Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Language and Ideology in Congress

Abstract

Legislative speech records from the 101st to 108th Congresses of the US Senate are analysed to study political ideologies. A widely-used text classification algorithm – Support Vector Machines (SVM) – allows the extraction of terms that are most indicative of conservative and liberal positions in legislative speeches and the prediction of senators’ ideological positions, with a 92 per cent level of accuracy. Feature analysis identifies the terms associated with conservative and liberal ideologies. The results demonstrate that cultural references appear more important than economic references in distinguishing conservative from liberal congressional speeches, calling into question the common economic interpretation of ideological differences in the US Congress.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Keith T. Poole , ‘Changing Minds? Not in Congress’, Public Choice, 131 (2007), 435451

Keith T. Poole and Howard Rosenthal , ‘Patterns of Congressional Voting’, American Journal of Political Science, 35 (1991), 228278



James J. Heckman and James M. Snyder Jr, ‘Linear Probability Models of the Demand for Attribution with an Empirical Application to Estimating the Preferences of Legislators’, RAND Journal of Economics, 28 (1997), S142S189

Kenneth A. Shepsle and Barry R. Weingast , ‘Structure-induced Equilibrium and Legislative Choice’, Public Choice, 37 (1981), 503519

Jeffery C. Talbert and Matthew Potoski , ‘Setting the Legislative Agenda: The Dimensional Structure of Bill Cosponsoring and Floor Voting’, Journal of Politics, 64 (2002), 864891

Joshua D. Clinton , ‘Lawmaking and Roll Calls’, Journal of Politics, 69 (2007), 457469

James M. Snyder and Michael M. Ting , ‘An Informational Rationale for Political Parties’, American Journal of Political Science, 46 (2002), 90110

James M. Snyder and Michael M. Ting , ‘Party Labels, Roll Calls, and Elections’, Political Analysis, 11 (2003), 419444

Jonathan Woon and Jeremy C. Pope , ‘Made in Congress? Testing the Electoral Implications of Party Ideological Brand Names’, Journal of Politics, 70 (2008), 823836

Arthur Spirling and Iain McLean , ‘UK OC OK? Interpreting Optimal Classification Scores for the U.K. House of Commons’, Political Analysis, 15 (2006), 8586

Stephen Ansolabehere , James M. Snyder Jr and Charles Stewart III, ‘The Effects of Party and Preferences on Congressional Roll-Call Voting’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 26 (2001), 533572


Michael Laver and Kenneth Benoit , ‘Locating TDs in Policy Spaces: Wordscoring Dáil Speeches’, Irish Political Studies, 17 (2002), 5973


Kenneth Benoit and Michael Laver , ‘Estimating Irish Party Positions Using Computer Wordscoring: The 2002 Elections’, Irish Political Studies, 18 (2003), 97107

Adam F. Simon and Michael Xenos , ‘Dimensional Reduction of Word-frequency Data as a Substitute for Intersubjective Content Analysis’, Political Analysis, 12 (2004), 6375

Jonathan B. Slapin and Sven O. Proksch , ‘A. Scaling Model for Estimating Time-Series Party Positions from Texts’, American Journal of Political Science, 52 (2008), 705722

Kevin M. Quinn , Burt L. Monroe , Michael Colaresi , Michael H. Crespin and Dragomir R. Radev , ‘How to Analyze Political Attention with Minimal Assumptions and Costs’, American Journal of Political Science, 54 (2010), 209228

Burt Monroe and Philipp A. Schrodt , ‘Introduction to the Special Issue: The Analysis of Political Text’, Political Analysis, 16 (2008), 351355

Ken Cousins and Wayne McIntosh , ‘More than Typewriters, More than Adding Machines: Integrating Information Technology into Political Research’, Quality and Quantity, 39 (2005), 591614

Kenneth Benoit , Michael Laver , Christine Arnold , Paul Pennings and Madeleine O. Hosli , ‘Measuring National Delegate Positions at the Convention on the Future of Europe Using Computerized Wordscoring’, European Union Politics, 6 (2005), 291313

Ian Budge and Paul Pennings , ‘Do They work? Validating Computerized Word Frequency Estimates against Policy Series’, Electoral Studies, 26 (2007), 121129

Stephen Purpura and Dustin Hillard , ‘Automated Classification of Congressional Legislation’, Proceedings of the 2006 International Conference on Digital Government Research (2006), 219225

Bo Pang , Lillian Lee and Shivakumar Vaithyanathan , ‘Thumbs up? Sentiment Classification Using Machine Learning Techniques’, Proceedings of the ACL-02 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, (2002), 7986

Matt Thomas , Bo Pang and Lillian Lee , ‘Get out the Vote: Determining Support or Opposition from Congressional Floor-debate Transcripts’, Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (2006), 327335

Isabelle Guyon , Jason Weston , Stephen Barnhilland , Vladimir Vapnik , ‘Gene Selection for Cancer Classification Using Support Vector Machines’, Machine Learning, 46 (2002), 389422

Fabrizio Sebastiani , ‘Machine Learning in Automated Text Categorization’, ACM Computing Surveys, 34 (2002), 147

Corinna Cortes and Vladimir Vapnik , ‘Support-vector Networks’, Machine Learning, 20 (1995), 273297

William W. Cohen and Yoram Singer , ‘Context-sensitive Learning Methods for Text Categorization’, ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 17 (1999), 141173

Aidan Finn and Nicholas Kushmerick , ‘Learning to Classify Documents according to Genre’, Journal of American Society of Information Science and Technology, 57 (2006), 15061518

M. F. Porter , ‘An Algorithm for Suffix Stripping’, Program, 14 (1980), 130137

Bei Yu , Daniel Diermeier and Stefan Kaufmann ‘Classifying Party Affiliation from Political Speech’, Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 5 (2008), 3348

George Lakoff , Moral Politics: How Liberals and Conservatives Think (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2002)

Edda Leopold and Jörg Kindermann , ‘Text Categorization with Support Vector Machines: How to Represent Texts in Input Space?’ Machine Learning, 46 (2002), 423444

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

British Journal of Political Science
  • ISSN: 0007-1234
  • EISSN: 1469-2112
  • URL: /core/journals/british-journal-of-political-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×