Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Leadership Competition and Disagreement at Party National Congresses

  • Zachary Greene and Matthias Haber
Abstract

Theories often explain intraparty competition based on electoral conditions and intraparty rules. This article further opens this black box by considering intraparty statements of preferences. In particular, it predicts that intraparty preference heterogeneity increases after electoral losses, but that candidates deviating from the party’s median receive fewer intraparty votes. Party members grant candidates greater leeway to accommodate competing policy demands when in government. The study tests the hypotheses using a new database of party congress speeches from Germany and France, and uses automated text classification to estimate speakers’ relative preferences. The results demonstrate that speeches at party meetings provide valuable insights into actors’ preferences and intraparty politics. The article finds evidence of a complex relationship between the governing context, the economy and intraparty disagreement.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Leadership Competition and Disagreement at Party National Congresses
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Leadership Competition and Disagreement at Party National Congresses
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Leadership Competition and Disagreement at Party National Congresses
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Footnotes
Hide All
*

University of Mannheim (emails: zacgreene@gmail.com, mhaber@uni-mannheim.de). The data replication sets and online appendices are available at http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1017/S0007123414000283. This work was supported by the Collaborative Research Center 884 Political Economy of Reforms (Project C2), funded by the German Research Foundation.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Adams, James. 1999. Policy Divergence in Multicandidate Probabilistic Spatial Voting. Public Choice 103:103122.
Adams, James, Clark, Michael, Ezrow, Lawrence, and Glasgow, Garrett. 2006. Are Niche Parties Fundamentally Different from Mainstream Parties? The Causes and the Electoral Consequences of Western European Parties’ Policy Shifts, 1976–1998. American Journal of Political Science 50 (3):513529.
Adams, James, Haupt, Andrea, and Stoll, Heather. 2009. What Moves Parties? The Role of Public Opinion and Global Economic Conditions in Western Europe. Comparative Political Studies 42 (5):611639.
Adams, James, and Merrill, Samuel, III 1999. Modeling Party Strategies and Policy Representation in Multiparty Elections: Why Are Strategies so Extreme? American Journal of Political Science 43 (3):765791.
Adams, James, and Merrill, Samuel. 2005. Candidates’ Policy Platforms and Election Outcomes: The Three Faces of Representation. European Journal of Political Research 44:899918.
Adams, James, and Merrill, Samuel. 2006. Why Small, Centrist Third Parties Motivate Policy Divergence by Major Parties. American Political Science Review 100 (3):403417.
Adams, James, and Somer-Topcu, Zeynep. 2009. Do Parties Adjust Their Policies in Response to Rival Parties’ Policy Shifts? Spatial Theory and the Dynamics of Party Competition in Twenty-Five Democracies. British Journal of Political Science 39 (4):825846.
Anderson, Christopher. 2007. The End of Economic Voting? Contingency Dilemmas and the Limits of Democratic Accountability. Annual Review of Political Science 10:271296.
Bergounioux, Alain, and Grunberg, Gerard. 2005. The French Socialists and Power. Paris: Hachette.
Bernauer, Julian, and Bräuninger, Thomas. 2009. Intra-Party Preference Heterogeneity and Faction Membership in the 15th German Bundestag: A Computational Text Analysis of Parliamentary Speeches. German Politics 18 (3):385402.
Bowler, Shaun, Farrell, David, and Katz, Richard. 1999. Party Discipline and Parliamentary Government. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
Carey, John. 2009. Legislative Voting and Accountability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carey, John, and Shugart, Matthew. 1995. Incentives to Cultivate a Personal Vote: A Rank Ordering of Electoral Formulas. Electoral Studies 14 (4):417439.
Carrubba, Clifford, Gabel, Matthew, and Hug, Simon. 2008. Legislative Voting Behavior, Seen and Unseen: A Theory of Roll-Call Vote Selection. Legislative Studies Quarterly 33:543572.
Ceron, Andrea. 2012. Bounded Oligarchy: How and When Factions Constrain Leaders in Party Position-Taking. Electoral Studies 31 (4):689701.
Ceron, Andrea. 2013. Brave Rebels Stay Home: Assessing the Effect of Intra-Party Ideological Heterogeneity and Party Whip on Roll-Call Votes. Party Politics (Published online January) 24:1–13.
Clinton, Joshua D., and Lapinski, John. 2008. Laws and Roll Calls in the U.S. Congress, 1891–1994. Legislative Studies Quarterly 33:511542.
Cox, Gary, and McCubbins, Matthew. 1993. Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cox, Gary, and McCubbins, Matthew. 2005. Setting the Agenda: Responsible Party Government in the US House of Representatives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Debus, Marc, and Bräuninger, Thomas. 2008. Intra-Party Factions and Coalition Bargaining in Germany. In Intra-Party Politics and Coalition Governments, edited by Danielea Giannetti and Kenneth Benoit, 121145. London: Routledge.
Diermeier, Daniel, and Feddersen, Timothy. 1998. Cohesion in Legislatures and the Vote of Confidence Procedure. American Political Science Review 92 (3):611621.
Döring, Herbert. 2003. Party Discipline and Government Imposition of Restrictive Rules. Journal of Legislative Studies 9 (4):147163.
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper.
The, Economist. 2009. A New Buzz for Germany: Angela Merkel’s CDU and the Liberal FDP Will Rule Germany Together. The Economist, 28 September.
Farrell, David M.. 2011. Electoral Systems: A Comparative Introduction. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Green, Jane, and Jennings, Will. 2012a. The Dynamics of Issue Competence and Vote for Parties In and Out of Power: An Analysis of Valence in Britain, 1979–1997. European Journal of Political Research 51:469503.
Green, Jane, and Jennings, Will. 2012b. Valence as Macro-Competence: An Analysis of Mood in Party Competence Evaluations in Britain. British Journal of Political Science 42:311343.
Green-Pedersen, Christoffer, and Mortensen, Peter. 2010. Who Sets the Agenda and Who Responds to it in the Danish Parliament? A New Model of Issue Competition and Agenda-Setting. European Journal of Political Research 49 (2):257281.
Greene, Zachary. 2011. Competing on the Issues: How Experience in Government and Economic Conditions Influence the Scope of Parties’ Policy Message. Presented at the Annual Conference of the European Political Science Association, 18 June, Dublin, Ireland.
Harmel, Robert, and Janda, Kenneth. 1994. An Integrated Theory of Party Goals and Party Change. Journal of Theoretical Politics 6:259287.
Harmel, Robert, Heo, Uk, Tan, Alexander, and Janda, Kenneth. 1995. Performance, Leadership, Factions and Party Change: An Empirical Analysis. West European Politics 18 (1):133.
Harmel, Robert, and Tan, Alexander. 2003. Party Actors and Party Change: Does Factional Dominance Matter? European Journal of Political Research 42:409424.
Hazan, Reuven, and Rahat, Gideon. 2006. The Influence of Candidate Selection Methods on Legislatures and Legislators: Theoretical Propositions, Methodological Suggestions and Empirical Evidence. The Journal of Legislative Studies 12 (3–4):366385.
Huber, John. 1996. Rationalizing Parliament: Legislative Institutions and Party Politics in France. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hug, Simon, and Schulz, Tobias. 2007. Left-Right Positions of Political Parties in Switzerland. Party Politics 13 (3):305330.
Janda, Kenneth, Harmel, Robert, Edens, Christine, and Goff, Patricia. 1995. Changes in Party Identity: Evidence from Party Manifestos. Party Politics 1 (2):171196.
Jean Jaurès Fondation. Congrès. Available from http://www.archives-socialistes.fr/search?fpsearch=mcpid+%3A+%22309%22&page=1, accessed 23 May 2013.
Kam, Christopher. 2009. Party Discipline and Parliamentary Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kenig, Ofer. 2009a. Classifying Party Leaders’ Selection Methods in Parliamentary Democracies. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 19 (4):433447.
Kenig, Ofer. 2009b. Democratization of Party Leadership Selection: Do Wider Selectorates Produce More Competitive Contests? Electoral Studies 28 (2):240247.
Kenig, Ofer, Philippov, Michael, and Rahat, Gideon. 2013. Party Membership in Israel: An Overview. Israel Studies Review 28 (1):832.
Kirchheimer, Otto. 1990. The Catch-All Party. In The West European Party System, edited by Peter Mair, 5060. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kitschelt, Herbert. 1989. The Internal Politics of Parties: The Law of Curvilinear Disparity Revisited. Political Studies 37 (3):400421.
Konrad Adenauer Foundation. Available from http://www.kas.de/wf/de/71.8936/, accessed 14 June 2013.
Krook, Mona, and O’Brien, Diana. 2010. The Politics of Group Representation: Quotas for Women and Minorities Worldwide. Comparative Politics 42 (3):253272.
Krook, Mona, and O’Brien, Diana. 2012. All the President’s Men? The Appointment of Female Cabinet Ministers Worldwide. Journal of Politics 74 (3):840855.
Laver, Michael. 1999. Divided Parties, Divided Government. Legislative Studies Quarterly 2 (1):529.
Laver, Michael, Benoit, Ken, and Garry, John. 2003. Extracting Policy Positions from Political Texts Using Words as Data. American Political Science Review 97 (2):311331.
Laver, Michael, and Shepsle, Kenneth. 1996. Making and Breaking Governments: Cabinets and Legislatures in Parliamentary Democracies (Political Economy of Institutions and Decisions). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lehrer, Ron. 2012. Intra-Party Democracy and Party Responsiveness. West European Politics 35 (6):12951319.
Lewis-Beck, Michael, and Stegmair, Marie. 2000. Economic Determinates of Political Outcomes. Annual Review of Political Science 3:183219.
Lipset, Seymour M., and Rokkan, Stein. 1967. Cleavage Structures, Party Systems, and Voter Alignments: An Introduction. In Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives, edited by Seymour Martin Lipset and Stein Rokkan, 164. New York: The Free Press.
Loewenberg, Gerhard. 2008. The Contribution of Comparative Research to Measuring the Policy Preferences of Legislators. Legislative Studies Quarterly 33 (4):501510.
Lowe, Will. 2011. Austin: Do Things With Words. R Package Version 0.2. Available from https://r-forge.r-project.org/projects/austin/. Accessed 14 June 2013.
Martin, Lanny W., and Vanberg, Georg. 2011. Parliaments and Coalitions: The Role of Legislative Institutions in Multiparty Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Marx, Paul, and Schumacher, Gijs. 2013. Will to Power? Intra-Party Conflict in Social Democratic Parties and the Choice for Neoliberal Policies in Germany, the Netherlands and Spain (1980–2010). European Political Science Review 5 (1):151173.
McElwain, Kenneth. 2008. Manipulating Electoral Rules to Manufacture Single-Party Dominance. American Journal of Political Science 52 (1):3247.
Meguid, Bonnie. 2008. Party Competition between Unequals. New York: Cambridge University Press.
O’Brien, Diana, and Shomer, Yael. 2013. A Cross-National Analysis of Party Switching. Legislative Studies Quarterly 38 (1):111141.
OECD Statistical Database. Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Available from http://stats.oecd.org/, accessed 29 January 2014.
Proksch, Sven-Oliver, and Slapin, Jonathan. 2012. Institutional Foundations of Legislative Speech. American Journal of Political Science 56 (3):520537.
Przeworski, Adam, and Sprague, John D.. 1986. Paper Stones: A History of Electoral Socialism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Przeworski, Adam, and Teune, Henry. 1970. The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. New York: Wiley.
Rosas, Guillermo, and Shomer, Yael. 2008. Models of Nonresponse in Legislative Politics. Legislative Studies Quarterly 33 (4):573601.
Schumacher, Gijs. 2013. When Does the Left Do the Right Thing? A Study of Party Position Change on Welfare Policies. Party Politics, doi:10.1177/1354068812470505.
Schumacher, Gijs, de Vries, Catherine, and Vis, Barbara. 2013. Why Do Parties Change Position? Party Organization and Environmental Incentives. Journal of Politics 75 (2):464477.
Seyd, Patrick, and Whitely, Paul. 2002. New Labour’s Grassroots: The Transformation of the Labour Party Membership. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
Slapin, Jonathan B., and Proksch, Sven-Oliver. 2008. A Scaling Model for Estimating Time-Series Party Positions from Texts. American Journal of Political Science 52 (3):705722.
Spoon, Jae-Jae. 2011. Political Survival of Small Parties in Europe. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Strøm, Kaare. 1990. A Behavioral Theory of Competitive Political Parties. American Journal of Political Science 34 (2):565598.
Tan, Alexander. 1997. Party Change and Party Membership Decline: An Exploratory Analysis. Party Politics 3:363377.
Tsebelis, George. 2002. Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Van Biezen, Ingrid, Mair, Peter, and Poguntke, Thomas. 2012. Going, Going … Gone? The Decline of Party Membership in Contemporary Europe. European Journal of Political Research 51:2456.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

British Journal of Political Science
  • ISSN: 0007-1234
  • EISSN: 1469-2112
  • URL: /core/journals/british-journal-of-political-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
Type Description Title
UNKNOWN
Supplementary materials

Greene and Haber Supplementary Material
Supplementary Material 2

 Unknown (4 KB)
4 KB
PDF
Supplementary materials

Greene and Haber Supplementary Material
Supplementary Material 6

 PDF (926 KB)
926 KB
PDF
Supplementary materials

Greene and Haber Supplementary Material
Supplementary Material 1

 PDF (256 KB)
256 KB
PDF
Supplementary materials

Greene and Haber Supplementary Material
Supplementary Material 4

 PDF (162 KB)
162 KB
UNKNOWN
Supplementary materials

Greene and Haber Supplementary Material
Supplementary Material 3

 Unknown (7 KB)
7 KB
UNKNOWN
Supplementary materials

Greene and Haber Supplementary Material
Supplementary Material 5

 Unknown (52 KB)
52 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 29
Total number of PDF views: 364 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 1152 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 22nd August 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.