Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Legislator Dissent as a Valence Signal

  • Rosie Campbell, Philip Cowley, Nick Vivyan and Markus Wagner
Abstract

Existing research suggests that voters tend to respond positively to legislator independence due to two types of mechanism. First, dissent has an indirect effect, increasing a legislator’s media coverage and personal recognition among constituents (profile effects). Secondly, constituents react positively to dissent when this signals that the legislator has matching political or representational preferences (conditional evaluation). This article presents a third effect: dissent acts as a valence signal of integrity and trustworthiness. Consistent with the valence signalling mechanism, it uses new observational and experimental evidence to show that British voters have a strong and largely unconditional preference for legislators who dissent. The findings pose a dilemma for political systems that rely on strong and cohesive parties.

Copyright
Footnotes
Hide All
*

Department of Politics, Birkbeck, University of London (email: r.campbell@bbk.ac.uk); School of Politics and International Relations, Queen Mary University of London (email: p.cowley@qmul.ac.uk); School of Government and International Affairs, Durham University (email: nick.vivyan@durham.ac.uk); Department of Government, University of Vienna (email: markus.wagner@univie.ac.at). Part of this research was funded by a British Academy Small Research Grant awarded to Nick Vivyan (grant number SG112504). We would also like to thank the University of Nottingham for its generous support. We provide supplementary material in the online appendix. Data replication sets are available at https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataverse/BJPolS and online appendices are available at http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1017/S0007123416000223.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Adams, James, and Merrill, Samuel III. 2013. Policy-Seeking Candidates Who Value the Valence Attributes of the Winner. Public Choice 155:139161.
Ansolabehere, Stephen, and Jones, Philip E.. 2010. Constituents’ Responses to Congressional Roll-Call Voting. American Journal of Political Science 54 (3):583597.
Benedetto, Giacomo, and Hix, Simon. 2007. The Rejected, the Ejected, and the Dejected: Explaining Government Rebels in the 2001–2005 British House of Commons. Comparative Political Studies 40 (7):755781.
Bengtsson, Asa, and Wass, Hanna. 2011. The Representative Roles of MPs: A Citizen Perspective. Scandinavian Political Studies 34 (2):143167.
Berrington, Hugh. 1973. Backbench Opinion in the House of Commons 19451955. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Bowler, Shaun, Farrell, David, and Katz, Richard. 1998. Party Discipline and Parliamentary Government. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
Cain, Bruce E., Ferejohn, John A., and Fiorina, Morris P.. 1987. The Personal Vote: Constituency Service and Electoral Independence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Campbell, Rosie, and Lovenduski, Joni. 2015. What Should MPs Do? Public and Parliamentarians’ Views Compared. Parliamentary Affairs 68 (4):690708.
Canes-Wrone, Brandice, Brady, David W., and Cogan, John F.. 2002. Out of Step, Out of Office: Electoral Accountability and House Members’ Voting. American Political Science Review 96 (1):127140.
Carey, John M. 2009. Legislative Voting and Accountability. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Carey, John M., and Shugart, Matthew S.. 1995. Incentives to Cultivate a Personal Vote: A Rank Ordering of Electoral Formulas. Electoral Studies 14 (4):417439.
Carman, Christopher J. 2006. Public Preferences for Parliamentary Representation in the UK: An Overlooked Link? Political Studies 54 (1):103122.
Carson, Jamie L., Kober, Gregory, Lebo, Matthew L., and Young, Everett. 2010. The Electoral Costs of Party Loyalty in Congress. American Journal of Political Science 54 (3):598616.
Collie, Mellisa P. 1988. Voting Behaviour in Legislatures. In Handbook of Legislative Research, edited by Gerhard Lowenberg, 471518. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Converse, Philip E., and Pierce, Roy. 1986. Political Representation in France. Harvard: Belknap Press.
Cowley, Philip. 2002. Revolts and Rebellions: Parliamentary Voting Under Blair. London: Politicos.
Cowley, Philip. 2005. The Rebels: How Blair Mislaid His Majority. London: Politicos.
Cowley, Philip. 2013. Analysis: You Don’t Have To Be a Rebel, But It Helps. (Accessed http://www.politics.co.uk/comment-analysis/2013/03/04/analysis-you-don-t-have-to-be-a-rebel-but-it-helps, accessed 21/04/16). April 2016.
Cox, Gary W. 1987. The Efficient Secret: The Cabinet and the Development of Political Parties in Victorian England. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Crisp, Brian, Olivella, Santiago, Malecki, Michael, and Sher, Mindy. 2013. Vote-Earning Strategies in Flexible List Systems: Seats at the Price of Unity. Electoral Studies 32 (4):658669.
Crowe, Edward. 1983. Consensus and Structure in Legislative Norms: Party Discipline in the House of Commons. Journal of Politics 45 (4):907931.
Dalton, Russell. 2004. Democratic Challenges, Democratic Choices: The Erosion in Political Support in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dalton, Russell, Farrell, David M., and McAllister, Ian. 2011. Political Parties and Democratic Linkage: How Parties Organize Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Davidson, Roger H. 1970. Public Prescriptions for the Job of Congressman. Midwest Journal of Political Science 14 (4):648666.
Eulau, Heinz, Wahlke, John C., Buchanan, William, and Ferguson, Leroy C.. 1959. The Role of the Representative: Some Empirical Observations on the Theory of Edmund Burke. American Political Science Review 53 (3):742756.
Finer, Samuel E., Berrington, Hugh B., and Bartholomew, David J.. 1961. Backbench Opinion in the House of Commons 1955–1959. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Franklin, Mark, and Norton, Philip, eds. 1993. Parliamentary Questions. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Goldstein, Daniel G., and Gigerenzer, Gerd. 2002. Models of Ecological Rationality: The Recognition Heuristic. Psychological Review 109 (1):7990.
Green, Paul E., Krieger, Abba M., and Wind, Yoram (Jerry). 2001. Thirty Years of Conjoint Analysis: Reflections and Prospects. Interfaces 31 (3, Supplement):S56S73.
Greene, Zachary, and Haber, Matthias. 2015. The Consequences of Appearing Divided: An Analysis of Party Evaluations and Vote Choice. Electoral Studies 37 (1):1527.
Grose, Christian R., Malhotra, Neil, and van Houweling, Robert P.. 2015. Explaining Explanations: How Legislators Explain their Policy Positions and How Citizens React. American Journal of Political Science 59 (3):724743 –43.
Hainmueller, Jens, Hopkins, Daniel J., and Yamamoto, Teppei. 2014. Causal Inference in Conjoint Analysis: Understanding Multi-Dimensional Choices Via Stated Preference Experiments. Political Analysis 22 (1):130.
Harbridge, Laurel, and Malhotra, Neil. 2011. Electoral Incentives and Partisan Conflict in Congress: Evidence from Survey Experiments. American Journal of Political Science 55 (3):494510.
Jacobson, Gary. 1989. Strategic Politicians and the Dynamics of U.S. House Elections, 1946–86. American Political Science Review 83 (3):773793.
Johnson, Catherine, and Rosenblatt, Gemma. 2007. Do MPs Have the ‘Right Stuff?’. Parliamentary Affairs 60 (1):164169.
Kam, Christopher J. 2009. Party Discipline and Parliamentary Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kam, Cindy D., and Zechmeister, Elizabeth J.. 2013. Name Recognition and Candidate Support. American Journal of Political Science 57 (4):971986.
Kellerman, Michael. 2012. Estimating Ideal Points in the British House of Commons Using Early Day Motions. American Journal of Political Science 56 (3):757771.
Mayhew, David. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
McCurley, Carl, and Mondak, Jeffery J.. 1995. Inspected by #1184063113: The Influence of Incumbents’ Competence and Integrity in U.S. House Elections. American Journal of Political Science 39 (4):864885.
Mendez-Lago, Monica, and Martinez, Antonia. 2002. Political Representation in Spain: An Empirical Analysis of the Perception of Citizens and MPs. The Journal of Legislative Studies 8 (1):6390.
Mondak, Jeffrey J. 1995. Competence, Integrity, and the Electoral Success of Congressional Incumbents. Journal of Politics 57 (4):10431069.
Mondak, Jeffrey J., and Huckfeldt, Robert. 2006. The Accessibility and Utility of Candidate Character in Electoral Decision Making. Electoral Studies 25 (1):2034.
Norton, Philip, and Wood, David M.. 1993. Back from Westminster. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.
Oeusoonthornwattana, Onvara, and Shanks, David R.. 2010. I Like What I Know: Is Recognition a Non-Compensatory Determiner of Consumer Choice? Judgement and Decision Making 5 (4):310325.
Patterson, Samuel C., Hedlund, Robert H., and Boynton, Robert G.. 1975. Representatives and Represented: Bases of Public Support for the American Legislatures. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Pattie, Charles, Fieldhouse, Ed, and Johnston, Ron. 1994. The Price of Conscience: The Electoral Correlates and Consequences of Free Votes and Rebellions in the British House of Commons, 1987–92. The British Journal of Political Science 24 (3):359380.
Patty, John W. 2015. 2015. Signaling Through Obstruction. American Journal of Political Science 60 (1):175189–89.
Powell, G. Bingham. 2000. Elections as Instruments of Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Sanbonmatsu, Kira. 2002. Gender Stereotypes and Vote Choice. American Journal of Political Science 46 (1):2034.
Sanders, David, Clarke, Harold, Stewart, Marianne, and Whiteley, Paul. 2007. Does Mode Matter for Modeling Political Choice. Political Analysis 15 (3):257285.
Stone, Walter J., and Simas, Elizabeth N.. 2010. Candidate Valence and Ideological Positions in U.S. House Elections. American Journal of Political Science 54 (2):371388.
Vivyan, Nick, and Wagner, Markus. 2012. Do Voters Reward Rebellion? The Electoral Accountability of MPs in Britain. European Journal of Political Research 51 (2):235264.
Vivyan, Nick, Wagner, Markus, and Tarlov, Jessica. 2012. Representative Misconduct, Voter Perceptions and Accountability: Evidence from the 2009 House of Commons Expenses Scandal. Electoral Studies 31 (4):750763.
Webb, Paul. 1996. A Partisanship and Anti-Party Sentiment in the United Kingdom: Correlates and Constraints. European Journal of Political Research 29 (3):365382.
Whiteley, Paul. 2011. Political Participation in Britain: The Decline and Revival of Civic Culture. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

British Journal of Political Science
  • ISSN: 0007-1234
  • EISSN: 1469-2112
  • URL: /core/journals/british-journal-of-political-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary materials

Campbell supplementary material
Appendix

 Word (1.6 MB)
1.6 MB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed