Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Niche Party Success and Mainstream Party Policy Shifts – How Green and Radical Right Parties Differ in Their Impact

Abstract

This article investigates the impact of niche party success on the policy agendas of mainstream parties. Following from the expected electoral effects of issue politicization, the success of radical right and green parties will cause different reactions from mainstream parties. While mainstream parties emphasize anti-immigrant positions in response to radical right success, green party success will have the opposite effect for environmental issues. Since green parties constitute issue owners, their success will make established parties de-emphasize the environment. Analyzing time-series cross-section data for sixteen Western European countries from 1980 to 2011, this article empirically establishes that green and radical right parties differ in their effect on mainstream party behavior and that their impact depends on the ideological position and past electoral performance of the mainstream parties.

Copyright
Footnotes
Hide All

Humboldt-University, Berlin (email: tarik.abou-chadi@sowi.hu-berlin.de). Earlier versions of this article were presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association (2013, Chicago) and at the General Conference of the European Political Science Association (2013, Barcelona). The author wishes to thank Pablo Barberá, Christoffer Green-Pedersen, Ellen Immergut, Martin Kroh, Nicolas Merz, Matthias Orlowski, Wouter van der Brug, Markus Wagner and Bernhard Wessels as well as three anonymous reviewers and the editor for their valuable comments, and the German National Science Foundation for financial support. Data replication sets and online appendices are available at http://dx.doi.org/doi: 10.1017/S0007123414000155.

Footnotes
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

James Adams . 2012. Causes and Electoral Consequences of Party Policy Shifts in Multiparty Elections: Theoretical Results and Empirical Evidence. Annual Review of Political Science 15:401419.

James Adams , Michael Clark , Lawrence Ezrow , and Garrett Glasgow . 2006. Are Niche Parties Fundamentally Different from Mainstream Parties? The Causes and the Electoral Consequences of Western European Parties’ Policy Shifts, 1976–1998. American Journal of Political Science 50:513529.

James Adams , Samuel Merrill , and Bernard Grofman . 2005. A Unified Theory of Party Competition: A Cross-National Analysis Integrating Spatial and Behavioral Factors. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.

James Adams , and Zeynep Somer-Topcu . 2009. Policy Adjustment by Parties in Response to Rival Parties’ Policy Shifts: Spatial Theory and the Dynamics of Party Competition in Twenty-Five Post-War Democracies. British Journal of Political Science 39:825.

Kai Arzheimer . 2009. Contextual Factors and the Extreme Right Vote in Western Europe, 1980–2002. American Journal of Political Science 53:259275.

Tim Bale . 2003. Cinderella and Her Ugly Sisters: The Mainstream and Extreme Right in Europe’s Bipolarising Party Systems. West European Politics 26:6790.

Tim Bale , Christoffer Green-Pedersen , André Krouwel , Kurt Richard Luther , and Nick Sitter . 2010. If You Can’t Beat Them, Join Them? Explaining Social Democratic Responses to the Challenge from the Populist Radical Right in Western Europe. Political Studies 58:410426.

Nathaniel Beck , and Jonathan N. Katz . 1995. What to Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series-Cross-Section Data in Comparative Politics. American Political Science Review 89:634647.

Nathaniel Beck , and Jonathan N. Katz . 1996. Nuissance vs. Substance: Specifying and Estimating Time-Series-Cross-Section Models. Political Analysis 6:136.

Nathaniel Beck , and Jonathan N. Katz . 2011. Modeling Dynamics in Time-Series-Cross-Section Political Economy Data. Annual Review of Political Science 14:331352.

Thomas Brambor , William R. Clark , and Matt Golder . 2005. Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses. Political Analysis 14:6382.

Ian Budge . 1994. A New Spatial Theory of Party Competition: Uncertainty, Ideology and Policy Equilibria Viewed Comparatively and Temporally. British Journal of Political Science 24:443467.

Edward G. Carmines , and Michael W. Wagner . 2006. Political Issues and Party Alignments: Assessing the Issue Evolution Perspective. Annual Review of Political Science 9:6781.

Gary W. Cox 1990. Centripetal and Centrifugal Incentives in Electoral Systems. American Journal of Political Science 34:903935.

Russell J. Dalton 2009. Economics, Environmentalism and Party Alignments: A Note on Partisan Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies. European Journal of Political Research 48:161175.

Catherine E. de Vries , and Sara B. Hobolt . 2012. When Dimensions Collide: The Electoral Success of Issue Entrepreneurs. European Union Politics 13:246268.

James M. Enelow , and Melvin J. Hinich . 1982. Ideology, Issues, and the Spatial Theory of Elections. American Political Science Review 76:493501.

Kostas Gemenis . 2013. What to Do (and Not to Do) with the Comparative Manifestos Project Data. Political Studies 61:323.

Christoffer Green-Pedersen . 2007. The Growing Importance of Issue Competition: The Changing Nature of Party Competition in Western Europe. Political Studies 55:607628.

Christoffer Green-Pedersen . 2012. A Giant Fast Asleep? Party Incentives and the Politicisation of European Integration. Political Studies 60:115130.

Christoffer Green-Pedersen , and Jesper Krogstrup . 2008. Immigration as a Political Issue in Denmark and Sweden. European Journal of Political Research 47:610634.

Christoffer Green-Pedersen , and Peter B. Mortensen . 2010. Who Sets the Agenda and Who Responds to it in the Danish Parliament? A New Model of Issue Competition and Agenda-Setting. European Journal of Political Research 49:257281.

Liesbet Hooghe , and Gary Marks . 2009. A Postfunctionalist Theory of European Integration: From Permissive Consensus to Constraining Dissensus. British Journal of Political Science 39:123.

Heemin Kim , and Richard C. Fording . 2003. Voter Ideology in Western Democracies: An Update. European Journal of Political Research 42:95105.

Herbert Kitschelt . 1994. The Transformation of European Social Democracy. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.

Hans-Peter Kriesi , Edgar Grande , Romain Lachat , Martin Dolezal , Simon Bornschier , and Timotheos Frey . 2006. Globalization and the Transformation of the National Political Space: Six European Countries Compared. European Journal of Political Research 45:921956.

Hans-Peter Kriesi , Edgar Grande , Romain Lachat , Martin Dolezal , Simon Bornschier , and Timotheos Frey . 2008. West European Politics in the Age of Globalization. Cambridge, UK and New York: Cambridge University Press.

Zoe Lefkofridi , Markus Wagner , and Johanna E. Willmann . 2014. Left-Authoritarians and Policy Representation in Western Europe: Electoral Choice Across Ideological Dimensions. West European Politics 37:126.

Bonnie M Meguid . 2005. Competition Between Unequals: The Role of Mainstream Party Strategy in Niche Party Success. American Political Science Review 99:347359.

Bonnie M Meguid . 2008. Party Competition Between Unequals: Strategies and Electoral Fortunes in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cas Mudde . 2007. Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Pippa Norris . 2005. Radical Right: Voters and Parties in the Electoral Market. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.

John Petrocik . 1996. Issue Ownership in Presidential Elections with a 1980 Case Study. American Journal of Political Science 40:825850.

Robert Rohrschneider . 1993. New Party Versus Old Left Realignments: Environmental Attitudes, Party Policies, and Partisan Affiliations in Four West European Countries. Journal of Politics 55:682701.

Thomas J. Sargent 1976. A Classical Macroeconometric Model for the United States. Journal of Political Economy 84:207238.

Zeynep Somer-Topcu . 2009. Timely Decisions: The Effects of Past National Elections on Party Policy Change. Journal of Politics 71:238248.

Jae-Jae Spoon . 2011. Political Survival of Small Parties in Europe. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Jae-Jae Spoon , Sara B. Hobolt , and Catherine E. de Vries . 2014. Going Green: Explaining Issue Competition on the Environment. European Journal of Political Research 53:363380.

James A. Stimson , Michael B. Mackuen , and Robert S. Erikson . 1995. Dynamic Representation. American Political Science Review 89:543565.

Donald E. Stokes 1963. Spatial Models of Party Competition. American Political Science Review 57:368377.

Wouter van der Brug , and Joost van Spanje . 2009. Immigration, Europe and the ‘New’ Cultural Dimension. European Journal of Political Research 48:309334.

Joost van Spanje . 2010. Contagious Parties: Anti-Immigration Parties and Their Impact on Other Parties’ Immigration Stances in Contemporary Western Europe. Party Politics 16:563586.

Markus Wagner . 2012a. Defining and Measuring Niche Parties. Party Politics 18:845864.

Markus Wagner . 2012b. When do Parties Emphasise Extreme Positions? How Strategic Incentives for Policy Differentiation Influence Issue Importance. European Journal of Political Research 51:6488.

Stefaan Walgrave , Jonas Lefevere , and Anke Tresch . 2012. The Associative Dimension of Issue Ownership. Public Opinion Quarterly 76:771782.

Stefaan Walgrave , and Peter van Aelst . 2006. The Contingency of the Mass Media’s Political Agenda Setting Power: Toward a Preliminary Theory. Journal of Communication 56:88109.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

British Journal of Political Science
  • ISSN: 0007-1234
  • EISSN: 1469-2112
  • URL: /core/journals/british-journal-of-political-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
Type Description Title
PDF
Supplementary Materials

Abou-Chadi Supplementary Material
Appendix

 PDF (180 KB)
180 KB
UNKNOWN
Supplementary Materials

Abou-Chadi Supplementary Material
Supplementary Material

 Unknown (365 KB)
365 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 18
Total number of PDF views: 339 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 960 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 27th April 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.