Skip to main content

Organizational and Ideological Strategies for Nationalization: Evidence from European Parties

  • Gabriela Borz and Carolina de Miguel

How does a party’s organizational structure affect its chances of becoming a national party? While existing explanations of party nationalization focus on country-level institutional and societal variables, we argue that aspects of party organization such as the degree of centralization of authority, ideological unity and leadership factionalism also matter. By bringing the analysis to the party level, this article provides a multilevel analysis of institutional and party organization variables and disentangles the effect of each set of influences. We use original data on party organization and party nationalization for 142 parties across twenty European countries. This research contributes to the literature on nationalization and party development by advancing organizational strategies which parties could adopt in different social and institutional environments.

Hide All

School of Government and Public Policy, University of Strathclyde (; Department of Political Science, University of Toronto ( We would like to add special thanks to Lauren Birch, Anton Rizor, Brianna Guertin and Kenneth Watt for excellent research help in collecting electoral and party organization data. We would also like to thank Daniel Bochsler for his guidance in calculating the standardized party nationalization scores and the discussant and audience members at the ECPR General Conference, Glasgow 2014, and the MPSA annual conference, Chicago 2015. Finally thanks to the editor Sona Golder and to the anonymous reviewers for excellent comments and guidance. Data replication sets are available in Harvard Dataverse at: (Borz and de Miguel (2017)) and online appendicies at

Hide All
Aldrich, John H. 1995. Why Parties? The Origin and Transformation of Political Parties in America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Alesina, Alberto, and Zhuravskaya, Ekaterina. 2011. Segregation and the Quality of Government in a Cross-section of Countries. American Economic Review 5 (101):18721911.
Alesina, Alberto, Devleeschauwer, Arnaud, Easterly, William, and Kurlat, Sergio. 2003. Fractionalization. Journal of Economic Growth 8 (2):155194.
Amorim Neto, Octavio, and Cox, Gary W.. 1997. Electoral Institutions, Cleavage Structures, and the Number of Parties. American Journal of Political Science 41 (1):149174.
Bakke, Kristin, and Wibbels, Erik. 2006. Diversity, Disparity, and Civil Conflict in Federal States. World Politics 59:150.
Bakker, Ryan, de Vries, Catherine, Edwards, Erica, Hooghe, Liesbet, Jolly, Seth, Marks, Gary, Polk, Jonathan, Rovny, Jan, Steenbergen, Marco, and Vachudova, Milada. 2015. Measuring Party Positions in Europe: The Chapel Hill Expert Survey Trend File, 1999–2010. Party Politics 21 (1):143152.
Bardi, Luciano, Bartolini, Stefano, and Trechsel, Alexander H.. 2014. Responsive and Responsible? The Role of Parties in Twenty-First Century Politics. West European Politics 37 (2):235252.
Beck, Thorsten, Clarke, George, Groff, Alberto, Keefer, Philip, and Walsh, Patrick. 2001. New Tools in Comparative Political Economy: The Database of Political Institutions. World Bank Economic Review 15 (1):165176.
Benoit, Kenneth, and Laver, Michael. 2007. Estimating Party Policy Positions: Comparing Expert Surveys and Hand-Coded Content Analysis. Electoral Studies 26:235252.
Berry, William D., Golder, Matt, and Milton, Daniel. 2012. Improving Tests of Theories Positing Interaction. Journal of Politics 74:653671.
Bochsler, Daniel. 2010. Measuring Party Nationalisation: A New Gini-based Indicator that Corrects for the Number of Units. Electoral Studies 29:155168.
Borz, Gabriela, and de Miguel, Carolina. 2017. “Replication data for: Organizational and Ideological Strategies for Nationalization: Evidence from European Parties”,, Harvard Dataverse, V1.
Boucek, Francoise. 2003. Managing Factional Conflict under Severe Constraints: John Major and British Conservatives 1992–97. Paper Presented at the PSA 2003 Annual Conference, Leicester.
Boucek, Francoise. 2012. Factional Politics: How Dominant Parties Implode or Stabilize. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Brambor, Thomas, Clark, William Roberts, and Golder, Matt. 2006. Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses. Political Analysis 14:6382.
Brancati, Dawn. 2009. Peace by Design: Managing Intrastate Conflict through Decentralization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Caramani, Daniele. 2004. The Nationalization of Politics: The Formation of National Electorates and Party Systems in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carey, John, and Shugart, Matthew S.. 1995. Incentives to Cultivate a Personal Vote. Electoral Studies 14 (4):417439.
Ceron, Andrea. 2015. The Politics of Fission: Analysis of Faction Breakaways among Italian Parties (1946–2011). British Journal of Political Science 2:121139.
Chandra, Kanchan. 2004. Why Ethnic Parties Succeed: Patronage and Ethnic Head Counts in India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chhibber, Pradeep K., and Kollman, Kenneth. 1998. Party Aggregation and the Number of Parties in India and the United States. American Political Science Review 92 (2):329342.
Chhibber, Pradeep K., and Kollman, Kenneth. 2004. The Formation of National Party Systems: Federalism and Party Competition in Canada, Great Britain, India and the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Chhibber, Pradeep K., and Suryanarayan, Pavithra. 2014. Party Organization and Party Proliferation in India. Party Politics 20 (4):489505.
Clark, William Roberts, and Golder, Matt. 2006. Rehabilitating Duverger’s Theory: Testing the Mechanical and Strategic Modifying Effects of Electoral Laws. Comparative Political Studies 39 (6):679708.
Cox, Gary, and Knoll, Jonathan S.. 2003. Ethnes, Fiscs, and Electoral Rules: The Determinants of Party-System Inflation. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago.
Cox, Gary W., and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 1999. Electoral Rules and Electoral Coordination. Annual Review of Political Science 2:145161.
Cox, Gary W., and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 2005. Setting the Agenda Responsible Party Government in the U.S. House of Representatives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Czaniawska-Joerges, Barbara. 1988. Ideological Control in Nonideological Organizations. New York: Praeger.
de Miguel, Carolina. 2017. The Role of Electoral Geography in the Territorialization of Party Systems. Electoral Studies 47:6783.
Duverger, Maurice. 1954. Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State Methuen: Wiley.
Forestiere, Carolyn. 2009. Kirchheimer Italian Style: Catch-All Parties or Catch-All Blocs. Party Politics 15:573591.
Gelman, Andrew, and Hill, Jennifer. 2006. Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Golosov, Grigorii V. 2016. Factors of Party Nationalization. International Political Science Review 37 (2):246260.
Greene, Zachary, and Haber, Matthias. 2015. Leadership Competition and Disagreement at Party National Congresses. British Journal of Political Science 2:122.
Hale Williams, Michelle. 2009. Kirchheimer’s French Twist: A Model of the Catch-all Thesis Applied to the French Case. Party Politics 15 (5):592614.
Harmel, Robert. 2002. Party Organizational Change: Competing Explanations? Pp. 119142, in Political Parties in the New Europe: Political and Analytical Challenges, edited by Kurt Richard Luther and Ferdinand Muller Rommel. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hatch, Mary Jo. 1997. Organization Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hazan, Reuven Y. 2002. Candidate Selection. Pp. 108126, in Comparing Democracies. Elections and Voting in Global Perspective, edited by Pippa Norris, Lawrence LeDuc, Richard G. Niemi. London: Sage Publications.
Hicken, Allen. 2009. Building Party Systems in Developing Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hicken, Allen, and Stoll, Heather. 2013. Are All Presidents Created Equal? Presidential Powers and the Shadow of Presidential Elections. Comparative Political Studies 46 (3):291319.
Hooghe, Liesbet, Marks, Gary, Schakel, Arjan H., Osterkatz, Sandi Chapman, Niedzwiecki, Sara, and Shair-Rosenfield, Sarah. 2015. A Postfunctionalist Theory of Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ishiyama, John T. 2001. Party Organization and the Political Success of the Communist Successor Parties. Social Science Quarterly 82 (4):844864.
Janda, Kenneth. 1980. Political Parties: A Cross-National Survey. New York: Free Press.
Janda, Kenneth, and Colman, Tyler. 1998. Effects of Party Organization on Performance during the ‘Golden Age’ of Parties. Political Studies 46:611632.
Janda, Kenneth, and King, Desmond S.. 1985. Formalizing and Testing Duverger’s Theories on Political Parties. Comparative Political Studies 18:139169.
Jones, Mark P., and Mainwaring, Scott. 2003. The Nationalization of Parties and Party Systems: An Empirical Measure and an Application to the Americas. Party Politics 9 (2):139166.
Katz, R. S. 1980. A Theory of Parties and Electoral Systems. Baltimore, MD, and London: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Kernell, Georgia. 2013. Political Party Organizations, Civic Representation, and Participation. Pp. 114137, in Representation: Elections and Beyond, edited by Jack Nagel and Rogers Smith. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Kirchheimer, Otto. 1966. The Transformation of the West European Party Systems. Pp. 177200, in Political Parties and Political Development, edited by Joseph LaPalombara and Myron Weiner. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Kitschelt, Herbert, Mansfeldova, Zdenka, Markowski, Radoslaw, and Toka, Gabor. 1999. Postcommunist Party Systems. Competition. Representation and Inter-Party Cooperation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Leon, Sandra. 2014. How Does Decentralization Affect Electoral Competition of State-wide Parties? Evidence from Spain. Party Politics 20 (3):391402.
Lipset, Seymour M., and Rokkan, Stein. 1967. Party Systems and Voters Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives. New York: Free Press.
Lublin, David. 2015. Minority Rules Dataset [data file and codebook] available at:
McAllister, I. 1991. Party Adaptation and Factionalism within the Australian Party System. American Journal of Political Science 35:206227.
McGann, A. J. 2002. The Advantages of Ideological Cohesion: A Model of Constituency Representation and Electoral Competition in Multi-Party Democracies. Journal of Theoretical Politics 14:3770.
Meguid, Bonnie. 2008. Institutional Change as Strategy: The Role of Decentralization in Party Competition. Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.
Mintzberg, Henry. 1990. The Design School: Reconsidering the Basic Premises of Strategic Management. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
Morgenstern, Scott, Swindle, Stephen M., and Castagnola, Andrea. 2009. Party Nationalization and Institutions. Journal of Politics 71 (4):13221341.
Mylonas, Harris, and Roussias, Nasos. 2012 Does Party Structure Affect Electoral Success? Center-Right Party Organization in Europe. Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.
Norris, Pippa. 1996. Legislative Recruitment. Pp. 184216, in Comparing Democracies: Elections and Voting in Global Perspective, edited by Pippa Norris Lawrence LeDuc and Richard G. Niemi. London: Sage Publications.
Rabe-Hesketh, Sophia, and Skrondal, Anders. 2012. Multilevel and Longitudinal Modeling Using Stata. Stata Press: Texas.
Rahat, Gideon. 2009. Which Candidate Selection Method is the Most Democratic?. Government and Opposition 44 (1):6890.
Rahat, Gideon, and Hazan, Reuven Y.. 2001. Candidate Selection Methods: An Analytical Framework. Party Politics 7:297322.
Rahat, Gideon, Hazan, Reuven, and Katz, Richard. 2008. Democracy and Political Parties: On the Uneasy Relationships between Participation, Competition and Representation. Party Politics 14 (6):663683.
Rodden, Jonathan. 2010. Federalism and Inter-Regional Redistribution. Pp. 191220, in The Political Economy of Inter-Regional Flows, edited by Bosch Marta Espasa and Albert Sole Olle. Nuria: Edward Elgar.
Rose, Richard, and Urwin, Derek W.. 1975. Regional Differentiation and Political Unity in Western Nations. London: Sage Publications.
Sartori, Giovanni. 1976. Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Scarrow, Susan E. 1994. The ‘Paradox of Enrollment’: Assessing the Costs and Benefits of Party Memberships. European Journal of Political Research 1:4160.
Scarrow, Susan E., and Webb, Paul D.. 2013. Assessing Party Organizational Change: Participation, Representation and Power. Paper prepared for presentation at the American Political Science Association Annual Meetings, Chicago, IL, 29 August–1 September.
Schattschneider, E. E. 1942. Party Government. New York: Rinehart & Co.
Schumacher, Gijs, de Vries, Catherine, and Vis, Barbara. 2013. Why Do Parties Change Position? Party Organization and Environmental Conditions. Journal of Politics 75:464477.
Selway, Joel Sawat. 2011. The Measurement of Cross-cutting Cleavages and Other Multidmensional Cleavage Structures. Political Analysis 19:4865.
Snyder, James M., and Ting, Michael M.. 2002. An Informational Rationale for Political Parties. American Journal of Political Science 46 (1):90110.
Strøm, Kaare. 1990. A Behavioral Theory of Competitive Political Parties. American Journal of Political Science 34 (2):565598.
Tavits, Margit. 2011. Organizing for Success: Party Organizational Strength and Electoral Performance in Postcommunist Europe. Journal of Politics 74 (1):8397.
Tsebelis, George. 2002. Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Ziegfeld, Adam. 2016. Why Regional Parties? Clientelism, Elites, and the Indian Party System. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

British Journal of Political Science
  • ISSN: 0007-1234
  • EISSN: 1469-2112
  • URL: /core/journals/british-journal-of-political-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Type Description Title
Supplementary materials

Borz and De Miguel Dataset



Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 8
Total number of PDF views: 98 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 456 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 3rd November 2017 - 24th April 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.