Skip to main content
×
×
Home

The Role of Evidence in Politics: Motivated Reasoning and Persuasion among Politicians

  • Martin Baekgaard, Julian Christensen, Casper Mondrup Dahlmann, Asbjørn Mathiasen and Niels Bjørn Grund Petersen...
Abstract

Does evidence help politicians make informed decisions even if it is at odds with their prior beliefs? And does providing more evidence increase the likelihood that politicians will be enlightened by the information? Based on the literature on motivated political reasoning and the theory about affective tipping points, this article hypothesizes that politicians tend to reject evidence that contradicts their prior attitudes, but that increasing the amount of evidence will reduce the impact of prior attitudes and strengthen their ability to interpret the information correctly. These hypotheses are examined using randomized survey experiments with responses from 954 Danish politicians, and results from this sample are compared to responses from similar survey experiments with Danish citizens. The experimental findings strongly support the hypothesis that politicians are biased by prior attitudes when interpreting information. However, in contrast to expectations, the findings show that the impact of prior attitudes increases when more evidence is provided.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      The Role of Evidence in Politics: Motivated Reasoning and Persuasion among Politicians
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      The Role of Evidence in Politics: Motivated Reasoning and Persuasion among Politicians
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      The Role of Evidence in Politics: Motivated Reasoning and Persuasion among Politicians
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Footnotes
Hide All
*

Department of Political Science, Aarhus University (emails: martinb@ps.au.dk; julian@ps.au.dk; casper_m_d@hotmail.com; as.ma@live.dk; niels@ps.au.dk). Support for this research was provided by the Aarhus University Supplementary Pool. Data replication sets are available at http://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataverse/BJPolS and online appendices are available at https://doi.org/doi:10.1017/S0007123417000084.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Andersen, Simon Calmar, and Hvidman, Ulrik. 2016. Perceptions of Public and Private Performance. Evidence from a Survey Experiment. Public Administration Review 76 (1):111120.
Baekgaard, Martin. 2010. Self-Selection or Socialization? A Dynamic Analysis of Committee Member Preferences. Legislative Studies Quarterly 35 (3):337359.
Baekgaard, Martin, and Serritzlew, Søren. 2016. Interpreting Performance Information: Motivated Reasoning or Unbiased Comprehension. Public Administration Review 76 (1):7382.
Barabas, Jason. 2004. How Deliberation Affects Policy Opinions. American Political Science Review 98 (4):687701.
Bullock, John G. 2009. Partisan Bias and the Bayesian Ideal in the Study of Public Opinion. The Journal of Politics 71 (3):11091124.
Chong, Dennis, and Druckman, James N.. 2007. Framing Public Opinion in Competitive Democracies. American Political Science Review 101 (4):637655.
Druckman, James N. 2012. The Politics of Motivation. Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 24 (2):199216.
Eppler, Martin J., and Mengis, Jeanne. 2004. The Concept of Information Overload – A Review of Literature from Organization Science, Accounting, Marketing, MIS, and Related Disciplines. In Kommunikationsmanagement im Wandel Elements of Reason, edited by Miriam Meckel and Beat Schmid, 271305. Wiesbaden: Gabler.
Festinger, Leon. 1957. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Garrett, R. Kelly. Forthcoming. Strategies for Countering False Information and Beliefs about Climate Change. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Climate Science, edited by H. Von Storch, 137. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gerber, Alan., and Green, Donald. 1999. Misperceptions About Perceptual Bias. Annual Review of Political Science 2:189210.
Hart, P. Sol., and Nisbet, Eric C.. 2012. Boomerang effects in science communication: How motivated reasoning and identity cues amplify opinion polarization about climate mitigation policies. Communication Research 39 (6):701723.
James, Oliver., and Van Ryzin, Gregg G.. 2017. Motivated Reasoning about Public Performance: An Experimental Study of How Citizens Judge the Affordable Care Act. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 27 (1):197209.
Jerit, Jennifer, and Barabas, Jason. 2012. Partisan Perceptual Bias and the Information Environment. The Journal of Politics 74 (3):672684.
Kahan, Dan M. 2013. Ideology, Motivated Reasoning, and Cognitive Reflection. Judgment and Decision Making 8 (4):407424.
Kahan, Dan M., Peters, Ellen, Dawson, Erica Cantrell, and Slovic, Paul. 2013. Motivated Numeracy and Enlightened Self-Government. Unpublished Working Paper. Available from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2319992, accessed 17 February 2016.
Kunda, Ziva. 1987. Motivation and Inference: Self-Serving Generation and Evaluation of Evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 53:636647.
Kunda, Ziva. 1990. The Case for Motivated Reasoning. Psychological Bulletin 108 (3):440498.
Lerner, Jennifer S., and Tetlock, Philip E.. 1999. Accounting for the Effects of Accountability. Psychological Bulletin 125 (2):255275.
Lodge, Milton, and Taber, Charles S.. 2000. Three Steps Toward a Theory of Motivated Political Reasoning. In Elements of Reason, edited by Arthur Lupia, Matthew D. McCubbins and Samuel L. Popkin, 183213. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lodge, Milton, and Taber, Charles S.. 2013. The Rationalizing Voter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Maddux, James E., and Rogers, Ronald W.. 1980. Effects of Source Expertness, Physical Attractiveness, and Supporting Arguments on Persuasion: A Case of Brains Over Beauty. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39 (2):235244.
Moynihan, Donald P. 2008. The Dynamics of Performance Management: Constructing Information and Reform. 1st Edition. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Nyhan, Brendan, and Reifler, Jason. 2010. When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions. Political Behavior 32:303330.
Nyhan, Brendan, Reifler, Jason, and Ubel, Peter A.. 2013. The Hazards of Correcting Myths About Health Care Reform. Medical Care 51 (2):127132.
Parker-Stephen, Evan. 2013. Tides of Disagreement: How Reality Facilitates (and Inhibits) Partisan Public Opinion. The Journal of Politics 75 (4):10771088.
Petty, Richard E., and Cacioppo, John T.. 1984. The Effects of Involvement on Responses to Argument Quantity and Quality: Central and Peripheral Routes to Persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 46 (1):6981.
Petty, Richard E., and Cacioppo, John T.. 1986. Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Prior, Markus, Sood, Gaurav, and Khanna, Kabir. 2015. You Cannot be Serious? The Impact of Accuracy Incentives on Partisan Bias in Reports of Economic Perceptions. Quarterly Journal of Political Science 10 (4):489518.
Redlawsk, David P., Civettini, Andrew J. W., and Emmerson, Karen M.. 2010. The Affective Tipping Point: Do Motivated Reasoners Ever ‘Get it’? Political Psychology 31 (4):562593.
Reyna, Valerie. F., Nelson, Wendy, Han, Paul, and Dieckmann, Nathan F.. 2009. How Numeracy Influences Risk Reduction and Medical Decision Making. Psychological Bulletin 135:943973.
Schick, Allen G., Gordon, Lawrence A., and Haka, Susan. 1990. Information Overload: A Temporal Approach. Accounting, Organizations and Society 15 (3):199220.
Schultze, Ulrike, and Vandenbosch, Betty. 1998. Information Overload in a Groupware Environment: Now You See It, Now You Don’t. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce 8 (2):127148.
Steffens, Paul R., Weeks, Clinton S., Davidsson, Per, and Isaak, Lauren. 2013. Shouting from the Ivory Tower: A Marketing Approach to Improve Communication of Academic Research to Entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 38 (2):399426.
Strickland, April A., Taber, Charles S., and Lodge, Milton. 2011. Motivated Reasoning and Public Opinion. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 36 (6):935944.
Swain, Monte R., and Haka, Susan F.. 2000. Effects of Information Load on Capital Budgeting Decisions. Behavioral Research in Accounting 12:171198.
Taber, Charles S., Cann, Damon, and Kucsova, Simona. 2009. The Motivated Processing of Political Arguments. Political Behavior 31 (2):137155.
Taber, Charles S., and Lodge, Milton. 2006. Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs. American Journal of Political Science 50 (3):755769.
Van Dooren, Wouter. 2011. Nothing New Under the Sun? Change and Continuity in the Twentieth-Century Performance Movements. In Performance Information in the Public Sector: How it is Used, edited by Wouter Van Dooren and Steven Van de Walle, 1527. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Wyer, Robert S., and Frey, Dieter. 1983. The Effects of Feedback about Self and Others on the Recall and Judgments of Feedback-Relevant Information. Journal of Experimental Psychology 19:540559.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

British Journal of Political Science
  • ISSN: 0007-1234
  • EISSN: 1469-2112
  • URL: /core/journals/british-journal-of-political-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary materials

Baekgaard supplementary material
Appendix

 Word (27 KB)
27 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 80
Total number of PDF views: 808 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 6740 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 18th August 2017 - 22nd September 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.