Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 7
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Allen, Chris and Isakjee, Arshad 2015. Controversy, Islam and politics: an exploration of the ‘Innocence of Muslims’ affair through the eyes of British Muslim elites. Ethnic and Racial Studies, Vol. 38, Issue. 11, p. 1852.


    Joppke, Christian 2014. Islam and the legal enforcement of morality. Theory and Society, Vol. 43, Issue. 6, p. 589.


    Mondal, Anshuman A. 2014. Islam and Controversy.


    Mondal, Anshuman A. 2014. Islam and Controversy.


    Joppke, Christian 2013. Islam in Europa – Integration durch Recht und ihre Grenzen. KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, Vol. 65, Issue. S1, p. 409.


    Jones, Peter 2011. Religious Belief and Freedom of Expression: Is Offensiveness Really the Issue?. Res Publica, Vol. 17, Issue. 1, p. 75.


    Jones, Peter 1999. Toleration, Identity and Difference.


    ×

Respecting Beliefs and Rebuking Rushdie

Abstract

The furore that followed the publication of Salman Rushdie's The Satanic Verses has provided a graphic illustration of the conflicts that may still arise in societies characterized by diverse religious beliefs. This article examines how far the rules governing a plural society should require its members to defer to beliefs that they themselves do not share. In particular, it examines whether a principle of ‘respect for beliefs’ can provide adequate reason for limiting freedom of expression. A strong version of the principle, which would limit substantive criticism of beliefs, is found untenable. A weaker version of the principle, which would concern itself not with the matter but with the manner in which others' beliefs are treated, has greater plausibility and moral appeal. That also, however, proves too hazardous and indeterminate a basis for setting legal limits to freedom of expression.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Timothy Brennan , Salman Rushdie and the Third World (London: Macmillan, 1989)

John Rawls , ‘The Idea of an Overlapping Consensus’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 7 (1987), 125.

Bernard Williams , Problems of the self (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973), p. 136.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

British Journal of Political Science
  • ISSN: 0007-1234
  • EISSN: 1469-2112
  • URL: /core/journals/british-journal-of-political-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×