Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Message Received? Experimental Findings on How Messages about Corruption Shape Perceptions

  • Caryn Peiffer
Copyright
Footnotes
Hide All
*

School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol (email: caryn.peiffer@bristol.ac.uk). The author thanks Professor David Hudson, Professor Heather Marquette and Dr. Grant Walton for their encouragement and for reviewing earlier drafts of this article. The author also thanks the team at REDI in Jakarta for their work on this project. Data replication sets are available in Harvard Dataverse at: https://dx.doi.org/10.7910/DVN/SQETXX and online appendices at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123418000108.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Anduiza, Eva, Gallego, Aina, and Munoz, Jordi. 2013. Turning a Blind Eye: Experimental Evidence of Partisan Bias in Attitudes Towards Corruption. Comparative Political Studies 46 (12):16641692.
Berinsky, Adam, Hutchings, Vincent, Mendelberg, Tali, Shaker, Lee, and Valentino, Nicholas. 2011. Sex and Race: Are Black Candidates More Likely to be Disadvantaged by Sex Scandals? Political Behavior 33 (2):179202.
Brody, Richard, and Page, Brody. 1972. Comment: Assessment of Policy Voting. American Political Science Review 66 (2):450458.
Carmines, Edward, and Stimson, James. 1989. Issue Evolution: Race and the Transformation of American Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Carter, Travis, Ferguson, Melissa, and Hassin, Ran. 2011. A Single Exposure to the American Flag Shifts Support Toward Republicans Up to 8 Months Later. Psychological Science 22 (8):10111018.
Chong, Alberto, De La O, Ana, Karlan, Dean, and Wantchekon, Leonard. 2015. Does Corruption Information Inspire the Fight or Quash the Hope? A Field Experiment in Mexico on Voter Turnout, Choice, and Party Identification. The Journal of Politics 77 (1):5571.
Corbacho, Ana, Gingerich, Daniel, Oliveros, Virginia, and Ruiz-Vega, Maurcio. 2016. Corruption as a Self-Fulfilling Prophecy: Evidence from a Survey Experiment in Costa Rica. American Journal of Political Science 60 (4):10771092.
Erisen, Cengiz, Lodge, Milton, and Taber, Charles. 2014. Affective Contagion in Effortful Political Thinking. Political Psychology 35 (2):187206.
Figueiredo, Miguel, Hidalgo, F., and Kasahara, Yuri. 2011. When Do Voters Punish Corrupt Politicians? Experimental Evidence from Brazil. Berkeley: University of California Berkeley.
Jones, Alun. 2011. International Corruption Prevention: Awareness Raising Campaigns and Public Education. Available from https://www.unodc.org/documents/yournocounts/DohaPresentation/3_Side_Event_presentation_Alun_Jones.ppt, accessed 5 July 2017.
Lenz, Gabriel. 2009. Learning and Opinion Change, Not Priming: Reconsidering the Priming Hypothesis. American Journal of Political Science 53 (4):821837.
Panth, Sabina. 2011. Changing Norms is Key to Fighting Everyday Corruption. Available from http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTGOVACC/Resources/ChangingNormsAnnexFinal.pdf, accessed 5 July 2017.
Peiffer, Caryn. 2018. Replication Data for Message received? Experimental findings on how messages about corruption shape perceptions, doi: 10.7910/DVN/SQETXX, Harvard Dataverse V1.
Peiffer, Caryn, and Alvarez, Linda. 2016. Who Will Be the ‘Principled Principals’? Perceptions of Corruption and Willingness to Engage in Anticorruption Activism. Governance 29 (3):351369.
Persson, Anna, Rothstein, Bo, and Teorell, Jan. 2013. Why Anticorruptino Reforms Fail – Systemic Corruption as a Collective Action Problem. Governance 26 (3):449471.
Riker, William. 1986. The Art of Political Manipulation. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Taber, Charles, and Lodge, Milton. 2006. Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs. American Journal of Political Science 50 (3):755769.
United Nations. 2004. United Nations Convention Against Corruption. Vienna: United Nations on Drugs and Crime.
Winters, Matthew, and Weitz-Shapiro, Rebecca. 2013. Lacking Information or Condoning Corruption: When Will Voters Support Corrupt Politicians. Comparative Politics 45 (4):418436.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

British Journal of Political Science
  • ISSN: 0007-1234
  • EISSN: 1469-2112
  • URL: /core/journals/british-journal-of-political-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Type Description Title
PDF
Supplementary materials

Peiffer supplementary material
Peiffer supplementary material 1

 PDF (157 KB)
157 KB
PDF
Supplementary materials

Peiffer supplementary material
Peiffer supplementary material 3

 PDF (624 KB)
624 KB
UNKNOWN
Supplementary materials

Peiffer Dataset
Dataset

 Unknown
PDF
Supplementary materials

Peiffer supplementary material
Peiffer supplementary material 2

 PDF (40 KB)
40 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 7
Total number of PDF views: 103 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 364 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 7th May 2018 - 20th July 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.