Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Niche Party Success and Mainstream Party Policy Shifts – How Green and Radical Right Parties Differ in Their Impact

Abstract

This article investigates the impact of niche party success on the policy agendas of mainstream parties. Following from the expected electoral effects of issue politicization, the success of radical right and green parties will cause different reactions from mainstream parties. While mainstream parties emphasize anti-immigrant positions in response to radical right success, green party success will have the opposite effect for environmental issues. Since green parties constitute issue owners, their success will make established parties de-emphasize the environment. Analyzing time-series cross-section data for sixteen Western European countries from 1980 to 2011, this article empirically establishes that green and radical right parties differ in their effect on mainstream party behavior and that their impact depends on the ideological position and past electoral performance of the mainstream parties.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Niche Party Success and Mainstream Party Policy Shifts – How Green and Radical Right Parties Differ in Their Impact
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Niche Party Success and Mainstream Party Policy Shifts – How Green and Radical Right Parties Differ in Their Impact
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Niche Party Success and Mainstream Party Policy Shifts – How Green and Radical Right Parties Differ in Their Impact
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Footnotes
Hide All
*

Humboldt-University, Berlin (email: tarik.abou-chadi@sowi.hu-berlin.de). Earlier versions of this article were presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association (2013, Chicago) and at the General Conference of the European Political Science Association (2013, Barcelona). The author wishes to thank Pablo Barberá, Christoffer Green-Pedersen, Ellen Immergut, Martin Kroh, Nicolas Merz, Matthias Orlowski, Wouter van der Brug, Markus Wagner and Bernhard Wessels as well as three anonymous reviewers and the editor for their valuable comments, and the German National Science Foundation for financial support. Data replication sets and online appendices are available at http://dx.doi.org/doi: 10.1017/S0007123414000155.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Adams James. 2012. Causes and Electoral Consequences of Party Policy Shifts in Multiparty Elections: Theoretical Results and Empirical Evidence. Annual Review of Political Science 15:401419.
Adams James, Clark Michael, Ezrow Lawrence, and Glasgow Garrett. 2004. Understanding Change and Stability in Party Ideologies: Do Parties Respond to Public Opinion or to Past Election Results? British Journal of Political Science 34:589610.
Adams James, Clark Michael, Ezrow Lawrence, and Glasgow Garrett. 2006. Are Niche Parties Fundamentally Different from Mainstream Parties? The Causes and the Electoral Consequences of Western European Parties’ Policy Shifts, 1976–1998. American Journal of Political Science 50:513529.
Adams James, Merrill Samuel, and Grofman Bernard. 2005. A Unified Theory of Party Competition: A Cross-National Analysis Integrating Spatial and Behavioral Factors . Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Adams James, and Somer-Topcu Zeynep. 2009. Policy Adjustment by Parties in Response to Rival Parties’ Policy Shifts: Spatial Theory and the Dynamics of Party Competition in Twenty-Five Post-War Democracies. British Journal of Political Science 39:825.
Alonso Sonia, and Claro da Fonseca Saro. 2011. Immigration, Left and Right. Party Politics 18:120.
Arzheimer Kai. 2009. Contextual Factors and the Extreme Right Vote in Western Europe, 1980–2002. American Journal of Political Science 53:259275.
Bale Tim. 2003. Cinderella and Her Ugly Sisters: The Mainstream and Extreme Right in Europe’s Bipolarising Party Systems. West European Politics 26:6790.
Bale Tim, Green-Pedersen Christoffer, Krouwel André, Luther Kurt Richard, and Sitter Nick. 2010. If You Can’t Beat Them, Join Them? Explaining Social Democratic Responses to the Challenge from the Populist Radical Right in Western Europe. Political Studies 58:410426.
Beck Nathaniel, and Katz Jonathan N.. 1995. What to Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series-Cross-Section Data in Comparative Politics. American Political Science Review 89:634647.
Beck Nathaniel, and Katz Jonathan N.. 1996. Nuissance vs. Substance: Specifying and Estimating Time-Series-Cross-Section Models. Political Analysis 6:136.
Beck Nathaniel, and Katz Jonathan N.. 2011. Modeling Dynamics in Time-Series-Cross-Section Political Economy Data. Annual Review of Political Science 14:331352.
Benoit Kenneth, and Laver Michael. 2006. Party Policy in Modern Democracies. New York: Routledge.
Brambor Thomas, Clark William R., and Golder Matt. 2005. Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses. Political Analysis 14:6382.
Budge Ian. 1994. A New Spatial Theory of Party Competition: Uncertainty, Ideology and Policy Equilibria Viewed Comparatively and Temporally. British Journal of Political Science 24:443467.
Budge Ian, and Farlie Dennis. 1983. Explaining and Predicting Elections: Issue Effects and Party Strategies in Twenty-Three Democracies . London: George Allen & Unwin.
Budge Ian, Klingemann Hans-Dieter, Volkens Andrea, Bara Judith, and Tanenbaum Eric. 2001. Mapping Policy Preferences: Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments 1945–1998 . Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Carmines Edward G., and Wagner Michael W.. 2006. Political Issues and Party Alignments: Assessing the Issue Evolution Perspective. Annual Review of Political Science 9:6781.
The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems. 2012. CSES Module 3 Third Advance Release [dataset]. Available from www.cses.org.
Cox Gary W. 1990. Centripetal and Centrifugal Incentives in Electoral Systems. American Journal of Political Science 34:903935.
Dalton Russell J. 2009. Economics, Environmentalism and Party Alignments: A Note on Partisan Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies. European Journal of Political Research 48:161175.
de Vries Catherine E., and Hobolt Sara B.. 2012. When Dimensions Collide: The Electoral Success of Issue Entrepreneurs. European Union Politics 13:246268.
Döring Herbert, and Manow Philip. 2011. Parliament and Government Composition Database (ParlGov): An Infrastructure for Empirical Information on Parties, Elections and Governments in Modern Democracies. Version 11/07. Available from parlgov.org, accessed 15 July 2013.
Downs Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
Enelow James M., and Hinich Melvin J.. 1982. Ideology, Issues, and the Spatial Theory of Elections. American Political Science Review 76:493501.
Gemenis Kostas. 2013. What to Do (and Not to Do) with the Comparative Manifestos Project Data. Political Studies 61:323.
Green-Pedersen Christoffer. 2007. The Growing Importance of Issue Competition: The Changing Nature of Party Competition in Western Europe. Political Studies 55:607628.
Green-Pedersen Christoffer. 2010. New Issues, New Cleavages, and New Parties: How to Understand Change in West European Party Competition. Paper prepared for the Annual Conference of the American Political Science Association, 2–5 September, Washington, DC.
Green-Pedersen Christoffer. 2012. A Giant Fast Asleep? Party Incentives and the Politicisation of European Integration. Political Studies 60:115130.
Green-Pedersen Christoffer, and Krogstrup Jesper. 2008. Immigration as a Political Issue in Denmark and Sweden. European Journal of Political Research 47:610634.
Green-Pedersen Christoffer, and Mortensen Peter B.. 2010. Who Sets the Agenda and Who Responds to it in the Danish Parliament? A New Model of Issue Competition and Agenda-Setting. European Journal of Political Research 49:257281.
Hooghe Liesbet, and Marks Gary. 2009. A Postfunctionalist Theory of European Integration: From Permissive Consensus to Constraining Dissensus. British Journal of Political Science 39:123.
Kim Heemin, and Fording Richard C.. 2003. Voter Ideology in Western Democracies: An Update. European Journal of Political Research 42:95105.
Kitschelt Herbert. 1994. The Transformation of European Social Democracy. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kitschelt Herbert, and McGann Anthony. 1995. The Radical Right in Western Europe: A Comparative Analysis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Klingemann Hans-Dieter, Volkens Andrea, Bara Judith, Budge Ian, and McDonald Michael D.. 2006. Mapping Policy Preferences II: Estimates for Parties, Electors and Governments in Central and Eastern Europe, European Union and OECD 1990–2003. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Kriesi Hans-Peter, Grande Edgar, Lachat Romain, Dolezal Martin, Bornschier Simon, and Frey Timotheos. 2006. Globalization and the Transformation of the National Political Space: Six European Countries Compared. European Journal of Political Research 45:921956.
Kriesi Hans-Peter, Grande Edgar, Lachat Romain, Dolezal Martin, Bornschier Simon, and Frey Timotheos. 2008. West European Politics in the Age of Globalization. Cambridge, UK and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lefkofridi Zoe, Wagner Markus, and Willmann Johanna E.. 2014. Left-Authoritarians and Policy Representation in Western Europe: Electoral Choice Across Ideological Dimensions. West European Politics 37:126.
Meguid Bonnie M. 2005. Competition Between Unequals: The Role of Mainstream Party Strategy in Niche Party Success. American Political Science Review 99:347359.
Meguid Bonnie M. 2008. Party Competition Between Unequals: Strategies and Electoral Fortunes in Western Europe . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mudde Cas. 2007. Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Norris Pippa. 2005. Radical Right: Voters and Parties in the Electoral Market . Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Petrocik John. 1996. Issue Ownership in Presidential Elections with a 1980 Case Study. American Journal of Political Science 40:825850.
Riker William H. 1986. The Art of Political Manipulation. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Riker William H.. 1996. The Strategy of Rhetoric: Campaigning for the American Constitution . New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Rohrschneider Robert. 1993. New Party Versus Old Left Realignments: Environmental Attitudes, Party Policies, and Partisan Affiliations in Four West European Countries. Journal of Politics 55:682701.
Sargent Thomas J. 1976. A Classical Macroeconometric Model for the United States. Journal of Political Economy 84:207238.
Somer-Topcu Zeynep. 2009. Timely Decisions: The Effects of Past National Elections on Party Policy Change. Journal of Politics 71:238248.
Spoon Jae-Jae. 2011. Political Survival of Small Parties in Europe. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Spoon Jae-Jae, Hobolt Sara B., and de Vries Catherine E.. 2014. Going Green: Explaining Issue Competition on the Environment. European Journal of Political Research 53:363380.
Stimson James A., Mackuen Michael B., and Erikson Robert S.. 1995. Dynamic Representation. American Political Science Review 89:543565.
Stokes Donald E. 1963. Spatial Models of Party Competition. American Political Science Review 57:368377.
van der Brug Wouter, and van Spanje Joost. 2009. Immigration, Europe and the ‘New’ Cultural Dimension. European Journal of Political Research 48:309334.
van Spanje Joost. 2010. Contagious Parties: Anti-Immigration Parties and Their Impact on Other Parties’ Immigration Stances in Contemporary Western Europe. Party Politics 16:563586.
Volkens Andrea, Lacewell Onawa, Lehmann Pola, Regel Sven, Schultze Henrike, and Werner Annika. 2012. The Manifesto Data Collection. Manifesto Project (MRG/CMP/MARPOR). Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung.
Wagner Markus. 2012a. Defining and Measuring Niche Parties. Party Politics 18:845864.
Wagner Markus. 2012b. When do Parties Emphasise Extreme Positions? How Strategic Incentives for Policy Differentiation Influence Issue Importance. European Journal of Political Research 51:6488.
Walgrave Stefaan, Lefevere Jonas, and Tresch Anke. 2012. The Associative Dimension of Issue Ownership. Public Opinion Quarterly 76:771782.
Walgrave Stefaan, and van Aelst Peter. 2006. The Contingency of the Mass Media’s Political Agenda Setting Power: Toward a Preliminary Theory. Journal of Communication 56:88109.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

British Journal of Political Science
  • ISSN: 0007-1234
  • EISSN: 1469-2112
  • URL: /core/journals/british-journal-of-political-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
Type Description Title
PDF
Supplementary materials

Abou-Chadi Supplementary Material
Appendix

 PDF (180 KB)
180 KB
UNKNOWN
Supplementary materials

Abou-Chadi Supplementary Material
Supplementary Material

 Unknown (365 KB)
365 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 77
Total number of PDF views: 829 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 2075 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 17th December 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.