):153167.
Andrews, Steven. 2011. Beijing's Hazardous Blue Sky. chinadialogue.net. 12 May.
Areddy, J. 2013. China Absent from Corruption Report. Wall Street Journal 10 July.
Bachman, D.M. 1991. Bureaucracy, Economy, and Leadership in China: The Institutional Origins of the Great Leap Forward. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Beissinger, M.R. 2007. Structure and Example in Modular Political Phenomena: The Diffusion of Bulldozer/Rose/Orange/Tulip Revolutions. Perspectives on Politics 5 (2):259276.
Blaydes, L. 2010. Elections and Distributive Politics in Mubarak's Egypt. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bueno de Mesquita, B., Smith, A., Siverson, R.M. Morrow, J.D.. 2003. The Logic of Political Survival. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Canaves, S. 2009. Song of Statistics: Odes to the Motherland from an Unlikely Source. Wall Street Journal. 31 July.
Cheibub, J.A., Gandhi, J. Vreeland, J.R.. 2010. Democracy and Dictatorship Revisited. Public Choice 143 (1):67101.
Chiozza, G. Goemans, H.E.. 2004. International Conflict and the Tenure of Leaders: Is War Still Ex Post Inefficient? American Journal of Political Science 48 (3):604619.
Demick, B. 2011. U.S. Embassy Air Quality Data Undercut China's Own Assessments. Los Angeles Times. 29 October.
Diaz-Cayeros, A., Magaloni, B., Weingast, B. , 2003. Tragic Brilliance: Equilibrium Party Hegemony in Mexico. SSRN Working Paper.
Drazen, A. 2001. The Political Business Cycle After 25 Years. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Fearon, J.D. 2011. Self-Enforcing Democracy. Quarterly Journal of Economics 126 (4):16611708.
Gandhi, J. 2008. Political Institutions under Dictatorship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Geddes, B. 1999. What do We Know about Democratization after Twenty Years. Annual Review of Political Science 2:115144.
Geddes, B. Zaller, J.. 1989. Sources of Popular Support for Authoritarian Regimes. American Journal of Political Science 33 (2):319347.
Gleditsch, K.S. 2002. Expanded Trade and GDP Data. The Journal of Conflict Resolution 46 (5):712724.
Guo, G. 2007. Retrospective Economic Accountability under Authoritarianism. Political Research Quarterly 60 (3):378390.
Guo, G. 2009. China's Local Political Budget Cycles. American Journal of Political Science 53 (3):621632.
Heston, A. 1994. A Brief Review of Some Problems in Using National Accounts Data in Level of Output Comparisons and Growth Studies. Journal of Development Economics 44 (1):2952.
Hollyer, J.R., Rosendorff, B.P. Vreeland, J.R.. 2011. Democracy and Transparency. The Journal of Politics 73 (4):11911205.
Holz, C.A. 2005. OECD-China Governance Project: The Institutional Arrangements for the Production of Statistics. Statistics Working Papers, OECD.
Holz, C.A.. 2008. China's 2004 Economic Census and 2006 Benchmark Revision of GDP Statistics: More Questions Than Answers? The China Quarterly 193:150163.
Huntington, S.P. 1968. Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Johnson, S., Kaufmann, D., Shleifer, A. 1997. The Unofficial Economy in Transition. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1997 (2): 159–239.
Kayser, M.A. 2005. Who Surfs, Who Manipulates? The Determinants of Opportunistic Election Timing and Electorally Motivated Economic Intervention. American Political Science Review 99 (1):1727.
Kerner, A., Jerven, M., Beatty, A.. 2013. Real Money, Fake Data: The Political Economy of World Bank Data Manipulation. IPES Working Paper.
Kung, J.K-S. Chen, S.. 2011. The Tragedy of the Nomenklatura: Career Incentives and Political Radicalism During China's Great Leap Famine. American Political Science Review 105 (1):2745.
Kuran, T. 1991a. Now Out of Never: The Element of Surprise in the East European Revolution of 1989. World Politics 44 (1):748.
Kuran, T. 1991b. The East European Revolution of 1989: Is it Surprising that We Were Surprised? American Economic Review 81 (2):121125.
Landry, P.F. 2008. Decentralized Authoritarianism in China: The Communist Party's Control of Local Elites in the Post-Mao Era. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Li, C. 2010. China's Midterm Jockeying: Gearing Up for 2012 Part 1: Provincial Chiefs. China Leadership Monitor (31):124.
Lin, J.Y. Yang, D.T.. 2000. Food Availability, Entitlements and the Chinese Famine of 1959-61. Economic Journal 110 (460):136158.
Lorentzen, P.L. 2013. Regularizing Rioting: Permitting Public Protest in an Authoritarian Regime. Quarterly Journal of Political Science 8 (2):127158.
Lupia, A McCubbins, M.D.. 1998. The Democratic Dilemma: Can Citizens Learn What They Need to Know? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
, X. Landry, P.F.. (forthcoming). Show Me the Money: Inter-Jurisdiction Political Competition and Fiscal Extraction in China. American Political Science Review.
Magaloni, B. 2006. Voting for Autocracy: Hegemonic Party Survival and Its Demise in Mexico. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Naughton, B. 2007. The Chinese Economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Nordhaus, W.D. 1975. The Political Business Cycle. The Review of Economic Studies 42 (2):169190.
Ober, J. 2008. Democracy and Knowledge: Innovation and Learning in Classical Athens. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Pepinsky, T. 2007. Autocracy, Elections, and Fiscal Policy: Evidence from Malaysia. Studies in Comparative International Development 42 (1):136163.
Rawski, T.G. 2001. What is Happening to China's GDP Statistics? China Economic Review 12 (4):347354.
Schmitter, P. Karl, T.. 1991. What Democracy Is & Is Not. Journal of Democracy 2:7588.
Shih, V., Adolph, C. Liu, M.. 2012. Getting Ahead in the Communist Party: Explaining the Advancement of Central Committee Members in China. American Political Science Review 106 (1):166187.
Shleifer, A. Vishny, R.W.. 1999. The Grabbing Hand: Government Pathologies and Their Cures. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Simpser, A. 2013. Why Governments and Parties Manipulate Elections: Theory, Practice, and Implications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sinton, J.E. 2001. Accuracy and Reliability of China's Energy Statistics. China Economic Review 12 (4):373383.
Smith, A. 2004. Election Timing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Smith, Yves. 2009. China Claims 6.8% Economic Growth for 4Q 2008. Naked Capitalism 22 January.
Tao, Y.F. 2006. The Evolution of ‘Political Business Cycle’ in Post-Mao China. Issues & Studies 42 (1):163194.
Teorell, J., Samanni, M., Holmberg, S., Rothstein, B. 2011. Quality of Government Dataset, version. Quality of Government Institute. Available from http://www.qog.pol.gu.se, accessed 6 April 2011.
Tsai, L.L. 2008. Understanding the Falsification of Village Income Statistics. The China Quarterly 196:805826.
Wallace, J. 2013. Cities, Redistribution, and Authoritarian Regime Survival. Journal of Politics 75 (3):632645.
Whiting, S.H. 2000. Power and Wealth in Rural China: The Political Economy of Institutional Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wright, J. 2008. Do Authoritarian Institutions Constrain? How Legislatures Affect Economic Growth and Investment. American Journal of Political Science 52 (2):322343.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

British Journal of Political Science
  • ISSN: 0007-1234
  • EISSN: 1469-2112
  • URL: /core/journals/british-journal-of-political-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary materials

Wallace Supplementary Material
Appendix

 Word (2.9 MB)
2.9 MB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 85
Total number of PDF views: 872 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 2407 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 22nd July 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.