Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 7
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Laver, Michael 2014. Measuring Policy Positions in Political Space. Annual Review of Political Science, Vol. 17, Issue. 1, p. 207.


    Eguia, Jon X. 2011. Foundations of spatial preferences. Journal of Mathematical Economics, Vol. 47, Issue. 2, p. 200.


    Bräuninger, Thomas Gschwend, Thomas and Shikano, Susumu 2010. Sachpolitik oder Parteipolitik?. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, Vol. 51, Issue. 2, p. 223.


    Benati, Stefano and Vittucci Marzetti, Giuseppe 2013. Probabilistic spatial power indexes. Social Choice and Welfare, Vol. 40, Issue. 2, p. 391.


    Laver, Michael 2011. Why Vote-seeking Parties May Make Voters Miserable. Irish Political Studies, Vol. 26, Issue. 4, p. 489.


    Balankin, Alexander S. Martínez Cruz, Miguel Ángel and Martínez, Alfredo Trejo 2011. Effect of initial concentration and spatial heterogeneity of active agent distribution on opinion dynamics. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Vol. 390, Issue. 21-22, p. 3876.


    Lefkofridi, Zoe Wagner, Markus and Willmann, Johanna E. 2014. Left-Authoritarians and Policy Representation in Western Europe: Electoral Choice across Ideological Dimensions. West European Politics, Vol. 37, Issue. 1, p. 65.


    ×

Spatial Models, Cognitive Metrics, and Majority Rule Equilibria

Abstract

Long-standing results demonstrate that, if policy choices are defined in spaces with more than one dimension, majority-rule equilibrium fails to exist for a general class of smooth preference profiles. This article shows that if agents perceive political similarity and difference in ‘city block’ terms, then the dimension-by-dimension median can be a majority-rule equilibrium even in spaces with an arbitrarily large number of dimensions and it provides necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of such an equilibrium. This is important because city block preferences accord more closely with empirical research on human perception than do many smooth preferences. It implies that, if empirical research findings on human perceptions of similarity and difference extend also to perceptions of political similarity and difference, then the possibility of equilibrium under majority rule re-emerges.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Frank DeMeyer and Charles R. Plott , ‘The Probability of a Cyclical Majority’, Econometrica, 38 (1970), 345354

Norman Schofield , ‘Generic Instability of Majority Rule’; Review of Economic Studies, 50 (1983), 695705

Richard D. McKelvey , ‘Intransitivities in Multidimensional Voting Models and Some Implications for Agenda Control’, Journal of Economic Theory, 12 (1976), 472482

Richard D. McKelvey and Norman Schofield , ‘Structural Instability of the Core’, Journal of Mathematical Economics, 15 (1986), 179198

Richard D. McKelvey and Norman Schofield , ‘Generalized Symmetry Conditions at a Core Point’, Econometrica, 55 (1987), 923933.

Michael Laver and Kenneth A. Shepsle , Making and Breaking Governments: Cabinets and Legislatures in Parliamentary Democracies (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996)

Kenneth A. Shepsle , ‘Institutional Arrangements and Equilibrium in Multidimensional Voting Models’, American Journal of Political Science, 23 (1979), 2759

Kenneth A. Shepsle and Barry R. Weingast , ‘The Institutional Foundations of Committee Power’, American Political Science Review, 81 (1987), 85104

Timothey Besley and Stephen Coate , ‘An Economic Model of Representative Democracy’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112 (1997), 85106

Daniel Diermeier and Antonio M. Merlo , ‘Government Turnover in Parliamentary Democracies’, Journal of Economic Theory, 94 (2000), 4679

Tse-min Lin , James M. Enelow and Han Dorussen , ‘Equilibrium in Multicandidate Probabilistic Spatial Voting’, Public Choice, 98 (1999), 5982).

Massimo Morelli , ‘Party Formation and Policy Outcomes under Different Electoral Systems’, Review of Economic Studies 71 (2004), 829853

Martin Osborne , ‘Entry-deterring Policy Differentiation by Electoral Candidates’, Mathematical Social Science, 40 (2000), 4162

James Snyder and Michael Ting , ‘An Informational Rationale for Political Parties’, American Journal of Political Science, 46 (2002), 90110

David Austen-Smith and Jeffrey S. Banks , ‘Social Choice Theory, Game Theory and Positive Political Theory’, in N. W. Polsby, eds., Annual Review of Political Science (Palo Alto, Calif.: Annual Reviews, 1998)

Hervé Moulin , ‘On Strategy-proofness and Single-peakedness’, Public Choice, 35 (1980), 437455

Douglas W. Rae and Michael Taylor , ‘Decision Rules and Policy Outcomes’, British Journal of Political Science, 1 (1971), 7190

Amoz Kats and Shmuel Nitzan , ‘More on Decision Rules and Policy Outcomes’, British Journal of Political Science, 7 (1977), 419422

Richard E. Wendell and Stuart J. Thorson , ‘Some Generalizations of Social Decisions under Majority Rule’, Econometrica, 42 (1974), 893912

Richard D. McKelvey and Richard E. Wendell , ‘Voting Equilibria in Multidimensional Choice Spaces’, Mathematics of Operations Research, 1 (1976), 144158

Janet Aisbett and Greg Gibbon , ‘A General Formulation of Conceptual Spaces as a Meso Level Representation’, Artificial Intelligence, 133 (2001), 189232

Fred Attneave , ‘Dimensions of Similarity’, American Journal of Psychology, 63 (1950), 546554

Roger N. Shepard , ‘Toward a Universal Law of Generalization for Psychological Science’, Science, 237 (1987), 13171323

James M. Enelow , Nancy R. Mendell , Subha Ramesh , ‘A Comparison of Two Distance Metrics through Regression Diagnostics of a Model of Relative Candidate Evaluation’, Journal of Politics, 50 (1988), 10571071

Anders Westholm , ‘Distance versus Direction: The Illusory Defeat of the Proximity Theory of Electoral Choice’, American Political Science Review, 91 (1997), 865883

Jeffrey D. Grynaviski and Bryce E. Corrigan , ‘Specification Issues in Proximity Models of Candidate Evaluation (with Issue Importance)’, Political Analysis, 14 (2006), 393420

Timothy Groseclose , ‘A Model of Candidate Location When One Candidate Has a Valence Advantage’, American Journal of Political Science, 45 (2001), 862886

Norman Schofield , ‘Valence Competition and the Spatial Stochastic Model’, Journal of Theoretical Politics, 15 (2003), 371383

Norman Schofield , ‘Equilibrium in the Spatial Valence Model of Politics’, Journal of Theoretical Politics, 16 (2004), 447481

Gary Cox and Richard McKelvey ‘A Ham Sandwich Theorem for General Measures’, Social Choice and Welfare, 1 (1984), 7583

Adrian M. A. van Deemen , ‘Dominant Players and Minimum Size Coalitions’, European Journal of Political Research, 17 (1989), 313332

Lloyd S. Shapley and Martin Shubik , ‘Quasi-cores in a Monetary Economy with Nonconvex Preferences’, Econometrica, 34 (1966), 805827

Thomas Bräuninger , ‘Stability in Spatial Voting Games with Restricted Preference Maximizing’, Journal of Theoretical Politics, 19 (2007), 173191

Peter Halfpenny and Michael Taylor , ‘An Experimental Study of Individual and Collective Decision-Making’, British Journal of Political Science, 3 (1973), 425444

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

British Journal of Political Science
  • ISSN: 0007-1234
  • EISSN: 1469-2112
  • URL: /core/journals/british-journal-of-political-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×