Skip to main content Accessibility help

Party Institutionalization and Welfare State Development

  • Magnus B. Rasmussen (a1) and Carl Henrik Knutsen (a1)


This article argues that the extent to which political parties are institutionalized shapes welfare state development. Institutionalized parties allow politicians to overcome co-ordination problems, avoid capture by special interests and form stable linkages with broad social groups. These features both enable and incentivize politicians to pursue extensive welfare policies. The study employs measures of party institutionalization and welfare state features to study these proposed relationships. Even when accounting for country- and year-fixed effects and plausible confounders such as electoral system, unionization, regime type and state capacity, the authors find clear relationships between party institutionalization and more extensive and universal welfare states. Focusing on universalism, they find that the relationship is more pronounced when constraints on executives are strong and in democracies, but that it also exists in autocracies. Further, when disaggregating party institutionalization and evaluating mechanisms, the linkages that institutionalized parties form with social groups constitute one important, but not the only relevant, factor.


Corresponding author

*Corresponding author. E-mail:


Hide All
Acemoglu, D and Robinson, JA (2006) Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Allern, EH and Bale, T (2012) Political parties and interest groups: disentangling complex relationships. Party Politics 18(1), 725.
Ansell, BW and Samuels, DJ (2014) Inequality and Democratization: An Elite-Competition Approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ansolabehere, S, Snyder, JM and Stewart, C (2001) Candidate positioning in US House elections. American Journal of Political Science 45(1), 136159.
Bartolini, S (2000) The Political Mobilization of the European Left, 1860–1980: The Class Cleavage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bizzarro, F, Hicken, A and Self, D (2017) The V-Dem Party Institutionalization Index: a new global indicator (1900–2015). V-Dem Working Paper 48. Available from
Bizzarro, F et al. (2018) Party strength and economic growth. World Politics, 70(2), 275320.
Boix, C (2003) Democracy and Redistribution. Cambridge, UK, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Boix, C, Miller, M and Rosato, S (2013) A complete data set of political regimes, 1800–2007. Comparative Political Studies 46(12), 15231554.
Boix, C and Svolik, M (2013) The foundations of limited authoritarian government: institutions, commitment, and power-sharing in dictatorships. Journal of Politics 75(2), 300316.
Bolt, J and Zanden, JL (2014) The Maddison project: collaborative research on historical national accounts. The Economic History Review 67(3), 627651.
Bueno de Mesquita, B et al. (2003) The Logic of Political Survival. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Carreras, M (2012) Party systems in Latin America after the third wave: a critical re-assessment. Journal of Politics in Latin America 4(1), 135153.
Chhibber, P, Jensenius, FR and Suryanarayan, P (2014) Party organization and party proliferation in India. Party Politics 20(4), 489505.
Coppedge, M, Gerring, J, Lindberg, SI, Skaaning, S-E, Teorell, J, Altman, D, Bernhard, M, Steven, Fish M, Glynn, A, Hicken, A, Knutsen, CH, Marquardt, K, McMann, K, Miri, F, Paxton, P, Pemstein, D, Staton, J, Tzelgov, Ei, Wang, Y-t, and Zimmerman, B (2016a) V-Dem Country-Year Dataset v6. Varieties of Democracy Project. Link:
Coppedge, M, Gerring, J, Lindberg, SI, Skaaning, S-E, Teorell, J, Altman, D, Bernhard, M, Steven, Fish M, Glynn, A, Hicken, A, Knutsen, CH, Marquardt, K, McMann, K, Miri, F, Paxton, P, Pemstein, D, Staton, J, Tzelgov, Ei, Wang, Y-t, and Zimmerman, B (2016b) V-Dem Codebook v6. Varieties of Democracy Project. Link:
Duverger, M (1959) Political Parties and Party Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ebbinghaus, B (1995) The Siamese twins: citizenship rights, cleavage formation, and party-union relations in Western Europe. International Review of Social History 40(S3), 5189.
Ehrlich, SD (2007) Access to protection: domestic institutions and trade policy in democracies. International Organization 61(3), 571605.
Esping-Andersen, G (1999) Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fairfield, T and Garay, C (2017) Redistribution under the right in Latin America: electoral competition and organized actors in policymaking. Comparative Political Studies 50(14), 18711906.
Folke, O and Rickne, J (2016) Electoral competition and gender differences in political careers. Quarterly Journal of Political Science 11(1), 59102.
Frendreis, J, Gibson, J and Vertz, L (1990) The electoral relevance of local party organizations. The American Political Science Review 84(1), 225235.
Geddes, B (1999). What do we know about democratization after twenty years? Annual Review of Political Science 2, 115144.
Gehlbach, S and Keefer, P (2011) Investment without democracy: ruling-party institutionalization and credible commitment in autocracies. Journal of Comparative Economics 39(2), 123139.
Gerring, J and Thacker, SC (2004) Political institutions and corruption: the role of unitarism and parliamentarism. British Journal of Political Science 34, 295330.
Goertz, G (2006) Social Science Concepts : A User's Guide. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Haggard, S and Kaufman, RR (2008) Development, Democracy, and Welfare States: Latin America, East Asia, and Eastern Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Henisz, WJ (2002) The institutional environment for infrastructure investment. Industrial and Corporate Change 11(2), 355389.
Hicken, A (2009) Building Party Systems in Developing Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hicken, A, Kollman, K and Simmons, JW (2016) Party system nationalization and the provision of public health services. Political Science Research and Methods 4(3), 573594.
Hicken, A, Kuhonta, EM and Weiss, ML (2015) Party System Institutionalization in Asia : Democracies, Autocracies, and the Shadows of the Past. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hicken, A and Simmons, JW (2008) The personal vote and the efficacy of education spending. American Journal of Political Science 52(1), 109124.
Huber, E and Stephens, JD (2001) Development and Crisis of the Welfare State: Parties and Policies in Global Markets. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Huber, E and Stephens, JD (2012) Democracy and the Left: Social Policy and Inequality in Latin America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Immergut, EM (1992) Health Politics: Interests and Institutions in Western Europe. Cambidge: Cambridge University Press.
Iversen, T (2005) Capitalism, Democracy, and Welfare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Janda, K and Colman, T (1998) Effects of party organization on performance during the ‘golden age'of parties. Political Studies 46(3), 611632.
Jensen, C (2014) The Right and the Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jones, MP and Mainwaring, S (2003) The nationalization of parties and party systems: an empirical measure and an application to the Americas. Party Politics 9(2), 139166.
Jurado, I (2014) Party system nationalisation and social spending. European Journal of Political Research 53(2), 288307.
Jurado, I and Leon, S (2019). Geography matters: the conditional effect of electoral systems on social spending. British Journal of Political Science 49(1), 81103.
Kalvyas, SN (1996) The rise of Christian democracy in Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press
Kalyvas, SN and Kersbergen, K (2010) Christian democracy. Annual Review of Political Science 13, 183209.
Katz, RS (2001) The problem of candidate selection and models of party democracy. Party Politics 7(3), 277296.
Katz, RS and Mair, P (1995) Changing models of party organization and party democracy: the emergence of the cartel party. Party Politics 1(1), 528.
Kim, W and Gandhi, J (2010) Coopting workers under dictatorship. Journal of Politics 72(3), 646658.
Kitschelt, H and Kselman, DM (2013) Economic development, democratic experience, and political parties' linkage strategies. Comparative Political Studies 46(11), 14531484.
Knutsen, CH and Rasmussen, MB (2018) The autocratic welfare state resource distribution, credible commitments and political survival. Comparative Political Studies 51 (5), 659695.
Korpi, W and Palme, J (2007) The social citizenship indicator program (SCIP). Swedish Institute for Social Research, Stockholm University.
Levitsky, S and Way, L (2010) Competitive Authoritarianism : Hybrid Regimes After the Cold War. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lindert, PH (2004) Growing Public: Social Spending and Economic Growth Since the Eighteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Magaloni, B (2006) Voting for Autocracy : Hegemonic Party Survival and its Demise in Mexico. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mainwaring, S and Torcal, M (2006) Party system institutionalization and party system theory after the third wave of democratization. In Katz, RS and Crotty, WJ (eds), Handbook of Party Politics. London: Sage, pp. 204227.
Mainwaring, S and Zoco, E (2007) Political sequences and the stabilization of interparty competition: electoral volatility in old and new democracies. Party Politics 13(2), 155178.
Martin, CJ and Swank, D (2008) The political origins of coordinated capitalism: business organizations, party systems, and state structure in the age of innocence. American Political Science Review 102(2), 181198.
Martínez Franzoni, J and Sánchez-Ancochea, D (2016) The Quest for Universal Social Policy in the South: Actors, Ideas, and Architectures. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Miller, MK (2015) Electoral authoritarianism and human development. Comparative Political Studies 48(12), 15261562.
Moene, KO and Wallerstein, M (2001) Inequality, social insurance, and redistribution. American Political Science Review 95(4), 859874.
Orloff, AS and Skocpol, T (1984) Why not equal protection? Explaining the politics of public social spending in Britain, 1900–1911, and the United States, 1880s–1920. American Sociological Review 49(6), 726750.
Pemstein, D, Tzelgov, E and Wang, Y (2017) The V-Dem measurement model: latent variable analysis for cross-national and cross-temporal expert-coded data. University of Gothenburg:V-Dem Working Paper 21. Available from
Persson, T and Tabellini, G (2004) Constitutions and economic policy. Journal of Economic Perspectives 18(1), 7598.
Pribble, J (2013) Welfare and Party Politics in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Rasmussen, MB (2016) How organized labor shaped the origin and structure of the regulatory revolution 1870–2000 (PhD dissertation). Aarhus: Politica.
Rasmussen, MB and Knutsen, CH (2019) “Replication Data for: Party Institutionalization and Welfare State Development”,, Harvard Dataverse, V1, UNF:6:mNEYgpaCeMJjtAABID7Tqg== [fileUNF]
Rothstein, B, Samanni, M and Teorell, J (2012) Explaining the welfare state: power resources vs. the Quality of Government. European Political Science Review 4(1), 128.
Samuels, D and Zucco, C (2015) Crafting mass partisanship at the grass roots. British Journal of Political Science 45(4), 755775.
Schumacher, G (2012) ‘Marx'or the market? Intra-party power and social democratic welfare state retrenchment. West European Politics 35(5), 10241043.
Schumacher, G, De Vries, CE and Vis, B (2013) Why do parties change position? Party organization and environmental incentives. Journal of Politics 75(2), 464477.
Scruggs, L (2006) The generosity of social insurance, 1971–2002. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 22(3), 349364.
Shefter, M (1977) Party and patronage: Germany, England, and Italy. Politics & Society 7(4), 403451.
Spies, DC and Kaiser, A (2014) Does the mode of candidate selection affect the representativeness of parties? Party Politics 20(4), 576590.
Stokes, SC et al. (2013) Brokers, Voters, and Clientelism: The Puzzle of Distributive Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Svolik, M (2012) The Politics of Authoritarian Rule. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tavits, M (2012a) Party organizational strength and party unity in post-communist Europe. European Political Science Review 4(3), 409431.
Tavits, M (2012b) Organizing for success: party organizational strength and electoral performance in postcommunist Europe. Journal of Politics 74(1), 8397.
Teorell, J et al. (2019) Measuring polyarchy across the globe, 1900-2017. Studies in Comparative International Development 54(1), 7195.
Vanhanen, T (1997) Prospects of Democracy: A Study of 172 Countries. London: Routledge.
Wright, J (2008) Do authoritarian institutions constrain? How legislatures affect economic growth and investment. American Journal of Political Science 52(2), 322343.


Type Description Title
Supplementary materials

Rasmussen and Knutsen Dataset

Supplementary materials

Rasmussen and Knutsen supplementary material
Online Appendices

 Word (298 KB)
298 KB

Party Institutionalization and Welfare State Development

  • Magnus B. Rasmussen (a1) and Carl Henrik Knutsen (a1)


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed