Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Long-Term Consequences of Election Results

Abstract

Voters in US elections receive markedly different representation depending on which candidate they elect, and because of incumbent advantages, the effects of this choice persist for many years. What are the long-term consequences of these two phenomena? Combining electoral and legislative roll-call data in a dynamic regression discontinuity design, this study assesses the long-term consequences of election results for representation. Across the US House, the US Senate and state legislatures, the effects of ‘coin-flip’ elections persist for at least a decade in all settings, and for as long as three decades in some. Further results suggest that elected officials do not adapt their roll-call voting to their districts’ preferences over time, and that voters do not systematically respond by replacing incumbents.

Copyright
Footnotes
Hide All
*

Harris School of Public Policy Studies, University of Chicago (email: anthony.fowler@uchicago.edu); Department of Political Science, Stanford University (email: andrewbhall@stanford.edu). We thank Steve Ansolabehere, David Broockman, Devin Caughey, Ryan Enos, Andrew Gelman, Gabe Lenz, Michele Margolis, Max Palmer, Jim Snyder, and seminar participants at Chicago, Harvard, MIT, Stanford, Ohio State and Pittsburgh for helpful feedback. Data replication sets are available at http://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataverse/BJPolS and online appendices are available at http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1017/S0007123415000241.

Footnotes
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Stephen Ansolabehere , and James M. Snyder Jr. 2000. Soft Money, Hard Money, Strong Parties. Columbia Law Review 100 (3):598619.

Stephen Ansolabehere , and James M. Snyder Jr. 2002. The Incumbency Advantage in U.S. Elections: An Analysis of State and Federal Offices, 1942–2000. Election Law Journal 1 (3):315338.

Stephen Ansolabehere , and James M. Snyder Jr. 2004. Using Term Limits to Estimate Incumbency Advantages When Officeholders Retire Strategically. Legislative Studies Quarterly 29 (4):487515.

Stephen Ansolabehere , James M. Snyder Jr, and Charles Stewart III . 2000. Old Voters, New Voters, and the Personal Vote: Using Redistricting to Measure the Incumbency Advantage. American Journal of Political Science 44 (1):1734.

Stephen Ansolabehere , James M. Snyder Jr, and Charles Stewart III . 2001. Candidate Positioning in U.S. House Elections. American Journal of Political Science 45 (1):136159.

Stephen Ansolabehere , and Philip Edward Jones . 2010. Constituents’ Responses to Congressional Roll-Call Voting. American Journal of Political Science 54 (3):583597.

Joseph Bafumi , and Michael C. Herron . 2010. Leapfrog Representation and Extremism: A Study of American Voters and Their Members of Congress. American Political Science Review 104 (3):519542.

Alan Barreca , Melanie Guldi , Jason M. Lindo , and Glen R. Waddell . 2011. Saving Babies? Revisiting the Effect of Very Low Birth Weight Classification. Quarterly Journal of Economics 126 (4):21172123.

M. Daniel Bernhardt , and Daniel E. Ingberman . 1985. Candidate Reputations and the Incumbency Effect. Journal of Public Economics 27 (1):4767.

Adam R Brown . 2014. Voters Don’t Care Much About Incumbency. Journal of Experimental Political Science 1 (2):132143.

Barry C. Burden , Gregory A. Caldeira , and Tim Groseclose . 2000. Measuring Ideologies of US Senators: The Song Remains the Same. Legislative Studies Quarterly 25 (2):237258.

Daniel M. Butler , and Matthew J. Butler . 2006. Splitting the Difference? Causal Inference and Theories of Split-Party Delegations. Political Analysis 14 (4):439455.

Bruce E. Cain , John A. Ferejohn , and Morris P. Fiorina . 1984. The Constituency Service Basis of the Personal Vote for U.S. Representatives and British Members of Parliament. American Political Science Review 78 (1):110125.

Brandice Canes-Wrone , David W. Brady , and John F. Cogan . 2002. Out of Step, Out of Office: Electoral Accountability and House Members’ Voting. American Political Science Review 96 (1):127140.

Jamie L. Carson , Gregory Kroger , Matthew J. Lebo , and Everett Young . 2010. The Electoral Costs of Party Loyalty in Congress. American Journal of Political Science 54 (3):598616.

Joshua D. Clinton , and Ted Enamorado . 2014. The National News Media’s Effect on Congress: How Fox News Affected Elites in Congress. Journal of Politics 76 (4):928943.

Gary W. Cox , and Keith T. Poole . 2002. On Measuring Partisanship in Roll-Call Voting: The U.S. House of Representatives, 1877–1999. American Journal of Political Science 46 (3):477489.

Leandro De Magalhaes . 2015. Incumbency Effects in a Comparative Perspective: Evidence from Brazilian Mayoral Elections. Political Analysis 23 (1):113126.

Andrew C. Eggers , Olle Folke , Anthony Fowler , Jens Hainmueller , Andrew B. Hall , and James M. Snyder Jr. 2015. On the Validity of the Regression Discontinuity Design for Estimating Electoral Effects: New Evidence from Over 40,000 Close Races. American Journal of Political Science 59 (1):259274.

Robert S Erikson . 1971. The Advantage of Incumbency in Congressional Elections. Polity 3 (3):395405.

Morris P Fiorina . 1977. Congress: Keystone of the Washington Establishment. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Anthony Fowler , and Andrew B. Hall . 2012. Conservative Vote Probabilities: An Easier Method for Summarizing Roll-Call Data. Working paper. Chicago: University of Chicago.

Anthony Fowler , and Andrew B. Hall . 2015. Congressional Seniority and Pork: A Pig Fat Myth? Working paper. Chicago: University of Chicago.

Andrew Gelman , and Gary King . 1990. Estimating Incumbency Advantage Without Bias. American Journal of Political Science 34 (4):11421164.

Donald Green , Bradley Palmquist , and Eric Schickler . 2002. Partisan Hearts and Minds. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

James J. Heckman , and James M. Snyder Jr. 1997. Linear Probability Models of the Demand for Attributes with an Empirical Application to Estimating the Preferences of Legislators. RAND Journal of Economics 28:142189.

John R Hibbing . 1991. Congressional Careers: Contours of Life in the U.S. House of Representatives. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

Shigeo Hirano , and James M. Snyder Jr. 2009. Using Multimember District Elections to Estimate the Sources of the Incumbency Advantage. American Journal of Political Science 53 (2):292306.

Simon Hix , Abdul Noury , and Gerard Roland . 2006. Dimensions of Politics in the European Parliament. American Journal of Political Science 50 (2):494520.

Harold Hotelling . 1929. Stability in Competition. Economic Journal 39:4157.

Guido W. Imbens , and Thomas Lemieux . 2008. Regression Discontinuity Designs: A Guide to Practice. Journal of Econometrics 142 (2):615635.

Gary Jacobson . 2014. It’s Nothing Personal: The Decline of the Incumbency Advantage in House Elections. MPSA 2014 Annual Meeting Paper, 3 April, Chicago, IL.

Cindy D. Kam , and Elizabeth J. Zechmeister . 2013. Name Recognition and Candidate Support. American Journal of Political Science 57 (4):971986.

David Klein , and Lawrence Baum . 2001. Ballot Information and Voting Decisions in Judicial Research. Political Research Quarterly 54 (4):709728.

David S Lee . 2008. Randomized Experiments from Non-Random Selection in U.S. House Elections. Journal of Econometrics 142 (2):675697.

David S Lee . 2008. Randomized Experiments from Non-Random Selection in U.S. House Elections. Journal of Econometrics 142 (2):675697.

Gabriel S Lenz . 2013. Follow the Leader? How Voters Respond to Politicians’ Policies and Performance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Steven D. Levitt , and Catherine Wolfram . 1997. Decomposing the Sources of Incumbency Advantage in the U.S. House. Legislative Studies Quarterly 22 (1):4560.

Christopher S.P. Magee , and Amy M. Wolaver . 2005. Policy Divergence in Races for the U.S. House of Representatives. Social Science Quarterly 86 (3):565581.

Christopher S.P. Magee , and Amy M. Wolaver . 2005. Policy Divergence in Races for the U.S. House of Representatives. Social Science Quarterly 86 (3):565581.

David R Mayhew . 1974. Congressional Elections: The Case of the Vanishing Marginals. Polity 6 (3):295317.

Nolan McCarty , Keith T. Poole , and Howard Rosenthal . 2006. Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Scott Morgenstern . 2004. Patterns of Legislative Politics: Roll-Call Voting in Latin America and the United States. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Keith T. Poole , and Howard Rosenthal . 1985. A Spatial Model for Legislative Roll Call Analysis. American Journal of Political Science 29 (2):357384.

James M. Snyder Jr., and Tim Groseclose . 2000. Estimating Party Influence in Congressional Roll-Call Voting. American Journal of Political Science 44 (2):193211.

James M. Snyder Jr., and Tim Groseclose . 2000. Estimating Party Influence in Congressional Roll-Call Voting. American Journal of Political Science 44 (2):193211.

Jason Snyder . 2005. Detecting Manipulation in U.S. House Elections, working paper. Berkeley: Haas School of Business, University of California.

Peverill Squire . 1988. Career Opportunities and Membership Stability in Legislatures. Legislative Studies Quarterly 13 (1):6582.

Chris Tausanovitch , and Christopher Warshaw . 2012. Measuring Constituent Policy Preferences in Congress, State Legislatures, and Cities. Journal of Politics 75 (2):330342.

Donald L. Thistlethwaite , and Donald T. Campbell . 1960. Regression-Discontinuity Analysis: An Alternative to the Ex Post Facto Experiment. Journal of Educational Psychology 51 (6):309317.

Yogesh Uppal . 2009. The Disadvantaged Incumbents: Estimating Incumbency Effects in Indian State Legislatures. Public Choice 138 (1–2):927.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

British Journal of Political Science
  • ISSN: 0007-1234
  • EISSN: 1469-2112
  • URL: /core/journals/british-journal-of-political-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
Type Description Title
PDF
Supplementary Materials

Fowler and Hall supplementary material S1
Appendix

 PDF (274 KB)
274 KB
UNKNOWN
Supplementary Materials

Fowler and Hall Dataset
Dataset

 Unknown

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 20
Total number of PDF views: 224 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 854 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 21st September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.